Log in

The Role of Sustainability Analysis in the Revalorization of Tequila Residues and Wastes Using Biorefineries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work shows the role that sustainability analysis may play in the revalorization of agroindustrial residues and wastes. The tequila industry in western Mexico is taken as case study, since residues and wastes from this industry are the source of serious environmental problems in the tequila-producing regions. The proposed solution uses these residues and wastes as feedstock of an integrated multi-feedstock biorefinery for the co-production of second generation bioethanol and electricity. The sustainability analysis employed in this work considers the environmental and economic domains and monetizes their indicators on the same basis, thus highlighting the contribution of environmental aspects that might otherwise be overlooked using standard techno-economic analysis approaches. This solution is compared against alternative designs using separate facilities handling these residues and wastes. Results show that the proposed solution may be attractive since the monetized environmental impact of treating the tequila residues and wastes is only one third of the economic cost of operating the proposed biorefinery, besides solving the environmental problem.

Graphic Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Global Reporting Initiative: Sustainability and reporting trends in 2025—preparing for the future. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/sustainability-and-reporting-trends-in-2025-1.pdf (2015)

  2. National Chamber of the Tequila Industry: Basic information of tequila industry. http://www.tequileros.org/stuff/file_estadistica/1501004805.pdf(in Spanish) (2017)

  3. España-Gamboa, E., Mijangos-Cortes, J., Barahona-Perez, L., Dominguez-Maldonado, J., Hernández-Zarate, G., Alzate-Gaviria, L.: Vinasses: characterization and treatments. Waste Manag. Res. 29(12), 1235–1250 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. López-López, A., Davila-Vazquez, G., León-Becerril, E., Villegas-García, E., Gallardo-Valdez, J.: Tequila vinasses: generation and full scale treatment processes. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 9(2), 109–116 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moran-Salazar, R.G., Sanchez-Lizarraga, A.L., Rodriguez-Campos, J., Davila-Vazquez, G., Marino-Marmolejo, E.N., Dendooven, L., Contreras-Ramos, S.M.: Utilization of vinasses as soil amendment: consequences and perspectives. SpringerPlus 5(1), 1007 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beltrán-Ramírez, F., Orona-Tamayo, D., Cornejo-Corona, I., Luz Nicacio González-Cervantes, J., de Jesús Esparza-Claudio, J., Quintana-Rodríguez, E.: Agro-Industrial Waste Revalorization: The Growing Biorefinery. In: Biomass for bioenergy—recent trends and future challenges [working title]. IntechOpen (2019)

  7. Buitrón, G., Prato-Garcia, D., Zhang, A.: Biohydrogen production from tequila vinasses using a fixed bed reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 70(12), 1919–1925 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alemán-Nava, G.S., Gatti, I.A., Parra-Saldivar, R., Dallemand, J.-F., Rittmann, B.E., Iqbal, H.M.N.: Biotechnological revalorization of Tequila waste and by-product streams for cleaner production—a review from bio-refinery perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 3713–3720 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arreola-Vargas, J., Jaramillo-Gante, N.E., Celis, L.B., Corona-González, R.I., González-Álvarez, V., Méndez-Acosta, H.O.: Biogas production in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor by using tequila vinasses: effect of pH and temperature. Water Sci. Technol. 73(3), 550–556 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanchez, S.: Personal Communication (2018)

