Abstract
In this contribution, dedicated to the memory of Prof. Gian Gualberto Volpi, we provide a short review of recent work carried out in our laboratory on reactive scattering studies of the reaction dynamics of atomic oxygen with nitrogen-bearing organic molecules. Specifically, we focus on the polyatomic bimolecular reactions of atomic oxygen, both in the ground and first excited state, O(3P) and O(1D), with the simplest unsaturated nitriles, namely HCCCN (cyanoacetylene) and CH2CHCN (cyanoethylene, or acrylonitrile), and with the simplest six-member ring N-heterocyclic compound, pyridine (C5H5N). Using the crossed molecular beam (CMB) scattering technique with universal electron-impact ionization mass-spectrometric detection and time-of-flight analysis to measure product angular and velocity distributions, the primary product channels and their branching fractions were determined, thus assessing the central role played by intersystem-crossing (ISC) in this class of reactions. The experimental work was synergistically accompanied by theoretical calculations of the relevant triplet and singlet potential energy surfaces (PESs) to assist the interpretation of experimental results and elucidate the reaction mechanism, including extent of ISC. Cyanoacetylene and cyanoethylene are of considerable interest in astrochemistry being ubiquitous (and relatively abundant) in space including comets and the upper atmosphere of Titan. Being oxygen the third most abundant element in space, the title reactions are of considerable relevance in the chemistry of extraterrestrial environments. In addition, they are also important in combustion chemistry, because thermal decomposition of pyrrolic and pyridinic structures present in bound N-containing fuels generates N-bearing compounds including, in particular, the above two nitriles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In 1968 Gian Gualberto Volpi (1928–2017, Linceo from 1994), together with collaborators Giorgio Liuti, Vincenzo Aquilanti, and Franco Vecchiocattivi, founded at the University of Perugia the research group “Elementary Chemical Processes” and began an exciting scientific journey that today still continues in Volpi’s legacy (Boato and Volpi 1999). In 1990, within the various group activities that were inspired by Volpi with enthusiastic support and collaboration, we undertook a broad research program on the investigation of the dynamics of elementary chemical reactions by exploiting a newly built, advanced “crossed molecular beam” (CMB) instrument equipped with a rotatable quadrupole mass-spectrometer (MS) detector and a time-of-flight analysis system (Beneventi et al 1986a, b; Alagia et al. 1995; Casavecchia et al. 1999a, b; Casavecchia 2000). Establishing a research line on experimental reaction dynamics had been one of the main dreams of Volpi ever since he arrived in Perugia. The initial CMB instrument, built in the early 1980s and first employed for high-resolution elastic scattering experiments (Beneventi et al 1986a,b), was optimized for reactive scattering studies in 1990 (Balucani et al. 1991; Alagia et al. 1993a, b, 1995, 1996; Casavecchia et al. 1999a, b; Casavecchia 2000) and continuously updated over the years. In 2004, most notably, a major improvement, consisting in the implementation of soft ionization with tunable energy electrons for product detection (Capozza et al. 2004; Casavecchia et al. 2005; Balucani et al. 2006), permitted us to overcome the main limitation of the method until that time, namely, the problem of serious (elastic/inelastic) interferences in product detection due to dissociative ionization of products, reactants, and background gases, that made very difficult, and often impossible, to identify all the primary reaction products of multichannel bimolecular reactions. This problem had, in particular, severely hampered the application of the CMB-MS method to studies of bimolecular reactions exhibiting a variety of competing product channels, as are most reactions of atomic and molecular radicals with polyatomic molecules occurring in atmospheric, combustion, and astrochemical environments. Among these reactions, those of ground state atomic oxygen, O(3P), with unsaturated hydrocarbons are a most notable example. In fact, although the first kinetic investigation of the O(3P) reaction with the simplest alkene, ethylene, dates back to the mid-1950s (Cvetanović 1955), and various dynamical techniques, including the CMB method with hard (200 eV) electron ionization detection (Schmoltner et al. 1989) and various spectroscopic methods in pump-probe experiments (Endo et al. 1986) were subsequently applied in the following decades, it was not until 2004, with the implementation in the Perugia laboratory of soft electron ionization in CMB experiments with MS detection, that it became possible to probe, on the same footing, all competing product channels of multichannel bimolecular reactions, such as those of O(3P) with acetylene (Capozza et al. 2004) and ethylene (Casavecchia et al. 2005), and to derive the product branching fractions (BFs). The initial studies on O(3P) reactions with 2C unsaturated hydrocarbons (UHCs) (the simplest alkyne and alkene) were subsequently followed by studies involving 3C (alkyne, alkene, and diene) and 4C (alkenes and dienes, including conjugated dienes) UHCs, as well as the simplest aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene and toluene) (see further below).
From a more general perspective, we emphasize that during the 1990s in the field of reaction dynamics, after successful work in several laboratories on a series of 3-atom and 4-atom reactions of great fundamental interest, such as H + D2/HD (Schnieder et al. 1995; Yuan et al. 2018), F + H2/D2/HD (Qiu et al. 2015a) and later on, for more complex reactions, with Carlo Cavallotti (Politecnico of Milan), Marzio Rosi (University of Perugia), and Dimitrios Skouteris (Master-Up, Perugia), to investigate a variety of bimolecular reactions of relevance in combustion chemistry, astrochemistry, and the atmosphere of Titan, such as:
-
(i)
Reactions of ground state atomic oxygen, O(3P) (also excited O(1D) in some cases) with unsaturated aliphatic [acetylene (Leonori et al. 2014), ethylene (Fu et al. 2012a, b; Balucani et al. 2015a), allene (Leonori et al. 2012a), propene (Cavallotti et al. 2014; Leonori et al. 2015), propyne (Vanuzzo et al. 2016a, b; Gimondi et al. 2016), 1-butene (Caracciolo et al. 2019a), 1,2-butadiene (Caracciolo et al. 2019b), 1, 3-butadiene (Cavallotti et al. 2022)], and aromatic hydrocarbons [benzene (Cavallotti et al. 2020; Vanuzzo et al. 2021), toluene (Balucani et al. 2024)], the prototype N-heterocyclic, pyridine (Recio et al. 2022), and ubiquitous nitriles [cyanoacetylene (Liang et al. 2023b), cyanoethylene (Pannacci et al. 2023)].
