SpringerLink
Log in

Primary school teacher candidates’ perceptions of “aesthetics”: a case study from Turkey

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the metaphors about “aesthetics” produced by 67 primary school teacher candidates at a state university in Turkey. The research is a basic qualitative study. In the determination of the study group of the research, the easily accessible sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling methods, was preferred. The data were collected through an opinion form, which was created using structured pattern questions. Content analysis technique was used in the analysis and the interpretation of the data. The metaphors provided by the participants were analyzed and classified under various themes. The results show that the aesthetic perceptions of primary school teacher candidates differ significantly and vary; also reveal that they prioritize form more in aesthetics, explain aesthetics based on comparison, and have a mental image focused on value judgment. The study empirically demonstrates that overall the same metaphor is understood differently by different people and provides clear evidence for individual differences in understanding metaphor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Aesthetic literacy; it is a combination of aesthetic knowledge/aesthetic perception, aesthetic sensitivity and aesthetic experience and should be beyond these three components. Aesthetic literacy is actually an important component of general education. However, it is often thought of in relation to the contextual information needed to understand works of art. The first focus will often be on the art world context. However, aesthetic literacy also has a cultural context, sub-cultural context, international context, social and political context (Parsons, 1990: 139–140).

References

  • Acer, D., & Ömeroğlu, E. (2008). A study on the effect of aesthetic education on the development of aesthetic judgment of six-year-old children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0193-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adu-Agyem, J., & Enti, M. (2009). Learning: The role of aesthetics in education. Journal of Science and Technology, 29(1), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.4314/just.v29i1.46464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi, A., Fathabadi, R., & Bakhtiarvand, M. (2020). The effectiveness of aesthetic teaching on the attitude of elementary school students. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 1(3), 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aruma, E. O., & Hanachor, M. E. (2017). Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and assessment of needs in community development. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 5(7), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryabkina, I. (2015). Pedagogical model of primary school teacher cultural and aesthetic competence formation using personality oriented approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilir-Seyhan, G., & Ocak- Karabay, S. (2018). Early childhood pre-service teachers’ views about visual arts education and aesthetics. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(73), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.73.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brielmann, A. A., & Pelli, D. G. (2018). Aesthetics. Current Biology, 28(16), R859–R863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cevizci, A. (2013). Paradigm philosophy dictionary. Paradigma Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis (12th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coşkun, H., & Çetinkaya, V. (2020). Evaluation of Turkish coursebooks according to Turkish teachers’ opinions in terms of literary pleasure and enjoyment. Journal of Turkish Culture and Civilization Researches, 1(1), 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, P. (1984). Kant and Greenberg’s varieties of aesthetic formalism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 42(4), 442–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/430218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Olimpio, L. (2021). Defending aesthetic education. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2021.1960267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dağ, N. (2017). In the light of the mind classification of Gardner an attempted analysis on primary teachers. Journal of International Social Sciences Education, 3(1), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirel, İN. (2018). Analysis of 9–12 years old children’ aesthetic value perceptions. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(2), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.346720

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. Berkley.

  • Dolapçıoğlu, S., Gürkan, B., & Karakuş, M. (2019). Aesthetics and aesthetic creativity in social studies. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 9(3), 913–944. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draaisma, D. (2007). Metaphors of memory, a history of ideas about the mind. (G. Koca, Trans. from English). Metis Publishing (Original work published 1995-Dutch, English work published 2000).

  • Fazlıoğlu, İ. (2014). Individuality, as the principle of existence of aesthetics, is the coming of its own essence to the eye. Journal of Reputation, 34, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87, 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1054

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gürkan, B., & Dolapçıoğlu, S. (2020). Development of creative thinking skills with aesthetic creativity teaching activities in social studies course. Education & Science, 45(202), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, B.-C. (2021). Die errettung des schönen (4th Edition). (K. Filiz, Trans. from German). İnsan Publishing (Original work published 2015).

  • Hartman, N. (2014). Aesthetics. (E. Kelly, Trans.). De Gruyter.

  • Hicyılmaz, Y., & Adanır, Y. (2019). Examining the perceptions of art education teachers’ perceptions about the concept of art through metaphors. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 7(3), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.462012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honer, S. M., Hunt, T. C. & Okholm, D. L. (2003). Invitation to philosophy: Issues and Options (2nd Editon). (H. Ünder, Trans.). İmge Publishing.

  • Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2006). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtuldu, M. K., & Ayaydın, A. (2010). Examination of vocational anxiety levels of fine arts education students. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 28, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuşcuoğlu, G., Aladağ, S., & Kuzgun, M. P. (2017). Classroom teachers’ views on the acquisition the value of esthetics in life sciences course. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 19(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.303763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaphors we live by. (G. Y. Demir, Trans.). Paradigma Publishing.

  • Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, B. (2005). Aesthetic experience in a dynamic cycle: Implications for early childhood teachers and teacher educators. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25(4), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/1090102050250411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokum-Süvari, G. (2019). A study on the relationship between design and aesthetic perception through architecture in Turkey. [Unpublished master dissertation]. Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University.

  • Mazman Budak, F. (2012). Historical and natural heritage in social studies lesson (7th grade) through aesthetic value education sample of Tokat [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Atatürk University.

  • McManus, I. C., & Furnham, A. (2010). Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 555–587. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712606X101088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menke, C. (2008). Aesthetic reflection and its ethical significance: A critique of the Kantian solution. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 34(1–2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453707084273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miralay, F., & Egitmen, Z. (2019). Aesthetic perceptions of art educators in higher education level at art classes and their effect on learners. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(2), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i2.4242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1998). Images of organization. (G. Bulut, Trans.). MESS.

  • Nia, H. A. (2015). A model for analysing effects of urban spatial configuration on aesthetic perception [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Eastern Mediterranean University.

  • Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice? Educational Review, 2, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özalp, H. K. (2018). Perception of elementary education and art education teacher candidates towards the aesthetic concept. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2187–2198. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, O. (2012a). Aesthetic processes in science education: Art based science education. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 45(1), 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, S. M. (2012b). Metaphoric perceptions of prospective teachers regarding the concept of curriculum. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(3), 369–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. J. (1990). Aesthetic literacy: The psychological context. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 24(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Eds. Trans.). Pegem Academy Publishing (Original work published 2002).

  • Pillow, K. (2003). Sublime understanding: Aesthetic reflection in Kant and Hegel. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeednia, Y. (2009). The need to know and to understand in Maslow’s basic needs hierarchy. US-China Education Review, 6(9), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Y. (2012). Everyday aesthetics and artification. Contemporary Aesthetics, Special Volume, Issue 4. Retrived July 12, 2022, from https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1192&context=liberalarts_contempaesthetics

  • Salderay, B. (2019). The persons’ thoughts about their anxiety level for the field who studying at or graduated from fine arts faculties. The Journal of Art & Design, 24, 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serhatlıoğlu, B., & İpek, S. (2018). Metaphorical perceptions of prospective preschool teachers of aesthetic. International Journal of Social Science, 72, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyhan, A. (2020). Social studies prospective teachers’ metaphoric perceptions about the value of aesthetics. Journal of Values Education, 18(40), 115–147. https://doi.org/10.34234/ded.714332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suna, H. E., Gür, B. S., Gelbal, S., & Özer, M. (2020). Science high school students’ socioeconomic background and their preferences regarding their transition into higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.734921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, A. I. (Ed.). (1996). The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, D. (2002). An introduction to aesthetics (S. Büyükdüvenci, Trans.). İmge Publishing.

  • Tuna, S. (2007). The teaching of art criticism in the primary school in relation to the development of aesthetics perception and taste. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulvik, M. (2020). Promoting aesthetical values to education. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ünlüer, E., & Zembat, R. (2019). Examining the effects of aesthetic education program on aesthetic judgment development of five-year-old children. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2019.51.44.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Cham: Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yalçın, M., & Erginer, A. (2012). Metaphoric perception of principals in primary schools. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 1(2), 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazar, T., Aslan, A., & Şener, S. (2014). The reasons for the ındifference to art education in elementary and secondary schools as an art education problem in Turkey. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Faculty of Education, 33(2), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.33.2.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (6th ed.). Cham: Seçkin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yob, I. M. (2003). Thinking constructively with metaphors. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, N. (2018). The concept of the aesthetic. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkin, M. (2012). Kant and the pleasure of “Mere Reflection.” Inquiry, 55(5), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2012.716194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Primary School Education, Faculty of Education, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey

    Ahu Taneri

  2. Department of Primary School Education, Faculty of Education, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey

    Nilgün Dağ

Authors
  1. Ahu Taneri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nilgün Dağ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahu Taneri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of ınterest

The authors declared that there is no potential conflict of interest regarding the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

Ethics committee approval was obtained for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taneri, A., Dağ, N. Primary school teacher candidates’ perceptions of “aesthetics”: a case study from Turkey. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 25, 201–211 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09848-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09848-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation