Abstract
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusions are rare in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) but may serve as a therapeutic target. This study aims to evaluate the preoperative cytologic findings and clinicopathologic features of a series of eight ALK-rearranged PTCs from our pathology archives and consultations. All cases were confirmed by ALK D5F3 immunohistochemistry and six with additional targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). The original fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology diagnosis included the Bethesda System (TBS) category II in three (37.5%), TBS III in two (25%), TBS V in two (25%), and TBS VI in one (12.5%). Six cases had available FNA cytology and were reviewed. The cytologic features showed microfollicular architecture as well as limited or reduced nuclear elongation and chromatin alterations in all six. Nuclear grooves and pseudoinclusions were absent in two cases, rarely or focally noted in three, and frequently found in one. Two cases initially diagnosed as TBS II, showing microfollicular architecture without well-developed nuclear features, were revised to TBS III (with architectural atypia only). For histologic correlations, four were infiltrative follicular variant PTCs, three as classic subtype PTC with predominant follicular growth, and one as solid/trabecular subtype PTC. All eight cases demonstrated reduced PTC nuclear features with respect to nuclear elongation and chromatin alterations compared to those typically identified in “BRAF-like” PTCs. The NGS testing revealed EML4::ALK fusion in three, STRN::ALK fusion in two, and ITSN2::ALK fusion in one. In conclusion, although ALK-rearranged PTCs have been associated with neutral gene expression profile from a BRAF-RAS scoring perspective, the “RAS-like” nuclear features were more commonly identified in this series, resulting in frequent indeterminate diagnosis of preoperative FNA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common malignancy of the thyroid [1]. The majority of PTC harbors BRAF mutations, reported in 59.7 to 86.8% [2,3,4]. In addition, kinase gene fusions are also commonly detected in about 8.5 to 15.3% of PTCs [2,3,4]. Among them, the RET fusions are the most frequent, followed by NTRK and BRAF [4]. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) belongs to the gene family of receptor tyrosine kinases, which control various cell functions, such as cell proliferation and survival. ALK gene rearrangement has been reported in many tumors across various organs, including anaplastic large cell lymphoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and non-small cell lung carcinoma [5, 6]. PTCs with ALK fusion have been reported in 0–2.2% of unselected patients, 2–7.3% in pediatric and young adult patients, and up to 12.7% in patients with radiation exposure [7,8,9,10,11]. Although PTC generally has a favorable prognosis, distant metastasis and disease progression can occur in a subset of patients. Due to the rarity of ALK-rearranged PTCs, their clinical behaviors were still not well-characterized. In addition, ALK fusion can serve as a potential therapeutic target given the targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Therefore, identifying ALK fusion in PTCs has important clinical implications in the era of precision medicine.
The ALK-rearranged PTCs were first discovered in atomic bomb survivors in 2012 and these tumors frequently showed a peculiar solid/trabecular-like architecture [11]. Since then, various histologic subtypes have been described in ALK-rearranged PTCs, including follicular variant as well as classic, solid/trabecular, diffuse sclerosing, tall cell, oncocytic, and Warthin-like subtypes [8, 11]. In addition, relatively subtle nuclear atypia has also been observed [8, 12]. In fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, subtle cytologic atypia with mild nuclear enlargement and less frequent nuclear grooves were noted [13]. To the best of our knowledge, the description of cytologic and histologic findings of ALK-rearranged PTCs was mostly mentioned in separate studies. The detailed cytomorphologic features as well as cytology-histology correlations were not well reported. In this study, we investigated the cytologic features, the distribution of the Bethesda System (TBS) categories, and the histopathological characteristics of these tumors in a series of eight ALK-rearranged PTCs.
Material and Methods
Patient Selection
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Taipei Veterans General Hospital (IRB no.: 2019-07-001BC) and Changhua Christian Hospital (IRB no.: 230902). This series consisted of cases identified from our previous studies of BRAF p.V600E wild-type PTCs, routine cases, and consultations [4, 14]. The BRAF p.V600E status was evaluated by a validated immunohistochemical assay (clone VE1, Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Previous study has showed ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) with good sensitivity and specificity for detecting ALK-rearranged PTCs [8]. Thus, ALK IHC (clone D5F3, Ventana, Oro Valley, AZ) was applied as the primary diagnostic tool on BRAF p.V600E wild-type PTCs in this series. The ALK IHC-positive cases passed the initial quality check for RNA were subjected to targeted RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) using FusionPlex pan solid tumor v2 (ArcherDX, Boulder, CO) to identify the specific fusion partner genes. Clinical characteristics, including surgical procedure, age, sex, tumor size, TNM stage, dose of radioactive iodine therapy, and follow-up status, were recorded from the medical charts.
