Log in

Quality of life issues in patients with bone metastases: A systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Bones are frequent sites of metastatic disease, observed in 30–75% of advanced cancer patients. Quality of life (QoL) is an important endpoint in studies evaluating the treatments of bone metastases (BM), and many patient-reported outcome tools are available. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compile a list of QoL issues relevant to BM and its interventions. The secondary objective was to identify common tools used to assess QoL in patients with BM, and the QoL issues they fail to address.

Methods

A search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1946 and 27 January 2023 with the keywords “bone metastases”, “quality of life”, and “patient reported outcomes”. Specific QoL issues in original research studies and the QoL tools used were extracted.

Results

The review identified the QoL issues most prevalent to BM in the literature. Physical and functional issues observed in patients included pain, interference with ambulation and daily activities, and fatigue. Psychological symptoms, such as helplessness, depression, and anxiety were also common. These issues interfered with patients’ relationships and social activities. Items not mentioned in existing QoL tools were related to newer treatments of BM, such as pain flare, flu-like symptoms, and jaw pain due to osteonecrosis.

Conclusions

This systematic review highlights that QoL issues for patients with BM have expanded over time due to advances in BM-directed treatments. If they are relevant, additional treatment-related QoL issues identified need to be validated prospectively by patients and added to current assessment tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The search strategy and results can all be found in the tables and figures in the manuscript. All included articles can be found referenced in Appendix 2.

References

  1. Tharmalingam S, Chow E, Harris K, Hird A, Sinclair E (2008) Quality of life measurement in bone metastases: A literature review. J Pain Res 1:49–58. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s4572

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang W, Rixiati Y, Zhao B, Li Y, Tang C, Liu J (2020) Incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of systemic malignancy with bone metastases. J Orthop Surg 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020915989

  3. Clézardin P, Coleman R, Puppo M et al (2021) Bone metastasis: Mechanisms, therapies, and biomarkers. Physiol Rev 101(3):797–855. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gainford MC, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M (2005) Recent developments in bisphosphonates for patients with metastatic breast cancer. BMJ 330(7494):769–773. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7494.769

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman RE (2006) Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12(20):6243s–6249s. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsukamoto S, Kido A, Tanaka Y et al (2021) Current overview of treatment for metastatic bone disease. Curr Oncol 28(5):3347–3372. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gouveia AG, Chan DCW, Hoskin PJ et al (2021) Advances in radiotherapy in bone metastases in the context of new target therapies and ablative alternatives: A critical review. Radiother Oncol 163:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Veritas Health Innovation (2023) Covidence systematic review software. http://www.covidence.org. Accessed 29 Jan 2023

  10. Coward DD, Wilkie DJ (2000) Metastatic bone pain. Meanings associated with self-report and self-management decision making. Cancer Nursing 23(2):101–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200004000-00005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin M, Bell R, Bourgeois H et al (2012) Bone-related complications and quality of life in advanced breast cancer: Results from a randomized phase III trial of denosumab versus zoledronic acid. Clin Cancer Res 18(17):4841–4849. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal KK, Singla S, Arora G, Bal C (2015) (177) Lu-EDTMP for palliation of pain from bone metastases in patients with prostate and breast cancer: A phase II study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(1):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2862-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bongiovanni A, Recine F, Fausti V et al (2019) Ten-year experience of the multidisciplinary osteoncology center. Support Care Cancer 27(9):3395–3402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4635-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gater A, Abetz-Webb L, Battersby C et al (2011) Pain in castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases: A qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 9:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-88

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chow E, Fan G, Hadi S, Filipczak L (2007) Symptom clusters in cancer patients with bone metastases. Support Care Cancer 15(9):1035–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0241-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi Z, Qiu H, Yu S (2010) The investigation of symptoms burden and treatment status in patients with bone metastasis. Chin Ger J Clin Oncol 9(2):63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-010-0009-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gottwald L, Dukowicz A, Misiewicz B, Pasz-Walczak G, Cialkowska-Rysz A (2011) An extremely rare presentation of relapse in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: Isolated metastases to the tibia and humerus. Case report and review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 32(5):547–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Plancarte R, Guajardo J, Meneses-Garcia A et al (2014) Clinical benefits of femoroplasty: A nonsurgical alternative for the management of femoral metastases. Pain Physician 17(3):227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moinpour C, Savage M, Troxel A et al (1998) Quality of life in advanced prostate cancer: Results of a randomized therapeutic trial. JNCI 90(20):1537–1544. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.20.1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindqvist O, Rasmussen BH, Widmark A (2008) Experiences of symptoms in men with hormone refractory prostate cancer and skeletal metastases. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12(4):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2008.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim Y, Krishnan CK, Kim HS, Cho HS, Han I (2020) Ambulation recovery after surgery for metastases to the femur. Oncologist 25(1):e178–e185. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Charles T, Ameye L, Gebhart M (2017) Surgical treatment for periacetabular metastatic lesions. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(9):1727–1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.03.018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Antal I, Szoke G, Szendroi M et al (2023) Functional outcome and quality of life following resection of the proximal humerus performed for musculoskeletal tumors and reconstruction done by four different methods. Musculoskelet Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-022-00771-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Porter AT, McEwan AJ, Powe JE et al (1993) Results of a randomized phase-III trial to evaluate the efficacy of strontium-89 adjuvant to local field external beam irradiation in the management of endocrine resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25(5):805–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90309-j

