Abstract
Convergence of knowledge and technology for the benefit of society (CKTS) is the core opportunity for progress in the twenty-first century. CKTS is defined as the escalating and transformative interactions among seemingly different disciplines, technologies, communities, and domains of human activity to achieve mutual compatibility, synergism, and integration, and through this process to create added value and branch out to meet shared goals. Convergence has been progressing by stages over the past several decades, beginning with nanotechnology for the material world, followed by convergence of nanotechnology, biotechnology, information, and cognitive science (NBIC) for emerging technologies. CKTS is the third level of convergence. It suggests a general process to advance creativity, innovation, and societal progress based on five general purpose principles: (1) the interdependence of all components of nature and society, (2) decision analysis for research, development, and applications based on dynamic system-logic deduction, (3) enhancement of creativity and innovation through evolutionary processes of convergence that combines existing principles and divergence that generates new ones, (4) the utility of higher-level cross-domain languages to generate new solutions and support transfer of new knowledge, and (5) the value of vision-inspired basic research embodied in grand challenges. CKTS is a general purpose approach in knowledge society. It allows society to answer questions and resolve problems that isolated capabilities cannot, as well as to create new competencies, knowledge, and technologies on this basis. Possible solutions are outlined for key societal challenges in the next decade, including support for foundational emerging technologies NBIC to penetrate essential platforms of human activity and create new industries and jobs, improve lifelong wellness and human potential, achieve personalized and integrated healthcare and education, and secure a sustainable quality of life for all. This paper provides a 10-year “NBIC2” vision within a longer-term framework for converging technology and human progress outlined in a previous study of unifying principles across “NBIC” fields that began with nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and technologies based on and enabling cognitive science (Roco and Bainbridge, Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive sciences, 2003).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989) Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Oxford University Press, New York. http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm. Accessed 27 Aug 2013
Alivisatos, AP, Chun M, Church GM, Greenspan RJ, Roukes ML, Yuste R (2012) The brain activity map project and the challenge of functional connectomics. Neuron 74(21):1–5
Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2006a) Managing Nano-bio-info-cogno Innovations. Springer, Berlin
Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2006b) Progress in convergence: technologies for human wellbeing. New York Academy of Sciences, New York
Dunbar RIM (2003) The social brain: mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Ann Rev Anthropol 32:163–181
Fichman RG (2004) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: emerging concepts and methods. J Assoc Inf Syst 5(8):314–355
Gregorian V (2004) Colleges must reconstruct the unity of knowledge. Chron High Education 50(39):B2
Hood L, Flores M (2012) A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. New Biotechnol 29(6):613–724
Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K (eds) (2009) The fourth paradigm, data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, Philadelphia
Kurzweil R (1999) The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. Viking, Penguin Group, New York
Langer EJ (1997) The power of mindful learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Mouw T, Kalleberg AL (2010) Occupations and the structure of wage inequality in the United States, 1980s to 2000s. Am Sociol Rev 75(3):402–431
National Science Board (2012) Science and engineering indicators. National Science Foundation, New York
NRC (National Research Council) (2010) Research at the intersection of the physical and life sciences. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C
NRC (National Research Council) (2012) Research Universities and the Future of America: ten breakthrough Actions vital to our nation’s prosperity and security. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Reif, R, Barrett C (2013) Science must be spared Washington’s axe. Financial Times, Upper Saddle River
Roco MC (2002) Coherence and divergence of megatrends in science and engineering. J Nanoparticle Res 4:9–19
Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years. J Nanoparticle Res 13:427–445
Roco MC (2012) Technology convergence, Ch. 24. In: Bainbridge WS (ed) Leadership in science and technology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 210–219
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht. http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications/nanosi.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2013
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale. J Nanoparticle Res 4:281–295
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive sciences. Springer, New York http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/. Accessed 27 Aug 2013
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2007) Nanotechnology: societal implications. Springer, New York
Roco MC, Montemagno C (2004) The co-evolution of human potential and converging technologies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York
Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (eds) (1999) Nanotechnology research directions: vision for the next decade. IWGN Workshop report 1999. National Science and Technology Council, Springer (2000), Washington, DC. http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/IWGN.Research.Directions/. Accessed 27 Aug 2013
Roco MC, Mirkin CA, Hersam MC (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. Springer, New York. http://www.wtec.org/nano2/Nanotechnology_Research_Directions_to_2020/. Accessed 27 Aug 2013
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (2013) Converging knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Boston http://www.wtec.org/NBIC2-report. Accessed 27 Aug 2013
Sadava D, Oh J (2000) Clinton speaks of science, technology. Calif Tech 1(14):1–2
Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information rules. Harvard Business Press, Boston
Sharp PA, Langer R (2011) Promoting convergence in biomedical science. Science 222(6042):527
Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic Science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
UN (United Nations) (2011) Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. United Nations, New York
UN (United Nations) (2012a) Millennium development goals report. United Nations, New York
UN (United Nations) (2012b) Realizing the future we want for all. United Nations, New York
UN (United Nations) (2012c) Report of the United Nations conference on sustainable development. United Nations, New York
UN (United Nations) (2012d) Building a sustainable and desirable economy-in-society-in-nature. United Nations, New York
Wilson EO (1999) Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Random House, New York
Acknowledgments
The National Science Foundation (NSF)/World Technology Evaluation Center (WTEC) international study was completed with panel members and expert contributions from U.S., and abroad (www.wtec.org/NBIC2-report). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or National Science and Technology Council/Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology committee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article contains excerpts from “Converging Knowledge, Technology and Society: Beyond Convergence of Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies”, edited by M.C. Roco, W.S. Bainbridge, B. Tonn and G. Whitesides, National Science Foundation/World Technology Evaluation Center report, Springer 2013, Boston (available on http://www.wtec.org/NBIC2-report) (Accessed on 27 Aug 2013).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roco, M.C., Bainbridge, W.S. The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. J Nanopart Res 15, 1946 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1946-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1946-1