Abstract
Using rich micro-level data on manufacturing firms in four South Asian economies, this paper examines how regional institutional quality (RIQ) influences the relationship between firm-level resources and technological innovation outputs. Our research hypothesis postulates that the impact of firm-level resources on innovation is moderated by the institutional environment within which the firm operates. To test our research hypothesis, a clustered robust standard errors logistic model is used, while the multi-level estimation technique is used for robustness analysis. Findings conclude that how much a firm can extract value from the firm-level resources to produce innovative products is dependent on the institutional quality, not only on the national level but regional level as well. Moreover, the internal R&D, employees education, and skilled labor force have positive impact on the product innovation when they interact with the regional institutional quality. The results have applied implications for policymakers in the area of regional-level governance and innovation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and material that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Notes
We converted managerial experience into a dummy variable by using threshold of 10 years. It implies that a manager will be considered as experienced if he/she has more than 10 years of experience. This number is taken by following existing literature (Barasa et al. 2017).
In terms of size, the World Bank Enterprise Survey divided the firms into three categories: 1) small or micro-sized firms (having 0 to < = 19 permanent employees), 2) medium-sized firms (having > = 20 to < = 99 permanent employees), and 3) large-sized firms (having > = 100 permanent employees). A bulk of empirical literature (Jiménez & Sanz, 2011; Ayyagari et al., 2012; Younas & Rehman, 2021) report that the medium and large firms are more likely to innovate. Taking inspiration from these studies and following world bank description, we use 20 permanent employees as a threshold to construct the dummy variable of firm size. Firms with less than 20 employees are categorized as small and micro enterprises in the World Bank Enterprise Survey. Firms with more than 20 employees fall in a continuum of medium to large-sized firms.
Meaningful methodology means it provides graphical interpretation of the interaction effects which is numerically difficult to interpret.
The output from the margins command can be very difficult to read. It can be like looking at a 5-dimensional crosstab where none of the variables have value labels. The “marginsplot” command introduced in Stata 14 makes it easy to create a visual display of results.
Check appendix for detailed results of marginal effects. We report marginal effects for firm-level resources and skilled labour/formal training only because we do not find significant coefficients of the impact of managerial experience and employees' education level on product innovation.
There is no marginal effects plot for managerial experience due to insignificant interaction term.
References
Abreu, M., Grinevich, V.: The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Res. Policy 42(2), 408–422 (2013)
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A.: Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. Am Econ Rev 98(1), 267–293 (2008)
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J., Thaicharoen, Y.: Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth. J. Monet. Econ. 50(1), 49–123 (2003)
Aidis, R., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T.: Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. J. Bus. Ventur. 23(6), 656–672 (2008)
Alence, R.: Political Institutions and Developmental Governance in Sub-Saharan. J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 42(2), 163–187 (2004)
Al-Laham, A., Tzabbar, D., Amburgey, T.L.: The dynamics of knowledge stocks and knowledge flows: innovation consequences of recruitment and collaboration in biotech. Ind. Corp. Chang. 20(2), 555–583 (2011)
Alonso, J.A., Garcimartín, C.: The determinants of institutional quality. More on the debate. J Int Dev 25(2), 206–226 (2013)
Anokhin, S., Schulze, W.S.: Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. J. Bus. Ventur. 24(5), 465–476 (2009)
Asheim, B.T., Coenen, L.: Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: on knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. J. Technol. Transfer 31(1), 163–173 (2006)
Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., Moodysson, J.: Knowledge bases, modes of innovation and regional innovation policy: A theoretical re-examination with illustrations from the Nordic countries. In: Beyond Territory, pp. 239–261. Routledge, New York (2012)
Asiedu, E., Freeman, J.: The effect of corruption on investment growth: Evidence from firms in Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and transition countries. Rev. Dev. Econ. 13(2), 200–214 (2009)
Austin, J.E.: Managing in develo** countries: strategic analysis and operating techniques. Simon and Schuster (2002)
Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V.: Financing of firms in develo** countries: lessons from research. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6036) (2012)
