Abstract
As the main form of the new urbanization strategy, urban agglomeration promotes inter-regional economic development, population flow, and industrial cooperation. It is not only an important platform for the country to participate in international competition, but also an important carrier to explore the multiple influencing factors of urbanization. Based on the Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei urban agglomeration, the temporal and spatial characteristics of its evolution from 1990 to 2020 are analyzed by using the models of urban evolution and industrial transfer. The results show that at the level of urban land use evolution intensity, Bei**g > Tian** > Hebei, and the evolution of urban land use showed an obvious pattern of concentration of resources in central cities (districts) and weak development in sub-central cities (counties). The overall level of urban sprawl showed a downward trend, and only 0.50% of districts and counties were in the stage of high sprawl. Before 2010, the urban sprawl of Bei**g, Tangshan, and southern Hebei province remained at a high level, and after 2010, the urban sprawl of central Hebei province remained at a high level. In terms of comprehensive development, the index of cities decreased, including Bei**g, Tian**, and Tangshan, while the index of cities increased including Shijiazhuang, Handan, ** countries.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-20027-1/MediaObjects/11356_2022_20027_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-20027-1/MediaObjects/11356_2022_20027_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-20027-1/MediaObjects/11356_2022_20027_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-20027-1/MediaObjects/11356_2022_20027_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-20027-1/MediaObjects/11356_2022_20027_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Bruneckiene J, Činčikaitė R, Kilijonienė A (2012) The specifics of measurement the urban competitiveness at the national and international level. Géocarrefour 23:45–54
Buckley RM, Kallergis A (2019) The sustainable development goal for urban sanitation: Africa’s statistical tragedy continues? J Urban Health 96:123–130
Chen L, Xu L, Yang Z (2017) Accounting carbon emission changes under regional industrial transfer in an urban agglomeration in China’s Pearl River Delta. J Clean Prod 167:110–119
Dempsey N, Bramley G, Power S, Brown C (2011) The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Sustain Dev 19:289–300
Fang C, Wang Y, Fang J (2015) A comprehensive assessment of urban vulnerability and its spatial differentiation in China. J Geog Sci 26:153–170
Gennaio M-P, Hersperger AM, Bürgi M (2009) Containing urban sprawl—evaluating effectiveness of urban growth boundaries set by the Swiss Land Use Plan. Land Use Policy 26:224–232
Gong J, Chen W, Liu Y, Wang J (2014) The intensity change of urban development land: implications for the city master plan of Guangzhou, China. Land Use Policy 40:91–100
Gu C (2019) Urbanization: processes and driving forces. Sci China Earth Sci 62:1351–1360
Krähmer K (2020) Are green cities sustainable? A degrowth critique of sustainable urban development in Copenhagen. Eur Plan Stud 29:1272–1289
Li X, Li C, Parriaux A, Wu W, Li H, Sun L, Liu C (2016) Multiple resources and their sustainable development in urban underground space. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 55:59–66
Lu N, Wei H, Fan W, Xu Z, Wang X, **ng K, Dong X, Viglia S, Ulgiati S (2018) Multiple influences of land transfer in the integration of Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei region in China. Ecol Ind 90:101–111
Martinat S, Dvorak P, Frantal B, Klusacek P, Kunc J, Navratil J, Osman R, Tureckova K, Reed M (2016) Sustainable urban development in a city affected by heavy industry and mining? Case study of brownfields in Karvina, Czech Republic. J Clean Prod 118:78–87
McCormick K, Anderberg S, Coenen L, Neij L (2013) Advancing sustainable urban transformation. J Clean Prod 50:1–11
Parjanen S, Hyypiä M, Martikainen SJ, Hennala L (2018) Elements of socially sustainable innovation processes in Finnish urban development. Sustain Dev 27:281–288
Prakash M, Ramage S, Kavvada A, Goodman S (2020) Open earth observations for sustainable urban development. Remote Sens 12:1646
Shao Z, Wu W, Li D (2021) Spatio-temporal-spectral observation model for urban remote sensing. Geo-Spatial Information Science 24:372–386
Shen L, Shuai C, Jiao L, Tan Y, Song X (2017) Dynamic sustainability performance during urbanization process between BRICS countries. Habitat Int 60:19–33
Silva Neiva S, Prasath RA, Amorim WS, Andrade Lima M, Barbosa SB, Ribeiro JMP, Ceci F, Schneider J, Deggau AB, Andrade Guerra JBSO (2021) Sustainable urban development: can the balanced scorecard contribute to the strategic management of sustainable cities? Sustain Dev 29:1155–1172
Tan F, Lu Z (2018) The impact of urban compactness on urban sustainable development in China: the case of Nan**g. Sustain Dev 27:270–280
Tang B, Hu Y, Li H, Yang D, Liu J (2015) Research on comprehensive carrying capacity of Bei**g–Tian**–Hebei region based on state-space method. Nat Hazards 84:113–128
Tian Y, Jiang G, Zhou D, Ding K, Su S, Zhou T, Chen D (2019) Regional industrial transfer in the **g**ji urban agglomeration, China: an analysis based on a new “transferring area-undertaking area-dynamic process” model. J Clean Prod 235:751–766
Tu W, Zhang Y, Li Q, Mai K, Cao J (2021) Scale effect on fusing remote sensing and human sensing to portray urban functions. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 18:38–42
Wang Y (2022) Development characteristics, influencing mechanism and co** strategies of resource-based cities in develo** countries: a case study of urban agglomeration in Northeast China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29:25336–25348
Wang Y, Cao H (2022) Study on ecological adaptability construction characteristics of residential buildings in Kangba area, Tibet, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29:573–583
Zhao W, Gu C, Tang Y (2017) Urbanization and rural development in the Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei metropolitan region: coupling-degree model. J Urban Plann Dev 143:4016028.1
Zhao Z, Bai Y, Wang G, Chen J, Yu J, Liu W (2018) Land eco-efficiency for new-type urbanization in the Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei Region. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:19–26
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71603142) and Shandong Province Social Science Planning Research Project (19CXSXJ05).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yufeng Wang: writing original draft, conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, validation, formal analysis, visualization, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, and data curation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y. Population-land urbanization and comprehensive development evaluation of the Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei urban agglomeration. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 59862–59871 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20027-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20027-1