  11. González, M.R.C., Crespo González, M.R., González Eguiarteq, D.R., Macías, R.R., Salcido, L.A.R., Del Real Laborde, J.I., Morán, J.P.T.: Evaluation of agave bagasse compost as a substrate component to produce tequila blue agave seedlings. Mex. J. Agric. Sci. 4, 1161–1173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v4i8.1130. (in Spanish)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kestur, G.S., Flores-Sahagun, T.H.S., Dos Santos, L.P., Dos Santos, J., Mazzaro, I., Mikowski, A.: Characterization of blue agave bagasse fibers of Mexico. Composites Part A 45, 153–161 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Teplická, K.: Energy solutions based on biomass and using of quantitative optimization model for biomass boiler. Res. J. Min. 1(4), 194–200 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sadhukhan, J., Ng, K.S., Hernandez, E.M.: Economic Analysis, Biorefineries and Chemical Processes. Wiley, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez, A., Magaña, G., Partida, M.I., Sanchez, S.: Bi-dimensional sustainability analysis of a multi-feed biorefinery design for biofuels co-production from lignocellulosic residues and agro-industrial wastes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 107, 195–217 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palomo-Briones, R., López-Gutiérrez, I., Islas-Lugo, F., Galindo-Hernández, K.L., Munguía-Aguilar, D., Rincón-Pérez, J.A., Razo-Flores, E.: Agave bagasse biorefinery: processing and perspectives. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 20(7), 1423–1441 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flores-Gómez, C.A., Escamilla Silva, E.M., Zhong, C., Dale, B.E., da Costa Sousa, L., Balan, V.: Conversion of lignocellulosic agave residues into liquid biofuels using an AFEX™-based biorefinery. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11, 7 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barrera, I., Amezcua-Allieri, M.A., Martínez, Y., Aburto, J.: Technical and economical evaluation of bioethanol production from lignocellulosic residues in Mexico: case of sugarcane and blue agave bagasses| Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 107, 91–101 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Núñez, H.M., Rodríguez, L.F., Khanna, M.: Agave for tequila and biofuels: an economic assessment and potential opportunities: economic assessment and opportunities of AGTVE. GCB Bioenergy 3(1), 43–57 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan, X., Tan, D.K.Y., Inderwildi, O.R., Smith, J.A.C., King, D.A.: Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis for agave-derived bioethanol. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(9), 3110–3121 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jimenez-Plascencia, C.: Feedstock Composition Analysis Results. Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the University Center of Biological and Agricultural Sciences (CUCBA) University of Guadalajara (UdeG), Jalisco (2017). (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tequila Regulatory Council: Personal Communication (2017) (in Spanish)

  23. Intelligen Inc.: SuperPro Designer (Version 8.5) http://www.intelligen.com/superpro_overview.html (2013)

  24. Seider, W.D., Seader, J.D., Lewin, D.R.: Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Design, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patterson, M.G.: What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy 24(5), 377–390 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodriguez, J.J.: Personal Communication (2015)

  27. Sanchez, A., Magaña, G., Gomez, D., Solís, M., Banares-Alcantara, R.: Bidimensional sustainability analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol production processes. Method and case study. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 8(5), 670–685 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanchez, A., Sevilla-Güitrón, V., Magaña, G., Gutierrez, L.: Parametric analysis of total costs and energy efficiency of 2G enzymatic ethanol production. Fuel 113, 165–179 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Romero-García, J.M., Sanchez, A., Rendón-Acosta, G., Martínez-Patiño, J.C., Ruiz, E., Magaña, G., Castro, E.: An olive tree pruning biorefinery for Co-producing high value-added bioproducts and biofuels: economic and energy efficiency analysis. Bioenergy Res. 9(4), 1070–1086 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chee Tahir, A., Darton, R.C.: The process analysis method of selecting indicators to quantify the sustainability performance of a business operation. J. Clean. Prod. 18(16), 1598–1607 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Agency, I.E., International Energy Agency: World Energy Outlook 2017. World Energy Outlook. https://doi.org/10.1787/weo-2017-en (2017)

  32. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases: Technical support document: technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-12/documents/sc_co2_tsd_august_2016.pdf (2016)

  33. United States Environmental Protection Agency: Acid rain and related programs: 2009 emission, compliance, and market analyses https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/arp_2009_ecm_analyses.pdf (2009)

  34. Mexican Deputies Chamber: Federal rights law. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/107_281218.pdf (2012)

  35. Pan American Health Organization: Regional evaluation of the services of handling solid municipal waste. http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd65/mexico.pdf (2013)

  36. Petróleos Mexicanos: Annual report 2012 http://www.pemex.com/acerca/informes_publicaciones/Documents/informes_art70/informe_anual_2012_art70.pdf (2012)

  37. Thomsen, M.H., Thygesen, A., Jørgensen, H., Larsen, J., Christensen, B.H., Thomsen, A.B.: Preliminary results on optimization of pilot scale pretreatment of wheat straw used in coproduction of bioethanol and electricity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 129–132, 448–460 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mojica, E.: Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Agro-Wastes (M. Sc.). Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (2013) (in Spanish)

  39. Aden, A., Ruth, M., Ibsen, K., Jechura, J., Neeves, K., Sheehan, J., Lukas, J. (2002). Process design report for stover feedstock: lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. https://doi.org/10.2172/1218326

