Abstract
In Colombia, Law 1787 of 2016 legalized marijuana for medicinal and scientific purposes. The law promotes social inclusion in two ways: (1) establishing mechanisms to incentivize rural marijuana production; and (2) protecting and strengthening small producers in the context of governmental efforts to voluntarily substitute illicit crops. These commitments are consistent with the peace agreement reached in 2016 between the guerrilla group, Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia—Ejército del Pueblo (FARC-EP) and the Colombian government, in which a solution to the problem of illicit crops based on voluntary substitution and rural development was proposed. What has happened, however, is that instead of the proposed “inclusion,” the legalization of marijuana has benefited the corporate sector almost exclusively. Employing a southern criminological approach, we first analyze the punitive rationale in the so-called “War on Drugs” and the shift to a purportedly more benign pro-poor and pro-health legalization discourse. From here, we critique the legal architecture to regulate the production of marijuana. In so doing, we illustrate how uneven power relations and governmental capitalist favoritism have been utilized by corporate ventures located in the political and economic bureaucratic heart of Colombia, reproducing the historical marginalization of impoverished mestizo campesinos (peasant farmers), whose livelihoods have been dependent on illicit crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A campesino is a rural inhabitant with little or no land, who in the context of this research has self-identified as such.
In this article, we have chosen to employ the term, “illicit crops,” to reflect the punitive and criminalizing discourse that is utilized by the Colombian government to refer to coca, marijuana and poppy crops. We use the term, “crops for illicit use,” to refer to the perspective of the peasants who argue that (i) the crop, itself, should not be illegal, but the use given to it; and (ii) these are the very same crops that enable impoverished communities to access basic needs.
“Ecologically unequal exchange” is a concept used to describe the economic and ecologic asymmetries between the resource-rich regions or countries that bear the burdens of the most negative effects of extractivist activities, and the industrialized regions or countries where capital and most benefits of those same activities accumulate (see Bedford et al. 2020).
References
Alvarez, M. D. (2007). Environmental damage from illicit drug crops in Colombia. In De Jong, W., Donovan, D., & Abe, K. (Eds.) Extreme conflict and tropical forests (pp. 133-147). Dordrecht: Springer.
Andreas, P., & Nadelmann, E. (2008). Policing the globe: Criminalization and crime control in international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ART. (2019). Municipios PDET subregiones. Retrieved on May 30, 2020, from https://www.renovacionterritorio.gov.co/Publicaciones/municipios_pdet_subregiones.
August, K. (2013). Women in the marijuana industry. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 35(1), 89-103.
Banco Mundial. (2019). Retrieved on December 4, 2019, from https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?end=2018&locations=CO&start=1960&view=chart.
Barro, R. & Lee, J. (2005). IMF programs: Who is chosen and what are the effects? Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(7), 1245-1269
Barry, R., Hiilamo, H., & Glantz, S. (2014). Waiting for the opportune moment: The tobacco industry and marijuana legalization. The Milbank Quarterly, 92(2), 207-242.
Bedford, L., McGillivray, L., & Walters, R. (2020). Ecologically unequal exchange, transnational mining, and resistance: A political ecology contribution to green criminology. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 28(3), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09464-6.
Bifulco, M., & Pisanti, S. (2015). Medicinal use of cannabis in Europe. EMBO reports, 16(2), 130-132.
Calderón, G.A., Pareja, L.M., Caicedo, C., & Chica, R.A. (2017). Regulación del uso de marihuana en Colombia con fines medicinales. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud, 22(1), 43-55.
Callejas-Baracaldo, P.D. (2017). Marihuana controversia legal, con fin medicinal. Tesis de grado Universidad Católica. Retrieved on May 30, 2020, from http://repository.ucatolica.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/10983/15377/1/ART%C3%8DCULO.%20.pdf.
Campbell, B. (2000). New rules of the game: the World Bank's role in the construction of new normative frameworks for states, markets and social exclusion. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 21(1), 7-30.
Carah, J., Howard, J., Thompson, S., Bauer, S.D., Carlson, S.M., Dralle, D.N., et al. (2015). High time for conservation: Adding the environment to the debate on marijuana liberalization. BioScience, 65(8), 822-829.