Cytology and Pathology Examination
The preoperative FNA specimens were prepared either by conventional or SurePath (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) methods, and were stained with Papanicolaou and/or Liu stains. The diagnosis was based on the 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, including TBS I: nondiagnostic, TBS II: benign, TBS III: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), TBS IV: follicular neoplasm, TBS V: suspicious for malignancy, and TBS VI: malignant. The TBS III category was further divided into AUS-nuclear atypia and AUS-other [15]. All available FNA slides were reviewed. Architecture features (macrofolliclular, microfollicular, and papillary patterns), nuclear features (elongation, chromatin alterations (powdering/margination), groove, and pseudoinclusion), and the amount of colloid were examined.
All available pathologic slides were reviewed. The diagnosis of PTC and histological subtypes was based on the 2022 World Health Organization classification. Histological features including proportions of growth patterns (macrofollicular, microfollicular, papillary, and solid/trabecular), nuclear features (elongation, chromatin alterations (powdering/margination), groove, and pseudoinclusion), tumor border, the presence of psammoma body, extrathyroidal extension, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, and background thyroid parenchyma were recorded. Tumor border was classified into three types: well-circumscribed, multinodular permeative (invasive growth in a multinodular pattern), and infiltrative (irregular and spiculated tumor invasion with desmoplastic change).
Results
Clinical Information
Eight ALK-rearranged PTCs were identified in this study. Cases 1 to 4 were identified through ALK IHC screening on the tissue microarrays of 60 BRAF p.V600E wild-type PTCs from our previous study cohort [14]. Case 5 was diagnosed as ALK-rearranged PTC in our routine practice and had been reported in our prior study [4]. Cases 6 to 8 were from the corresponding author’s consultation files. The clinicopathologic features are summarized in Table 1. None of the eight cases had a history of radiation exposure. Six patients underwent total thyroidectomy and two received lobectomy. The average age was 39 years (range: 17–59 years). The female-to-male ratio was 6:2. The average tumor size was 2.2 cm (range: 0.9–4.5 cm). The pT stage included pT1a in three, pT1b in two, pT2 in one, pT3a in one, and pT4a in one. The pT4a case (case 3) showed tracheal invasion and lost to follow-up after the surgery. Six patients were subjected to lymph node dissection. Central compartment cervical lymph node metastasis (N1a) was found in two cases (cases 7 and 8) and lateral compartment cervical lymph node metastasis (N1b) was found in one case (case 2). Six patients received post-operation radioactive iodine therapy. Seven of the eight cases had no sign of disease recurrence and remained free of disease upon follow-up with a mean interval of 47.4 months (4–87 months). The ALK IHC showed diffuse moderate to strong cytoplasmic expression in all eight cases (Figs. 1C and F, 2C and F). Targeted RNA NGS was successfully performed in six cases and the fusion variants included EML4::ALK in three, STRN::ALK in two, and ITSN2::ALK in one. The remaining two cases failed the test due to poor RNA quality.
Cytological Features
The cytologic features of ALK-rearranged PTCs are summarized in Table 2. Preoperative FNA was performed in all eight cases and the original diagnosis included TBS II in three, TBS III in two, TBS V in two, and TBS VI in one. The FNA of case 3 (with TBS III diagnosis) was not performed in our country and the remaining seven cases had available FNA slides for review. The FNA from case 7 (with TBS II diagnosis) showed bland follicular cells without PTC nuclear features in a lymphocytic background and very scant colloid. Thus, the findings suggested lymphocytic thyroiditis rather than PTC. It is assumed that the tumor cells were not adequately represented through the FNA and thus the case was removed for the following analysis. In the two cases (cases 2 and 6) (Fig. 1A and D) assigned initially as TBS II, the nuclear features were limited but focal microfollicular architecture was identified. Thus, the diagnosis was revised to TBS III (AUS-other, with architecture atypia only). In case 8 assigned initially as TBS III, the cytology showed focal papillary architecture and rare nuclear atypia (Fig. 3A). Therefore, we assigned the diagnosis as TBS III (AUS-nuclear atypia) after review. The final reviewed diagnosis of the six cases showed TBS III: AUS-nuclear atypia in 16.7% (1/6), TBS III: AUS-other in 33% (2/6), TBS V in 33.3% (2/6), and TBS VI in 16.7% (1/6). Microfollicular architecture was identified in all six cases. Scant papillary architecture and macrofollicular architecture were present in only one case each (case 8 and case 2, respectively). The typical PTC nuclear features of grooves and pseudoinclusions were absent in two cases (Fig. 1A and D), rarely seen in one case, focally found in two cases (Fig. 2A and D), and readily identified in one case (Fig. 4A). Nuclear elongation and chromatin alterations were limited in two cases (Fig. 1A and D) and reduced in the remaining four cases (Figs. 2A and D, 3A, and 4A).
