Abstract
Given their lower socioeconomic background and achievement, immigrants and their descendants have been shown to make more ambitious decisions regarding educational transitions. While previous research has extensively analysed transitions within and after compulsory education, research on late transitions is scarce. This study focuses on the secondary effect of ethnic origin in the transition after upper secondary education in Germany, where school leavers decide between vocational education and training and higher education. Based on longitudinal data from the National Educational Panel Study, we first analyse differences by ethnic origin (Turkey, former Soviet Union, Poland, other countries) and immigrant generation (first, second, third generation) net of socioeconomic background and achievement. Compared to those of the ethnic majority, we find increased probabilities of enrolment in higher education for most ethnic groups of the first and second immigrant generation, net of differences in socioeconomic background and achievement. Second, we test four explanatory approaches for secondary ethnic effects (immigrant optimism, relative status maintenance, anticipated discrimination, and information deficits). By employing decomposition analyses for nonlinear regression models, we find that, taken together, the four explanations account for up to half of the ethnic differences in educational choice after upper secondary education. Specifically, increased levels of immigrant optimism and information deficits regarding vocational education explain a substantial share of the ethnic differences among all origin groups. For Turkish immigrants, the motive to maintain relative status in the origin country also contributes to increased enrolment rates in higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Ethnic educational inequality research has shown that immigrants and their descendants are often disadvantaged in the educational system. These findings can be seen in a wide variety of national contexts (Heath et al., 2008) and generally relate to performance and school-leaving qualifications but often also to participation in the education system in general. However, immigrants and their descendants choose academic alternatives more often than natives at various educational transitions in light of their comparatively low socioeconomic background and achievement (Dollmann, 2017). This so-called positive secondary ethnic effectFootnote 1 might lead to a compensation for ethnic disadvantages in terms of educational success in the medium term.
Research has shown that, consistent with secondary ethnic effects, immigrants and their descendants have relatively high educational aspirations and expectations compared to families without migration experience (Becker & Gresch, 2016; Hao & Bonstead-Bruns, 1998). High educational aspirations and expectations are associated with various educational transitions and at least partly explain immigrants’ increased transition rates (Dollmann, 2017; Glick & White, 2004; Kristen & Dollmann, 2010). Another strand of related research has examined the concrete mechanisms associated with the situation of immigrants and their descendants (e.g., immigrant optimism) and examined the explanatory power of these mechanisms for increased aspirations and expectations among immigrants (Hadjar & Scharf, 2019; Salikutluk, 2016; Tjaden & Hunkler, 2017). However, the empirical evidence has not shown a uniform picture, which is not least due to differences or incomplete operationalizations of the relevant mechanisms. Additionally, it is not yet clear to what extent the concrete mechanisms of increased aspirations and expectations affect the educational transitions that are ultimately realized. Educational aspirations and expectations, while understood as predictions or anticipations of the transition decision (Kleine et al., 2010), may deviate from actual educational transitions for a variety of reasons. On the one hand, aspirations and expectations might change in light of new information. On the other hand, students may not be able to realize the transitions they originally sought (Roderick et al., 2011), for example, because they do not meet admission requirements or because they encounter other structural barriers. Another limitation of previous research on increased ethnic aspirations and expectations concerns the specific educational transitions studied. Most related studies have focused on educational transitions within compulsory education or transitions from school to vocational education and training (VET). Only a few authors have addressed ethnic differences at the transition to higher education (HE) (Blake & Langenkamp, 2022; Jackson, 2012; Kristen et al., 2008; Tong & Harris, 2021) or within HE (Kirui & Kao, 2018; Neumeyer & Pietrzyk, 2019, 2023; Tienda & Zhao, 2017; Wakeling & Laurison, 2017). However, HE is increasingly important for the attainment of high socioeconomic positions in Western societies.
Taken together, these research gaps give rise to the following two research questions that we address in this article: Are there ethnic differences in educational decision-making at the transition to HE? What role do aspirations and expectations and their underlying mechanisms play in the emergence of ethnic differences in the transition to HE?