Castillejo, A. (2017). Introducción: dialécticas de la fractura y la continuidad: elementos para una lectura crítica de las transiciones. In La ilusión de la justicia transicional Perspectivas críticas desde el Sur global. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
Caulkins, J.P., & Kilmer, B. (2016). Considering marijuana legalization carefully: insights for other jurisdictions from analysis for Vermont. Addiction, 111(12), 2082-2089.
CEDD. (2014). Consumo, consumidores de drogas y respuestas estatales en América Latina. México D.F: Fontanamara.
Chu, Y. (2015). Do medical marijuana laws increase hard-drug use? The Journal of Law & Economics, 58(2), 481-517. https://doi.org/10.1086/684043.
Collins, J. (2016a) Executive Summary. In After the Drug Wars: Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy (pp. 6–8). LSE IDEAS, February. Retrieved on December 9, 2019, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/reports/LSE-IDEAS-After-Drug-Wars.pdf.
Collins, J. (2016b). Development First: Multilateralism in the Post-'War on Drug' Era. In After the Drug Wars: Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy (pp. 9-18). LSE IDEAS, February. Retrieved on December 9, 2019, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/reports/LSE-IDEAS-After-Drug-Wars.pdf.
Cook, K. & Powell, C. (2003). Christianity and punitive mentalities: A qualitative study. Crime, Law and Social Change, 39(1), 69-89.
Crawford, S. (2014). Estimating the quasi-underground: Oregon's informal marijuana economy. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 36(1), 118-137.
Crick, E. (2012). Drugs as an existential threat: An analysis of the? international securitization of drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 23(5), 407-414.
Cuellar, F. (2005). The profits of extermination: How US corporate power is destroying Colombia. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
Dados, N., & Connell, R. (2012). The global south. Contexts, 11(1), 12-13.
del Olmo, R. (1987). Aerobiology and the War on Drugs: A Transnational Crime. Crime and Social Justice 30(1), 28-44.
del Olmo, R. (1998a). La cara oculta de la droga. Bogotá: Editorial Nomos.
del Olmo, R. (1998b). The ecological impact of illicit drug cultivation and crop eradication programs in Latin America. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 269-278.
Dion, M., & Russler, C. (2008). Eradication efforts, the state, displacement and poverty: Explaining coca cultivation in Colombia during Plan Colombia. Journal of Latin American Studies, 40(3), 399-421.
Dyer, O. (2014). Canadian court decision challenges new rules on medical marijuana. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 348(1), 2369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2369
Edelman, M. (2013). Messy hectares: questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40(3), 485-501.
EFE. (2020). Según EE. UU., producción de cocaína llegó a 951 toneladas en 2019. El Tiempo, March 6. Retrieved on May 26, 2019, from https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/conflicto-y-narcotrafico/cifras-record-de-cultivos-y-de-produccion-de-coca-en-colombia-en-2019-469630.
El País (2019). Estados Unidos aumentará en 27 millones de dólares fondos para el Plan Colombia. El Pais, febrero 15 de 2019. Retrieved on November 20, 2019, from https://www.elpais.com.co/colombia/estados-unidos-aumentara-en-27-millones-de-dolares-fondos-para-el-plan-colombia.html.
El Tiempo. (2019). Colombia hace su primera exportación comercial de cannabis medicinal. El Tiempo, agosto 1 de 2019. Retrieved on December 1, 2019, from https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/servicios/colombia-hace-su-primera-exportacion-comercial-de-cannabis-medicinal-396134.
Fergusson, L., Romero, D., & Vargas, J. F. (2014). The environmental impact of civil conflict: the deforestation effect of paramilitary expansion in Colombia. Documento CEDE No. 2014–36. Retrieved on August 6, 2021, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2516512.
Foster, J.B., & Holleman, H. (2014). The theory of unequal ecological exchange: a Marx-Odum dialectic. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(2), 199-233.
Fundación Ideas Para La Paz (FIP). (2014). Área de dinámicas del conflicto y negociaciones de paz. Unidad de análisis ‘Siguiendo el conflicto’ - boletín # 72. Dinámicas del conflicto armado en el sur del Valle y norte del Cauca y su impacto humanitario. Retrieved on November 20, 2019, from http://cdn.ideaspaz.org/media/website/document/53b5910826062.pdf.
Fundación Ideas Para La Paz (FIP). (2018) ¿En qué va la sustitución de cultivos ilícitos? Balance del 2017 y lo que viene en 2018. Retrieved on May 26, 2019, from http://www.ideaspaz.org/publications/posts/1654.