Bantel, K.A., Jackson, S.E.: Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strateg. Manag. J. 10(S1), 107–124 (1989)
Barasa, L., Knoben, J., Vermeulen, P., Kimuyu, P., Kinyanjui, B.: Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm-level approach. Res. Policy 46(1), 280–291 (2017)
Baron, R.A., Tang, J.: The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. J. Bus. Ventur. 26(1), 49–60 (2011)
Bernard, O., Helen, H., Paul, R.: Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: enterprising Africa. Small Business Economics. RePEc kap sbusec 32(3), 331–350 (2009)
Blundell, R., Dearden, L., Meghir, C., Sianesi, B.: Human capital investment: the returns from education and training to the individual, the firm and the economy. Fisc. Stud. 20(1), 1–23 (1999)
Bowen, H.P., Wiersema, M.F.: Modeling limited dependent variables: Methods and guidelines for researchers in strategic management. Res Methodol Strat Manag 1(1), 87–134 (2004)
Brahma, S.S., Chakraborty, H.: From industry to firm resources: Resource-based view of competitive advantage. IUP J Bus Strat 8(2), 7–21 (2011)
Bräutigam, D.A., Knack, S.: Foreign aid, institutions, and governance in sub-Saharan Africa. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 52(2), 255–285 (2004)
Chadee, D., Roxas, B.: Institutional environment, innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia. Critical perspectives on international business (2013)
Chun, H., Kim, J.W., Morck, R., Yeung, B.: Creative destruction and firm-specific performance heterogeneity. J. Financ. Econ. 89(1), 109–135 (2008)
Coad, A.: The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2009)
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. Econ. J. 99(397), 569–596 (1989)
Crespi, G., Zuniga, P.: Innovation and productivity: evidence from six Latin American countries. World Dev. 40(2), 273–290 (2012)
Dreher, A., Kotsogiannis, C., McCorriston, S.: How do institutions affect corruption and the shadow economy? Int. Tax Public Financ. 16(6), 773 (2009)
Egbetokun, A.A., Siyanbola, W.O., Sanni, M., Olamade, O.O., Adeniyi, A.A., Irefin, I.A.: What drives innovation? Inferences from an industry-wide survey in Nigeria. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 45(1–2), 123–140 (2009)
Fogel, K., Hawk, A., Morck, R., Yeung, B.: Institutional obstacles to entrepreneurship. In: Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship, pp. 541–580. (2006)
Francois, J., Manchin, M.: Institutions, infrastructure, and trade. World Dev. 46, 165–175 (2013)
Garavaglia, C., Breschi, S.: The co-evolution of entrepreneurship and clusters. In: Growth and innovation of competitive regions, pp. 95–116. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Geldes, C., Felzensztein, C., Palacios-Fenech, J.: Technological and non-technological innovations, performance and propensity to innovate across industries: The case of an emerging economy. Ind. Mark. Manage. 61, 55–66 (2017)
Giannopoulou, E., Barlatier, P.J., Pénin, J.: Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms. Res. Policy 48(1), 223–233 (2019)
Glaeser, E.L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.: Do institutions cause growth? J. Econ. Growth 9(3), 271–303 (2004)
Goedhuys, M.: Learning, product innovation, and firm heterogeneity in develo** countries; Evidence from Tanzania. Ind. Corp. Chang. 16(2), 269–292 (2007)
Goedhuys, M., Veugelers, R.: Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 23(4), 516–529 (2012)
Goedhuys, M., Janz, N., Mohnen, P.: Knowledge-based productivity in “low-tech” industries: evidence from firms in develo** countries. Ind. Corp. Chang. 23(1), 1–23 (2014)
Gómez-Haro, S., Aragón-Correa, J.A., Cordón-Pozo, E.: Differentiating the effects of the institutional environment on corporate entrepreneurship. Manag. Decis. 49(10), 1677–1693 (2011)
Griffith, R., Redding, S., Reenen, J.V.: Map** the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Rev. Econ. Stat. 86(4), 883–895 (2004)
Gupta, M.S., Abed, M.G.T.: The economics of corruption: An overview. Govern Corrupt Econ Perform 2, 23–45 (2002)
Gupta, V.K., Yayla, A.A., Sikdar, A., Cha, M.S.: Institutional environment for entrepreneurship: Evidence from the developmental states of South Korea and United Arab Emirates. J. Dev. Entrep. 17(03), 1250013 (2012)
Gupta, V.K., Guo, C., Canever, M., Yim, H.R., Sraw, G.K., Liu, M.: The institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea. Int Entrepr Manag J 10(2), 367–384 (2014)
Heyneman, S.P.: Education and corruption. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 24(6), 637–648 (2004)
Hoetker, G.: The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strateg. Manag. J. 28(4), 331–343 (2007)
Huergo, E., Jaumandreu, J.: How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Bus. Econ. 22(3–4), 193–207 (2004)
Jiménez-Jiménez, D., Sanz-Valle, R.: Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. J. Bus. Res. 64(4), 408–417 (2011)
Kakar, A. K., Younas, M. Z., & Malik, W. S. (2020). The Impact of Institutional Quality on Monetary Policy Response Function: Evidence from Developed and Develo** Economies. The Singapore Economic Review, 1–25.