To answer these questions, we examine the educational transitions of upper secondary school leavers in Germany. The transition to the German HE system seems to us to be particularly well suited to answering our research questions. On the one hand, students meet comparatively few restrictions on access to universities once they obtain a higher education entry qualification. The majority of bachelor's programmes in Germany have no admission restrictions (Hochschulrektorenkonferenz, 2020, p. 21). Therefore, if graduates from upper secondary schools are flexible in their choice of field or institution, they can circumvent achievement restrictions. This situation is in contrast to, for example, the situation in the U.S. or UK, where there is stronger selectivity by institutions. On the other hand, there are no tuition fees in Germany, a relatively small private sector of HE, or funding possibilities for students from low-income families (according to the Federal Training Assistance Act). For a first degree at a German university, semester fees are required, but these fees are usually well below 500 euros per semester and often include a ticket for public transport. Accordingly, students pay only a negligible fraction of tuition fees compared to studying at a public university in the U.S. or UK (Garritzmann, 2016). Thus, it can be assumed that high aspirations and expectations are of particular importance for the decision to study in Germany. However, there are alternative educational paths in Germany that also enable access to prestigious professions and high labour market returns. In Germany, there is a relatively well-developed system of VET in which various professions can be learned in the so-called dual system or at vocational schools (similar to Austria and Switzerland). The professional qualifications obtained there are perceived as relatively viable alternatives to HE, which is not the case in other countries without comparable VET programmes (e.g., the US). Therefore, a sufficiently large group of individuals with a higher education entry qualification (HEEQ) is taking educational paths other than HE after upper secondary education.
This article contributes to the state of related research in three ways. First, by analysing the transition to HE, we focus on a transition that is rarely analysed in research on the educational trajectories of immigrants. Second, we replicate existing analyses on the transition of immigrant students to HE compared to that of natives with more recent, large panel data in Germany. In our analyses, we distinguish specific groups of immigrants by their ethnic group and their immigrant generation. Third, we examine to what extent explanatory approaches that have been developed in the context of high aspirations and expectations of immigrants (for an overview, see Becker & Gresch, 2016) can also contribute to increased probabilities of immigrants enrolling in HE: immigrant optimism, relative status maintenance, anticipated discrimination, and information deficits. We apply decomposition analyses for nonlinear models to quantify the extent to which specific approaches explain ethnic differences.
To answer our research questions, we employ data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), starting cohort 4. The NEPS data cover the educational careers of a recent cohort of school leavers who have obtained an HEEQ in Germany. It is possible to distinguish between specific immigrant groups regarding ethnic origin and generational status with this data. Furthermore, the NEPS data allow a more exhaustive test of the different mechanisms of increased aspirations and expectations.
Our article is structured as follows: First, we describe theoretical explanations of ethnic secondary effects. In doing so, we account for migration-specific mechanisms that have been formulated in the context of the formation of high aspirations and expectations of immigrants. Based on these theoretical considerations, we develop our hypotheses and provide an overview of the current state of related research. Where applicable, we derive hypotheses for specific immigrant groups (Sect. 2). In Sect. 3, we describe the data before we present the results in Sect. 4. In the concluding section, we discuss our results and address their theoretical and practical implications.
Explanations of Secondary Ethnic Effects
Research on ethnic inequalities often draws on the distinction between primary and secondary effects coined by Boudon (1974) (Heath & Brinbaum, 2007). Primary ethnic effects refer to differences in skill levels and school performance between different ethnic groups that persist after controlling for the often less favourable socioeconomic background of different immigrant groups. Typically, primary ethnic effects are negative and often visible in early childhood (Becker & Klein, 2021). Secondary ethnic effects, the focus of this paper, refer to ethnic differences in educational choices that exist after socioeconomic background and ethnic primary effects, i.e., differences in achievement, are accounted for. Research has shown that secondary ethnic effects are positive at various educational transitions and that secondary effects are aligned with increased educational aspirations and expectations of ethnic minorities (Dollmann, 2017; Glick & White, 2004). Aspirations (or idealistic aspirations) and expectations (also called realistic aspirations) (Haller, 1968) reflect different types of goals that are assumed to be important in educational decision-making and that are explained by different theories: Aspirations represent educational wishes independently of the respective actual circumstances. According to the Wisconsin model (Sewell et al., 1969), educational aspirations are shaped by the norms and values of significant others (e.g., parents or peers). In the formation of expectations, however, actors take individual resources (e.g., social and financial capital) and prerequisites (e.g., academic performance) into account. According to rational choice theory, educational expectations are assumed to be based on rational decision-making processes (Breen & Goldthorpe, 1997; Erikson & Jonsson, 1996). Actors compare the costs, benefits, and probabilities of success of different educational alternatives, as well as their utility for intergenerational status maintenance. Theoretically, aspirations and expectations and the underlying considerations for their emergence can be clearly distinguished from one another. Empirically, however, it is difficult to measure the two concepts separately, and it is assumed that aspirations and expectations are strongly interwoven and that both significant others and rational calculations play a role in ethnic minorities’ educational decision-making (Busse et al., 2023; Schmaus et al., 2024). In the following, we consider aspirations and expectations since both types can also be relevant for transition decisions and are theoretically associated with secondary ethnic effects (Becker & Gresch, 2016).
