Log in

Internal multiple prediction using high-order born modeling for LSRTM

  • Research Article - Applied Geophysics
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In least squares migration (LSM), multiples are usually a type of noise. Although they contain information about underground structures, they also cause artifacts in imaging. Therefore, multiple attenuation is an important way to reduce these artifacts in LSM images. Reweighted least squares reverse time migration (RWLSRTM) can use the weighting matrix and the predicted multiples to eliminate artifacts. Because the LSM provides a high resolution model, we can predict the internal multiples by using high-order Born modeling. The method is based on the inverse scattering series (ISS), and the difference is that it forwards the modeling of the internal multiples in the time domain; the model is constructed by the RWLSRTM. Because this method does not require performing as many Fourier transforms as the ISS method, it requires less calculation. We have applied the predicted multiples in the RWLSRTM to remove the artifacts caused by the multiples. The RWLSRTM image can also serve as a parameter of multiple predictions and can make the results of multiple predictions more accurate. The results of numerical tests using synthetic data show that this method can remove artifacts of internal multiples well. A comparison with the ISS method shows that our method can reduce the calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baysal E, Kosloff D, Sherwood J (1983) Reverse-time migration. Geophysics 48:1514–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout AJ (2011) Combining full wavefield migration and full waveform inversion. In: 81st SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 3321–3325

  • Berkhout AJ (2012) Combining full wavefield migration and full waveform inversion, a glance into the future of seismic imaging. Geophysics 77(2):S43–S50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout AJ (2014) Review paper: an outlook on the future of seismic imaging Part II: Full-Wavefield Migration. Geophys Prospect 62(5):931–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho FM (1992b) Free-surface multiple reflection elimination method based on non-linear inversion of seismic data. Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Bahia (in Portuguese)

  • Carvalho FM, Weglein AB, Stolt RH (1991) Examples of a non-linear inversion method based on the T matrix of scattering theory: application to multiple suppression. In: 61st SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 1319–1322

  • Carvalho FM, Weglein AB, Stolt RH (1992a) Non-linear inverse scattering for multiple suppression: application to real data, Part I. In: 62nd SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 1093–1095

  • Claerbout JF (1971) Toward a unified theory of reflector map**. Geophysics 36(3):467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claerbout JF (1976) Fundamentals of geophysical data processing. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Claerbout JF (1985) Imaging of the earth’s interior. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Housten, TX, USA, pp 1–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai W, Wang X, Schuster GT (2011) Least-squares migration of multisource data with a deblurring filter. Geophysics 76(5):R135–R146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster DJ, Mosher CC (1992) Suppression of multiple reflections using the radon transform. Geophysics 57(3):386–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson D (1986) Inverse velocity stacking for multiple elimination. In: 56th SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 422–424

  • He R, Schuster G (2003) Least‐squares migration of both primaries and multiples. In: 73rd SEG annual international meeting. Expanded. pp 1035–1038

  • Ikelle Luc T (1999) Using even terms of the scattering series for deghosting and multiple attenuation of ocean-bottom cable data. Geophysics 64(2):579–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikelle LT (2006) A construct of internal multiples form surface data only: the concept of virtual seismic events. Geophysics 164:383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikelle LT (2009) Scattering diagrams in seismic imaging: more insights into the construction of virtual events and internal multiples. J Appl Geophys 67:150–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowicz H (1998) Wave equation prediction and removal of interbed multiples. In: 61st SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 1527–1530

  • Li C, Huang J, Li Z, Yu H, Wang R (2019) Least-squares migration with primary- and multiple-guided weighting matrices. Geophysics 84(3):S171–S185. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0038.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Li Z, Li Q, Li Q, Sun M, Hu P, Li L (2020) Least-squares reverse time migration of multiples in visco-acoustic media. Geophysics 85(5):S285–S297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Liu Y (2018) Plane-wave domain least-squares reverse time migration with free-surface multiples. Geophysics 83(6):S477–S487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Xu C, ** D, He R, Sun H, Zheng R (2011a) Reverse time migration of multiples. In: 81st SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 3326–3331