-
(ii)
Reactions of excited atomic nitrogen, N(2D), with saturated [methane (Balucani et al. 2009), ethane (Balucani et al. 2010)] and unsaturated hydrocarbons [acetylene (Balucani et al. 2000), ethylene (Balucani et al. 2012), propyne (Mancini et al. 2021), allene (Vanuzzo et al. 2022b)], with aromatic hydrocarbons [benzene (Balucani et al. 2023), toluene (Vanuzzo et al. 2024)], pyridine (Recio et al. 2021), cyanoacetylene (Liang et al. 2022), and cyanoethylene (Vanuzzo et al. 2022a).
-
(iii)
Reactions of carbon atoms, C(3P), and CN radicals with unsaturated hydrocarbons [acetylene (Casavecchia et al. 2001; Leonori et al. 2008, 2010), ethylene (Geppert et al. 2003; Leonori et al. 2012b; Balucani et al. 2015b)]; of S(1D) with saturated (CH4) and unsaturated hydrocarbons (C2H2, C2H4) (Leonori et al. 2009; Berteloite et al. 2011), and of CN with also nitriles [cyanoacetylene (de Aragão et al. 2024), cyanoethylene (Marchione et al. 2022)].
In this contribution, we provide a short review of some of the most interesting results very recently obtained in our laboratory on the dynamics of the multichannel reactions of O(3P) with N-bearing unsaturated hydrocarbons, specifically, the simplest unsaturated nitriles, cyanoacetylene and cyanoethylene (acrylonitrile), and with the simplest 6-member ring, N-heterocyclic molecule, namely, pyridine. As already noted, these systems are of relevance in areas ranging from combustion to astrochemistry, including biology and astrobiology.
2 Experimental method
The basic methodology of crossed molecular beam reactive scattering with mass spectrometric detection is well established (Lee 1987a, b; Herschbach 1987; Casavecchia 2000). The CMB-MS technique is arguably the most powerful experimental method for studying the dynamics of bimolecular reactions at the microscopic level. In fact, MS, either by electron-impact ionization or photo-ionization, is a universal detection method. This is particularly advantageous, actually crucial when studying polyatomic multichannel reactions, because the different products can be probed on the same footing, while this is not possible, for instance, using laser spectroscopy methods. Critical in MS product detection for multichannel reactions is the use of soft ionization, either using tunable low energy electrons (Casavecchia et al. 2005, 2009, 2015) or tunable VUV photons, as can be afforded by third generation synchrotrons (Yang et al. 1997; Lee et al. 2009) or even table-top lasers [in this case the selection of photon energies is limited, but the approach still remains powerful in many cases (Albert and Davis 2013)]. The great advantage of soft ionization in CMB-MS experiments is the gained capability of limiting or, often, even suppressing completely the problem of dissociative ionization of reactants, products, and background gases.
A description of our CMB apparatus, including the implementation of soft electron ionization, has been provided in previous articles and reviews. (Alagia et al. 1995; Casavecchia 2000; Casavecchia et al. 2009, 2010; Caracciolo et al. 2019c). We wish to emphasize that, because absolute electron-ionization (EI) cross sections are usually known or can be reliably estimated for most species, once measured in the laboratory (LAB) the product angular and velocity distributions of the various competing product channels, the use of soft EI allows us to derive the product branching fractions from the observed product number densities and velocities and their conversions into product angular and translational energy distributions in the center-of-mass (CM) reference frame (Casavecchia et al. 2009, 2015).
A most recent technical improvement of our apparatus has seen the replacement of two freon-baffled diffusion pumps (effective pum** speed of 1200 and 1600 l/s) and an old cryopump (3500 l/s, 20 K), used to pump the main, large scattering chamber, with two magnetically suspended turbomolecular pumps (pum** speed 1850 l/s each) backed by a large dry roots pump (110 m3/h) and a new cryopump (3600 l/s, 10 K) (Murray et al. 2020) Although the ultimate vacuum of the main chamber is only slightly improved (by more than a factor of two), the new pum** speed is overall higher and the vacuum cleaner, which reduces the main chamber effusion in the ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) detector (kept below 1 × 10−10 mbar by extensive turbo- and cryo-pum**).
In our CMB apparatus, two supersonic beams of atomic and molecular species are produced with narrow angular and velocity spread and made to cross in a high-vacuum chamber (maintained in the 10−7 mbar (= 10−5 Pa) pressure range in operating conditions), typically at 90°, but also 45° or 135° are uniquely possible for reaching lower and higher, respectively, collisions energies while maintaining the same beam characteristics (Balucani et al. 2006; Leonori et al. 2008). Product angular distributions, N(Θ), are measured by modulating the molecular beam at 160 Hz for background subtraction. When measuring TOF distributions, N(Θ,t), a chopper wheel is placed in front of the detector, which is composed of a tuneable electron-impact ionizer followed by a quadrupole mass filter and a Daly type ion detector (Daly 1960). Single-shot TOF is used for beam characterization, while the higher duty-cycle pseudo-random chop** method is used for measuring the product TOF distributions. The ionizer is located in the innermost region of the triply differentially pumped UHV detector chamber. The detector chamber can be rotated in the collision plane, around the axis orthogonal to the plane of the two beams passing through the collision center.