The increased aspirations and expectations of ethnic minorities are attributed to various factors. On the one hand, these aspects are directly related to migration itself. On the other hand, these aspects are related to how the situation of immigrants in the county of destination affects their norms and values as well as the parameters of rational decision-making (Becker & Gresch, 2016). Four different immigration-specific lines of theoretical arguments for increased educational aspirations and expectations are distinguished.
Immigrant Optimism
Migrants are assumed to be more positively selected than nonmigrants regarding their motivation and their orientation to strive for upwards mobility (Kao & Tienda, 1995). Education is seen as a central means to achieve this social advancement and is therefore attributed a high value (Hadjar & Scharf, 2019). It is also assumed that parents pass on their high occupational and educational aspirations to their children (Louie, 2001; Shah et al., 2010), especially since first-generation immigrants are able to realize their goals in their own lives only to a limited extent.
Hypothesis 1
Higher levels of immigrant optimism contribute to increased rates of college enrolment among ethnic minorities. We assume that the immigrant optimism is particularly pronounced for immigrants who migrate for economic reasons. Therefore, it should contribute, at least to some extent, to increased rates of enrolment in HE among all major immigrant groups in Germany.
Relative Status Maintenance
The motive for status maintenance, formulated in the context of socioeconomic inequalities in education (e.g., Breen & Goldthorpe, 1997), should apply equally to families with and without migration experience. However, many immigrants had a higher status within their origin country, e.g., in terms of education (Spörlein & Kristen, 2019). In immigrant families, relative status in the country of origin could serve as a reference point in the formation of aspirations and educational decision-making (Becker & Gresch, 2016; Engzell, 2019).
Hypothesis 2
Higher levels of relative status in the country of origin contribute to increased rates of college enrolment among ethnic minorities. This mechanism should work equally for all immigrant groups, although specific groups may, of course, differ in their educational or occupational selectivity (see Spörlein & Kristen, 2019; Spörlein et al., 2020).
Anticipated Discrimination
In the case of Germany, which has a large share of company-based dual VET, students from ethnic minorities might fear discrimination when they are accessing a VET position, as it is usually the company managers who decide on the hiring process partly on the basis of personal interviews. In contrast, access to HE is granted through a more formalized and less personal process, leaving less room for individual discrimination. If students expect discrimination in access to VET, opportunity costs of longer education ultimately decrease, and students may direct their expectations towards HE (Heath & Brinbaum, 2007). Additionally, in academic labour market segments, less discrimination based on ethnic origin is expected than in labour markets for less qualified employees (Heath et al., 2008; Sue & Okazaki, 2009). If this argument is correct, anticipated discrimination should particularly affect the assessment of the relative returns of VET and HE and thereby influence the educational decision in favour of entry into HE.
Hypothesis 3
Anticipated discrimination in accessing VET and in labour markets for VET graduates contributes to increased college enrolment rates of ethnic minorities. It can be assumed that this mechanism is more relevant for immigrant groups with greater social distance to the majority population and immigrant groups that are visually more recognisable. In Germany, this applies above all to immigrants from Turkey (Hans, 2010).
Information Deficit
Missing or incorrect information about the education system can lead to distorted assessments of school performance, the necessary requirements and the usability of qualifications in the labour market (Kao & Tienda, 1998; Kristen & Granato, 2007; Ogbu, 1987; Relikowski et al., 2012). This should be reflected in expectations that deviate more from real conditions. Additionally, immigrants might be less familiar with specific educational careers in the host country that are less important in their country of origin. In our application case, this refers in particular to the VET system in Germany, which does not exist in this way in most immigrants' countries of origin. Furthermore, it is assumed that immigrants tend to overestimate the probability of successful completion of a university degree for two reasons. First, they report higher levels of academic self-concept; i.e., they perceive their own academic abilities as higher than majority students with similar grades (Kao & Tienda, 1998; Ogbu, 1987; Siegert & Roth, 2020) on the basis of comparisons within their ethnic group. Second, they assign less importance to performance per se and, instead, put more emphasis on motivational factors (Relikowski et al., 2012).