Pathological Features
The pathologic features of ALK-rearranged PTCs are summarized in Table 3. All eight cases demonstrated a predominant follicular growth. Four cases (case 2, 3, 7, and 8) showed a multinodular permeative tumor border and were classified as infiltrative follicular variant PTC (Figs. 3B and 5C). One case (case 1) showed microfollicular with predominant solid/trabecular growth and was diagnosed as solid/trabecular subtype PTC (Fig. 4B). The three remaining cases (case 4, 5, and 6) showed discernible papillary architecture (Fig. 2E) that precludes infiltrative follicular variant PTC and non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features. Thus, these three cases were diagnosed as classic subtype PTC with predominant follicular growth. Case 5 was the only one that showed well-demarcated tumor border (Fig. 2C), while the other two cases had infiltrative border. Macrofollicular (Figs. 2B and 5A) and microfollicular (Figs. 1B and E, 3B, 4B, and 5C) growths comprised varies proportion of < 5 to 80% and 15 to 95% of the tumors, respectively. Papillary growth was present in 0 to 20% of the cases (Fig. 2E). Only one case showed a predominantly solid/trabecular growth (Fig. 4B). All cases showed subtle nuclear features with respect to nuclear elongation and chromatin alterations (Figs. 1B and E, 3C, 4C, 5B and D) compared to those identified in most “BRAF-like” PTCs. Other well-developed nuclear features, including nuclear groove and pseudoinclusion, were only focally found in five cases (Figs. 1B and E, 5B) and were frequent in the remaining three cases (Figs. 3C, 4C, and 5D). Overall, five cases (62.5%) showed only focal areas present with well-developed PTC nuclear features (nuclear score of ≥ 2). The rest of three cases (38.5%) showed relatively discernable nuclear grooves and pseudoinclusions. In contrast, psammoma bodies, which are typically enriched in “BRAF-like” PTCs, were present in five cases. Necrosis or increased mitotic count was absent. Lymphatic invasion was noted in four cases and vascular invasion (angioinvasion) was present in two cases. Coexisted incidental subcentimeter PTCs (size: 0.1–0.2 cm) had been found in four cases. The BRAF p.V600E mutation–specific VE1 IHC was performed on four incidental subcentimeter PTCs. Three of them were positive for VE1 IHC. The one tumor negative for VE1 IHC was also negative for ALK IHC. For the background thyroid parenchyma, three cases (cases 5, 6, and 7) had underlying chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and one case (case 4) showed follicular nodular disease.
Discussion
In this study, we examined the cytologic characteristics, the distribution of the TBS categories, and the histologic correlates of a series of eight ALK-rearranged PTCs. In our series, the original FNA cytology diagnosis yielded a notable false-negative result (TBS II) in three out of eight patients. Following the review of seven cases with available FNA slides, we excluded one TBS II case with missed sampling for the final analysis. Two cases initially designated as TBS II were reclassified to TBS III due to the presence of scant microfollicles. Another case originally classified as TBS III remained the diagnosis of TBS III after review based on rare nuclear grooves and pseudoinclusions. The high rate of TBS III interpretation (50%, 3/6) in our series likely resulted from subtle nuclear features and the presence of only microfollicular pattern. Two cases (33.3%, 2/6) were diagnosed as TBS V based on reduced nuclear elongation and chromatin alterations as well as focal grooves and pseudoinclusions. Only one case (16.7%, 1/6) met the criteria for TBS VI. In a case report, Jurkiewicz et al. illustrated a STRN::ALK PTC with preoperative FNA diagnosis of TBS III, displaying focal cytological atypia with mild nuclear enlargement and occasional nuclear grooves [13]. Panebianco et al. also observed attenuated nuclear features in FNA cytology of ALK-rearranged PTC and a high rate of indeterminate diagnoses (TBS III: 66%, TBS IV: 10%, TBS V: 16%) [12]. The corresponding pathological features of ALK-rearranged PTCs in this study showed predominant follicular growth and rare papillary growth in a subset of cases. Limited nuclear elongation and reduced chromatin alterations were also observed. Nuclear grooves and pseudoinclusions were infrequently identified and were obvious in only three of eight cases (37.5%). The findings between cytology and pathology overlapped with good correlation in our study.