The product N(Θ) and N(Θ,t) distributions are measured in the LAB reference frame, but for the physical interpretation of the scattering results a coordinate transformation from the LAB to the center-of-mass (CM) reference frame is required (Lee 1987b). For each reaction channel the relation between LAB and CM product flux is given by ILAB(Θ,v) = ICM(θ,u)v2/u2, where Θ and v are the LAB scattering angle and velocity, respectively, while θ and u are the corresponding CM quantities. Since the EI mass-spectrometer detector measures the product number density, NLAB(Θ,v), rather than the flux, ILAB(Θ,v), the actual relation between the LAB density and the CM flux is given by NLAB(Θ) = ICM(θ,u)v/u2. Analysis of the LAB data is performed by forward convolution of trial CM distributions over the experimental conditions (beam divergences in angle and velocity, and detector angular resolution). The CM reactive differential cross section ICM(θ,u) is commonly factorized into the product of the velocity (or translational energy) distribution, P(u) [or P(E′T)], and the angular distribution, T(θ): ICM(θ, E) = T(θ) × P(E′T). In some cases the coupling between the T(θ) and P(E′T) functions needs to be accounted for. The T(θ) and P(E′T) functions contain all the information about the reaction dynamics. When multiple reaction channels contribute to the signal at a given mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio, as in the reaction systems discussed here, a more complex situation arises. In these cases a weighted total CM differential cross section reflecting the possible contributions for a specific m/z value is used in the data analysis of the LAB distributions, that is, ICM(θ,E′T) = ∑iwi × [T(θ) × P(E′T)]i, with the parameter wi representing the relative contribution of the integral cross section of the ith channel (Casavecchia et al. 2009, 2015). The T(θ) and P(E′T) functions and the relative weight wi for each channel are iteratively adjusted until calculated LAB angular distributions and TOF spectra reproduce the experimental ones. Once the T(θ) and P(E′T) functions for the various product channels are characterized, the branching fraction of each primary product can be estimated by using the procedure introduced by Schmoltner et al. (1989) and widely employed by us in the study of a variety of multichannel reactions of O(3P) with UHCs (Casavecchia et al. 2015; Caracciolo et al. 2019a; Vanuzzo et al. 2021).
2.1 The reactions of O(3P,1D) with unsaturated nitriles
The simplest unsaturated nitriles, cyanoacetylene (HC3N) and cyanoethylene (acrylonitrile) (C2H3CN), are particularly important in combustion chemistry and astrochemistry. The inclusion of the oxidation processes of cyanoacetylene and acrylonitrile in models that simulate the combustion of coals and other low-rank fossil fuels is important to account for dangerous emissions. This because the nitrogen content of many fuels is essentially ascribed to the presence of pyrrolic and pyridinic structures (Snyder 1969; Brandenburg and Latham 1968; Wallace et al. 1989), but their thermal decomposition generates many nitrogen-bearing compounds, including cyanoacetylene and acrylonitrile (Mackie et al. 1990; Lifshitz et al. 1989; Hore and Russell 1998; Terentis et al. 1992), that can undergo subsequent oxidation to NOx (Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts 1986). For the above reasons, it is worth investigating the reactions of cyanoacetylene and acrylonitrile with common oxidant species in combustion, including atomic oxygen. Information on the primary products and branching fractions for the reactions O(3P) + HC3N and O(3P) + C2H3CN are expected to be useful for improving combustion models.
In addition, the O(3P) + cyanoacetylene and O(3P) + acrylonitrile reactions are also relevant in the chemistry of the interstellar medium, being these two nitriles ubiquitous in space. In fact, HC3N was first detected in 1971 in the galactic star-forming region Sgr B2 (Turner 1971) and has since been observed in a variety of interstellar environments, including molecular clouds, solar-type protostars, circumstellar envelopes and external galaxies (Turner 1971; Walmsley et al. 1986; van Dishoeck et al. 1995; Jaber Al-Edhari et al. 2017; Suzuki et al. 1992; Aladro et al. 2011, 2015; Lindberg et al. 2011; Costagliola et al. 2011). HC3N is also one of the few molecules observed in protoplanetary disks (Chapillon et al. 2012) and it has been detected in cometary comas (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2000; Hänni et al. 2021; Biver et al. 2015) as well as in the upper atmosphere of Titan, the massive moon of Saturn (Teanby et al. 2007). In addition to being ubiquitous, interstellar HC3N has a relatively large abundance with respect to H2 (which is, by far, the most abundant molecule in space). Regarding acrylonitrile, it is the first molecule with a C=C double bond detected in the ISM (Ceccarelli et al. 2017; McGuire 2022). After the first detection in Sagittarius (Sgr) B2 (Ceccarelli et al. 2017), acrylonitrile has been identified in a variety of interstellar environments, such as the hot molecular core Sgr B2(N) (Turner 1971; Walmsley et al. 1986), Orion-KL (van Dishoeck et al. 1995), the TMC-1 dark cloud (Jaber Al-Edhari et al. 2017), the circumstellar envelope of the C-rich star IRC + 10216 (Jaber Al-Edhari et al. 2017), and the L1544 prototypical prestellar core (Aladro et al. 2011), as well as in Titan’s atmosphere (Lindberg et al. 2011; Aladro et al. 2015; Costagliola et al. 2011; Chapillon et al. 2012; Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2000; Hänni et al. 2021; Biver et al. 2015). Being O(3P) quite abundant in various regions of the ISM, its reactions with the above two nitriles might contribute to control the abundance of HCCCN and CH2CHCN in various extraterrestrial environments, and should be included in astrochemical models, where instead, so far, these reactions have been overlooked.
It should be noted that also atomic oxygen in its first excited state, O(1D), can have an important role in governing the chemistry of several extraterrestrial environments, being its reactions called into play to elucidate the formation routes of complex organic molecules in cometary comas (Teanby et al. 2007) and interstellar ice (Mumma and Charnley 2011). Therefore, the study of the reaction of cyanoacetylene and acrylonitrile with also O(1D) can contribute to enrich current astrochemical models.
The goal of our study on the reactions of O(3P) with HC3N and C2H3CN was to provide useful information on the nature of the primary products and their BFs for inclusion in improved astrochemical and combustion models.
We add that, recently, we have investigated the reactions of the above two nitriles not only with atomic oxygen, but also with other radicals that are abundant in extraterrestrial environments where HC3N and C2H3CN have been identified, such as N(2D) (Liang et al. 2022) (Titan and comets) and CN (de Aragão et al. 2020, 2021, 2022) (Titan, interstellar clouds, and comets).
Below, we summarize the main results obtained from our recent CMB and theoretical studies on the dynamics and mechanism of these two reactions.
2.2 O(3P,1D) + HCCCN (cyanoacetylene)
Despite the relevance of the O(3P) + HC3N reaction in both astrophysical and combustion environments, there were very few experimental/theoretical studies on this reaction prior to our recent study (Liang et al. 2023b).