Fundación Ideas Para La Paz (FIP). (2019). Norte del Cauca. Informe preliminar sobre el estado de la implementación del Acuerdo de Paz, febrero de 2019. Retrieved on March 5, 2021, from from: http://ideaspaz.org/media/website/Informe_Norte_Cauca_2019.pdf.
Galvis, D. (2012). Legalización de la marihuana en Colombia: análisis sobre los efectos en el presupuesto nacional. Tesis de grado Universidad de los Andes, mayo 28 de 2012. Retrieved on November 20, 2019, from https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstream/handle/1992/24816/u615636.pdf?sequence=1.
Garland, D. (1991). Frameworks of Inquiry in the Sociology of Punishment. The British Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/591014.
Girotto, E., De Andrade, S., Mesas, A., González, A., & Guidoni, C. (2015). Working conditions and illicit psychoactive substance use among truck drivers in Brazil. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 72(11), 764-769.
Goyes, D.R. (2018). Corporate lobbying and criminalisation. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 69(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9745-8.
Guy, G. W., Whittle, B. A., & Robson, P. J. (2008). The medicinal uses of cannabis and cannabinoids. Le Pharmacien Hospitalier, 43(172), 56-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0768-9179(08)70455-3.
Heddleston, T. (2013). A tale of three cities: Medical marijuana, activism, and local regulation in California. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 35(1), 123-143.
Hernández, Z.J. (2009). Las empresas transnacionales frente a los derechos humanos: historia de una asimetría normativa: de la responsabilidad social corporativa a las redes contrahegemónicas transnacionales. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, Instituto de Estudios sobre Desarrollo y Cooperación Internacional (Hegoa).
Hernández, Z., J., & Ramiro, P. (2016). Lex mercatoria vs. derechos humanos. Las empresas transnacionales y la arquitectura jurídica de la impunidad. Gaceta Sindical: reflexión y debate, 26(1), 223–240.
Hernández, Z., J., González, E., & Ramiro, P. (2012). Diccionario crítico de empresas transnacionales. Claves para enfrentar el poder de las grandes corporaciones. Barcelona: Icaria.
Hickenlooper, A. (2014). Experimenting with pot: The state of Colorado's legalization of marijuana. The Milbank Quarterly, 92(2), 243-249.
Hornborg, A. (2009). Zero-sum world: challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50(3-4), 237-262.
Hougaard, I. & Vélez-Torres, I. (2020). Shifting sands: Legal dispossession of small-scale miners in an extractivist era. Geoforum, 115(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.022.
Huber, A., Newman, R., & LaFave, D. (2016). Cannabis control and crime: Medicinal use, depenalization and the war on drugs. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 16(4), 1-35.
IGAC. (2018). División política de la República de Colombia. Escala 1:25.000. Subdirección de Geografía y Cartografía– Grupo Interno de Trabajo Generación de Datos y Productos Cartográficos. Retrieved on December 3, 2019, from https://geoportal.igac.gov.co/es/contenido/datos-abiertos-cartografia-y-geografia.
Ibáñez, M. (2010). Who crops coca and why? The case of Colombian farmers. Discussion Paper No. 40. CRC Discussion Papers, Courant Research Centre Poverty, Equity and Growth, Universität Göttingen. Retrieved on December 5, 2019, from https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/90527.
Irwin-Rogers, K. (2019). Illicit drug markets, consumer capitalism and the rise of social media: A toxic trap for young people. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 27(1), 591-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09476-2.
Jensen, E. L., Gerber, J., & Mosher, C. (2004). Social consequences of the war on drugs: the legacy of failed policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(1), 100-121.
Joyce, S. (1999). Environmental casualties of the war on drugs. Environmental Health Perspectives, 107(2), A74-A77.
Kamin, S. (2016). Marijuana legalization in Colorado-lessons for Colombia. Journal Colombian Institute of Tax Law, 75(1), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2654305.
Li, T. M. (2007). Governmentality. Anthropologica, 49(2), 275-281.
Lindahl, H. (2009). A right to inclusion and exclusion?: normative fault lines of the EU's area of freedom, security and justice. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
Londoño, G. (2019). La guerra contra los líderes en el norte del Cauca. Pares, febrero 18 de 2019. Retrieved on December 5, 2019, from https://pares.com.co/2019/02/18/la-guerra-contra-los-lideres-en-el-norte-del-cauca/.
