Log in

Tropoelastin Switch and Modulated Endothelial Cell Binding to PTFE

  • Published:
BioNanoScience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Waterhouse, A., Wise, S. G., Ng, M. K., & Weiss, A. S. (2011). Elastin as a nonthrombogenic biomaterial. Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews, 17(2), 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tzoneva, R., Faucheux, N., & Groth, T. (2007). Wettability of substrata controls cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1770(11), 1538–1547.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia, A. J. (2005). Get a grip: integrins in cell-biomaterial interactions. Biomaterials, 26(36), 7525–7529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bacakova, L., Filova, E., Rypacek, F., Svorcik, V., & Stary, V. (2004). Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering. Physiological Research, 53(Suppl 1), S35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vermeer, A. W., Bremer, M. G., & Norde, W. (1998). Structural changes of IgG induced by heat treatment and by adsorption onto a hydrophobic teflon surface studied by circular dichroism spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1425(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mollmann, S. H., et al. (2006). Interfacial adsorption of insulin conformational changes and reversibility of adsorption. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 27(2–3), 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sethuraman, A., Vedantham, G., Imoto, T., Przybycien, T., & Belfort, G. (2004). Protein unfolding at interfaces: slow dynamics of alpha-helix to beta-sheet transition. Proteins, 56(4), 669–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zardeneta, G., Mukai, H., Marker, V., & Milam, S. B. (1996). Protein interactions with particulate Teflon: implications for the foreign body response. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 54(7), 873–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Balasubramanian, V., Grusin, N. K., Bucher, R. W., Turitto, V. T., & Slack, S. M. (1999). Residence-time dependent changes in fibrinogen adsorbed to polymeric biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 44(3), 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bilek, M. M. M., & McKenzie, D. R. (2010). Plasma modified surfaces for covalent immobilization of functional biomolecules in the absence of chemical linkers: towards better biosensors and a new generation of medical implants. Biophysical Reviews, 2, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bax, D. V., et al. (2011). Binding of the cell adhesive protein tropoelastin to PTFE through plasma immersion ion implantation treatment. Biomaterials, 32, 5100–5011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bax DV, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM, Weiss AS (2011) Directed cell attachment by tropoelastin on masked plasma immersion ion implantation treated PTFE. Biomaterials accepted manuscript.

  13. Wilson, B. D., et al. (2011). Novel approach for endothelializing vascular devices: understanding and exploiting elastin-endothelial interactions. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 39(1), 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bax, D. V., Rodgers, U. R., Bilek, M. M. M., & Weiss, A. S. (2009). Cell adhesion to tropoelastin is mediated via the C-terminal GRKRK motif and integrin alpha(V)beta(3). Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284(42), 28616–28623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Akhtar, K., et al. (2011). Oxidative modifications of the C-terminal domain of tropoelastin prevent cell binding. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286(15), 13574–13582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge project funding from the Australian Research Council and the National Health & Medical Research Council. We thank Cochlear Ltd. and SpineCell Pty Ltd for financial and in-kind support. We thank Daniel Smyth for assistance and Yan Yee Poon, Rodrigo Vazquez-Lombardi, and Sarah Martinez for the technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony S. Weiss.

Appendix: Materials and Methods

Appendix: Materials and Methods

Polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) sheets of 0.1 mm thickness were obtained from Goodfellow. Recombinant tropoelastin was produced in-house. HUVECs were harvested enzymatically from umbilical cords. HUVECs were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere and passage 1 in 3, up to passage 5, every 3–4 days.

1.1 Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Treatment

PTFE sheets were cut into 0.8 × 8 cm strips, mounted onto a substrate holder, with an electrically connected mesh placed 5.5 cm in front of the PTFE surface and PIII treated for 800 s as in [11]. The rF plasma power was 100 W and the working pressure was 2 mTorr of high purity nitrogen with a flow rate of 72 standard cubic centimeters. PIII was applied to the substrate holder with 20 kV pulses lasting for 20 μs with a repetition rate of 50 Hz. Tape-masked samples were generated by layering a low tack kapton tape across the PTFE samples prior to PIII treatment and subsequently removing the tape post PIII treatment. (Appendix)

1.2 Cell Attachment Analysis

The cell attachment methodology is described in [11]. Samples (1.2 × 0.8 cm2) were incubated in 0.75 ml 20 μg/ml tropoelastin for 16 h at 4°C. Where stated, following tropoelastin coating, non-specific polymer binding was blocked with 10 mg/ml heat denatured BSA (80°C for 10 min, then cooled on ice) for 1 h at room temperature. HUVECs were harvested by trypsinization, and the cell density adjusted to 2 × 105 cells/ml. 1 ml aliquots of cells were added for 60 min at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. To assess percent cell attachment, a minimum of three known cell number controls were plated by adding 0, 0.5, or 1 ml cells to unblocked PIII-treated polystyrene which supports cell binding. After incubation, the cell number controls were fixed by the addition of 100 μl 50% glutaraldehyde (w/v) directly to the media. Cells were removed from the experimental wells and non-adherent cells were removed with 2 × 1 ml PBS washes then fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde (w/v) 20 min. The cells were stained with 500 μl 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet in 0.2 M MES pH 5.0 for 1 h at room temperature. Following extensive QH2O washes, the stain was released in 500 μl 10% (v/v) acetic acid and the absorbance measured at 570 nm using a plate reader. Data from known standards were fitted by linear regression and used to convert experimental absorbances into percentage attachment. In all experiments, triplicate measurements were taken.

To determine the effect of EDTA or heparan sulfate on cell attachment, the same methodology was employed except that 0.5 ml aliquots of 10 mM EDTA or 20 μg/ml heparan sulfate followed with 0.5 ml HUVECs, resuspended to a density of 4 × 105 cells/ml were added to the samples following BSA blocking.

1.3 Cell Spreading Analysis

The cell spreading methodology is described in [11]. Briefly, samples were coated with tropoelastin then BSA blocked as described for cell attachment analysis. HUVECs were harvested as for cell attachment analysis, and the cell density adjusted to 1 × 105 cells/ml. One milliliter aliquots of cells were added and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 90 min. Cells were then fixed with the addition of 81 μl 37% (w/v) formaldehyde directly to each well for 20 min, then stained 500 μl 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet in 0.2 M MES pH 5.0 for 1 h at room temperature. Following extensive QH2O washes, the samples were layered between two glass slides and visualized by phase contrast microscopy.

1.4 Confocal Microscopy

A 1.2 × 0.8-cm2 samples were tropoelastin-coated then BSA blocked as described for cell attachment analysis. HDFs were prepared as for spreading analysis and 1 ml aliquots of cells were added to the wells and placed at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 180 min. Following incubation, the cells were immediately fixed as for spreading analysis, permeabilized in 500 μl 0.5% (w/v) Triton X-100 in PBS for 4 min and stained in 1 ml, 1 μg/ml rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin for 1 h at room temperature. The cell nuclei were stained with 500 μl, 3.5 μM DAPI for 30 s. Following QH2O washing, the samples were placed in a drop of fluoromount between a glass slide and a coverslip, sealed with varnish, then viewed using a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bax, D.V., Liu, S.J., McKenzie, D.R. et al. Tropoelastin Switch and Modulated Endothelial Cell Binding to PTFE. BioNanoSci. 1, 123–127 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-011-0018-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-011-0018-1

Keywords

Navigation