According to electronic structure calculations of the relevant triplet and singlet PESs from our recent work (Liang et al. 2023b), and also from previous, less detailed work (** from the triplet to the singlet PES (ISCt-s) in the entrance channel is more likely to occur, is indicated with an ellipse. Indicated with a circle is also the possible singlet-to-triplet crossing in the exit channel (ISCs-t), which has been assumed to be negligible
The corresponding channels (1b)–(4b) for the O(1D) reaction are more exoergic by 190 kJ/mol (the 3P-1D energy separation), and therefore are all strongly exothermic:
While channel (2a) can only be formed via ISC from the triplet to the underlying singlet PES in the entrance channel of the reaction, channels (1a) and (3a) (not shown in Fig. 1) can occur only adiabatically on the triplet PES, and channel (4a) can occur on both the triplet and singlet PES. We have searched for all channels (1a–4a)/(1b–4b), but have observed reactive signal only attributable to channels (2a)/(2b), that is, formation of CO + 1HCCN (cyanomethylene, also termed cyanocarbene) and channels (4a)/(4b), that is, formation of OCCCN (cyanoketyl) + H. We emphasize that channels a and b (from O(3P) and O(1D), respectively) can be differentiated because of their different thermochemistry (see below).
Reactive scattering signals were measured at m/z = 66 (OCCCN+) and m/z = 38 (CCN+). Because for m/z = 38 there were interferences from daughter ions of the HC3N reactant elastically/inelastically scattered by the oxygen seeded beam, the use of soft ionization (28 eV electrons were sufficient) was crucial for obtaining reliable results on the product channels. Notably, the presence of some O(1D) in our atomic oxygen beam, which is mainly composed by O(3P) (about 90%) (Alagia et al. 1997), permitted us to obtain information on also the O(1D) + HC3N reaction dynamics. In Fig. 2a, b we show product angular distributions measured at m/z = 66 (top panel) and m/z = 38 (bottom panel), and the TOF spectra at the same two masses (at the exemplary LAB angle Θ = 28°), respectively. Figure 2c shows the velocity vector diagram of the experiment.
It should be noted that while m/z = 66 corresponds to the parent ion of the heavy coproduct, OC3N, of channel (4a) and possibly also (4b), m/z = 38 (CCN+) corresponds to the (− 1) daughter ion of the HCCN product from channels (1a)/(1b), (2a)/(2b), and possibly also to the (− 28) daughter ion of the OC3N product from channels (4a)/(4b). HCCN products were detected at the (− 1) daughter ion m/z = 38 rather than at the parent ion mass of 39 for signal-to-noise reasons. The m/z = 66 LAB angular distribution shown in Fig. 2a (top panel) corresponding to the heavy coproduct OC3N of the H-displacement channels (4a)/(4b) is peaked around the CM angle (ΘCM = 44.1°) and is quite narrow being confined within a small Newton circle (Fig. 2c). The single peak structure in the TOF spectrum (peaked around 300 μs) (Fig. 2b, top panel) is what is expected for the heavy coproduct of the possible H-displacement channels (4a)/(4b). The contribution of OC3N from channels (4a)/(4b) is also visible at m/z = 38, through its daughter ion C2N+, in the recorded LAB distributions (see Fig. 2a, bottom panel) and especially in the TOF spectra (Fig. 2b, bottom panel). In order to fit the data at m/z = 66 it was necessary to use two sets of CM functions. These are shown in Fig. 3 (top two panels), and they were associated to the H-displacement channels (4a), leading to OC3N from O(3P) on the triplet PES, and (4b), leading to OC3N from O(1D) on the singlet PES. A possible small contribution of OC3N from O(3P) via ISC was difficult to evaluate, but it is expected to be small. As can be seen from Fig. 2a (bottom panel) the m/z = 38 LAB angular distribution is characterized by the same prominent peak centered around ΘCM of the m/z = 66 distribution (top panel), but it is clear that the m/z = 38 distribution is not confined between 18° and 68° as the m/z = 66 distribution, exhibiting significant additional intensity in the two wings. This is confirmed clearly by the TOF spectra at m/z = 38 (Fig. 2b, bottom panel), where it is evident that, in addition to the pronounced peak centered at ca. 300 μs due to the fragmentation of the OC3N product in the ionizer, there are also two distinct fast peaks, with the fastest one located at ca. 90 μs and the other at ca. 180 μs. The wings of the m/z = 38 angular distribution and the two fast peaks in the m/z = 38 TOF spectra could only be fitted by invoking two additional (with respect to the m/z = 66 data) reactive contributions that, on the basis of energy and linear momentum conservation, can be unambiguously attributed to the HCCN products from the (1a)/(1b) and (2a)/(2b) channels.
From the shape of the CM angular distributions of Fig. 3 we can infer that formation of OC3N and of HCCN from O(3P) proceeds via a long-lived complex mechanism (Levine and Bernstein 1987), while via a strongly osculating complex mechanism from O(1D), which reflects a substantially shorter intermediate complex lifetime in the case of the strongly exothermic O(1D) reactions.
The interpretation of the experimental results was assisted by dedicated electronic calculations of the triplet/singlet HC3ON PESs (see Fig. 1) and statistical RRKM/ME calculations of product BFs, carried out separately on the adiabatic triplet and adiabatic singlet PESs (Liang et al. 2023b).
It was found that the O(3P) reaction dynamics with HC3N is dominated by ISC from the entrance triplet PES to the underlying singlet PES (see Fig. 1), leading to the spin-forbidden 1HCCN + CO product channel, with an estimated BF = 0.90 ± 0.05, while the H-displacement channel, formed adiabatically on the triplet PES, is minor, yet substantial, with BF = 0.10 ± 0.05. The experimentally derived BFs are summarized in Table 1 for both O(3P) and O(1D) reactions. This conclusion for the O(3P) reaction was derived from the observation that adiabatic theoretical calculations predict 98% of H channel on the triplet PES and 99% of CO channel on the singlet PES (see Table 2 in Liang et al. 2023b), which leads to a theoretical BF of 89% and 11% for the CO and H channels from O(3P), respectively, to be compared with the experimental values of 90% and 10% for CO-forming and H-displacement channels, respectively, when assuming an extent of ISC of 90% (Liang et al. 2023b). From our data analysis we reached the conclusion that nearly all HCCN formed from the O(3P) reaction is actually the spin-forbidden excited cyanomethylene, 1HCCN, from channel (2a) reached via ISC from the triplet to the singlet PES, rather than ground-state 3HCCN from the adiabatic channel (1a). That is, the main reaction channel is the C–C bond breaking channel forming CO and 1HCCN, and this means that the three-carbon chain of cyanoacetylene is not maintained when attacked by O(3P) (by an extent of 90%), and this is due to efficient triplet to singlet ISC (ISCt-s) in the entrance channel (see Fig. 1).