The terms “BRAF-like” and “RAS-like” was first applied in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study to describe gene expression pattern in PTCs [2]. TCGA study identified that ALK-rearranged PTCs had a neutral gene expression profile which was intermediate between those of BRAF p.V600E mutant tumors (“BRAF-like”) and RAS mutant tumors (“RAS-like”) based on their BRAF-RAS scoring system. Recently, a few studies and expert reviews have adopted “BRAF-like” and “RAS-like” designations to describe the cytomorphologic features that are most commonly associated with tumors with the BRAF p.V600E mutation (or tumors with a similar gene expression profile) as “BRAF-like” whereas tumors with a RAS mutation (or tumors with a similar gene expression profile to tumors with a RAS mutation) show “RAS-like” nuclear atypia [16,17,18]. While “BRAF-like” nuclear atypia is characterized by classical chromatin margination (nuclear clearing) and heterogenous nuclear membrane irregularities resulting in intranuclear pseudoinclusions, “RAS-like” tumors are characterized by attenuated chromatin margination and reduced nuclear irregularity. The data from our study showed that ALK-rearranged tumors usually demonstrate “RAS-like” nuclear atypia rather than “BRAF-like” atypia. Interestingly, Chou et al. also described that the majority of ALK-rearranged PTCs (eight out of 14 cases) showed a predominance of follicular growth and variable nuclear atypia, which would be considered morphologically “RAS-like” [8].
To date, approximately 100 cases of ALK-rearranged PTCs have been reported. The clinicopathologic features of ALK-rearranged PTCs are summarized in Table 4. ALK-rearranged PTCs constitute an overall 2.4% of PTCs, with a female predominance (female to male ratio of 3.56) and a younger age at onset compared to non-ALK-rearranged PTC patients [7,8,9,10,11, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The majority of ALK-rearranged PTCs were PTCs with a mixed papillary and follicular growth (53%), followed by classic (22.9%), solid/trabecular (9.7%), diffuse sclerosing (9.7%), tall cell (2.4%), oncocytic (1.2%), and Warthin-like (1.2%) subtypes [7,8,9,10,11,12,13, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Our findings aligned with the descriptions in previous literature of a predominance of female patients and various histological subtypes/variants of ALK-rearranged PTCs.
The majority of ALK-rearranged thyroid carcinomas were PTCs (87.3%), followed by poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (11%) and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas (1.7%) [7,8,9,10,11,12,13, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The most frequent ALK fusion variants were STRN::ALK (45.8%) and EML4::ALK (31.4%). Other less common fusion partner genes included CTSB, GTF2IRD1, PPP1R21, TFG, CCDC149, and ITSN2 [12, 20, 28, 36]. Similarly, STRN::ALK and EML4::ALK fusions comprised the majority of our cases, including three (50%) with EML4::ALK and two (33.3%) with STRN::ALK fusion among the six cases tested. We also identified a rare ITSN2::ALK fusion gene (case 1), previously reported in only one FNA cytology case [12]. Interestingly, the FNA cytology of ITSN2::ALK PTC in our study exhibited the most pronounced PTC nuclear features, consistent with the diagnostic criteria of TBS VI (Fig. 4). The histological examination revealed more frequent PTC nuclear features than EML4::ALK and STRN::ALK fusion–associated cases.
The prognosis of ALK-rearranged thyroid carcinomas remains uncertain due to its rarity. In our study, all eight cases displayed an absence of high-grade features, and seven showed no signs of recurrence during the follow-up period. Most previously reported PTC cases also exhibited no evidence of disease during the follow-up period [7, 8, 12, 20, 21, 23, 25, 34]. There was only one classic subtype PTC that persisted with disease for 5 years and another tall cell subtype PTC that manifested with recurrence 3 years after thyroidectomy [22, 33]. Although rare, similar to other molecular alterations, ALK rearrangement may also occur in aggressive thyroid cancers, such as poorly differentiated or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma [12, 26, 34,35,36,37]. Since 2011, several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma [38]. Godbert et al. reported a case of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma showing focal follicular variant PTC component with tumor regression after off-label use of crizotinib [35]. Thus, ALK inhibitors also appear to be a promising therapeutic agent for aggressive thyroid cancer with ALK fusions.