Hypothesis 4
Lower familiarity with VET and high academic self-concepts contribute to increased rates of college enrolment among ethnic minorities. In particular, immigrants who come from countries where there is no established vocational training system should be less familiar with VET. In Germany, this applies primarily to immigrants from Turkey. We also expect that information deficits diminish over the course of generations. In particular, for third-generation immigrants whose parents have already completed the education system in the host country, information deficits should be negligible.
Figure 1 summarizes the assumed general explanations of ethnic differences in educational transitions. Furthermore, we expect the explanatory factors to have an indirect effect on educational decisions, mediated by aspirations and expectations. In the present study, we focus on the overall influences of the four explanatory mechanisms for two reasons. First, they are more informative and differentiated regarding the underlying factors of differences in educational decisions. Second, it is theoretically expected that their influences on transition behaviour are largely mediated by aspirations and expectations. However, we exploit aspirations and expectations as a benchmark of the four explanatory mechanisms. This allows us to assess whether the four mechanisms exhaustively account for the explanatory value of aspirations and expectations for ethnic differences in the postsecondary transition. If this is not the case, other unobserved mechanisms might play a role in the formation of high educational aspirations and expectations of immigrant students.
Some studiesFootnote 2 are already available on the individual arguments to explain the high aspirations and expectations of immigrants, although it is difficult to compare these studies due to the different operationalizations of the central explanatory variables. Research that analyses different arguments at the same time has been the exception thus far (Salikutluk, 2016). In the context of the transition to HE, research has provided initial indications of the importance of some of these factors. Mantovani et al. (2018) examined the intention to study and showed that parents' expectations, social capital and attitudes towards the costs and benefits of university education, in particular, help explain ethnic differences. Goyette and ** urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178–211." href="/article/10.1007/s11162-024-09791-w#ref-CR55" id="ref-link-section-d148415346e3396">2011). Furthermore, we expect that, in contexts without an established VET system, secondary effects in access to HE are not driven by information deficits about educational alternatives and therefore are less pronounced than in Germany. In our study, we showed that immigrants and their descendants have great potential to help overcome the shortage of skilled labour. Our study provides important information, particularly for education policy makers in countries with high barriers to university access.
However, future research should address several limitations. First, regarding the measurement of immigrant optimism, we were not able to capture the motive for status gain compared to the status of one’s parents, as proposed by Salikutluk (2016). Instead, we utilized occupational aspirations, which might be driven by factors other than the status gain motive. Second, we assumed that relative education captures the relative position of immigrant parents in their countries of origin. As occupational status is strongly linked to education in the origin countries we analysed (Schneider, 2010), we assumed that relative education is an adequate indicator of individuals’ position in the occupational hierarchy of their origin country. However, the relative position in terms of occupational status (socioeconomic status, income, prestige) might differ from that of education status in origin countries with a weaker link between education and occupation. Therefore, whether this operationalization of relative status maintenance can be applied should be reexamined for all countries of origin.
In addition, building on our results, further research is needed. In view of the ambitious decisions made by many descendants of immigrants, the next step is to ask to what extent they will also succeed in completing their studies and thus reduce ethnic educational inequality in the medium term. This is of particular interest for school leavers who have comparatively lower prerequisites (e.g., lower academic achievement). It has been shown that initial differences in achievement are associated with higher dropout rates in HE (Klein & Müller, 2020). However, the extent to which this is driven by secondary ethnic effects, as the role that aspirations and expectations might play in persistence in HE, remains unclear. Furthermore, it is theoretically important to ask whether the phenomenon of positive ethnic secondary effects is exhausted with university entry or whether this tendency continues into the further course of the university system, e.g., in relation to master's degree programmes and doctorates (e.g., Neumeyer & Pietrzyk, 2023).
In conclusion, this study contributes to the understanding of what factors drive ethnic preferences for higher education in their postsecondary educational transition. Our results highlight that multiple mechanisms are important in explaining secondary ethnic effects. Furthermore, we can show that some of the underlying mechanisms are relevant to various immigrant groups in different ways.
Data Availability
Access to the NEPS data (https://doi.org/10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0) can be requested at https://www.neps-data.de/Data-Center/Data-Access.
