Log in

Service strategy’s effect on firm performance: A meta-analysis of the servitization literature

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The servitization literature has evolved into a rich field of academic inquiry that today calls for a consolidation of extant knowledge and opens new opportunities for meta-analytic reviews. The present research provides a fine-grained understanding of the servitization–firm performance relationship. We first develop an integrative conceptual framework that systematically ties together factors identified in prior research that affect the relationship. Through a meta-analysis of 379 effect sizes across 85 studies, we then provide broad-based empirical evidence that servitization indeed exerts a positive effect on firm performance. We further examine a broad set of potential moderators affecting the servitization–performance relationship to understand and explain the heterogeneity and, at times, the inconsistency of prior results regarding the relationship’s directionality and strength. Finally, we provide guidance for future research, from both a substantive and methodological standpoint, and sketch out an integrative conceptual model for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Likewise, Palmatier et al. (2007) find that interorganizational relationship performance is explained best by integrating various theoretical lenses.

  2. Cost savings due to these synergies help firms in their transition. However, firms transitioning to higher service revenues also need to overhaul their fundamental business models, which represents a costly shift (Crozet & Milet, 2017).

  3. We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting that RBT-based mechanisms of the impact of servitization on performance should be positive and related to the creation of an SCA.

  4. We base our choices of moderators on their theoretical and practical relevance. However, we also view an occurrence of at least 5% of all observations for each variable (cutoff value Farley et al. [1995] suggest) as feasible for a moderator.

  5. Ulaga and Reinartz (2011) develop a different typology of four hybrid offering types, but for reasons of data availability and sample size, we stick with the distinction between SSP and SSC.

  6. Instead of replacing capital goods, customers might try to stretch the lifetime of an equipment by spending more on (repair and maintenance) services.

  7. We used a random-effect model for two reasons. First, from our theoretical discussion, we expect the mean to vary systematically under the influence of moderator variables. Second, in line with meta-analytic standards, we use the Q-test for homogeneity, which confirms that the assumptions of the fixed model do not hold (Table 5).

  8. The harmonic mean is less sensitive to outliers and more conservative than the arithmetic mean (Drees & Heugens, 2013).

  9. We also analyze the curvilinear effect of servitization on performance in part 2 of the Web Appendix. Given the main focus of our study, we did not include this analysis in the main text.

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (2004). Business market management: Understanding, creating, and delivering value. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antioco, M., Moenaert, R. K., Lindgreen, A., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2008). Organizational antecedents to and consequences of service business orientations in manufacturing companies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(3), 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016). The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Benedettini, O., & Kay, J. M. (2009). The servitization of manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(5), 547–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedettini, O., Neely, A., & Swink, M. (2015). Why do servitized firms fail? A risk-based explanation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(6), 946–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beuren, F. H., Gomes Ferreira, M. G., & Cauchick Miguel, P. A. (2013). Product-service systems: A literature review on integrated products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Country specific advantage, firm specific advantage and multinationality – Sources of competitive advantage in emerging markets: Evidence from the electronics industry in China. International Business Review, 25(1, Part A), 165–176.

  • Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2001). Meta-Analysis in Marketing When Studies Contain Multiple Measurements. Marketing Letters, 12(2), 157–169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40216595

  • Böhm, E., Eggert, A., & Thiesbrummel, C. (2017). Service transition: A viable option for manufacturing companies with deteriorating financial performance? Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E. U., de Jong, A., Eggert, A., Houston, M. B., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Kohli, A. K., Ritter, T., & Ulaga, W. (2020). The Future of B2B Customer Solutions in a Post-COVID-19 Economy: Managerial Issues and an Agenda for Academic Inquiry. Journal of Service Research, 23(4), 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brax, S. A. (2005). A manufacturer becoming service provider – challenges and a paradox. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15(2), 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. C. (1997). Understanding Chinese courts and legal process: Law with Chinese characteristics. Kluwer Law International.

  • Calabrese, A., Levialdi Ghiron, N., Tiburzi, L., Baines, T., & Ziaee Bigdeli, A. (2019). The measurement of degree of servitization: Literature review and recommendations. Production Planning & Control, 30(13), 1118–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: A Two-Stage Approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Covin, T. J. (1990). Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: A comparison of small firms in high- and low technology industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozet, M., & Milet, E. (2017). Should everybody be in services? The effect of servitization on manufacturing firm performance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(4), 820–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotzel, T., & Shankar, V. (2019). The Relative Effects of Business-to-Business (vs. Business-to-Consumer) Service Innovations on Firm Value and Firm Risk: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 133–152.

  • Dotzel, T., Shankar, V., & Berry, L. L. (2013). Service Innovativeness and Firm Value. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2013). Synthesizing and Extending Resource Dependence Theory: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edeling, A., & Himme, A. (2018). When Does Market Share Matter? New Empirical Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of the Market Share-Performance Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 82(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, A., Hogreve, J., Ulaga, W., & Muenkhoff, E. (2014). Revenue and Profit Implications of Industrial Service Strategies. Journal of Service Research, 17(1), 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, A., Thiesbrummel, C., & Deutscher, C. (2015). Heading for new shores: Do service and hybrid innovations outperform product innovations in industrial companies? Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E. (Er), Palmatier, R. W., & Grewal, R. (2011). Effects of Customer and Innovation Asset Configuration Strategies on Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 587–602.

  • Fang, E. (Er), Palmatier, R. W., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2008). Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value. Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 1–14.

  • Farley, J. U., Lehmann, D. R., & Sawyer, A. (1995). Empirical Marketing Generalization Using Meta-Analysis. Marketing Science, 14(3_supplement), G36–G46.

  • Fliess, S., & Lexutt, E. (2019). How to be successful with servitization – Guidelines for research and management. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkmann, S., Henneberg, S. C., Witell, L., & Kindström, D. (2017). Driver Configurations for Successful Service Infusion. Journal of Service Research, 20(3), 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, H., Gustafsson, A., & Witell, L. (2011). Competitive advantage through service differentiation by manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1270–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, H., Pütz, F., Fischer, T., & Fleisch, E. (2009). Service Orientation of Organizational Structures. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 8(2), 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Krishnan, R., Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., & Cunha, P. V. (2009). A Review and Evaluation of Meta-Analysis Practices in Management Research. Journal of Management, 35(2), 393–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, S. J., Chen, H., & Daugherty, J. P. (2009). The relationship between strategic orientation, service innovation, and performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(4), 282–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2008). Econometric Analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company, 7.

  • Grewal, D., Puccinelli, N., & Monroe, K. B. (2018). Meta-analysis: Integrating accumulated knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubic, T., & Peppard, J. (2016). Servitized manufacturing firms competing through remote monitoring technology: An exploratory study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(2), 154–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssens, D. M. (2018). The value of empirical generalizations in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 6–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, J. (1994). To know me is to trust me. Industrial Marketing Management, 23(3), 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, S., Zhang, Z., Zhang, G., & He, Z. (2017). Two-dimensional base warranty design based on a new demand function considering heterogeneous usage rate. International Journal of Production Research, 55(23), 7058–7072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Elsevier Science. https://books.google.fr/books?id=brNpAAAAMAAJ

  • Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (And Other Quarrels): A Meta-Analysis Of Institutional Theories Of Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, S. B., & Sarin, S. (2003). From Market Driven to Market Driving: An Alternate Paradigm for Marketing in High Technology Industries. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(3), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Hoyer, W. D., & Fassnacht, M. (2002). Service Orientation of a Retailer’s Business Strategy: Dimensions, Antecedents, and Performance Outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huedo-Medina, T., Sanchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I 2 Index? Psychological Methods, 11, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A. E., Raddats, C., & Witell, L. (2019). The role of customer knowledge development for incremental and radical service innovation in servitized manufacturers. Journal of Business Research, 98, 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. S., & Jaramillo, F. (2017). Meta-analyses in sales research. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 37(2), 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, B. W., Johnson, J. L., Mariadoss, B. J., & Cullen, J. (2016). Service Transition Strategies in Manufacturing: Implications for Firm Risk. Journal of Service Research, 19(2), 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanatlı, M. A., & Karaer, Ö. (2022). Servitization as an alternative business model and its implications on product durability, profitability & environmental impact. European Journal of Operational Research, 301(2), 546–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastalli, I. V., & Van Looy, B. (2013). Servitization: Disentangling the impact of service business model innovation on manufacturing firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 31(4), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanra, S., Dhir, A., Parida, V., & Kohtamäki, M. (2021). Servitization research: A review and bibliometric analysis of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Business Research, 131, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindström, D., Kowalkowski, C., & Sandberg, E. (2013). Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1063–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamaki, M., Hakala, H., Partanen, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2015). The performance impact of industrial services and service orientation on manufacturing companies. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 25(4), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., & Partanen, J. (2016). Co-creating value from knowledge-intensive business services in manufacturing firms: The moderating role of relationship learning in supplier–customer interactions. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2498–2506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., Partanen, J., & Möller, K. (2013a). Making a profit with R&D services — The critical role of relational capital. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., Partanen, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2013b). Non-linear relationship between industrial service offering and sales growth: The moderating role of network capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1374–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., Rabetino, R., Parida, V., Sjödin, D., & Henneberg, S. (2022). Managing digital servitization toward smart solutions: Framing the connections between technologies, business models, and ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis, A. (1979). Theory of costs. In: Modern microeconomics. London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16077-8_4

  • Kowalkowski, C., Gebauer, H., Kamp, B., & Parry, G. (2017). Servitization and deservitization: Overview, concepts, and definitions. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalkowski, C., & Ulaga, W. (2017). Service strategy in action: A practical guide for growing your B2B Service and solution business, Self-Edited Book. Available on Amazon.com and Kindle.