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support is kindly acknowledged from the Energy Sustainability Fund 2014-05 (CONACYT SENER, Mexico) Grants 245750 and 249564 (Mexican Bioenergy Innovation Center, Bioalcohols Cluster).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sanchez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Annex 1

Annex 1

Process Description

Pretreatment and Neutralization

The AB feedstock stream (111A) is first shredded, then cleaned in a vibrating screen and size reduced in a grinder coupled with a vibrating screen. The conditioning system reduces the bagasse to stems of approximately 5 cm [in length]. Larger stems are recycled for re-milling. The process stream is then fed into a tank and a diluted solution (0.75%, v.v.) of sulfuric acid at 90 °C soaks solids for 20 min, assuming that no reaction takes place [37]. Acid pretreatment is then carried out in a continuous tubular reactor with a diluted solution stream (0.75% v/v) of sulfuric acid at 90 °C and a 20-minute residence time, achieving a conversion of 80.10% to xylose and 11.90% to arabinose. Only 3.15% of cellulose is converted to glucose [31]. Wet solids with high cellulose concentration are separated from liquid hydrolysate using vacuum filtration. The solids stream (mainstream) is stored while liquid hydrolysate (311) is sent to overliming.

Overliming

Process stream 311, mainly liquid hydrolysate (xylose, arabinose and inhibitors), is mixed with a calcium hydroxide solution in order to remove inhibitors. Hydrolysates pH is adjusted and the precipitated solids are separated using drum vacuum filters. Liquid stream is sent to tank containing mainstream from pretreatment giving the final product of the stage (stream 411C). Solids are disposed as gypsum (321B).

Saccharification

The remaining polysaccharides (mostly cellulose) from stream 411C enter the enzymatic saccharification stage, carried out in a reactor battery using the necessary dosage of commercial cellulase cocktails, as determined by the cellulose content in the feedstock suggested by the enzyme provider (residence time 24 h, temperature 45 °C). At the end of saccharification 92% conversion of hemicellulose and 44% conversion of cellulose to glucose is obtained. These conversion values were experimentally corroborated at 250 mL scale [38]. Stream 911B is sent to fermentation stage.

Fermentation

The monosaccharide mixture is fed into a battery of batch fermenters (residence time 24 h, temperature 31 °C) that employ Saccharomyces sp. for alcoholic fermentation. Conversion at this step reaches 95% of glucose and 90% of xylose and arabinose to ethanol and carbon dioxide. The liquid stream (511A) with 31.15 g/L ethanol concentration is sent to the separation stage.

Separation

In this stage of the process, the fermentation broth is fed into a beer distillation column (P = 1 atm, T = 78 °C). The top stream, with 25.8% w/w ethanol, is fed into a rectification column, and bottom stream (521 A) is sent to cogeneration stage. From rectification column (P = 1 atm, T = 80 °C), it is obtained a minimum of 87.36% w/w ethanol concentration. A final purification step is carried out in a molecular sieve, for a final concentration of 99.7% w/w (stream 514). Bottom stream from rectification column is sent to the waste water treatment stage (stream 541 A) [39]. Organic components from rectification in the separation stage are mostly liquor, acetic acid, ethanol, water, and diammonium phosphate (DAP).

Waste Water Treatment

Sludge from the separation stage is fed into the WWT stage. For the MFB and VTP schemes, an additional input (TV stream) is considered. Water is treated sequentially, first in an anaerobic reactor (with a residence time of 7 days), where the organic components react to produce methane and CO2 as main products, and then in an aerobic reactor (with a residence time of 7 days). The biogas output stream (621) contains 63.66% w/w methane and 36.34% w/w carbon dioxide. Solids are separated with a clarifier and then sent to a vacuum filter; from there, they are taken to the co-generation stage (661).

Co-generation

Biogas, lignin and biomass residues from all bioethanol production stages are fed to the co-generation stage. The turbine supplies high-pressure (13 bar) and low pressure (4.5 bar) steam streams, as well as a condensate stream. The amount of electricity co-generated depends on the sugar content in the feedstock and plant capacity; for a 500 MT DB/day MFB, the total was 3539.42 kWh/h, and for 2000 MT DB/day, it was 15,746.07 kWh/h.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanchez, A., Sanchez, S., Dueñas, P. et al. The Role of Sustainability Analysis in the Revalorization of Tequila Residues and Wastes Using Biorefineries. Waste Biomass Valor 11, 701–713 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00756-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00756-0

Keywords

Navigation