Notes
Note that despite its causal connotation, the term ‘secondary ethnic effects’ strictly refers to descriptive differences in educational transitions net of socioeconomic background and achievement. For the sake of consistency, we adopt this term from previous research.
We assume that the aforementioned mechanisms apply largely independently of the countries of origin and receiving, provided that immigrants are not per se excluded from access to university. We therefore consider in the state of research not only studies related to Germany but also account for research results from other countries.
This paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS): Starting Cohort Grade 9, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0 (NEPS Network, 2021). From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data were collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, the NEPS has been carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network.
In Germany, there are several types of HEEQs. In addition to the general Abitur, which in principle entitles students to choose any tertiary course of study, there are restricted HEEQs that only allow students to choose certain fields (fachgebundene Hochschulreife) or programmes at universities of applied sciences (Fachhochschulreife). Most students obtain their general HEEQ after 12 or 13 years, depending on the federal state (e.g., Homuth, 2017). A restricted HEEQ can be obtained after 11 years at some school types. However, as some explanatory variables are not measured before grade 12, we do not include entry qualifications obtained after 11 years or earlier (N = 117 or 1.9%). Some students take more than 13 years because they have repeated grades or because they have obtained their HEEQ over the vocational track or second-chance education.
As auxiliary variables, we utilize: school grades in German, math, and English from the penultimate school year before receiving the HEEQ; the last type of school; applications for postsecondary education in the first year after HEEQ; students’ answers for parents’ highest ISEI and parents’ highest education; occupational aspirations in the penultimate school year.
HE includes programmes at universities (Universität), universities of applied sciences (Fachhochschule), universities of cooperative education (Berufsakademie), dual higher education institutions (duale Hochschule), and universities of public administration (Fachhochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung). VET includes dual company-based apprenticeships, school-based training, civil service preparation courses, and other courses.
To assess the extent to which this influences the estimation of the relative importance of explanatory factors, we compare it with a reduced model, excluding occupational aspirations and perceived parental aspirations as indicators of immigrant optimism (Supplementary Information, Fig. S6b). In this case, only the explanatory value of information deficits increased minimally for most groups. Overall, occupational aspirations and parental aspirations seem to exert their influence on enrolment largely independently from other explanatory approaches. Furthermore, it lends plausibility to the conclusion that, by including occupational aspirations and parental aspirations as mediators of immigrant optimism, the relevance of other explanatory approaches is not substantially underestimated.
This category (No vocational training) might comprise both students who do not aspire to or expect either type of training, and students who have not yet formed a clear preference. As the additional categories (No vocational training, Both) are small for aspirations and expectations, we focus on the distinct categories (VET, HE) in the analyses.
The distributions of analysed variables in the reduced sample without school-leavers who didn’t enrol in HE or VET and without third generation immigrants are shown in the Supplementary Information (Table S3). Reducing the outcome variable to the choices HE and VET did not lead to different conclusions regarding the observed pattern of ethnic differences (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1), regarding the coefficients of mediators and control variables (Table S5), or explanations of ethnic differences (Fig. S2 and Fig. S5b).
The model does not include heterogeneous effects of explanatory variables by ethnic origin. However, we compared the effects in separate models for the majority and ethnic minorities and find no significant differences (Supplementary Information, Fig. S3). Only for the effects of friends’ aspirations, we find weak descriptive evidence that they are slightly more important for the educational transition among minority students compared to majority students, for whom the effects are practically zero. Therefore, the positive contributions of friends’ aspirations to ethnic differences for students from Turkey and other countries (see Table 2) as well as the combined contributions of immigrant optimism and the total explained effects might be slightly underestimated by our decomposition model.
Their magnitudes slightly differ from the effects in the previous analyses (Fig. 3, M1) because the KHB method applies a correction for rescaling to make total and direct effects comparable across nested nonlinear models.
With the KHB method, the sum of disentangled mediation paths can exceed the explained effect (in terms of the difference between total and unexplained effects), when categorical independent variables are analysed, and differences are quantified as AME or average partial effects (APE). To tackle this problem, we rescale the disentangled indirect mediation coefficients so that their sum is equal to the explained effect (defined by the difference between the total secondary effect and the unexplained secondary effect). Furthermore, we compare our main results with a decomposition of logit-coefficients that is unaffected by this inconsistency. With this approach, the composition of ethnic differences remains very similar (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S4).