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris K, Chow E, Zhang L et al (2009) Patients’ and health care professionals’ evaluation of health-related quality of life issues in bone metastases. Eur J Cancer 45(14):2510–2518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.05.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Torvik K, Holen J, Kaasa S et al (2008) Pain in elderly hospitalized cancer patients with bone metastases in Norway. Int J Palliat Nurs 14(5):238–245. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2008.14.5.29491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Akakura K, Uemura H, Miyazaki K et al (2021) A qualitative research study in Japan investigating patients’ experience with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: From diagnosis to decision for Ra-223 treatment. Future Oncol 17(36):5103–5118. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2021-0773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. van der Doelen MJ, Oving IM, Wyndaele DNJ et al (2022) Health-related quality of life, psychological distress, and fatigue in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with radium-223 therapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 26:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00569-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen JJ, Roldan CS, Nichipor AN et al (2021) Patient-provider communication, decision-making, and psychosocial burdens in palliative radiotherapy: A qualitative study on patients’ perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage 62(3):512–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nielsen OS, Bentzen SM, Sandberg E, Gadeberg CC, Timothy AR (1998) Randomized trial of single dose versus fractionated palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 47(3):233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00011-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Laitinen M, Nieminen J, Pakarinen TK (2011) Treatment of pathological humerus shaft fractures with intramedullary nails with or without cement fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(4):503–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1172-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katzer A, Meenen NM, Grabbe F, Rueger JM (2002) Surgery of skeletal metastases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122(5):251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-001-0359-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Amadori D, Aglietta M, Alessi B et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of 12-weekly versus 4-weekly zoledronic acid for prolonged treatment of patients with bone metastases from breast cancer (ZOOM): A phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 14(7):663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70174-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Parker CC, Pascoe S, Chodacki A et al (2013) A randomized, double-blind, dose-finding, multicenter, phase 2 study of radium chloride (Ra 223) in patients with bone metastases and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 63(2):189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Napoli A, De Maio A, Alfieri G et al (2023) Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Phase II Clinical Trial. Radiology 307(2). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.211857

  36. Fares A, Shaaban MH, Reyad RM, Ragab AS, Sami MA (2018) Combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and cementoplasty for the treatment of extraspinal painful bone metastases: A prospective study. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 30(3):117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnci.2018.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S et al (2021) Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: An open label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol 22(7):1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045%2821%2900196-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pielkenrood BJ, van der Velden JM, van der Linden YM et al (2021) Pain response after stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventional radiation therapy in patients with bone metastases - A phase 2 randomized controlled trial within a prospective cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 110(2):358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chow E, Hird A, Velikova G et al (2009) The European organisation for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire for patients with bone metastases: The EORTC QLQ-BM22. Eur J Cancer 45(7):1146–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Broom R, Du H, Clemons M et al (2009) Switching breast cancer patients with progressive bone metastases to third-generation bisphosphonates: Measuring impact using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 38(2):244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.08.005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Barnadas A, Muñoz M, Margelí M et al (2019) BOMET-QoL-10 questionnaire for breast cancer patients with bone metastasis: the prospective MABOMET GEICAM study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 3(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0161-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Hatfield AK et al (1994) Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med 330:592–596. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199403033300902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R et al (2021) Outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy of bone oligometastatic prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 16:125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01849-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wheelwright S, Bjordal K, Bottomley A et al (2021) EORTC quality of life group guidelines for develo** questionnaire modules. Fifth edition. https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2022/07/Module-Guidelines-Version-5-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2023

  45. Zaza C, Baine N (2002) Cancer pain and psychosocial factors: A critical review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manage 24(5):526–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00497-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ et al (2020) Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 31(12):1650–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. de Vries S, Lormans T, de Graaf E, Leget C, Teunissen S (2021) The content validity of the items related to the social and spiritual dimensions of the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional from a patient’s perspective: A qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manage 61(2):287-294.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Consortium members and affiliations

Henry CY Wong MBBS2, 20, Samantha KF Kennedy BSc(C)1, 20, Hany Soliman MD1, 20, Vassilios Vassiliou MD, PhD3, 20, Dirk Rades MD, FASTRO4, 20, Pierluigi Bonomo MD5, 20, Shing-Fung Lee MBBS, MSc6,7, 20, Adrian Wai Chan MBBS7, 20, Agata Rembielak MD, PhD8, 9, 20, Eva Oldenburger MD10, 20, Ernesto Maranzano MD11,12, 20, Joel A Finkelstein MD, MSc14, 20, Jeremie Larouche MD, MSc14, 20, Gustavo N Marta MD, PhD16, 20, Albert JM Yee MD, MSc14, 20, Joanne M van der Velden PhD18, 20, Edward Chow MBBS1, 20, On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group20

20Quality of Life Department, EORTC, Avenue E. Mounier, 83/11, 1200 Brussels, Belgium

Funding

This research was funded by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG), grant number 005/2023. The EORTC QLG business model involves license fees for commercial use of their instruments. Academic use of EORTC instruments is free of charge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Data extraction was conducted by TR, HCYW, and EZ. Figures and tables were prepared by TR and HCYW. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TR and HCYW and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Chow.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Thenugaa Rajeswaran and Henry CY Wong contributed equally to this work as joint first authors.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 88 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 166 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajeswaran, T., Wong, H.C.Y., Zhang, E. et al. Quality of life issues in patients with bone metastases: A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 32, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08241-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08241-0

Keywords

Navigation