Log in

Economic policy uncertainty, corporate diversification and firm value: the global evidence

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on firm value and examines corporate diversification's role between EPU and firm value. We employ firm-level data for twenty-two countries from 2000 through 2020, which covers 364,433 firm-year observations of 29,709 unique firms and use index-based measures for EPU and corporate diversification. The results illustrate that EPU negatively impacts the firm value. However, corporate diversification positively moderates the adverse impact of EPU on the firm value by efficiently mitigating the effect of financial constraints. Further, the additional analysis shows that related and unrelated corporate diversification can be instrumental in alleviating the negative impact of high EPU on firm value in developed economies. In emerging economies, only unrelated diversification effectively deals with high EPU. The results are robust to subsampling, sensitivity, and endogeneity issues. Our study suggests a potential policy recommendation from a managerial perspective, that diversification helps to sustain the firm's value during uncertainty. Furthermore, Policymakers should recognize high policy uncertainty as a threat to business environment stability and take measures to reduce uncertainty and provide a more favorable environment for businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Apart from the moderating channels between EPU-firm value relationship, various other studies use the moderating channels to conduct studies. Like, Usman et al. (2022) examined the financial development role between pollution concern and globalization mode relationship using financially rich countries data. Also, Sadiq et al. (2022), conducted a study to see the role of external debt and financial globalization on the relationship between human development, nuclear energy, and carbon emission in BRICS countries. Another study done by Ke et al. (2022) examines the nexus between information, telecommunication, and technology (ICTs), globalization, foreign direct investment, and carbon emission based on 77 develo** countries' data.

  2. The data for EPU is collected from www.policyuncertainty.com.

  3. For more detail about the construction of the index. See, Baker et al. (2016) and visit www.policyuncertainty.com.

  4. For brevity, regression results for control variables are not reported in all the results except for baseline results.

  5. In unreported results, following (Jumah et al. 2022; Suh and Yang 2021), we rerun our baseline results using data sample after excluding financial crisis years (year excluded 2007–2009), sample after financial crises years (2010–2020) and sample excluding Covid-19 years (2000–2018). Also, we rerun the baseline results by clustering the robust standard errors at the firm level. In all the specifications, our results align with the baseline findings.

References

Download references

Funding

This study was conducted without external funding or financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahid Jumah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors state that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the study.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Variable definition

Appendix: Variable definition

Variables Name

Variable

Symbol

Description

Source

Firm value

Dependent

Q

(Market value of equity − Book value of equity + Book value of total assets)/(Book value of total assets) following the study (Gulen and Ion 2016)

Refinitiv DataStream

Excess value

Dependent

(Alternate

Measure)

E.V

We measured the Excess value based on the natural logarithm of the firm's excess value following the study of (Berger and Ofek 1995). A diversified firm’s excess value is the ratio of the actual market value of the firm to the sum of its imputed value of each business segment. Each firm segment's imputed value is based on its sales multiplied by the corresponding industry-median capital-to-sales ratio

Same as above

Firm size

Control

Size

Firm size is measured by taking the natural logarithm of the firm's total assets at time t

Same as above

Debt ratio

Control

Debt

The debt ratio is calculated by dividing the firm's total debt by its total assets at time t

Same as above

Capital expenditure

Control

Capex

Firm investment is calculated by dividing the total capital expenditure of the firm by its total assets at time t

Same as above

Dividend

Control

Div

The dividend ratio is a common share dividend to total assets at time t

Same as above

Operating cash flow

Control

OperCF

The firm's operating cash flow is calculated by dividing the operating cash flow by total assets at time t

Same as above

Sales growth

Control

SGrowth

The sales growth of the firm is a dummy measure with a value of ‘1’ where a firm has positive growth and ‘0’ otherwise. This measure adjusted the firms' sales growth by the median sales growth of its respective industry based on 4-digit SIC codes in the same country and year

Same as above

EPU

Independent

LnEPU

Economic policy uncertainty is measured using the natural logarithm of the equally-weighted arithmetic mean of the monthly EPU index for the 12 months of the year, developed by (Baker et al. 2016). The equation is as follows

\({LN(EPU}_{t})=LN({\sum }_{m=1}^{12}{EPU}_{m}/12)\)

where, EPUt denotes the economic policy uncertainty at time t = year, EPUm denotes the monthly value of the U.S. EPU index and 12 denotes 12 months of the year

Data gathered from the website; www.policyuncertainty.com

EPU3

Independent

(Alternate

Measure)