Furthermore, we conducted decomposition analyses to test if the four mechanisms explained ethnic differences in aspirations and expectations as implicated by our theoretical model. The results are documented in the Supplementary Information (Table S6c − f, Fig. S5c − f). Aspirations and expectations were significantly increased for students from Turkey, countries of the former Soviet Union and other countries, net of social origin and prior achievement. For all groups except students from countries of the former Soviet Union, differences in aspirations and expectations could be completely explained by the four mechanisms. In conformity with our main decomposition model (Fig. 4), we found that immigrant optimism, relative status maintenance, and information deficits contributed to increased aspirations and expectations of ethnic minorities. However, while the decompositions of aspirations and expectations indicated that anticipated discrimination played a role in the formation of immigrants’ aspirations for HE, anticipated discrimination was negligible in explaining ethnic differences in actual enrolment in HE.
References
Alvarado, S. E. (2021). The role of college-bound friends in college enrollment decisions by race, ethnicity, and gender. American Educational Research Journal, 58(6), 1315–1354.
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.
Becker, B., & Gresch, C. (2016). Bildungsaspirationen in Familien mit Migrationshintergrund. In C. Diehl, C. Hunkler, & C. Kristen (Eds.), Ethnische Ungleichheiten im Bildungsverlauf (pp. 73–115). Springer VS.
Becker, B., & Klein, O. (2021). The primary effect of ethnic origin – rooted in early childhood? An analysis of the educational disadvantages of Turkish-origin children during the transition to secondary education in Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 75, 100639.
Blake, M. K., & Langenkamp, A. G. (2022). Differences between latinx and white students in college-going behaviors. Research in Higher Education, 63(2), 248–270.
Blossfeld, H.-P., & Roßbach, H.-G. (Eds.). (2019). Education as a Lifelong Process. The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). Edition ZfE (2nd ed.). Springer VS.
Boudon, R. (1974). Education Opportunity and Social Inequality. Changing Prospects in Western Society.
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials. Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality & Society, 9(3), 275–305.
Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2013). Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Logit and Probit Models. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(2), 164–191.
Busse, R., Michaelis, C., & Nennstiel, R. (2023). To what extent do secondary effects shape migrants’ educational trajectories after lower-secondary education? Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 15, 3.
Busse, R., & Scharenberg, K. (2022). How immigrant optimism shapes educational transitions over the educational life course–Empirical evidence from Germany. Frontiers in Education, 7, 894249.
Dollmann, J. (2017). Positive choices for all? SES- and gender-specific premia of immigrants at educational transitions. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 49, 20–31.
Engzell, P. (2019). Aspiration squeeze: the struggle of children to positively selected immigrants. Sociology of Education, 92(1), 83–103.
Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Explaining class inequality in education: The Swedish case. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 1–63). Westview Press.
Garritzmann, J. L. (2016). The political economy of higher education finance. In The Politics of Tuition Fees and Subsidies in OECD Countries, 1945–2015. Springer.
Glick, J. E., & White, M. J. (2004). Post-secondary school participation of immigrant and native youth: The role of familial resources and educational expectations. Social Science Research, 33(2), 272–299.
Goyette, K., & **e, Y. (1999). Educational expectations of Asian American youths: Determinants and ethnic differences. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 22–36.
Hadjar, A., & Scharf, J. (2019). The value of education among immigrants and non-immigrants and how this translates into educational aspirations: A comparison of four European countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(5), 711–734.
Haller, A. O. (1968). On the concept of aspiration. Rural Sociology, 33(4), 484–487.
Hans, S. (2010). Assimilation oder Segregation? Anpassungsprozesse von Einwanderern in Deutschland. VS Verlag.
Hao, L., & Bonstead-Bruns, M. (1998). Parent-child differences in educational expectations and the academic achievement of immigrant and native students. Sociology of Education, 71(3), 175–198.
Heath, A., & Brinbaum, Y. (2007). Guest editorial: Explaining ethnic inequalities in educational attainment. Ethnicities, 7(3), 291–304.
Heath, A., Rothon, C., & Kilpi, E. (2008). The second generation in Western Europe: Education, unemployment, and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 211–235.
Hochschulrektorenkonferenz. (2020). Statistische Daten zu Studienangeboten an Hochschulen in Deutschland. Wintersemester 2020/2021.
Homuth, C. (2017). Die G8-Reform(en) in Deutschland. Springer.
Ichou, M. (2014). Who they were there: Immigrants’ educational selectivity and their children’s educational attainment. European Sociological Review, 30(6), 750–765.
Jackson, M. (2012). Bold choices: How ethnic inequalities in educational attainment are suppressed. Oxford Review of Education, 38(2), 189–208.
Jackson, M., Jonsson, J. O., & Rudolphi, F. (2012). Ethnic inequality in choice-driven education systems: A longitudinal study of performance and choice in England and Sweden. Sociology of Education, 85(2), 158–178.
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76(1), 1–19.
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1998). Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education, 106(3), 349–384.
Kirui, D. K., & Kao, G. (2018). Does generational status matter in college? Expectations and academic performance among second-generation college students in the US. Ethnicities, 18(4), 571–602.
Kitagawa, E. M. (1955). Components of a difference between two rates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50(272), 1168–1194.
Klein, D., & Müller, L. (2020). Soziale, ethnische und geschlechtsspezifische Ungleichheiten beim Studienabbruch. Welche Rolle spielen akademische Leistungen vor und während des Studiums? Zeitschrift Für Empirische Hochschulforschung, 4(1), 13–31.
Kleine, L., Paulus, W., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2010). Die Formation elterlicher Bildungsentscheidungen beim Übergang von der Grundschule in die Sekundarstufe I. In J. Baumert, K. Maaz, & U. Trautwein (Eds.), Bildungsentscheidungen. ZfE Sonderheft 12 (pp. 103–125).
Kohler, U., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2011). Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. The Stata Journal, 11(3), 420–438.
Kretschmer, D. (2019). Explaining native-migrant differences in parental knowledge about the German educational system. International Migration, 57(1), 281–297.
Kretschmer, D., & Roth, T. (2021). Why do friends have similar educational expectations? Separating influence and selection effects. European Sociological Review, 37(2), 201–217.
Kristen, C., & Dollmann, J. (2010). Sekundäre Effekte der ethnischen Herkunft: Kinder aus türkischen Familien am ersten Bildungsübergang. In B. Becker & D. Reimer (Eds.), Vom Kindergarten bis zur Hochschule. Die Generierung von ethnischen und sozialen Disparitäten in der Bildungsbiographie (pp. 117–144). VS Verlag.
Kristen, C., & Granato, N. (2007). The educational attainment of the second generation in Germany: Social origins and ethnic inequality. Ethnicities, 7(3), 343–366.
Kristen, C., Reimer, D., & Kogan, I. (2008). Higher education entry of Turkish immigrant youth in Germany. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49(2–3), 127–151.
Lorenz, G., Boda, Z., Salikutluk, Z., & Jansen, M. (2020). Social influence or selection? Peer effects on the development of adolescents’ educational expectations in Germany. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(5), 643–669.
Louie, V. (2001). Parents’ aspirations and investment: The role of social class in the educational experiences of 1.5- and second-generation Chinese Americans. Harvard Educational Review, 71(3), 438–474.
Mantovani, D., Gasperoni, G., & Albertini, M. (2018). Higher education beliefs and intentions among immigrant-origin students in Italy. Ethnicities, 18(4), 603–626.
Mentges, H. (2019). Studium oder Berufsausbildung? Migrationsspezifische Bildungsentscheidungen von Studienberechtigten. Eine kritische Replikation und Erweiterung der Studie von Kristen et al. (2008). Soziale Welt, 70(4), 403–434.
Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.
NEPS Network. (2021). National educational panel study, scientific use file of starting cohort Grade 9. Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi). https://doi.org/10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0
Neumeyer, S., & Pietrzyk, I. (2019). Hochschulabsolvent/innen mit Migrationshintergrund am Übergang in die Promotion. Soziale Welt, 70(4), 435–473.
Neumeyer, S., & Pietrzyk, I. (2023). Done with a degree? Immigration-specific disparities among holders of bachelor’s degrees in the transition to graduate studies in Germany. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1204164.
Ogbu, J. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18, 312–334.
Olczyk, M., Will, G., & Kristen, C. (2016). Immigrants in the NEPS: Identifying generation status and group of origin. NEPS Survey Paper No. 4. Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, National Educational Panel Study.
Olczyk, M., Seuring, J., Will, G., & Zinn, S. (2016). Migranten und ihre Nachkommen im deutschen Bildungssystem: Ein aktueller Überblick. In C. Diehl, C. Hunkler, & C. Kristen (Eds.), Ethnische Ungleichheiten im Bildungsverlauf. Mechanismen, Befunde, Debatten (pp. 33–70). Springer VS.