  • Kozlenkova, I. V., Samaha, S. A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014). Resource-based theory in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is Market Orientation a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage or Simply the Cost of Competing? Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, K., & Kim, W. (2016). Effect of service integration strategy on industrial firm performance. Journal of Service Management, 27(3), 391–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M. G., & Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. (2007). How Business Cycles Contribute to Private-Label Success: Evidence from the United States and Europe. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, H., Baines, T., & Smart, P. (2011). Examining the information and communication technologies enabling servitized manufacture. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225(10), 1964–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Dong, Wu, G., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, W. (2017). Servitization and organizational performance: Is organizational learning ambidexterity a missing link? Orlando, Florida: Conference: American Marketing Association (AMA) Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings At: Orlando.

  • Loukis, E., Janssen, M., & Mintchev, I. (2019). Determinants of software-as-a-service benefits and impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 117, 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2006). Opportunism in Inter-firm Exchanges in Emerging Markets[1]. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, E. K., Kleinaltenkamp, M., & Wilson, H. N. (2016). How Business Customers Judge Solutions: Solution Quality and Value in Use. Journal of Marketing, 80(3), 96–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, B. (2021). The 8 Biggest Consumer And Customer Experience Trends In 2022. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2021/11/08/the-8-biggest-consumer-and-customer-experience-trends-in-2022/?sh=63852cc64cfe

  • Masten, S. E., Meehan, J. W., Jr., & Snyder, E. A. (1991). The Costs of Organization. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, V. (2001). Product services: From a service supporting the product to a service supporting the client. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 16(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. J., Sengupta, S., & Slater, S. F. (2010). Marketing of high-technology products and innovations. Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Morgan Stanley. (2017). Gross profit margin forecast of the Apple company worldwide from 2017 to 2019, by segment. https://www.statista.com/statistics/785496/apple-gross-margin-forecast-by-segment-worldwide/

  • Moriarty, R. T., & Kosnik, T. J. (1989). High-tech marketing: Concepts, continuity, and change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, P. R. (1993). Performance Effects of Information Asymmetry and Economies of Scope in Diversified Service Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 28–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A., Benedettini, O., & Visnjic, I. (2011). The servitization of manufacturing: Further evidence. In 18th European operations management association conference (Vol. 1).

  • Neu, W. A., & Brown, S. W. (2005). Forming Successful Business-to-Business Services in Goods-Dominant Firms. Journal of Service Research, 8(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezami, M., Worm, S., & Palmatier, R. W. (2018). Disentangling the effect of services on B2B firm value: Trade-offs of sales, profits, and earnings volatility. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, R., Gebauer, H., & Brann, J. M. (2012). Separate or Integrate? Assessing the Impact of Separation Between Product and Service Business on Service Performance in Product Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 19(4), 309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., & Grewal, D. (2007). A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives of Interorganizational Relationship Performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Brown, S. (2005). On the Use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., Brax, S. A., & Sihvonen, J. (2021). The tribes in the field of servitization: Discovering latent streams across 30 years of research. Industrial Marketing Management, 95, 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raddats, C., Kowalkowski, C., Benedettini, O., Burton, J., & Gebauer, H. (2019). Servitization: A contemporary thematic review of four major research streams. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R., & Defillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W., & Ulaga, W. (2008). How to sell services more profitably. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 90–96,129. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18543811

  • Richter, F. (2022). iPhone, Services Help Apple Weather Global Headwinds. https://www.statista.com/chart/16845/apple-quarterly-revenue-by-product-category/

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojanakit, P., Torres de Oliveira, R., & Dulleck, U. (2022). The sharing economy: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1317–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984997

  • Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Lehmann, D. R., & Farley, J. U. (1990). Estimating Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M., Balasubramanian, S., & Krishnan, V. V. (2004). Creating Growth With Services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (2015). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of Emerging Markets on Marketing: Rethinking Existing Perspectives and Practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1993). An Analysis of the Market Share-Profitability Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenucci, A., & Supino, E. (2019). Exploring the relationship between product-service system and profitability. Journal of Management and Governance, 24, 563–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09490-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006). Relationship value and relationship quality. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3/4), 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulaga, W., & Kowalkowski, C. (2022). Servitization: A state-of-the-art overview and future directions. In B. Edvardsson & B. Tronvoll (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of service management (pp. 169–200). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulaga, W., & Reinartz, W. J. (2011). Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visnjic, I., Wiengarten, F., & Neely, A. (2016). Only the Brave: Product Innovation, Service Business Model Innovation, and Their Impact on Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Lai, K.-H., & Shou, Y. (2018). The impact of servitization on firm performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(7), 1562–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, F. (2013). The B2B Agenda: The current state of B2B marketing and a look ahead. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 470–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm, S., Bharadwaj, S. G., Ulaga, W., & Reinartz, W. J. (2017). When and why do customer solutions pay off in business markets? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(4), 490–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Banerji, S. (2017). Challenges of servitization: A systematic literature review. Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research Funding from the Department of Marketing, BI Norwegian Business School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashkan Faramarzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lopo Rego served as Area Editor for this manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 219 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faramarzi, A., Worm, S. & Ulaga, W. Service strategy’s effect on firm performance: A meta-analysis of the servitization literature. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00971-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00971-1

Keywords

Navigation