Abstract
This paper provides initial evidence on executive pay in small private limited liability firms in Germany. More than 80% of the firms report fewer than 50 employees. We find that executive pay increases with firm size and variable pay. We also find weak evidence that executive pay is lower in the presence of female executives, and increases with profitability. Surprisingly, variable pay is related in an inverted U-shape to total salary. Significant executive ownership (> 25%) is associated with higher compensation. Executive pay varies widely by region. Some, but not all results are in line with efficient contracting theory. In sum, we provide novel evidence on executive pay in small private firms outside the U.S.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11573-023-01150-y/MediaObjects/11573_2023_1150_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11573-023-01150-y/MediaObjects/11573_2023_1150_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Notes
Other studies on private firms have conducted surveys on larger U.S. entities controlled by private equity investors (Bengtsson and Hand 2011; Jackson 2013; Cronqvist and Fahlenbrach 2013). Wasserman (2006) analyzed a proprietary dataset of U.S. private technology firms provided by three consulting and audit firms. Ke et al. (1999) and Ke (2001) investigated chief executive officer (CEO) compensation with private U.S. insurance firms.
In our sample, 83% of the firms have fewer than 50 employees and median sales are €1.9 million. Cole and Mehran (2016) report mean sales of $1.9 million for the NSSBF sample in 2003. In Banghøj et al. (2010), mean sales were $169 million; in Watson et al. (1994) £12.3 million; in Conyon and Nicolitsas (1998), median sales amounted to £13.3 million. Gallego and Larrain (2012) reported median total assets of $840 million. Sample firms in Brunello et al. (2001) have 1,350 employees on average.
It also seems reasonable to assume that total pay is generally higher in more complex firms because it takes more effort to steer a more complex firm, generating higher opportunity costs for which the manager needs to be compensated.
Dafne is a database by Bureau van Dijk. It contains general, corporate governance, and financial accounting data of German publicly listed and private firms with up to ten years of history. It can be used to research individual companies or to search for companies with specific attributes.
Eight responses (4%) were sent by a non-managing shareholder. The remaining responses were from people who were neither an executive nor a shareholder.
To check how representative our sample is, we compared it to a “full Dafne sample,” which we assumed to reflect the population of German private firms. The “full Dafne sample” consists of all German, solvent, private limited liability companies with fewer than 500 employees and less than €50 million in sales (excluding firms from the finance sector) that are available in the Dafne database.
For each of the 16 German federal states, we determined the share of firms that are headquartered there – within the sample of our study as well as within the “full Dafne sample”. Then, we calculated the correlation of these shares per federal state between the two samples. The correlation with respect to industry distribution is calculated in a similar way.
In the survey, we ask for the share of fixed pay of the executive’s total compensation. The share of variable pay is 100% minus the share of fixed pay.
The rule of thumb is that this assumption usually causes only problems for small sample sizes with fewer than 50 observations. Even with the model in (1), we have 112 observations.
The literature on public firms suggests that pay-for-performance sensitivity increases with CEO shareholdings (e.g., Ntim et al. 2019). Even though variable pay is different to pay-for-performance sensitivity, our finding is not consistent with this evidence.
We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for raising this point.
References
Adams R, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94(2):291–309
Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2010) Comparative and international corporate governance. Acad Manag Ann 4(1):485–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495525
Banghøj J, Gabrielsen G, Petersen C, Plenborg T (2010) Determinants of executive compensation in privately held firms. Accounting and Finance 50(3):481–510
Bar-Yosef S, Augusta CD, Prencipe A (2019) Accounting research on private firms: State of the art and future directions. International Journal of Accounting 54(2):1–75. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406019500070
Bebchuk LA, Fried J (2006) Pay without performance: Overview of the issues. Acad Manag Perspect 20(1):5–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.19873407
Beck D, Friedl G, Schäfer P (2020) Executive compensation in Germany. Journal of Business Economics 90:787–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00978-y
Bengtsson O, Hand JRM (2011) CEO compensation in venture-backed firms. J Bus Ventur 26(4):391–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.11.001
Bonacchi M (2019) Organizational structure and earnings quality of private and public firms. Rev Acc Stud 24(3):1066–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09495-y
Brunello G, Graziano C, Parigi B (2001) Executive compensation and firm performance in Italy. Int J Ind Organ 19(1–2):133–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00026-0
Carter ME, Franco F, Gine M (2017) Executive gender pay gaps: The roles of female risk aversion and board representation. Contemp Account Res 34(2):1232–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12286
Cieślak K (2018) Agency conflicts, executive compensation regulations and CEO pay-performance sensitivity: Evidence from Sweden. J Manage Governance 22(3):535–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9410-3
Cole RA, Mehran H (2016) What do we know about executive compensation at small privately held firms? Small Bus Econ 46(2):215–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9689-2
Conyon MJ, Nicolitsas D (1998) Does the market for top executives work? CEO pay and turnover in small UK Companies. Small Bus Eco. 11(2):145–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007908520404
Croci E, Gonenc H, Ozkan N (2012) CEO compensation, family control, and institutional investors in continental Europe. J Bank Finance 36(12):3318–3335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.017
Cronqvist H, Fahlenbrach R (2013) CEO contract design: How do strong principals do it? J Financ Econ 108(3):659–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.013
Edmans A, Gabaix X, Jenter D (2017) Executive compensation: A survey of theory and evidence. In: Hermalin BE (ed) The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Elmagrhi MH, Ntim CG, Wang Y, Abdou H, Zalata A (2020) Corporate governance disclosure index-executive pay nexus: the moderating effect of governance mechanisms. Eur Manag Rev 17(1):121–152
Ernst and Young, 2021. Frauen in Führungspositionen im deutschen Mittelstand, Spring 2021.
