Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), often arising from a (plexiform) neurofibroma, is one of the hallmark complications of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) characterized by aggressive behavior [10]. The genetic background is complex and heterogeneous, with the initiating biallelic NF1 inactivation followed by a cascade of acquired mutations driving malignant progression. Amplification of receptor tyrosine kinase genes, have also been observed, and models demonstrated responses to the corresponding therapeutic blockades [7,8,9]. Fusion genes are rarely investigated in NF1-related MPNSTs [5]. We describe subclonal NTRK fusion genes in a subset of such tumors (Fig. 1), thereby potentially providing additional treatment options.
Three out of 21 (14%) cases of our cohort harbored a NTRK1 fusion gene. The partner genes were TPM3, LMNA and CACYBP (Fig. 2). TPM3::NTRK1 and LMNA::NTRK1 are common driver fusion genes in NTRK-related spindle cell neoplasms [1], whereas CACYBP::NTRK1 has not been reported in the literature so far. One could argue that these three tumors represent classical NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms unrelated to the NF1. Nonetheless, two tumors originated in a plexiform neurofibroma and harbored biallelic NF1 mutations. The third case showed clinical signs of NF1, but failed to show two hits, possibly due to technical limitations (Tables 1, 2).
By WGS, FISH and/or immunohistochemistry, the NTRK1 rearrangement presented as a subclonal molecular event in all three cases, further influencing MAPK signaling due to autoactivation of the corresponding transmembrane tyrosine kinase. NTRK genes, encoding for the neurotrophin family of growth factor receptors, have a crucial role in cell survival and proliferation, especially of neural tissue. Hence, it is not surprising that alterations in these genes can result in tumor development of MPNSTs [2].
Detection of NTRK chimeric fusion transcripts in NF1-associated MPNSTs might be of clinical importance as they may allow for targeted treatment with Trk-i as shown in one of our cases (Fig. 1a). While neurofibromin acts downstream of Trk, the sole blockade of the latter might be insufficient to fully abrogate MAPK signaling. In fact, a recent study showed that combined targeting of Trk and MEK, further downstream in the MAPK signaling pathway, in tumors harboring a NTRK fusion gene in combination with another activating alteration in the MAPK signaling pathway (i.e., activating KRAS and BRAF mutations) is paramount to prevent progression under Trk-i therapy and increase efficacy [3]. Whereas single agent treatment efficacy of MEK-i in NF1-related MPNSTs is questionable [4], the combination of a Trk-i and a MEK-i warrants further investigation.
In accordance with the intrinsic resistance against monotherapeutic Trk-i, the tumor of our treated case, initially showing good response, progressed during continuation of Trk-i treatment. A typical “escape” mutation in the kinase domain could not be detected by WES [2, 6]. Although the underlying resistance mechanism remains unclear so far, one could hypothesize that, besides another undetected mutation, quiescent cancer stem cells with specific genetic alterations are responsible for sustaining tumor growth [9].
Our study for the first time describes NF1-related MPNSTs harboring subclonal NTRK rearrangements with primarily good response to Trk-i treatment which could be an (additional) therapeutic agent.
References
Antonescu CR (2020) Emerging soft tissue tumors with kinase fusions: an overview of the recent literature with an emphasis on diagnostic criteria. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 59:437–444
Cocco E, Scaltriti M, Drilon A (2018) NTRK fusion-positive cancers and TRK inhibitor therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15:731–747
Cocco E, Schram AM, Kulick A, Misale S, Won HH, Yaeger R et al (2019) Resistance to TRK inhibition mediated by convergent MAPK pathway activation. Nat Med 25:1422–1427
de Blank PMK, Gross AM, Akshintala S, Blakeley JO, Bollag G, Cannon A et al (2022) MEK inhibitors for neurofibromatosis type 1 manifestations: clinical evidence and consensus. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac165
Dupain C, Harttrampf AC, Boursin Y, Lebeurrier M, Rondof W, Robert-Siegwald G et al (2019) Discovery of new fusion transcripts in a cohort of pediatric solid cancers at relapse and relevance for personalized medicine. Mol Ther 27:200–218
Hemming ML, Nathenson MJ, Lin JR, Mei S, Du Z, Malik K et al (2020) Response and mechanisms of resistance to larotrectinib and selitrectinib in metastatic undifferentiated sarcoma harboring oncogenic fusion of NTRK1. JCO Precis Oncol 4:79–90
Longo JF, Brosius SN, Znoyko I, Alers VA, Jenkins DP, Wilson RC et al (2021) Establishment and genomic characterization of a sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell line. Sci Rep 11:5690
Pemov A, Li H, Presley W, Wallace MR, Miller DT (2020) Genetics of human malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neurooncol Adv 2:i50–i61
Somatilaka BN, Sadek A, McKay RM, Le LQ (2022) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: models, biology, and translation. Oncogene 41:2405–2421
Uusitalo E, Rantanen M, Kallionpää RA, Pöyhönen M, Leppävirta J, Ylä-Outinen H et al (2016) Distinctive cancer associations in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Clin Oncol 34:1978–1986
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Marja van Blokland and Petra van der Weide for their very valuable help with this project.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LHI, MM, LKE, UFL conceptualized and made the original draft of the manuscript; LKE, RM, JHK, IvB performed the formal analyses; LHI, MM conducted the visualization of the data; all authors reviewed, edited and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Medical Research of the Federation of the Dutch Medical Scientific Societies. In addition, the material acquisition was performed in accordance with local bio banking initiative.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hiemcke-Jiwa, L.S., Meister, M.T., Martin, E. et al. NTRK rearrangements in a subset of NF1-related malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors as novel actionable target. Acta Neuropathol 145, 149–152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-022-02515-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-022-02515-3