Abstract
Volunteering by immigrants provides dual a contribution: To civil society, immigrant volunteers can add an untapped human and social capital, social diversity and multiculturalism; to the immigrant, volunteering offers cultural, economic, and social benefits in their integration efforts. Yet, we need a more multidimensional probing of the term ‘immigrant volunteering’, because the multiplicity of migration generations requires questioning who is an ‘immigrant’, and formal volunteering does not capture the full array of unpaid work done by immigrants, suggesting the need to consider informal volunteering. By comparing formal and informal volunteering behavior of three immigrant groups (second-generation, generation 1.5, first-generation), we reflect on several distinctions and overlooked dimensions that might better explain whether and why immigrants withhold their volunteering. Using the 2014 wave of the German Survey on Volunteering, our findings indicate variation on formal and informal volunteering between the migration groups: differences are greater in formal volunteering, but smaller when we consider informal volunteering. Citizenship status and language proficiency also play a role. Implications of these findings are discussed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11266-023-00563-1/MediaObjects/11266_2023_563_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Second generation individuals differ from native-born, defined as those who were born in the destination country to non-immigrant parents.
Others combine second-generation and generation 1.5 into a single ‘second-generation’ category (Artero & Ambrosini, 2022).
The GSV survey interviews started in German, but if interviewers noted difficulties, the respondents were offered the choice to conduct the interview in a different language. A native speaker of the chosen language would then call the respondent back to conduct the interview. Overall, 2800 respondents were offered to have the interview conducted in a different language, of which 712 were completed in a language other than German (Simonson et al., 2016). Only 2 native-born individuals and 9 second-generation immigrants took the survey in a language other than German; we removed those from the models.
Despite the benefits of a fairly large, representative sample, relying on secondary, cross-sectional data limits our choice of variables and the opportunity to draw causal relations.
Previous research has used either aggregated or disaggregated measures of informal volunteering (e.g., Wang et al., 2017). Our data indicates that 31% of respondents are engaged in childcare, 18% in care services, and 40% in assistance services. Given our modeling approach (bivariate probit), we use the aggregated measure.
With the second-generation immigrant variable, all respondents that had one or two parents born in a country different from Germany categorized as second-generation immigrant. The survey specifically asked “Were both of your parents born in Germany” with response options (1) yes, both, (2) Yes, but only your mother, (3) yes, but only your father, (4) no, none of them (Schmiade et al., 2014).
This is an aggregation of the 1997 version of the international standard classification of education which includes seven distinct categories: pre-primary education; primary education; lower secondary education; upper secondary education; post-secondary non-tertiary education; first stage of tertiary education; second stage of tertiary education. Categories 1–5 are coded 0, categories 6–7 are coded 1.
These values are the results of a test for the difference in probability between those in each category compared to those in the reference category (when all other variables are held constant at their means).
References
Alba, R. (2005). Bright versus blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20–49.
Alba, R., & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31(4), 826–874.
Ambrosini, M., & Artero, M. (2022). Immigrant volunteering: A form of citizenship from below. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00454-x
Artero, M., & Ambrosini, M. (2022). Citizenship beyond the normative script: Young immigrants’ volunteering as a practice of ‘citizenship from below.’ Citizenship Studies, 26, 203–220.
Baert, S., & Vujić, S. (2016). Immigrant volunteering: A way out of labour market discrimination? Economics Letters, 146, 95–98.
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.
Benesch, S. (2008). “Generation 1.5” and its discourses of partiality: A critical analysis. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7(3-4), 294–311.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34.
Dean, J. (2022). Informal volunteering, inequality, and illegitimacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 527–544.
Destatis. (2022). Press Release #162: Well over one in four people in Germany had a migrant background in 2021.
Einolf, C. J., Prouteau, L., Nezhina, T., & Ibrayeva, A. R. (2016). Informal, unorganized volunteering. In D. H. Smith, R. A. Stebbins, & J. Grotz (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of volunteering, civic participation, and nonprofit associations (pp. 223–241). Springer.
Finkelstein, M. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2007). Applying theories of institutional hel** to informal volunteering: Motives, role identity, and prosocial personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 101–114.
Gorodzeisky, A., & Leykin, I. (2020). When borders migrate: Reconstructing the category of ‘international migrant.’ Sociology, 54(1), 142–158.
Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Prentice-Hall.