However, as discussed in ref. (Liang et al. 2023b) we cannot tell experimentally, within the resolution of our experiment, whether additional singlet to triplet ISC is occurring in the exit channel (ISCs-t) (see circle in Fig. 1) that could lead to production of ground state cyanomethylene 3HCCN + CO. Answer to the above question could come from a detailed treatment of ISC in both the entrance and exit channel of the O(3P) + HC3N reaction, but this was outside the scope of our work. Interestingly, however, the excited 1HCCN product is expected, in any case, to decay spontaneously to ground state 3HCCN in astrophysical environments [because of an expectedly short phosphorescence lifetime (Szczepaniak 2017)] and, ultimately, the main product of the O(3P) + HC3N reaction would be ground state 3HCCN (+ CO). This is particularly relevant in astrophysical environments, where it is ground-state 3HCCN that has been actually observed. However, also in combustion environments at atmospheric pressure 1HCCN is expected to be rapidly quenched to ground state 3HCCN.
As shown in Table 1 also for the O(1D) reaction the dominant product channel is 1HCCN + CO. The BF of 0.94 ± 0.03 was found to agree with the adiabatic calculated value of 0.97. That is, the O(1D) reaction proceeds adiabatically on the singlet PES. Using the same arguments already invoked in the discussion of the O(3P) reaction, the ultimate coproduct of CO will be 3HCCN also for the O(1D) reaction.
Our theoretical results indicated that the main reaction mechanism is addition of O(3P) to the C1 carbon of the triple C≡C bond of HCC-CN, occurring with an entrance barrier of 9 kJ/mol (see Fig. 1), which makes this reaction relevant not only in combustion environments, but also in relatively warm regions of the ISM, such as circumstellar envelopes and PDRs (photon dominated regions), and, possibly, also the upper atmosphere of Titan, where it could represent an efficient mechanism of formation of cyanomethylene. We emphasize that the main product of the O(3P) + HC3N reaction, cyanomethylene (3HCCN), has been detected toward IRC + 10216 where HC3N is particularly abundant and O atoms are present (Tenenbaum et al. 2006; Agúndez and Cernicharo 2006; Zhang et al. 2017) as well as in the upper atmosphere of Titan (Martens et al. 2008).
Our study led us to propose to include the O(3P) + cyanoacetylene reaction both as a possible destruction pathway of HC3N and a possible formation route of HCCN, and also of OCCCN, both in extraterrestrial environments and in the upper atmosphere of Titan. In particular, since both HC3N and HCCN are present in IRC + 10216, we proposed to search in this environment also for OCCCN (cyanoketyl), which is the other main product of the reaction (see Table 1). We remark that the O(3P) + HC3N reaction is not present in astrochemical databases, such as KIDA (Wakelam et al. 2012) and UMIST (McElroy et al. 2013). Finally, we remind that nitriles are key intermediates in the formation of species with biological potential, such as nucleobases and aminoacids, both on Earth and in extraterrestrial environments.
2.3 O(3P,1D) + CH2CHCN (acrylonitrile)
Despite the significant relevance in both astrophysical and combustion environments, very few experimental/theoretical studies existed prior to our recent work (Pannacci et al. 2023) on the O(3P,1D) reactions with C2H3CN, similarly to the case of the reactions with HC3N.
According to electronic structure calculations of the relevant triplet and singlet PESs for the O(3P) + C2H3CN reactions from our recent work (Pannacci et al. 2023), there are about ten possible exothermic channels, while several others are nearly thermoneutral or substantially endothermic. The most exothermic ones, which include the two channels (in bold) found to be dominant in our study, are the following:
The reported enthalpies of reaction are from electronic structure calculations from Ref. Pannacci et al. (2023) at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ level and at the CCSD(T)/CBS level (values in parentheses) (only for the most relevant channels). Regarding the O(3P) + acrylonitrile reaction, channel (11a) correlates adiabatically with the triplet PES, while channels (5a)–(9a) are expected to occur on the singlet PES after ISC. Channel (10a) can occur both adiabatically on the triplet PES and via ISC on the singlet PES.
Figure 4 depicts a simplified scheme of the triplet (red lines) and singlet (blue lines) PESs for the reactions O(3P,1D) + CH2CHCN, where are portrayed only the two most exothermic channels leading to CO formation (5a, 6a), the most exothermic H-displacement channel (10a), and the second most exoergic channel on the triplet PES, that leads to formaldehyde formation (11a). The two bolded product channels are those found to be dominant (Pannacci et al. 2023). In the figure, ISC between the entrance triplet and the underlying singlet PES is indicated with a dotted ellipse. For a more detailed representation of the PESs showing also the other energetically open channels (that, however, were not observed to occur), see Figs. 5 and 6 in Ref. Pannacci et al. (2023).
The corresponding channels (5b)–(10b) for the O(1D) reaction, being 190 kJ/mol more exoergic than the corresponding channels from O(3P), are all strongly exothermic:
As can be seen from Fig. 4 the two CO forming channels can only be formed on the singlet PES, so they are adiabatic for the O(1D) reaction, while for the O(3P) reaction they can only be formed via ISC (see Fig. 4 for the CO channel). In contrast, the HCO, CH3, and H forming channels can originate from both the triplet and singlet PES. We probed all the above channels, but reactive signal was observed and attributable only to channels (6a)/(6b) and channels (10a)/(10b), that is, the channels leading to CH2CNH (ketenimine) + CO and to HCOCHCN + H.