Lund, C. (2006). Twilight institutions: public authority and local politics in Africa. Development and change, 37(4), 685-705.
Massey, R. (2001). The “drug war” in Colombia: Echoes of Vietnam. Journal of Public Health Policy, 22(3), 280-285.
Mechoulam, R. (2000). Looking back at cannabis research. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 6(13), 1313-1322.
Mejía, D. (2010). Evaluating Plan Colombia. In Keefer, P., & Loayza, N. (Eds.) Innocent bystanders: Develo** countries and the war on drugs (pp. 135-164). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ministerio de Justicia y Derecho. (2019). Resoluciones técnicas del cannabis. Retrieved on May 30, 2020, from https://www.minjusticia.gov.co/Portals/0/Cannabis/Licencias%20de%20Cannabis%20otorgadas%20MJD%2031-10-2019.pdf
Ministerio de Salud. (2017). Ley 1787 de 2016. Retrieved on May 30, 2020, from https://www.minjusticia.gov.co/Cannabis-Con-Fines-Medicinales-y-Cientificos/Normatividad-Cannabis.
Ministerio de Salud. (2020). Licencias de fabricación de derivados de cannabis con fecha del 20 de septiembre de 2019. Retrieved on May 30, 2020, from https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/MET/licencia-fabricacion-cannabis-uso-medicinal.pdf.
Mol, H. (2017). The Politics of Palm Oil Harm: A Green Criminological Perspective. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer.
OCHA. (2020). Briefing departamental. Cauca: Junio 2020. Retrieved on March 5, 2021, from: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/documents/files/briefing_humanitario_cauca_junio_2020.pdf.
O'Dea, P. J., Murphy, B., & Balzer, C. (1997). Traffic and illegal production of drugs in rural America In Robertson, E. et al. (Ed.). Rural substance abuse: State of knowledge and issues (pp.79–88). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.
Oficina del Alto Comisionado para la Paz. (2016). Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera. Retrieved on December 2, 2019, from http://www.altocomisionadoparalapaz.gov.co/procesos-y-conversaciones/Paginas/Texto-completo-del-Acuerdo-Final-para-la-Terminacion-del-conflicto.aspx.
Paley, D. (2015). Drug war as neoliberal trojan horse. Latin American Perspectives, 42(5), 109-132.
Palmater, P. (2014). Genocide, Indian policy, and legislated elimination of Indians in Canada. Aboriginal policy studies, 3(3), 27-57.
Patten, D. (2016). The mass incarceration of nations and the global war on drugs: Comparing the United States' domestic and foreign drug policies. Social Justice, 43(1), 85-105.
Pérez-Rincón, M., Vargas-Morales, J., & Crespo-Marín, Z. (2018). Trends in social metabolism and environmental conflicts in four Andean countries from 1970 to 2013. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 635-648.
Potter, D.J. (2014). A review of the cultivation and processing of cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) for production of prescription medicines in the UK. Drug Testing and Analysis, 6(1-2), 31-38.
Reuter, P. (2013). Why has US drug policy changed so little over 30 years? Crime and Justice, 42(1), 75-140.
Reuter, P., Pollack, H., & Pardo, B. (2016). If Tougher Enforcement Cannot Reliably Raise Drug Prices, 51 What are Appropriate Goals and Metrics? In After the Drug Wars: Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy (pp. 51-58). LSE IDEAS, February. Retrieved on August 6, 2021, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/reports/LSE-IDEAS-After-Drug-Wars.pdf.
Safford, F., & Palacios, M. (2002). Colombia: Fragmented land, divided society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Salazar, S. (2019). El departamento del Cauca es donde más asesinan dirigentes sociales. Colombiacheck, abril 22 de 2019. Retrieved on December 5, 2019, from https://colombiacheck.com/chequeos/el-departamento-del-cauca-es-donde-mas-asesinan-dirigentes-sociales.
Semana. (2019). Así va la industria del cannabis en Colombia. Semana, August 8. Retrieved on December 3, 2019, from https://www.dinero.com/pais/articulo/asi-va-la-industria-del-cannabis-en-colombia/275313.
Single, E., Christie, P., & Ali, R. (2000). The impact of cannabis decriminalisation in Australia and the United States. Journal of Public Health Policy, 21(2), 157-186.
Smith, C. L., Hooks, G., & Lengefeld, M. (2014). The war on drugs in Colombia: The environment, the treadmill of destruction and risk-transfer militarism. Journal of World-Systems Research, 20(2), 185-206.