Kamau, P., Munandi, M.: Upgrading and technical efficiency in Kenyan garment firms: Does insertion in global value chains matter. University of Nairobi, Institute for Development Studies (2009)
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.C., Groen, A.J.: The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. J. Manag. 36(1), 349–372 (2010)
Kunčič, A.: Institutional quality dataset. J. Inst. Econ. 10(1), 135–161 (2014)
Lee, K., Kang, S.M.: Innovation types and productivity growth: Evidence from Korean manufacturing firms. Glob. Econ. Rev. 36(4), 343–359 (2007)
Liu, X., Buck, T.: Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Res. Policy 36(3), 355–366 (2007)
Liu, C.Y., Ye, L., Feng, B.: Migrant entrepreneurship in China: entrepreneurial transition and firm performance. Small Bus. Econ. 52(3), 681–696 (2019)
Lockett, A., Thompson, S., Morgenstern, U.: The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 11(1), 9–28 (2009)
Long, J.S., Freese, J.: Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata Press (2006)
Martin, R., Moodysson, J.: Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. Euro Urb Reg Stud 20(2), 170–187 (2013)
Mason, C., Brown, R.: Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Bus. Econ. 40(2), 211–225 (2013)
McAdam, R., Reid, R., Shevlin, M.: Determinants for innovation implementation at SME and inter SME levels within peripheral regions. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 20(1), 66–90 (2014)
McGee, J.E., Dowling, M.J.: Using R&D cooperative arrangements to leverage managerial experience: A study of technology-intensive new ventures. J. Bus. Ventur. 9(1), 33–48 (1994)
McGuirk, H., & Lenihan, H. (2013). Innovation and HUMAN capital: The impact of firm and regional factors on Innovative Human Capital. A working paper by University of Limerick
Meyer, K.E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S.K., Peng, M.W.: Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strateg. Manag. J. 30(1), 61–80 (2009)
Michailova, S., McCarthy, D.J., Puffer, S.M., Chadee, D., Roxas, B.: Institutional environment, innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia. Crit. Perspect. Int. Bus. 9(1), 19–39 (2013)
Mosconi, F., & D’Ingiullo, D. (2021). Institutional quality and innovation: evidence from Emilia-Romagna. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 1–33.
Naude, W.: Promoting entrepreneurship in develo** countries: Policy challenges. Unit. Nation Univ 1(4), 1–7 (2010)
Ndofor, H.A., Sirmon, D.G., He, X.: Utilizing the firm’s resources: How TMT heterogeneity and resulting faultlines affect TMT tasks. Strateg. Manag. J. 36(11), 1656–1674 (2015)
Nichter, S., Goldmark, L.: Small firm growth in develo** countries. World Dev. 37(9), 1453–1464 (2009)
Olson, M., Sarna, N., Swamy, A.V.: Governance and growth: A simple hypothesis explaining cross-country differences in productivity growth. Public Choice 102(3–4), 341–364 (2000)
Oluwatobi, S., Efobi, U., Olurinola, I., Alege, P.: Innovation in Africa: Why Institutions Matter. S Afric J Econ 83(3), 390–410 (2015)
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B.: Systems of innovation and underdevelopment: an institutional perspective. Sci Technol Soc 11(2), 239–269 (2006)
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. (2004). How can Africa benefit from globalization? ATPS Special paper series, 17.
Paiva, E.L., Roth, A.V., Fensterseifer, J.E.: Organizational knowledge and the manufacturing strategy process: a resource-based view analysis. J. Oper. Manag. 26(1), 115–132 (2008)
Penrose, E., Penrose, E.T.: The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press (1995)
Qiu, W., Zhang, J., Wu, H., Irfan, M., Ahmad, M.: The role of innovation investment and institutional quality on green total factor productivity: Evidence from 46 countries along the “Belt and Road.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29(11), 16597–16611 (2022)
Robson, P.J., Haugh, H.M., Obeng, B.A.: Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: Enterprising Africa. Small Bus. Econ. 32(3), 331–350 (2009)
Romer, P.M.: Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102 (1990)
Roper, S., Love, J.H.: Innovation and regional absorptive capacity: the labor market dimension. Ann. Reg. Sci. 40(2), 437–447 (2006)
Schilirò, D.: Investing in knowledge: knowledge. In: Arentsen, M.J., van Rossum, W., Steenge, A.E. (eds.) human capital, and institutions for the long-run growth, pp. 33–50. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2010)
Schilke, O.: Second-order dynamic capabilities: How do they matter? Acad. Manag. Perspect. 28(4), 368–380 (2014)
Schumpeter, J.A.: The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1934)
Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D.: Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(1), 273–292 (2007)
Statistical Office of the European Communities: Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (No 4). Publications de l’OCDE (2005)
Tavassoli, S.: Innovation determinants over industry life cycle. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 91, 18–32 (2015)
Tebaldi, E., Elmslie, B.: Does institutional quality impact innovation? Evidence from cross-country patent grant data. Appl. Econ. 45(7), 887–900 (2013)
Terziovski, M.: Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource-based view. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(8), 892–902 (2010)
Tian, X., & Xu, J. (2019). Do place-based policies promote local innovation and entrepreneurial finance?. Working paper.
Tipton, F.B.: Southeast Asian capitalism: History, institutions, states, and firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 26(3), 401–434 (2009)
Wang, C.C., Lin, G.C.: Dynamics of innovation in a globalizing china: regional environment, inter-firm relations and firm attributes. Journal of Economic Geography 13(3), 397–418 (2013)
Zhao, M.: Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Manage. Sci. 52(8), 1185–1199 (2006)
Funding
The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All work is done by Muhammad Zeeshan Younas.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval was not required for this study.
Consent for publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Younas, M.Z. Regional institutional quality and firm-level innovation: a case of selected south asian economies. Qual Quant 57, 615–643 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01381-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01381-1