Experimentally, reactive scattering signals were detected at m/z = 68 (C3H2NO+), 67 (C3HNO+), 66 (C3NO+), 41 (C2H3N+), 40 (C2H2N+), 39 (C2HN+), and 29 (HCO+). For reasons of S/N ratio, product LAB angular distributions, N(Θ), and TOF distributions, N(Θ, t), were measured in detail only for m/z = 67 and m/z = 40 (using an electron energy of 28 eV), and they are shown in Fig. 5a, b, respectively. Figure 5c depicts, instead, the velocity vector diagram of the experiment, where only the limiting circles of the observed products are indicated. The circle associated to the CH2O (+ 3HCCN) product from the O(3P) reaction [channel (11a)] was also added to the Newton diagram because useful in the discussion of the results.
As discussed below, from the experimental data we have characterized channels (6a)/(6b) and (10a)/(10b) by measuring angular and TOF distributions at m/z = 67 and 40, respectively, and we have determined their relative yields (BFs). In fact, signal at m/z = 68, 67, and 66 was attributed to the H-displacement channel, dominantly from the O(3P) reaction. This because the theoretical predictions of the BFs on the singlet PES clearly indicate a very small contribution of the HCOCHCN + H reactive channel (10b) (BF = 1.2% at the collision energy of the experiment) (see Pannacci et al. 2023). Therefore, we have neglected, within our experimental sensitivity (i.e., BF \(\le\) 2–3%), the reactive channel (10b). The contribution of HCOCHCN from O(3P) via ISC is very hard to evaluate, but it is expected to be small and, therefore, it was not considered in the data analysis. The measurements on the H-displacement channel were performed at the (− 1) daughter ion (i.e., m/z = 67) for reasons of S/N ratio. On the other hand, possible contribution at this m/z value from channels (7a)/(7b) (corresponding to H2 elimination) was ruled out on the basis of the shape of the angular and TOF distributions at this m/z ratio (see Pannacci et al. 2023).
As can be seen in Fig. 5a (bottom panel), in contrast to the m/z = 67 angular distribution (top panel), the angular distribution at m/z = 40 is characterized by a prominent peak centered at around ΘCM = 45°, superimposed on two additional wings. The central peak corresponds to a daughter ion of the HCOCHCN product coming from the H-displacement channel (10a), whose presence is also evident from the slow broad peak in the corresponding m/z = 40 TOF spectrum (see Fig. 5b, bottom panel), which is identical to that observed at m/z = 67 (Fig. 5b, top panel). The two additional wings in the angular distribution and the fast peaks in the TOF spectra at m/z = 40 can be fitted by invoking two other reactive contributions associated with the CO-forming channels (6a) and (6b), observed via the daughter ion C2NH2+ of ketenimine (CH2CNH). The assignment of the signal registered at m/z = 40 to ketenimine was made on the basis of the topology of the singlet PES and considering the RRKM/ME predictions of product BFs on the singlet PES (see Pannacci et al. 2023). The situation is similar to what observed in the case of the O(3P,1D) reaction with HC3N (see Sect. 3.1). In fact, by analyzing the TOF spectra (Fig. 5b), it should be noted that the fingerprint of the CH2CNH + CO channel from the reaction of O(3P) and O(1D) is particularly clear at the reported angle Θ = 32°. The fact that the angular distribution of CH2CNH [channels (6a) and (6b)] is much wider than that of HCOCHCN (channel (10a) and that the TOF features associated to the two contributions of CH2CNH is much faster than that of HCOCHCN, is due to two reasons: (i) the main one is that CH2CHCN is scattered over a much larger Newton circle (see Fig. 5c) than HCOCHCN because of linear momentum conservation, being its coproduct, CO, much heavier than H; (ii) additionally, channels (6a) and (6b) are much more exothermic than channel (10a). The calculated best-fit LAB angular and TOF distributions for the indicated channels in Fig. 5a, b are obtained from the best-fit CM product angular and translational energy distribution shown, together with their error bounds, in Fig. 6.
Adiabatic statistical calculations of product BFs for the decomposition of the main triplet and singlet intermediates were carried out (Pannacci et al. 2023). Combining experimental and theoretical results, it was concluded that the O(3P) reaction leads to two main product channels, among a variety of possible open channels: (i) CH2CNH (ketenimine) + CO (dominant, BF = 0.87 ± 0.05), formed via efficient ISC from the entrance triplet PES to the underlying singlet PES, (ii) HCOCHCN + H (minor, BF = 0.13 ± 0.05), occurring adiabatically on the triplet PES. The experimentally derived BFs for both O(3P) and O(1D) reactions are reported in Table 2. As can be seen the derived BFs for O(3P) + acrylonitrile show strong preference for formation of CH2CNH + CO.
Notably, both ketenimine and acrylonitrile have been detected toward the same star-forming regions (as in Sagittarius B2(N) hot core) (Gardner and Winnewisser 1975). Ketenimine is often neglected by astrochemical modelers in the most common astrochemical databases, such as KIDA (Wakelam et al. 2012) and UMIST (Woodall et al. 2007), with respect to its more abundant CH3CN (acetonitrile) isomer, and also the reaction O(3P) + acrylonitrile is overlooked in models.
It should be noted that the most exothermic of all channels, more than channel (6a), namely, channel (5a) forming CO + CH3CN, is statistically highly unfavored with respect to the isomeric channel (6a) leading to CO + ketenimine because of the much higher interconversion barrier (1TS4) located at − 138 kJ/mol (with respect to reactants) when compared to 1TS3 located at − 235 kJ/mol, that is about 100 kJ/mol lower (see Fig. 4). This is another example where the detailed reaction dynamics, which is dictated by the detailed features of the PES, determines what the most probable product channel actually is, against the common, simplistic and often unwarranted sense often used in models of taking as dominant product channel the most exothermic one.
Our study suggests to include the O(3P) + acrylonitrile reaction both as a possible destruction pathway of CH2CHCN and a possible formation route of CH2CNH. The O(1D) + CH2CHCN reaction mainly leads to formation of CH2CNH + CO adiabatically on the singlet PES (see Table 2). This result can improve models related to the chemistry of interstellar ices and cometary comas, where O(1D) reactions are believed to play an important role. Overall, our results are expected to be useful to improve models of combustion and extraterrestrial environments.