Conclusion
Although ALK-rearranged PTCs have been shown to harbor a neutral gene expression profile from a BRAF-RAS scoring perspective of TCGA study, one can see tumors with “RAS-like” and “BRAF-like” nuclear alterations or the combination of both in an individual case. In this current study, the “RAS-like” nuclear features were more commonly identified. The diagnostic challenges due to attenuated nuclear alterations and the absence of a discernible papillary architecture seem to result in frequent indeterminate diagnosis of preoperative FNA. The corresponding histopathologic features included a predominant follicular growth along with variable and subtle nuclear features. Recognition of these findings is essential for the identification of ALK-rearranged PTC.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Miranda-Filho A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Bray F et al. (2021) Thyroid cancer incidence trends by histology in 25 countries: a population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9:225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00027-9
Cancer Genome Atlas Research N (2014) Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell 159:676-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.050
Liang J, Cai W, Feng D et al. (2018) Genetic landscape of papillary thyroid carcinoma in the Chinese population. J Pathol 244:215-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.5005
Hang JF, Chen JY, Kuo PC et al. (2023) A shift in molecular drivers of papillary thyroid carcinoma following the 2017 world health organization classification: characterization of 554 consecutive tumors with emphasis on BRAF-negative cases. Mod Pathol 36:100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100242
Chiarle R, Voena C, Ambrogio C, Piva R, Inghirami G (2008) The anaplastic lymphoma kinase in the pathogenesis of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8:11-23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2291
Webb TR, Slavish J, George RE et al. (2009) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase: role in cancer pathogenesis and small-molecule inhibitor development for therapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:331-356. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.9.3.331
Nozaki Y, Yamamoto H, Iwasaki T et al. (2020) Clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical utility of NTRK-, ALK-, and ROS1-rearranged papillary thyroid carcinomas and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. Hum Pathol 106:82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2020.09.004
Chou A, Fraser S, Toon CW et al. (2015) A detailed clinicopathologic study of ALK-translocated papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 39:652-659. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000368
Iyama K, Matsuse M, Mitsutake N et al. (2017) Identification of three novel fusion oncogenes, SQSTM1/NTRK3, AFAP1L2/RET, and PPFIBP2/RET, in thyroid cancers of young patients in fukushima. Thyroid 27:811-818. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0673
Pekova B, Sykorova V, Dvorakova S et al. (2020) RET, NTRK, ALK, BRAF, and MET fusions in a large cohort of pediatric papillary thyroid carcinomas. Thyroid 30:1771-1780. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2019.0802
Hamatani K, Mukai M, Takahashi K, Hayashi Y, Nakachi K, Kusunoki Y (2012) Rearranged anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in adult-onset papillary thyroid cancer amongst atomic bomb survivors. Thyroid 22:1153-1159. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2011.0511
Panebianco F, Nikitski AV, Nikiforova MN et al. (2019) Characterization of thyroid cancer driven by known and novel ALK fusions. Endocr Relat Cancer 26:803-814. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-19-0325
Jurkiewicz M, Cimic A, Murty VV et al. (2021) Detection of STRN-ALK fusion in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytopathology facilitates papillary thyroid cancer diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 49:E146-E151. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24647
Lee YC, Chen JY, Huang CJ, Chen HS, Yang AH, Hang JF (2020) Detection of NTRK1/3 Rearrangements in papillary thyroid carcinoma using immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing. Endocr Pathol 31:348-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-020-09648-9
Ali SZ, Baloch ZW, Cochand-Priollet B, Schmitt FC, Vielh P, VanderLaan PA (2023) The 2023 bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 33:1039-1044. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2023.0141
Turchini J, Sioson L, Clarkson A et al. (2023) The presence of typical "BRAFV600E-Like" atypia in papillary thyroid carcinoma is highly specific for the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation. Endocr Pathol 34:112-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09747-9
Kakudo K. (2022) Different threshold of malignancy for RAS-like thyroid tumors causes significant differences in thyroid nodule practice. Cancers (Basel) 14:812. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030812
Jung CK, Bychkov A, Song DE et al. (2021) Molecular correlates and nuclear features of encapsulated follicular-patterned thyroid neoplasms. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 36:123-133. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2020.860
Lee SE, Hwang TS, Choi YL et al. (2017) Molecular profiling of papillary thyroid carcinoma in korea with a high prevalence of BRAF(V600E) mutation. Thyroid 27:802-810. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0547
McFadden DG, Dias-Santagata D, Sadow PM et al. (2014) Identification of oncogenic mutations and gene fusions in the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:E2457-2462. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2611
Jeon MJ, Chun SM, Lee JY et al. (2019) Mutational profile of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma with extensive lymph node metastasis. Endocrine 64:130-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-01842-y