Fahlenbrach R (2009) Shareholder rights, boards, and CEO compensation. Review of Finance 13(1):81–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfn011
Farrell K, Winters D (2008) An analysis of executive compensation in small businesses. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 12(3):1–21
Gallego F, Larrain B (2012) CEO compensation and large shareholders; Evidence from emerging markets. J Comp Econ 40(4):621–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.02.003
Gao H, Li K (2015) A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms. J Corp Finan 35:370–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.005
Gassen J, Schwedler K (2010) The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement concepts: Evidence from an online survey of professional investors and their advisors. European Accounting Review 19(3):495–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2010.496548
Gomez-Mejia L, Wiseman RM, Dykes BJ (2005) Agency problems in diverse contexts: a global perspective. J Manage Stud 42(7):1507–1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00554.x
Holmström B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J Econ 10:74–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
Homroy S, Mukherjee S (2021) The role of employer learning and regulatory interventions in mitigating executive gender pay gap. J Corp Finan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101857
Hope O-K, Vyas D (2017) Private company finance and financial reporting. Account Bus Res 47(5):506–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2017.1303963
Jackson R (2013) Private equity and executive compensation. UCLA Law Rev 60(3):638–677
Janakiraman S, Radhakrishnan S, Tsang A (2010) Institutional investors, managerial ownership, and executive compensation. J Acc Audit Financ 25(4):673–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X1002500409
Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J Polit Econ 98(2):225–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/261677
Ke B (2001) Taxes as a determinant of managerial compensation in privately held insurance companies. Account Rev 76(4):655–674. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2001.76.4.655
Ke B, Petroni K, Safieddine A (1999) Ownership concentration and sensitivity of executive pay to accounting performance measures: Evidence from publicly and privately-held insurance companies. J Account Econ 28(2):185–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00021-X
Kulich C, Trojanowski G, Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Renneboog L-D (2011) Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration. Strateg Manag J 32(3):301–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.878
Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review 90(5):1346–1361. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1346
Lin YF (2005) Corporate governance, leadership structure and CEO compensation: Evidence from Taiwan. Corp Gov: Int Rev 13(6):824–835
Michiels A, Voordeckers W, Lybaert N, Steijvers T (2012) CEO compensation in private family firms. Fam Bus Rev 26(2):140–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512454731
Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1988) Management ownership and market valuation. J Financ Econ 20:293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7
Murphy K (1999) Executive compensation. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics. Elsevier
Ntim CG, Lindop S, Osei KA, Thomas DA (2015) Executive compensation, corporate governance and corporate performance: A simultaneous equation approach. Manag Decis Econ 36(12):67–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2653
Ntim CG, Lindop S, Thomas DA, Abdou H, Opong KK (2019) Executive pay and performance: The moderating effect of CEO power and governance structure. Int J Human Res Manag 30(6):921–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1282532
Perkins SJ, Hendry C (2005) Ordering top pay: interpreting the signals. J Manage Stud 42(7):1443–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00550.x
Sarhan AA, Ntim CG, Al-Najjar B (2019) Board diversity, corporate governance, corporate performance and executive pay. Int J Financ Econ 24(2):761–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1690
Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN (2003) Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Res High Educ 44(4):409–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870
Uhlaner L, Wright M, Huse M (2007) Private firms and corporate governance: An integrated economic and management perspective. Small Bus Econ 29(3):225–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9032-z
Wasserman N (2006) Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Acad Manag J 49(5):960–976. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798177
Watson R, Storey DJ, Wynarczyk P, Keasey K, Short H (1994) The remuneration of non-owner managers in small and medium-sized UK enterprises. J Manage Stud 31(4):553–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00630.x
Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd edit). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JB contributed to the study conception and design. MK prepared the material and collected the data. AG mainly performed the analysis, partly also MK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JB and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bigus, J., Grahn, A. & Karakaya, M. Determinants of executive pay in small private firms–initial evidence from Germany. J Bus Econ 94, 41–73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01150-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01150-y