  • Liu Y, Xu C, ** D, He R, Sun H, Zheng R (2011b) Reverse time migration of multiples for subsalt imaging. Geophysics 76(5):WB209–WB216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Liu X, Osen A, Shao Y, Hu H, Zheng Y (2016) Least-squares reverse time migration using controlled-order multiple reflections. Geophysics 81(5):S347–S357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Liu Y, Khan M (2018) Fast least-squares reverse time migration of VSP free-surface multiples with dynamic phase-encoding schemes. Geophysics 83(4):S321–S332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMechan G (1983) Migration by extrapolation of time-dependent boundary values. Geophys Prospect 31:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson KH (1996) The relationship between seattering theory and the primaries and multiples of refiection seismic data. J Seismi Explor 5(1):63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson KH (1997) An inverses scattering series method for attenuating elastic multiples from multicomponent land ocean bottom seismic data. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. EOAS, British Columbia Univ BC, Canada

  • Nemeth T, Wu C, Schuster GT (1999) Least-squares migration of incomplete reflection data. Geophysics 64(1):208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nocedal J (1980) Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage. Math Comput 35:773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pica A, Delmas L (2008) Wave equation based internal multiple modeling in 3D. In: 78th SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 2476–2480

  • Qu Y, Huang C, Li LC, Z, (2021) Full-path compensated least-squares reverse time migration of joint primaries and different-order multiples for deep-marine environment. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 59(8):7109–7121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez AC, Weglein AB (2005) An inverse scattering internal multiple elimination method: beyond attenuation, a new algorithm, and initial tests. In: 75th SEG annual international meeting, expanded. pp 2115–2118

  • Tarantola A (1984) Linearized inversion of seismic reflection data*. Geophys Prospect 32(6):998–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu N, Herrmann FJ (2015) Fast imaging with surface-related multiples by sparse inversion. Geophys J Int 201(1):304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Neut J, Wapenaar K (2016) Adaptive overburden elimination with the multidimensional marchenko equation. Geophysics 81(5):T265–T284. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0024.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuur DJ, Berkhout AJ (2005) Removal of internal multiples with the common- focus-point (CFP) approach: part 2—Application strategies and data examples. Geophysics 70(3):V61-72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weglein AB (1999) Multiple attenuation: an overview of recent advances and the road ahead. Lead Edge 18(1):40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weglein AB, Gasparotto EA, Carvalho PM, Stolt RH (1997) An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data. Geophysics 62(6):1975–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong M, Biondi B, Ronen S (2015) Imaging with primaries and free-surface multiples by joint least-squares reverse time migration. Geophysics 80(6):S223–S235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan S, Wang S, Yuan F, Liu Y (2018) The influence of errors in the source wavelet on inversion-based surface-related multiple attenuation. Geophys Prospect 66:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Schuster GT (2014) Least-squares reverse time migration of multiples. Geophysics 79(1):S11–S21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42130805, No. 42074154, No. 42004106,), the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (No. YDZJ202101ZYTS020), the Lift Project for Young Science and Technology Talents of Jilin Province (No. QT202116).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liguo Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Edited by Prof. Sanyi Yuan (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Michał Malinowski (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Appendix

Appendix

In the ISS method, the third term of Eq. 17 is processed in the frequency domain to satisfy the condition \(z_{1} < z_{2} ,z_{3} < z_{2}\). Assuming that the actual medium varies only in depth, the internal multiple attenuation in a 1D Earth can be expressed as:

$$b_{1} (k) = D(w)$$
$$b_{3} (k) = \int_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {dz_{1} e^{{{\text{ikz}}_{1} }} b_{1} (z_{1} )} \int_{ - \infty }^{{z_{1} - \varepsilon_{2} }} {dz_{2} } e^{{ - {\text{ikz}}_{2} }} b_{1} (z_{2} )\int_{{z_{2} + \varepsilon_{1} }}^{\infty } {dz_{3} e^{{{\text{ikz}}_{3} }} b_{1} (z_{3} )}$$
$$b_{3} (t) = {\text{FFT}}^{ - 1} [b_{3} (k)],$$

where \(k = 2w/c_{0}\) is the vertical wavenumber and \(\varepsilon\) is the parameter that is small and positive to assure \(z_{1} < z_{2} ,z_{3} < z_{2}\). This equation shows that the first-order multiple is computed by combining three sets of data using convolution and cross-correlation in the wavenumber domain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, R., Han, L., Zhang, P. et al. Internal multiple prediction using high-order born modeling for LSRTM. Acta Geophys. 70, 1491–1505 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00830-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00830-7

Keywords

Navigation