van der Tuin K, Ventayol Garcia M, Corver WE et al. (2019) Targetable gene fusions identified in radioactive iodine refractory advanced thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol 180:235-241. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0653
Bastos AU, de Jesus AC, Cerutti JM (2018) ETV6-NTRK3 and STRN-ALK kinase fusions are recurrent events in papillary thyroid cancer of adult population. Eur J Endocrinol 178:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0499
Perot G, Soubeyran I, Ribeiro A et al. (2014) Identification of a recurrent STRN/ALK fusion in thyroid carcinomas. PLoS One 9:e87170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087170
Park G, Kim TH, Lee HO et al. (2015) Standard immunohistochemistry efficiently screens for anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements in differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 22:55-63. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-14-0467
Kelly LM, Barila G, Liu P et al. (2014) Identification of the transforming STRN-ALK fusion as a potential therapeutic target in the aggressive forms of thyroid cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:4233-4238. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321937111
Pfeifer A, Rusinek D, Zebracka-Gala J et al. (2019) Novel TG-FGFR1 and TRIM33-NTRK1 transcript fusions in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 58:558-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22737
Vanden Borre P, Schrock AB, Anderson PM et al. (2017) Pediatric, adolescent, and young adult thyroid carcinoma harbors frequent and diverse targetable genomic alterations, including kinase fusions. Oncologist 22:255-263. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0279
Stosic A, Fuligni F, Anderson ND et al. (2021) Diverse oncogenic fusions and distinct gene expression patterns define the genomic landscape of pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 81:5625-5637. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0761
Efanov AA, Brenner AV, Bogdanova TI et al. (2018) Investigation of the relationship between radiation dose and gene mutations and fusions in post-chernobyl thyroid cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 110:371-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx209
Arndt A, Steinestel K, Rump A et al. (2018) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements in radiation-related human papillary thyroid carcinoma after the Chernobyl accident. J Pathol Clin Res 4:175-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.102
Chou A, Qiu MR, Crayton H et al. (2023) A Detailed histologic and molecular assessment of the diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mod Pathol 36:100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100329
Demeure MJ, Aziz M, Rosenberg R, Gurley SD, Bussey KJ, Carpten JD (2014) Whole-genome sequencing of an aggressive BRAF wild-type papillary thyroid cancer identified EML4-ALK translocation as a therapeutic target. World J Surg 38:1296-1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2485-3
Chu YH, Wirth LJ, Farahani AA et al. (2020) Clinicopathologic features of kinase fusion-related thyroid carcinomas: an integrative analysis with molecular characterization. Mod Pathol 33:2458-24725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0638-5
Godbert Y, Henriques de Figueiredo B, Bonichon F et al. (2015) Remarkable response to crizotinib in woman with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 33:e84-87. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.49.6596
Landa I, Ibrahimpasic T, Boucai L et al. (2016) Genomic and transcriptomic hallmarks of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers. J Clin Invest 126:1052-1066. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci85271
Duan H, Li Y, Hu P et al. (2019) Mutational profiling of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma by the use of targeted next-generation sequencing. Histopathology 75:890-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13942
Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR et al. (2010) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:1693-1703. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1006448
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Biobank, Taipei Veterans General Hospital for assistance with sample preparation in this study.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University The study was supported by research grants from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V110B-019) and the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (MOST110-2320-B-075-003-MY3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.-P.S. and Y.-C.L. performed analysis and interpretation of data and statistical analysis; K.-P.S. and J.-F.H. wrote the manuscript; K.-P.S., Y.-C.L., J.-J.T., S.-H.L., C.-Y.L., W.-S.L., C.-F.L., and J.-F.H. provided specimen acquisition and clinical data; J.-F.H. performed the study concept and design, development of methodology, and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval/Consent to Participate
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Taipei Veterans General Hospital (IRB no.: 2019-07-001BC) and Changhua Christian Hospital (IRB no.: 230902).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, assays, or instruments described in this article.
Additional information
This study was presented in part at the annual meeting of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology on March 14th, 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shih, KP., Lee, YC., Tsai, JJ. et al. Clinicopathologic Features and Cytologic Correlation of ALK-Rearranged Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Series of Eight Cases. Endocr Pathol 35, 134–146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-024-09808-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-024-09808-1