2.4 O(3P,1D) + C6H5N (pyridine)
Recent CMB experiments backed by theoretical calculations of the reaction PESs and of product distributions on multichannel O(3P) reactions with a variety of unsaturated hydrocarbons containing 2C, 3C, and 4C atoms (simple alkynes, alkenes, dienes, and conjugated dienes) and with simple aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene) have shown that ISC between the weakly coupled entrance triplet and underlying singlet PESs plays a central role in the dynamics and kinetics of these reactions (Casavecchia et al. 2015; Pan et al. 2017; Caracciolo et al. 2019c; Vanuzzo et al. 2021; Cavallotti et al. 2022). These O(3P) reactions were all found to mainly proceed via an addition–elimination mechanism and to exhibit from a small to a sizeable entrance energy barrier (from a few kJ/mol up to 20 kJ/mol). In all these reactions the electrophilic addition of O(3P) to the unsaturated bond(s) leads to a covalently bound triplet diradical intermediate(s) in the triplet PES. Since triplet and singlet PESs always cross in these systems, a nonadiabatic jump (ISC) can occur from the entrance triplet PES to the underlying singlet PES. It was found that ISC takes place near the minimum of the initial triplet intermediate (more than one intermediate can be present when three or more C atoms are present in the molecule), which is reached only after the triplet entrance barrier has been surmounted. In these systems, ISC mainly affects the number of exit channels and the BFs of the various product channels. The extent of ISC usually increases with increasing lifetime of the triplet intermediate, which, in turn, typically increases with increasing stability of the diradical and lowering of the collision energy (Pan et al. 2017). Interestingly, when we studied the reaction of O(3P) with one of the simplest heterocyclic molecules, namely pyridine, which is isoelectronic with benzene, and compared the two systems, we observed a hitherto unobserved ISC-based mechanism (Recio et al. 2022). The study of the O(3P) + pyridine reaction was motivated by the importance of this system in several fields including biology, combustion, and astrochemistry (Wang et al. 2012; Parker et al. 2015; Puzzarini and Barone 2020). Specifically, we found that ISC does occur for ortho-, meta-, and para-addition of the O atom to the carbons of the aromatic ring of pyridine, after the corresponding entrance barrier has been surmounted, as in the case of the reaction of O(3P) with the isoelectronic molecule of benzene. However, for these types of addition the extent of ISC was found to be small, while it was found that ISC can also occur, much more efficiently, for O atom addition to the heteroatom, specifically, to the lone pair of the nitrogen atom (ipso addition) before the entrance barrier. Figure 7 shows a simplified, schematic representation of the triplet/singlet PESs for meta and ipso addition of O(3P) to pyridine. In the figure we emphasize the minimum energy crossing point (MECP) for the two cases of ipso and meta addition (MECPi and MECPm, respectively), and portray schematically only the pathways to the main product channels of the O(3P) + C5H5N reaction, namely, the strongly exothermic spin-forbidden CO elimination channel, involving ring-contraction with formation of pyrrole + CO, occurring on the singlet PES reached from the triplet PES via ISC, and the H-displacement channel occurring adiabatically on the triplet PES or, nonadiabatically (via ISC), on the singlet PES, and leading to the weakly exothermic pyridoxyl + H products. The fact that ISC is much more efficient for ipso addition than for meta addition is due to the fact that the MECP for ISC in the case of ipso addition is located at an energy (8.0 kJ/mol) lower than the entrance barrier (16.5 kJ/mol) for meta addition (the most favourable addition site to the ring C among the three possible ortho, meta, and para sites) (Fig. 7). The CMB experiments were supported by detailed theoretical work, consisting in high-level, quantum electronic structure calculations of the triplet and singlet PESs and related RRKM/ME simulations of product BFs, with the inclusion of ISC for both meta (the preferred attack position on the C sites) and ipso addition (to the N atom) (Recio et al. 2022). The theoretical calculations of the triplet and singlet PESs for the O(3P,1D) + pyridine reaction indicated that the main energetically allowed product channels at Ec = 37.2 kJ/mol for the O(3P) reaction are (in bold are the two main observed channels):
These same channels can also be formed from the O(1D) + C5H5N reaction, with the reaction exothermicities in this case being larger by 190 kJ/mol because of the energy difference between excited state 1D and ground state 3P of atomic oxygen. It should be noted that while the o-, m-, and p-pyridoxyl + H products can be formed on either triplet or singlet PES, the pyrrole + CO products can be formed from O(3P) only via ISC from the entrance triplet PES to the singlet PES, or from O(1D) adiabatically. Particularly relevant to the O(1D) reaction, besides the H and CO forming channels, are also the so called “3-body channel” (14), generated by the fast uni-molecular decay of internally hot pyrrole before reaching the detector, and the channel (13) leading to pyrrolyl + HCO, that for O(1D) are both strongly exothermic.
In the following we summarize the main experimental results and findings of our recent study. The O(3P,1D) + C5H5N reactions were investigated in CMB experiments at Ec = 37.2 kJ/mol using a supersonic oxygen beam containing about 90% of O(3P) and 10% of O(1D) (Alagia et al. 1997). Data analysis was carried out in a similar way as for the related O(3P,1D) + C6H6 (benzene) reaction (Vanuzzo et al. 2021). Notably, it was found that there are similarities as well as differences in the derived best-fit CM functions for the related O(3P,1D) + pyridine and O(3P,1D) + benzene systems (Recio et al. 2022).
Reactive scattering signals were observed at m/z = 94 (C5H4NO+), 93 (C5H3NO+), 67 (C4H5N+), and 66 (C4H4N+). From LAB product angular and TOF distribution measurements at m/z = 94, 67, and 66, we characterized the occurrence of the H-displacement channel(s), from data at m/z = 67 the pyrrole formation channels as well as the H-displacement channel(s), and from data at m/z = 66 the 3-body and HCO channels, as well as the H-displacement channel(s). In Fig. 8 we show some data at m/z = 66 and 67 (the angular distributions, N(Θ), and exemplary TOF distributions, N(Θ,t), at the LAB angle of 60°), to demonstrate the dynamics of the observed reaction channels from O(3P) and O(1D) reactions (for the complete data set, see Recio et al. 2022).