Olczyk, M., & Will, G. (2019). Measuring knowledge about the German education system in NEPS. NEPS Survey Paper No. 56. Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, National Educational Panel Study.
Phalet, K., & Lens, W. (1995). Achievement motivation and group loyalty among Turkish and Belgian youth. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 31–72). JAI.
Relikowski, I., Yilmaz, E., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2012). Migration und Integration in das Bildungssystem. In R. Becker & H. Solga (Eds.), Soziologische Bildungsforschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 52 (pp. 111–136). Springer.
Roderick, M., Coca, V., & Nagaoka, J. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: high school effects in sha** urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178–211.
Salikutluk, Z. (2016). Why do immigrant students aim high? explaining the aspiration-achievement paradox of immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32(5), 581–592.
Schmaus, M., Olczyk, M., Neumeyer, S., & Will, G. (2024). High realistic aspirations – Do normative pressures overthrow rational calculations? Applying the model of frame selection to the educational aspirations of immigrant and majority students in Germany. Rationality and Society, 36(1), 34–65.
Schneider, S. L. (2010). Nominal comparability is not enough: (In-)equivalence of construct validity of cross-national measures of educational attainment in the European Social Survey. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28(3), 343–357.
Spörlein, C., Kristen, C., Schmidt, R., & Welker, J. (2020). Selectivity profiles of recently arrived refugees and labour migrants in Germany. Soziale Welt, 71(1–2), 54–89.
Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34(1), 82–92.
Shah, B., Dwyer, C., & Modood, T. (2010). Explaining educational achievement and career aspirations among young british pakistanis: Mobilizing “ethnic capital”? Sociology, 44(6), 1109–1127.
Siegert, M., & Roth, T. (2020). Das schulische Selbstkonzept von türkeistämmigen Neuntklässlern und von Neuntklässlern ohne Migrationshintergrund. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 72(4), 627–650.
Skopek, J., Pink, S., & Bela, D. (2013). Starting Cohort 4: 9th Grade (SC4). SUF Version 1.1.0. Data Manual. NEPS Research Data Paper. National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), University of Bamberg.
Spörlein, C., & Kristen, C. (2019). Why we should care about regional origins: educational selectivity among refugees and labor migrants in Western Europe. Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 39.
Stöver, B. (2017). The transition behaviour from school to studies – Empirical evidence on the reasons of a delayed start of studies in Germany (596). Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) No. 596. Leibniz Universität Hannover.
Sue, S., & Okazaki, S. (2009). Asian-American educational achievements: A phenomenon in search of an explanation. Asian American Journal of Psychology, S(1), 45–55.
Tienda, M., & Zhao, L. (2017). Institutional and ethnic variations in postgraduate enrollment and completion. Journal of Higher Education, 88(4), 561–592.
Tjaden, J. D., & Hunkler, C. (2017). The optimism trap: Migrants’ educational choices in stratified education systems. Social Science Research, 67, 213–228.
Tong, G., & Harris, A. L. (2021). Immigrant selectivity, academic culture and college enrollment among Asian Americans. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(17), 4058–4080.
von Hippel, P. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 83–117.
von Hippel, P. (2020). How many imputations do you need? a two-stage calculation using a quadratic rule. Sociological Methods and Research, 49(3), 699–718.
Wakeling, P., & Laurison, D. (2017). Are postgraduate qualifications the ‘new frontier of social mobility’? British Journal of Sociology, 68(3), 533–555.
White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399.
Wohlkinger, F., Bayer, M., & Ditton, H. (2016). Measuring Self-Concept in the NEPS. In H.-P. Blossfeld, J. von Maurice, M. Bayer, & J. Skopek (Eds.), Methodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys (pp. 181–193). Springer Fachmedien.
Acknowledgements
This article greatly benefitted from helpful comments we received at the colloquia at the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, department 2, and the chair of sociology, area social stratification, at the University of Bamberg. Finally, we would like to thank two anonymous reviewers who helped us to significantly improve this article.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the internal research funding program of the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)–project number 390731161. Both funding institutions were not involved in decisions regarding the research process or the publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Neumeyer, S., Will, G. Secondary Ethnic Effects in the Transition to Higher Education in Germany and Their Explanations. Res High Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09791-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09791-w