Greenspan, I., Walk, M., & Handy, F. (2018). Immigrant integration through volunteering: The importance of contextual factors. Journal of Social Policy, 47(4), 803–825.
Gundelach, B., Freitag, M., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2010). Making or breaking informal volunteering: Welfare statism and social capital in a sub-national comparative perspective. European Societies, 12(5), 627–652.
Guven, C., Akbulut-Yuksel, M., & Yuksel, M. (2019). Do English skills affect Muslim immigrants’ economic and social integration differentially? Economic Record, 95, 279–300.
Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Pietrantuono, G. (2017). Catalyst or crown: Does naturalization promote the long-term social integration of immigrants? American Political Science Review, 111(2), 256–276.
Handy, F., & Greenspan, I. (2009). Immigrant volunteering: A step** stone to integration? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(6), 956–982.
Helms, S., & McKenzie, T. (2014). Gender differences in formal and informal volunteering in Germany. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 887–904.
Hertner, I. (2022). Germany as ‘a country of integration’? The CDU/CSU’s policies and discourses on immigration during Angela Merkel’s Chancellorship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2), 461–481.
Hustinx, L., Grubb, A., Rameder, P., & Shachar, Y. I. (2022). Inequality in volunteering: Building a new research front. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33, 1–17.
Ishizawa, H. (2015). Civic participation through volunteerism among youth across immigrant generations. Sociological Perspectives, 58, 264–285.
Jacobsen, J., Schieferdecker, D., Gerstorf, D., Hutter, S., & Specht, J. (2022). Long-term Dynamics of voluntary engagement: Differentiating social structural from cohort and period effects. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–11.
Jang, H. S., Wang, L., & Yoshioka, C. F. (2016). The impact of acculturation on informal and formal volunteering of Korean Americans in the United States. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 2(1), 31–47.
Jegermalm, M., & Grassman, E. J. (2013). Links between informal caregiving and volunteering in Sweden: A 17-year perspective. European Journal of Social Work, 16(2), 205–219.
Karakayali, S., & Kleist, O. (2015). EFA-studie: Strukturen und motive der ehrenamtlichen Flüchtlingsarbeit in Deutschland, Berlin. BIM.
Knortz, H. (2008). Diplomatische Tauschgeschäfte:" Gastarbeiter" in der westdeutschen Diplomatie und Beschäftigungspolitik 1953–1973. Böhlau Verlag.
Kosyakova, Y., & Sirries, S. (2017). Large-scale immigration and labour market integration: First lessons from the recent past in Germany. Intereconomics, 52(5), 263–269.
Kvorostianov, N., & Remennick, L. (2017). By hel** others, we helped ourselves: Volunteering and social integration of ex-Soviet immigrants in Israel. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 335–357.
Laubenthal, B. (2019). Refugees welcome? Reforms of German asylum policies between 2013 and 2017 and Germany’s transformation into an immigration country. German Politics, 28(3), 412–425.
Lee, S. H., Johnson, K. J., & Lyu, J. (2018). Volunteering among first-generation Asian ethnic groups residing in California. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 33(4), 369–385.
Lee, Y., & Brudney, J. L. (2012). Participation in formal and informal volunteering: Implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(2), 159–180.
Lichterman, P. (2006). Social capital or group style? Rescuing Tocqueville’s insights on civic engagement. Theory and Society, 35(5/6), 529–563.
Lin, M., Lucas, H. C., & Shmueli, G. (2011). Too big to fail: Larger samples and false discoveries. SSRN.
Marek, S. (2019). Refugees in Germany: Amongst culture of welcome and xenophobia. International Journal of Interreligious and Intercultural Studies, 2(2), 68–74.
McAndrew, S., & Voas, D. (2014). Immigrant generation, religiosity and civic engagement in Britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(1), 99–119.
Meyer, M., & Rameder, P. (2021). Who is in charge? Social inequality in different fields of volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33, 18–32.
Piatak, J., Dietz, N., & McKeever, B. (2018). Bridging or deepening the digital divide: Influence of household internet access on formal and informal volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(S2), 123S-150S.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. University of California Press.
Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants among post-1965 immigrant youth. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74–98.
Ramaekers, M. J. M., Verbakel, E., & Kraaykamp, G. (2021). Informal volunteering and socialization effects: Examining modelling and encouragement by parents and partner. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33, 347–361.
Ramakrishnan, S. K., & Baldassare, M. (2004). The ties that bind: Changing demographics and civic engagement in California. Public Policy Institute of CA.
