Abstract
This study explores how citizens develop a sense of commonality by investigating the motivations that underlie their environmental activism. Our theoretical framework is based on engagement theory, from which we derive three fundamental components (i.e. cognitive, affective, and behavioural). Data derived from explorative fieldwork and in-depth interviews with engaged citizens and public servants provide the empirical grounding. Set in Brussels, Belgium, we focus on two cases that involve green spaces earmarked for future development and have been contested by citizens who have expressed various ecological and political demands. We find that the cognitive, affective, and behavioural dimensions are fundamental to understand environmental activism. In addition, we show that personal values are relational in nature and that indignation and anger are identified as pivotal for collective action. Also internal/external efficacy is important to understand citizens’ engagement. Citizens’ motivational components exhibit a robust form of entanglement that highlights a more complex mode of city-making, a finding that may inform environmental policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data were collected in compliance with KU Leuven ethics regulation.
Notes
Interviewees from Friche Josaphat and Marais Wiels are indicated as FJ_X and MW_X, respectively.
References
Anbleyth-Evans, J., Ñanculef-Huaiquinao, J., Coñuecar-Llancapani, Y., Araos Leiva, F., Riquelme Maulén, W., & Raymond, C. (2023). Mapuche Az-Mapu and Nature’s contribution to people: Eudemonic values for living well. Environmental Values, 32(3), 291–314.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220.
Blaikie, N. (2009). Designing Social Research. Polity.
Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2018). Measuring values in environmental research: A test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 564.
Chan, K. M., et al. (2016). Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(6), 1462–1465.
Chavis, D. M., & Wadersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81.
Datastore Brussels. (2023). UrbIS-Adm download retrieved from https://datastore.brussels/web/urbis-download.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nauta, A. (2009). Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for Job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 913–926.
de Groot, W. T., Bonaiuto, M., Dedeurwaerdere, T., Knippenberg, L. W. J. (2015). A Theory of Committed Action for Nature: Key outcomes of the BIOMAT project.
De Laet, M., Driessen, A., & Vogel, E. (2021). Thinking with attachments: Appreciating a generative analytic. Social Studies of Science, 51(6), 799–819.
Finkel, S. E., & Muller, E. N. (1998). Rational choice and the dynamics of collective political action: Evaluating alternative models with panel data. American Political Science Review, 92, 37–49.
Fornara, F., et al. (2020). The extended Value-Belief-Norm theory predicts committed action for nature and biodiversity in Europe. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106338.
Ghijselinck, D. (2023). Relational values of nature: Outgrowing anthropocentrism by enriching human-nature relationships? Journal for Nature Conservation, 73, 126386.
Gulliver, R. E., Pittaway, C., Fielding, K. S. & Louis, W.R. (2023). Resources That Help Sustain Environmental Volunteer Activist Leaders. Voluntas.
Gurr, T. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton University Press.
Jamison, A. (2010). Climate Change Knowledge and Social Movement Theory. Wires Climate Change, 1(6), 811–823.
Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 285–303.
Klain, S. C., Olmsted, P., Chan, K. M., & Satterfield, T. (2017). Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0183962.
Klar, M., & Kasser, T. (2009). Some benefits of being an activist: Measuring activism and its role in psychological wellbeing. Political Psychology, 30, 755–777.
Knippenberg, L., De Groot, W. T., Van Den Born, R. J., Knights, P., & Muraca, B. (2018). Relational value, partnership, eudaimonia: A review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 39–45.
Knops, L., & Petit, G. (2022). Indignation as affective transformation: An affect-theoretical approach to the belgian yellow vest movement. Mobilization., 27(2), 169–192.
Kronenberg, J., et al. (2020). Environmental justice in the context of urban green space availability, accessibility, and attractiveness in postsocialist cities. Cities, 106, 102862.
Kruglanski, A. W., Jasko, K., Chernikova, M., Dugas, M., & Webber, D. (2017). To the fringe and back: Violent extremism and the psychology of deviance. American Psychology, 72, 217–230.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459.
Lubell, M. (2002). Environmental activism as collective action. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 431–454.
Marshall, N. A., Thiault, L., Beeden, A., Beeden, R., Benham, C., Curnock, M. I., Diedrich, A., Gurney, G. G., Jones, L., Marshall, P. A., Nakamura, N., & Pert, P. (2019). Our environmental value orientations influence how we respond to climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 938.
Martiskainen, M., Axon, S., Sovacool, B. K., Sareen, S., Furszyfer Del Rio, D., & Axon, K. (2020). Contextualizing climate justice activism: Knowledge, emotions, motivations, and actions among climate strikers in six cities. Global Environmental Change, 65, 102180.
Mattijssen, T. J. M., et al. (2020). Relational values of nature: Leverage points for nature policy in Europe. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 402–410.
McFarlane, B. L., & Hunt, L. M. (2006). Environmental activism in the forest sector: Social psychological, social-cultural, and contextual effects. Environment and Behavior, 38(2), 266–285.
Meetiyagoda, L., et al. (2023). Collaborative place-making: Some theoretical perspectives on sense of place as motivation for participation. Journal of Urban Culture Research, 27, 89–103.
Neuteleers, S. (2020). A fresh look at ’relational’ values in nature: Distinctions derived from the debate on meaningfulness in life. Environmental Values, 29(4), 461–479.
Nielsen, K. S., Brick, C., Hofmann, W., Joanes, T., Lange, F., & Gwozdz, W. (2022). The motivation-impact gap in pro-environmental clothing consumption. Nature Sustainability, 5(8), 665–668.
OpenStreetMap Contributors. (2023). Land use, waterways and roads in Brussels retrieved from https://download.geofabrik.de/europe/belgium.html.
Putnam (in collab. with Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R. Y.)., R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11.
Steg, L., De Groot, J. I. M., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W., & Siero, F. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources, 24(4), 349–367.
Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van Der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 163–192.
Stokes, J. (2003). How to do media and cultural studies. CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Snelgar, R., & Furnham, A. (2010). Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: A path analytic investigation of their determinants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 139–145.
Tindall, D. B. (2002). Social networks, identification and participation in an environmental movement: Low-medium cost activism within the British Columbia wilderness preservation movement. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 39(4), 413–452.
Wallis, H., & Loy, L. S. (2021). What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study on the Fridays For Future movement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101581.
Weenink, E., & Bridgman, T. (2017). Taking subjectivity and reflexivity seriously: Implications of social constructionism for researching volunteer motivation. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 90–109.
Zihnioğlu, Ö. (2019). The prospects of civic alliance: New civic activists acting together with civil society organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(2), 289–299.
Acknowledgements
The research for this paper was financially supported by patronage funding provided to KU Leuven for carrying out fundamental scientific research into urban processes and change. In develo** the ideas presented here, the authors have received helpful input from Maarten Loopmans and Valerie Dewaelheyns. We also thank the members of Marais Wiels, Friche Josaphat, and Tuiniersforum Des Jardiniers who were generous with their time and knowledge and without whom this research would not be possible. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors, and any remaining errors are ours.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Kato Van Speybroeck. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Kato Van Speybroeck, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Speybroeck, K., Steen, T. & Derudder, B. Values, Emotions, and Knowledge in the Motivations Underlying Environmental Activism: The Case of Contested Green Spaces in Brussels. Voluntas (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00656-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00656-5