Log in

The Radicalization of Democracy: Conflict, Social Movements and Terrorism

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea of democracy is being championed across the world, with some fifty new countries embracing this type of political system between 1974 and 2011 (Freedom House Anxious dictators, wavering democracies: global freedom under pressure, Freedom House, Washington, 2016). Simultaneously, however, dissatisfaction has grown due to the perceived incapacity of democracy to deal with collective problems, hence the necessity to reconfigure it and redraw some of its principles. This paper links the analysis of the recent evolution of democratic systems with the trajectory of socio-political conflicts and the changing features of contemporary terrorism. It examines, therefore, two intertwined phenomena, namely the radicalization of democracy and the radicalization of the other. It concludes by stressing that encouraging dissent and heeding contentious claims made by social movements may be one way of mitigating both types of radicalization. Embedded in the tradition of critical criminology, this paper attempts to demonstrate that only by outflanking conventional categories of analysis can the criminological community aspire to grasp such thorny contemporary phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adonis, (2016). Violence and islam. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2016). Our wound is not so recent. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E. (2016). Critique in the 21st century. Radical Philosophy, 200, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H. D. (2016). Dead for good: Martyrdom and the rise of the suicide bomber. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. J. (2015). Radicals, revolutionaries and terrorists. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (2004). The geometry of terrorism. Sociological Theory, 22, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, G., & Heymann, P. B. (2010). Laws, outlaws and terrorists. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1998). Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buc, P. (2015). Holy wars, martyrdom and terror. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, M. (2016). Softening up the state. New Left Review, 100, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1965). ‘L’homme revolté’, in essais. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, L. (2013). Terrorism in the twenty-first century. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved?. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2002). Faith and knowledge: Two sources of “religion” at the limits of reason alone. In G. Anidjar (Ed.), Acts of religion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2003). Autoimmunity: Real and symbolic suicides. In G. Borradori (Ed.), Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Habermas and Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1954). The public and its problems. Columbus: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1965). Studies in a dying colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (2016). Anxious dictators, wavering democracies: Global freedom under pressure. Washington: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freilich, J. D., & LaFree, G. (2015). Criminological theory and terrorism: Introduction to the special issue. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerges, F. A. (2015). ISIS: A history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2013). The democracy project. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassner, R. E. (2016). Religion on the battlefield. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkuc, H. (2009). Said nursi: Makers of islamic civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2016). The state. Past present future. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H. (2016). The caliphate. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2015). The new Arab wars: Uprising and anarchy in the middle east. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1970). The discourses. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (2010). Understanding terrorism. Challenges, perspectives and issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, K. (2013). Our violent world. Terrorism in society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism. A psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, J. A. (2017). Repression and terrorism: A cross-national empirical analysis of types of repression and domestic terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 29, 102–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2006). Understanding political violence. A criminological analysis. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2010). Armed struggle in Italy: The limits to criminology in the analysis of political violence. British Journal of Criminology, 50(4), 708–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2017). Dirty money. On financial delinquency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V., & Montagna, N. (Eds.). (2008). Social movements: A reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, J. (2015). Not in god’s name. Confronting religious violence. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2015). The country of first boys and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, T. (2016). Wars of religion. Times Literary Supplement, 23 September, Middle East Special Feature, pp. 1–12.

  • Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (2014). The inner enemies of democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, R. (2016). Il tempo della paura. Micro Mega, 2, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2014). Offshoring. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victoroff, J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.). (2009). Psychology of terrorism: Classic and contemporary insights. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S., & Mythen, G. (2016). Fractured lives, splintered knowledge: Making criminological sense of the january, 2015 terrorist attack in Paris. Critical Criminology, 24, 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (2015). The paradox of liberation. Secular revolutions and religious counterrevolutions. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. (2002). Fundamentalist violence: Political violence and political religion in modern conflict. International Social Science Journal, 54, 499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, C. (2016). New masters of revolutionary warfare: The islamic state movement (2002–2016). Perspectives on Terrorism, 10, 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, G. (2016). My koran problem. New York Review of Books, pp. 16–19.

  • Witte, R. (1996). Racist violence and the state. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding has been received from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 700688.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Ruggiero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruggiero, V. The Radicalization of Democracy: Conflict, Social Movements and Terrorism. Crit Crim 25, 593–607 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9373-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9373-8

Navigation