Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore how youth’s engineering identity has changed in the process of productive struggle in Making activities in the Midwestern U.S in a summer program. The researchers conducted focus-group interviews, and also administered an Engineering Identity survey as well as the Draw an Engineer Test to the students at two time points (pre/post). Additionally, the researchers observed the level of youths’ interaction by video-recording each session, conducted debriefing sessions, and examined youth artifacts. The findings revealed two themes. The first theme is that the boys and girls who were engaged in the process of productive struggle showed changes in their identity with engineering. The second theme is that the boys and girls who weren’t fully engaged in the process of productive struggle (i.e., demonstrated unproductive struggle) showed little or no change in their identity with engineering. This study showed that regardless of whether the students went through the process of productive struggle or not, they developed neutral or positive attitudes toward engineering. This finding also added to the existing literature on that productive struggle in Making activities has potential to enhance these youth’ learning of engineering knowledge and engineering tools.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, PSH, upon reasonable request.
References
Baker, K., Jessup, N. A., Jacobs, V. R., Empson, S. B., & Case, J. (2020). Productive struggle in action. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK, -12(5), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2019.0060. 113.
Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380.
Brownell, W. A., & Sims, V. M. (1946). The nature of understanding. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Forty-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part I. The measurement of understanding (pp. 27–43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2018). A longitudinal study of equity-oriented STEM-rich making among youth from historically marginalized communities. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 761–800. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218758668.
Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2020). Beyond equity as inclusion: A framework of rightful presence for guiding justice-oriented studies in teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20927363. https://doi-org.auth.lib.niu.edu/.
Calabrese Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Greenberg, D. (2017). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 1–44.
Capobianco, B. M. (2006). Undergraduate women engineering their professional identities. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2-1.10.
Capobianco, B. M., French, B. F., & Diefes-Du, H. A. (2012). Engineering identity development among pre-adolescent learners. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01125.x.
Carlone, H. B. (2017). Disciplinary identity as analytic construct and design goal: Making learning sciences matter. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336026.
Carlone, H. B., Huffling, L. D., Tomasek, T., Hegedus, T. A., Matthews, C. E., Allen, M. H., & Ash, M. C. (2015). Unthinkable’Selves: Identity boundary work in a summer field ecology enrichment program for diverse youth. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1524–1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1033776.
Collins, S. (2004). Framing the complexity of a participatory democracy in a public primary classroom. The Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 2(2), 4–34.
Collins, S., & Clarke, A. (2008). Activity frames and complexity thinking: Honoring both public and personal agendas in an emergent curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.002.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D C: Heath.
Dewey, J. (1926). Democracy and education. London: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York: Row, Peterson & Company.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2017). The importance of struggle. Educational Leadership, 74(8), 85–86.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322.
Godhe, A. L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 317–328.
Gossen, D., Hammack, R., & Utley, J. (2021). Impact of a summer camp on elementary students’ understanding and awareness of engineering careers and attitudes toward engineering. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 25(4), 23–41.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545.
Granberg, C. (2016). Discovering and addressing errors during mathematics problem-solving—A productive struggle? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.02.002.
Hartung, P. J., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 385–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.006.
Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. In G. B. Saxe & M. Gearhart (Eds.), Children’s mathematics (pp. 55–70). California: Jossey-Bass.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 371–404.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004012.
Hsu, P. S., Lee, E. M., Ginting, S., Smith, T. J., & Kraft, C. (2019). A case study exploring non-dominant youth’s attitudes toward science through Making and scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(suppl), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09997-w
Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38, 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x.
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457.
Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. M. (June, 2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate student’s ideas about engineers and engineering Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
Lachapelle, C. P., & Brennan, R. T. (2018). An instrument for examining elementary students’ engineering interests and attitudes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 6(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.428171.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California: Sage Publications.
Maltese, A. V., Simpson, A., & Anderson, A. (2018). Failing to learn: The impact of failures during making activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.003.
Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4.
Martin, L., & Dixon, C. (2013, June). Youth conceptions of making and the Maker Movement. In Interaction Design and Children Conference, New York.
Martin, L., Dixon, C., & Betser, S. (2018). Iterative design toward equity: Youth repertoires of practice in a high school maker space. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1436997.
Mhakure, D., & Sayster, A. (2020). Students’ productive struggles in mathematics learning. In K. Tirri & A. Toom (Eds.), Pedagogy in basic and higher education- Current developments and challenges. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90802.
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77.
Pattison, S., Gontan, I., Ramos-Montañez, S., Shagott, T., Francisco, M., & Dierking, L. (2020). The identity-frame model: A framework to describe situated identity negotiation for adolescent youth participating in an informal engineering education program. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(4–5), 550–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1770762.
Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3002_5.
Rahm, J., & Moore, J. C. (2016). A case study of long-term engagement and identity‐in‐practice: Insights into the STEM pathways of four underrepresented youths. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 768–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21268.
Reaney, M. J. (2019). The place of play in education. New York: Routledge.
Ryu, M. (2015). An examination of Melody’s identities, contexts, and learning in a US science classroom: Implications for science education of asian transnational students. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 1(1), 1–30.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. California: Sage Publications.
Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–5223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4.
Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u.
Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). The role of play in development. In M. Cole (Ed.), Mind in society (pp. 92–104). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Warshauer, H. K. (2015). Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 18, 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3.
Weber, N., Duncan, D., Dyehouse, M., Strobel, J., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2011). The development of a systematic coding system for elementary students’ drawings of engineers. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1030.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. England: Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. California: Sage Publications.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Rockford Public School District in Illinois under Grant R2202502. The author would also like to thank Sharif Shahadat, Aniqa Tahsin, Cassandra Sendra, and Jacob Martinez for their assistance in the program development.
Funding
This work was supported by Rockford Public School District (Grant no.: R2202502).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
See Appendix Table 3
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hsu, PS., Lee, E.M. & Smith, T.J. Exploring non-dominant youths’ engineering identity through productive struggle in a making summer program. Education Tech Research Dev 72, 83–107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10299-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10299-w