Sollund, R., Maldonado, A., & Rico, C. B. (2019). El acuerdo entre Noruega y Colombia para proteger los bosques tropicales y reducir el calentamiento global: ¿éxito o fracaso?. Crítica Penal y Poder, 16(1), 75-98.
Taylor, J., Jasparro, C., & Mattson, K. (2013). Geographers and drugs: a survey of the literature. Geographical Review, 103(3), 415-430.
Thoumi, F. E. (2002). Illegal drugs in Colombia: From illegal economic boom to social crisis. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 582(1), 102-116.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2015). Perspectives on the development dimensions of drug control policy. Geneva: UNDP. Retrieved on December 2, 2019, from https://www.unodc.org/documents/ungass2016/Contributions/UN/UNDP/UNDP_paper_for_CND_March_2015.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Oficina de la Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito) (UNODC). (2013). Colombia: monitoreo de cultivos de coca 2012. Retrieved on November 20, 2019, from http://www.odc.gov.co/Portals/1/publicaciones/pdf/oferta/censos/OF02012012-censo-cultivos-coca-2012-.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Oficina de la Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito) (UNODC). (2019). Colombia: Monitoreo de territorios afectados por cultivos ilícitos 2018. Retrieved on November 20, 2019, from https://www.unodc.org/documents/crop-monitoring/Colombia/Censo_cultivos_coca_2018.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Oficina de la Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito) (UNODC). (2020). Colombia: Monitoreo de territorios afectados por cultivos ilícitos 2019. Retrieved on May 30, 2021, from https://www.unodc.org/documents/colombia/2020/Julio/Informe_Monitoreo_de_Territorios_Afectados_por_Cultivos_Ilicitos_2019.pdf.
Uribe, S. (2017). Frontier road: power, history, and the everyday state in the Colombian Amazon. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
U.S. Department of State. (2001). 2000 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR): South America. Issued March 1, 2001. Retrieved on August 26, 2021, from https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2000/883.htm.
Vargas, R. (1999). Fumigación y conflicto: Políticas antidrogas y deslegitimación del Estado en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Tercer Mundo S.A.
Vargas, R. (2005). Narcotráfico, guerra y política antidrogas: una perspectiva sobre las drogas en el conflicto armado colombiano. Amsterdam: Acción Andina Colombiana and Transnational Institute.
Vélez-Torres, I. (2014). Governmental extractivism in Colombia: Legislation, securitization and the local settings of mining control. Political Geography, 38(1), 68–78.
Vélez-Torres, I. (2019). Narrativas comunitarias y dinámicas territoriales del proceso de implementación del Acuerdo de Paz en Miranda, Cauca (2016-2018). Revista CS, 28(1), 153-179.
Vélez-Torres, I., & Lugo, D. (2021). Slow violence and the corporate greening in the war on drugs in Colombia. International Affairs, 97(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa159.
Yepes, R. U., Guzmán, D. E., & Norato, J. P. (2012). La adicción punitiva: La desproporción de leyes de drogas en América Latina. Bogotá, DC, COL: Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad, Dejusticia. Retrieved on November 20, 2019, from https://www.wola.org/sites/default/files/downloadable/Drug_Policy/la_adiccion_punitiva.pdf.
Yepes, R. U., Hernández, S. C., & Olivera, L. F. C. (2017). Delitos de drogas y sobredosis carcelaria en Colombia. Bogotá, DC, COL: Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad, Dejusticia. Retrieved on November 20, 2019, from https://www.dejusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Delitos-de-drogas-y-sobredosis-carcelaria-en-Colombia-Version-final-PDF-para-WEB.pdf.
Acknowledgments
This research was possible due to the financial support given by MINCIENCIAS and RCUK (Grant No. 7912017). We are extremely grateful to the social organizations of Indigenous, Afro-descendants, and mestizo campesinos for their generosity in sharing their space, time, trust, and ideas. Their participation has always been at the heart of the Paz Alto Cauca Project (see http://pazaltocauca.net/).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vélez-Torres, I., Hurtado, D. & Bueno, B. Medicinal Marijuana, Inc.: A Critique on the Market-led Legalization of Cannabis and the Criminalization of Rural Livelihoods in Colombia. Crit Crim 29, 505–526 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-021-09589-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-021-09589-7