As mentioned above, the C5H4NO (pyridoxyl) product, besides at the parent ion (m/z = 94), was also detected (more readily) at m/z = 66 and also at m/z = 67, originating from strong dissociative ionization of the parent ion C5H4NO+ in the ionizer. As can be seen in Fig. 8(lhs) the N(Θ)s of m/z = 66 and 67 exhibit a pronounced, slightly backward-biased distribution with respect to the O atom direction, centered around the CM angle. The N(Θ) of the C5H4NO products at m/z = 94 (not shown here—see supporting Fig. 1 in Recio et al. 2022) and their contributions at m/z = 66 and 67 are confined to a narrow LAB angular range because of linear momentum conservation, as the H coproduct is very light. However, in contrast to the m/z = 94 N(Θ), at both m/z = 66 and 67, while the partial contribution of the coproduct of the H displacement channel has the same shape as at m/z = 94, a strong reactive signal is also present at LAB angles well outside the range where the heavy coproducts of H channels are confined, thus suggesting the presence of at least another channel, besides the H channel. The different channels were identified from the combined analysis of angular and TOF distributions; in particular the TOF spectra N(Θ,t), although are essentially bimodal [see Fig. 8 (rhs)], carry the fingerprint of all observed channels mentioned above [two from O(3P) and four from O(1D)] (see Recio et al 2022 for the complete data set and analysis).
Quantitative information on the reaction dynamics was obtained by moving from the LAB coordinate system to the CM reference frame and analyzing the best-fit product \({\text{T}}(\uptheta )\) and \({\text{P}}({{\text{E}}}_{{\text{T}}}^{\mathrm{^{\prime}}})\) distributions. In Fig. 8 the solid curves superimposed on the experimental distributions are the calculated curves obtained using the best-fit CM \({\text{T}}(\uptheta )\) and \({\text{P}}({{\text{E}}}_{{\text{T}}}^{\mathrm{^{\prime}}})\) functions reported in supporting Fig. 4 of Recio et al. (2022) for all six observed channels [the two channels from O(3P) and the four from O(1D)].
The procedure adopted to determine reaction yields (product BFs) for this system was similar to that used for the O(3P,1D) + C6H6 system (Vanuzzo et al. 2021). Despite the large number of exothermic channels, our study (Recio et al. 2022) showed that the dominant product channels from the O(3P) reaction are only channels (11b) and (12a), leading to H and CO elimination, respectively, with channel (11b) being minor (\({\text{BF}}={0.02}_{-0.01}^{+0.02}\)) and coming from the triplet PES via adiabatic reaction, and channel (12a) being dominant (\({{\text{BF}}=0.98}_{-0.02}^{+0.01}\) and coming from the singlet PES via efficient triplet to singlet ISC. The product BFs for both O(3P) and O(1D) reactions are summarized in Table 3. The fact that the BF of the pyrrole + CO channel from O(3P) is 0.98 indicates that the extent of ISC is very large (98%).
The O(3P) + pyridine reaction is the system with the largest contribution of triplet to singlet ISC observed up to now, a feature that theory explained with the occurrence of ISC in the entrance channel for the ipso addition of O(3P) to the lone pair of the nitrogen atom, before the entrance barrier (Recio et al. 2022). Instead, for the O(1D) reaction the main product channel is the three-body channel leading to pyrrolyl + H + CO (BF = 0.78 ± 0.10), which, while nearly thermoneutral for O(3P) [channel (14)], is strongly exothermic for O(1D) (\(\Delta {H}_{0}^{0}=-188\) kJ/mol). Notably, the 3-body channel was also observed to be the main channel, leading to cyclopentadiene + H + CO, in the corresponding reaction of O(1D) with benzene (Vanuzzo et al 2021). For O(1D), the pyrrole + CO channel has BF = 0.16 ± 0.08, the H channel has BF = 0.014 ± 0.007, and the HCO-forming channel has BF = 0.04 ± 0.02 (see Table 3). This indicates that, overall, also for the O(1D) reaction the H-displacement channel is minor.
The experimentally estimated extent of ISC of about 98% is in sharp contrast to what was derived for the reaction of O(3P) with the isoelectronic benzene molecule, where the extent of ISC was determined to be ca. 50% at a comparable Ec (Vanuzzo et al. 2021). In O(3P) + benzene, the H + C6H5O (phenoxy) production is controlled by the spin-allowed triplet pathway with BF = 0.66 (0.48 from the adiabatic contribution on the triplet PES and 0.18 from the nonadiabatic contribution on singlet PES via ISC), that is, it is much larger than in O(3P) + pyridine. The ring contraction channel leading to CO + C5H6 (cyclopentadiene) occurs via triplet to singlet ISC with a BF of 0.32, that is, the ring contraction channel in O(3P) + benzene is much smaller (50%) than in O(3P) + pyridine (98%).
The observation that ISC to the singlet PES, leading to formation of pyrrole + CO [both 1H- and 2H-pyrrole (channel (12a) and (12b), respectively) in a 1/2.4 ratio, according to statistical calculations (Recio et al. 2022)], occurs in the entrance channel before the barrier, following the ipso interaction between the O atom and the lone pair of the N atom of pyridine on the triplet PES, represented the first detection of ISC in the entrance channel of a bimolecular reaction in the absence of heavy atoms (e.g., iodine). Interestingly, this reaction mechanism involving ISC before the entrance barrier may play a role in bimolecular reactions with the same characteristics. In particular, considering that important biomolecules, including nucleobases, are N-heterocyclic aromatic compounds, the finding of our study on the reaction of O(3P) with pyridine about the key role of the electrophilic attack of the oxygen atom on the nitrogen atom accompanied by efficient ISC, as opposed to the usual attack on the carbons of the aromatic ring, may have significant implications in biological processes. Finally, in relation to the potential astrochemical relevance of the O(3P) + pyridine reaction, our results suggested a possible destruction pathway of pyridine hitherto unobserved in different environments of the interstellar medium.