Remennick, L., & Prashizky, A. (2019). Generation 1.5 of Russian Israelis: Integrated but distinct. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies, 18(3), 263–281.
Ruiz-Sportmann, A. S., & Greenspan, I. (2019). Relational interactions between immigrant and native-born volunteers: Trust-building and integration or suspicion and conflict? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(5), 932–946.
Rumbaut, R. G. (2004). Ages, life stages, and generational cohorts: Decomposing the immigrant first and second generations in the United States. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1160–1205.
Schmiade, N., Müller, D., Kausmann, C., Vogel, C., Ziegelmann, J. P., & Simonson, J. (2014). The German Survey on Volunteering. Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2009, 2004 and 1999. Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen.
Schoeneberg, U. (1985). Participation in ethnic associations: The case of immigrants in West Germany. International Migration Review, 19(3), 416–437.
Simonson, J., Hameister, N., & Vogel, C. (2016). Deutscher Freiwilligensurvey 2014—Kapitel “Daten und Methoden des Deutschen Freiwilligensurveys 2014.” Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen.
Slootjes, J., & Kampen, T. (2017). ‘Is my volunteer job not real work?’ The experiences of migrant women with finding employment through volunteer work. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 1900–1921.
Sundeen, R. A., Garcia, C., & Raskoff, S. A. (2009). Ethnicity, acculturation, and volunteering to organizations: A comparison of African Americans, Asians, Hispanics, and Whites. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(6), 929–955.
Taniguchi, H. (2012). The determinants of formal and informal volunteering: Evidence from the American time use survey. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 920–939.
Van Houdt, F., Suvarierol, S., & Schinkel, W. (2011). Neoliberal communitarian citizenship: Current trends towards ‘earned citizenship’ in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands. International Sociology, 26(3), 408–432.
van der Veer, L. (2022). Treacherous elasticity, callous boundaries: Aspiring volunteer initiatives in the field of refugee support in Rotterdam. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(1), 83–92.
van Overbeeke, P. S., Koolen-Maas, S. A., Meijs, L. C., & Brudney, J. L. (2021). You shall (not) pass: Strategies for third-party gatekeepers to enhance volunteer inclusion. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33, 33–45.
Voicu, B., & Şerban, M. (2012). Immigrant involvement in voluntary associations in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 1569–1587.
Waerniers, R., & Hustinx, L. (2019). The labyrinth towards citizenship: Contradictions in the framing and categorization of immigrants in immigration and integration policies. Identities, 26(3), 270–288.
Walk, M., Greenspan, I., Crossley, H., & Handy, F. (2014). Canadian immigrants and their access to services: A case study of a social purpose enterprise. In J. Quarter, S. Ryan, & A. Chan (Eds.), Social purpose enterprises: Case studies for social change (pp. 162–187). University of Toronto.
Wang, L. (2017). Ethnic/immigrant associations and minorities’/immigrants’ voluntary participation. Voluntaristics Review, 2(4), 1–95.
Wang, L., & Handy, F. (2014). Religious and secular voluntary participation by immigrants in Canada: How trust and social networks affect decision to participate. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 6(25), 1559–1582.
Wang, L., Mook, L., & Handy, F. (2017). An empirical examination of formal and informal volunteering in Canada. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 139–161.
Weng, S. S., & Lee, J. S. (2016). Why do immigrants and refugees give back to their communities and what can we learn from their civic engagement? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27, 509–524.
Wiertz, D. (2016). Segregation in civic life: Ethnic sorting and mixing across voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 81(4), 800–827.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who Cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694.
Yap, S. Y., Byrne, A., & Davidson, S. (2011). From refugee to good citizen: A discourse analysis of volunteering. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(1), 157–170.
Zychlinski, E., & Kagan, M. (2022). The culture of volunteerism: Attitudes and motivations among generation 1.5 Former Soviet Union immigrants versus native-born Israelis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 12783.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful for data access to the German Survey on Volunteering through the German Center for Gerontology (https://www.dza.de/en/).
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests.
Human and Animals Rights
The study did not involve human participants and relied on administrative survey data obtained with permission from the German Center for Gerontology.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Greenspan, I., Walk, M. Informal Volunteering and Immigrant Generations: Exploring Overlooked Dimensions in Immigrant Volunteering Research. Voluntas 35, 23–35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00563-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00563-1