LnEPU3

Instead of 12 months, equally-weighted arithmetic mean, we use the last three months' EPU index arithmetic mean and take the natural logarithm of it as an alternate measure of EPU following the study of (Hong and Quang 2022; Nguyen and Phan 2017)

\({LN(EPU}_{t})=LN({\sum }_{m=1}^{3}{EPU}_{m}/3)\)

where, EPUt denotes the economic policy uncertainty at time t = year, EPUm denotes the monthly value of the U.S. EPU index and 3 denotes last three months of the year

Same as above

EPU6

Independent

(Alternate

Measure)

LnEPU6

Instead of 12 months, equally-weighted arithmetic mean, we use the last six months EPU index arithmetic mean and take the natural logarithm of it as an alternate measure of EPU following the study of (Hong and Quang 2022; Nguyen and Phan 2017)

\({LN(EPU}_{t})=LN({\sum }_{m=1}^{6}{EPU}_{m}/6)\)

where, EPUt denotes the economic policy uncertainty at time t = year, EPUm denotes the monthly value of the U.S. EPU index and 6 denotes last six months of the year

Same as above

Diversification dummy

Moderator

CDDum

Diversification measure based on dummy variable takes the value ‘1’ for the firms with two or more business segments and ‘0’ otherwise

Refinitiv DataStream

Diversification index (Entropy)

Moderator

CDENindex

Diversification proxy using Entropy Index, measured as follows

\(CDENindex={\sum }_{{\varvec{i}}=0}^{{\varvec{N}}{\varvec{S}}}{{\varvec{P}}}_{{\varvec{i}}}\boldsymbol{ }\mathbf{l}\mathbf{n}(\frac{1}{{{\varvec{P}}}_{{\varvec{i}}}})\)

Where NS is many business segments in the conglomerate. Pi shows the income proportion from individual segment i in the total income of the conglomerate. The greater value of the index shows a high diversification level and vice-versa

Same as above

Diversification index (Caves)

Moderator

(Alternate

Measure)

CDCavesindex

This Caves diversification measure captures the diversification in terms of relatedness and unrelatedness from its base industry. We measure the Caves index as follows

\({\varvec{C}}.{\varvec{I}}=\boldsymbol{ }{\sum }_{{\varvec{K}}=1}^{{\varvec{K}}}{{\varvec{P}}}_{{\varvec{k}}}\times {{\varvec{D}}}_{{\varvec{k}}{\varvec{H}}}\)

where k is the total product segments of the firm, Pk is the sales percentage of k product to the firm's total sales. \({{\varvec{D}}}_{{\varvec{k}}{\varvec{H}}}\) takes the value ‘0’ if the segment N belongs to the same four-digit SIC as its based product H and takes the value ‘1’ if the segment N has a different four-digit SIC from its base product H but the same three-digit SIC as the based product H, and takes the value ‘2’ if the segment N has different two-digit SIC from its base product H. The higher the value, shows greater the unrelated diversification level. See (Bae et al. 2011) for extensive detail on Caves-index measurement

Same as above

Diversification index (Modified Herfindahl)

Moderator

(Alternate

Measure)

CDHFindex

Diversification measure based on the modified Herfindahl index is calculated as follows

\({\varvec{M}}.\mathbf{H}.\mathbf{I}\mathbf{n}\mathbf{d}\mathbf{e}\mathbf{x}=1-{\sum }_{{\varvec{i}}=1}^{{\varvec{Z}}}\boldsymbol{ }({\varvec{S}}{\varvec{i}}\boldsymbol{ }/{\sum }_{{\varvec{i}}=1}^{{\varvec{Z}}}{\varvec{S}}{\varvec{i}})^2\)

We measure across Z business segments of the firm, taking the sum of the square of each business segment i’s sales, \(Si,\) as a ratio of the total sale of the firm. After this, the value of the Herfindahl index is subtracted from 1 to get the modified Herfindahl index as a measure of diversification. If the value is close to ‘0’, the less diversified the firm is, and vice-versa. There is no defined standard for SIC code levels, and we use three- and four-digit codes to measure the caves index

Same as above

Financial constraints

Mechanism analysis channel

F.C

Financial constraints measured as

FC = {(−0.737 × firm size) + (0.043×(firm size)2)(0.040×firm age)},

following the study of (Hadlock and Pierce 2010)

Same as above

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jumah, Z., Safdar, N., Younas, Z.I. et al. Economic policy uncertainty, corporate diversification and firm value: the global evidence. Qual Quant 58, 2677–2707 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01768-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01768-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation