Abstract
The article challenges the theoretical “sectoral model” of civil society through a historical case study and offers an alternative actor-centered approach inspired by American pragmatism. First, three separate strands of research are identified that each conceptualize civil society as a sector with institutional independence, a single normative logic, and fixed roles. Building on archival material on the Danish temperance organization the Blue Cross, the article then compares the theory to the empirical case. It is argued that the CSO exposes three types of “awkwardness” in the sector model, as the Blue Cross (1) de-differentiated and became part of the public system of treatment for alcoholism, (2) applied multiple logics depending on the audience it addressed, and (3) acted in the role of “interpreter” rather than “antenna”—and specifically interpreted the needs of alcoholics in mutual understanding with state authorities. Finally, an alternative approach to the study of CSOs is proposed: a historically sensitive approach that differently from an ahistorical model analyzes collective actors historically, affirmatively, and situationally through their application of contentious and non-contentious repertoires of civic action.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It has been suggested that certain social movements are “awkward” to many researchers, since they do not fit the established view of what a movement “ought to be,” e.g., terrorist movements or religious conservative movements (Polletta 2006).
Association of Voluntary Action Scholars
Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action
In this way, I follow a trend where historical sociologists are increasingly heading to the archives (Adams et al. 2005, p. 26).
Sevelsted (2019) deals explicitly with the Blue Cross’ involvement in the emergence of “illiberal” policies in Denmark.
Blue Cross Denmark annual report 2017 and https://www.blaakors.dk/om/om-blaa-kors.
Habermas admits as much (Habermas 1984).
Habermas (2003, pp. 307–342)
I am somewhat overstating my point here. Habermas does seek to avoid teleology through a complicated understanding of how historical evolution can be reconstructed, but not causally described (Habermas 1975). The overall process, however, does in hindsight look suspiciously teleological.
For the sake of completeness, it should be noted that collective civic action can also be what you might call “un-contentious,” i.e., where the CSO becomes a mere service provider operating on the market or for the state.
References
Adams, J., Clemens, E. S., & Orloff, A. S. (Eds.). (2005). Remaking modernity: politics, history, and sociology. Durham: Duke University Press.
Anheier, H., & Knapp, M. (1990). Voluntas: an editorial statement. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1(1), 1–12.
Arato, A. (1981). Civil society against the state: Poland 1980-81. Telos, 1981(47), 23–47.
Arato, A. (1989). Civil society, history and socialism: reply to John Keane. Praxis International, 9(1+2), 133–151.
Arato, A., & Cohen, J. L. (1988). Civil society and social theory. Thesis Eleven, 21(1), 40–64.
Banke, C. F. S. (1999). Den sociale ingeniørkunst i Danmark: Familie, stat og politik fra 1900 til 1945: Ph.d.-afhandling. Roskilde: Institut for Historie og Samfundsforhold, Roskilde Universitetscenter.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
Beveridge, W. (1948). Voluntary action: a report on method of social advance. London: Routledge.
Blå, K. (2015). +120—Blå Kors 120 år i Danmark. Blå Kors: Silkeborg.
Bundesen, P., Henriksen, L. S., & Jørgensen, A. (2001). Filantropi, selvhjælp og interesseorganisering: Frivillige organisationer i dansk socialpolitik 1849–1990’erne. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.
Celik, T. H. (2017). Tension-filled governance?: Exploring the emergence, consolidation and reconfiguration of legitimatory and fiscal state-crafting. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School.
Christensen, C. (1918). Udenlands. Det Blå Kors.
Cohen, J. L. (1983). Rethinking social movements. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 28, 97–113.
Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory (1st ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Dahl, H. (1933). Livets Skole. Det Blå Kors.
Dahl, H. (1936). Mors Dreng. Det Blå Kors.
Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume II, Number 4 (Vol. 2, pp. 1–66). Chicago, ill: The University of Chicago press.
Dikötter, F. (1998). Race culture: recent perspectives on the history of eugenics. The American Historical Review, 103(2), 467–478.
Durkheim, É. (2008). In M. S. Cladis, C. Cosman, & Trans (Eds.), The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elias, N. (1997). Towards a theory of social processes: a translation (R. van Krieken & E. dunning, trans.). The British Journal of Sociology, 48(3), 355.
Eriksen, S. (1988). Vækkelse og afholdsbevægelse. Scandia: Tidsskrift För Historisk Forskning, 54(2), 251–295.
Eriksen, S. (2007). From gold cure to Antabuse: Danish treatment traditions in a liberal drinking culture. In K. Stenius (Ed.), On the margins: Nordic alcohol and drug treatment 1885–2007 (pp. 48–74). Helsinki: NAD.
Es**-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Folmann, E. (1938). Familien Hammer. Det Blå Kors.
Garboe, A. (1934). Landsbypigen. En Skildring fra det virkelige Liv. Det Blå Kors.
Granum-Jensen, A. R. (1979). Baggrund og glimt fra Blå Kors’ historie i 100 år. Silkeborg: Blå Kors.
Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358–379.
Habermas, J. (1975). Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism. Theory and Society, 2(3), 287–300 Retrieved from JSTOR.
Habermas, J. (1984). In T. MacCarthy & Trans (Eds.), Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1985a). In T. MacCarthy & Trans (Eds.), Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon.
Habermas, J. (1985b). In T. MacCarthy & Trans (Eds.), The theory of communicative action vol 1: reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (2001). Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (1 MIT press paperback ed., 4. Printing; W. Rehg, trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT press.
Habermas, J. (2003). In M. Cooke & Trans (Eds.), On the pragmatics of communication. Oxford: Polity.
Hall, P. D. (1992). Inventing the nonprofit sector and other essays on philanthropy, voluntarism, and nonprofit organizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. press.
Honneth, A., & Joas, H. (Eds.). (1991). Communicative action: essays on Jürgen Habermas’s the theory of communicative action (1st MIT Press ed.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press.
Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joas, H. (2013). The sacredness of the person: a new genealogy of human rights. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Joas, H. (2017). Die Macht des Heiligen: Eine Alternative zur Geschichte von der Entzauberung (Erste Auflage ed.). Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Keane, J. (1988). Democracy and civil society: on the predicaments of European socialism, the prospects for democracy, and the problem of controlling social and political power. In London. New York: Verso.
Koch, L. (1996). Racehygiejne i Danmark 1920–56. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Koch, L. (2000). Tvangssterilisation i Danmark 1929–67. København: Gyldendal.
Kocka, J. (2004a). Civil society from a historical perspective. European Review, 12(1), 65–79 Retrieved from Cambridge Core.
Kocka, J. (2004b). Zivilgesellschaft in historischer Perspektive. In Jessen, R., Reichardt, S.& Klein, A. (Eds.), Zivilgesellschaft als Geschichte (pp. 29–42). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Kocka, J. (2010). Civil society and dictatorship in modern German history. Hanover: Published by University Press of new England.
Koselleck, R. (2004). In K. Tribe & Trans (Eds.), Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.
Leth, M. (1910). Ved Gudenaa. Det Blå Kors.
Leth, M. (1915). Et Firkløver. Det Blå Kors.
Leth, M. (1928). Livets Kompas. Det Blå Kors.
Lichterman, P., & Eliasoph, N. (2014). Civic action. The American Journal of Sociology, 120(3), 798–863.
Nielsen, M. Th. (1938). Holger Borgstrøm—Et ungdomsliv. Det Blaa Kors Forlag.
Polletta, F. (2006). Mobilization forum: awkward movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(4), 475–500.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rasmussen, M. (1921). Den Skyldige. Det Blå Kors.
Rasmussen, M. (1923). Værtshusholderens Peter. Det Blå Kors.
Riegel, R. E. (1968). Changing American attitudes toward prostitution (1800-1920). Journal of the History of Ideas, 29(3), 437–452.
Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16(1–2), 29–49.
Salamon, L. M. (1989). The voluntary sector and the future of the welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18(1), 11–24.
Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2016). Beyond nonprofits: re-conceptualizing the third sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1515–1545.
Schädler Andersen, L. (2008). Folkekirkens entreprenører: Striden om Det københavnske Kirkefond 1896-1907. Historie, 2008(1), 35–86.
Sevelsted, A. (2019). Degeneration, protestantism, and social democracy: the case of alcoholism and “illiberal” policies and practices in Denmark 1900–43. Social Science History, 43(1), 87–111.
Sewell, W. H. (1996). Historical events as transformations of structures: inventing revolution at the bastille. Theory and Society, 25(6), 841–881.
Skocpol, T. (2001). Das bürgergesellschaftliche Amerika—Gestern und heute. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Gesellschaft und Gemeinsinn (pp. 593–654). Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Skocpol, T. (2004). Diminished democracy: from membership to management in American civic life (1. Paperback publ). Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma press.
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000). A nation of organizers: the institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. The American Political Science Review, 94(3), 527–546.
Smith, D. H. (1972). Major analytical topics of voluntary action theory and research: version 2. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1(1), 6–19.
Smith, D. H. (2003). A history of ARNOVA. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(3), 458–472.
Smith, D. H. (2013). Growth of research associations and journals in the emerging discipline of altruistics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 638–656.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481.
Sobriety Commission report. (1907). Betænkning afgiven af den af Indenrigsministeriet den 25. Juni 1903 nedsatte Kommission til overvejelse af Foranstaltninger til Ædruelighedens Fremme.
Somers, M. R. (1993). Citizenship and the place of the public sphere: law, community, and political culture in the transition to democracy. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 587–620.
Steincke, K. K. (1933). Socialreformen: En kortfattet Oversigt. Fremad.
Thompson, E. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past & Present, 50, 76–136.
Thorsen, T. (1993). Dansk alkoholpolitik efter 1950. Holte: Socpol.
Tilly, C. (1993). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Social Science History, 17(2), 253–280.
Vaughan, D. (1992). Theory elaboration: the heuristics of case analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 173–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, E. O. (2011). The “triadic” model of society in Somers’ genealogies of citizenship. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 405–418.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sevelsted, A. From Awkwardness to Action Christian Voluntarism in Denmark Beyond the Sector Model of Civil Society. Int J Polit Cult Soc 34, 191–215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-020-09378-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-020-09378-0