Abstract
Climate-length experiments of the Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0 (GA7) and Global Coupled 3.0 (GC3) configurations are evaluated against observations and reanalyses for the simulation of the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM). The results show systematic model biases, such as overestimated rainfall over southern China and underestimated rainfall over northern China, suggesting a monsoon that does not penetrate northward enough. We evaluate the effects on the EASM of regional errors in sea-surface temperature (SST) conditions in three regions: the Pacific, the Indian, and the Atlantic Oceans. The global SST biases in GC3 configuration substantially shift the EASM seasonal cycle: a late northward progression of the EASM in the early/mid-monsoon season, and an early retreat of the monsoon that also reduces rainfall over most of northern China. The EASM seasonal rainfall bias in the EASM region is linked to changes in the locations and strength of the western North Pacific subtropical high, which is associated with biases in local evaporation and moisture transport towards South China. GC3 biases in the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) teleconnection pathways also influence the EASM biases. GC3 biases weaken the ENSO teleconnection to the EASM and cause a strong dry bias in southeast China during develo** El Niño.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
East Asian Summer Monsoon (EASM) rainfall is crucial for one of the most densely populated regions in the world. The population of China strongly depends on EASM rainfall for socio-economic development, such as agriculture, industry, transportation, and infrastructure systems. The EASM is subject to interannual variability that induces floods and droughts and can cause casualties and economic losses (Song and Zhou 2014; Jiang et al. 2021). Therefore, it is necessary to develop weather and climate models that can accurately predict variability and projected change in summer monsoon rainfall over China. Despite recent successes in seasonal predictions for specific regions in China [e.g., the Yangtze River Valley forecast from the Climate Science for Service Partnership China; Li et al. (2016)], the simulation of summer monsoon rainfall in global numerical models is still challenging. Models often overestimate rainfall in southern China and underestimate rainfall in northern China. For example, in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs), these rainfall biases are often associated with a weak and southeastward shifted western North Pacific subtropical high (WNPSH), which is linked to a southward shift in moisture transports to East Asia (EA; Song and Zhou 2014; He and Zhou 2014). Also, coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) underestimate the southeast-northwest precipitation gradient, show a deficient strength of the EASM circulation, and overestimate the spatial and magnitude of interannual precipitation variability in EA (Jiang et al. 2016). The Met Office Unified Model (MetUM) produces too much rainfall in southern China and too little rainfall in northern China [e.g., MetUM Global Atmosphere 6.0; Stephan et al. (2018)]. Guo et al. (2020) identified systematic errors of MetUM atmosphere-only and atmosphere-ocean coupled configurations in simulating the moisture sources of East Asian precipitation. Their results suggest that MetUM precipitation biases in EA are linked to underestimated moisture contributions from the tropical Indian Ocean and overestimated contributions from the Eurasian continent.
Other hypothesised sources of EASM systematic model errors include biases in the large-scale meridional tropospheric temperature gradient (Dai et al. 2013) and coarsely resolved topography over EA (Wu et al. 2017). The latter is associated with an underestimated ascent over the mountains of subtropical EA and the Tibetan Plateau. This creates overestimated southerly winds and, compared with observations and high-resolution models, reduces East Asian pre-summer precipitation further north. Another source of hypothesised systematic errors in the thermal forcing is biasing in Pacific and Indian Ocean SSTs. The latter is associated with the representation of the Walker circulation and wave propagation from the Indian to the Pacific Oceans (Wang et al. 2015; Levine et al. 2021). Although not statistically significant, ERSSTv5 and both GOML3 regressions also show differences in the SST magnitude in the Indian Ocean. While ERSSTv5 reaches up to 0.3 °C in a large portion of the Arabian Sea and the equatorial Indian Ocean, SSTs in both GOML3 simulations reach up to 0.05 °C.
During JJAS, ERA5 and GOML3 regression analyses show that western Pacific anomalous equatorial westerly winds at 850 hPa positively correlated with ENSO. However, the anomalous westerlies over the West Pacific extend northwards 15° N in both GOML3 experiments (Fig. 9b, c) during JJAS. In both GOML3 experiments, the anomalous westerly winds weaken the WNPSH, centred at \(\approx {25}^\circ\) N, \(175^\circ\) E. These cyclonic circulation anomalies extend to continental China. The 850 hPa anomalous circulation is associated with reduced rainfall in South East China in GOML3 experiments. Also, at low levels in the troposphere, both GOML3-OBS_ENSO and GOML3-GC3_ENSO simulations show an anomalous anticyclonic circulation over India and anomalous northeasterlies associated with a weakened Indian monsoon circulation over the northern Indian Ocean in El Niño years (Fig. 9b, c, respectively). These anomalous regional circulations are associated with errors in the signal of anomalous precipitation simulated over India, the Bay of Bengal, and the Arabian Sea located west of India with GOML3.
JJAS ERA5 regressed winds onto Nino 3.4 suggest that the entire North Pacific Subtropical High (NPSH, centred at \(\approx {35}^\circ\) N, \(177^\circ\) E) is weakened during develo** El Niño (Fig. 9a). However, the anomalous circulation associated with the NPSH is weaker in GOML3-OBS_ENSO during develo** ENSO, and it is centred about 7 degrees further east in GOML3-GC3_ENSO regressions (\(\approx {35}^\circ\) N, 170\(^\circ\) W).
To understand the overall effect of GC3 mean-state errors influencing the ENSO teleconnection to the EASM rainfall, we analyse the GOML3-OBS_ENSO and GOML3-GC3_ENSO regressions. JJAS precipitation anomalies over \(\approx {{20^\circ -40^\circ }}\) N, simulated with GOML3-OBS_ENSO (Fig. 9b) and GOML3-GC3_ENSO (Fig. 9c), are significantly anticorrelated with Niño 3.4, with up to \(\approx {-0.5}\) and \(\approx {-1}\) mm \({\text {day}^{-1}}\), respectively. However, JJAS ERA5 rainfall is significantly anticorrelated with simultaneous SSTs from the Niño 3.4 region (Fig. 9a), only over the northernmost portion of South East China (\(\approx {30}^\circ -40^\circ\) N). This regression analysis suggests that during develo** El Niño (La Niña) episodes, this area experiences drier (wetter) conditions.
The major biases in the ENSO teleconnection to the EASM rainfall with GC3 are identified when directly comparing GOML3-GC3_ENSO against GOML3-OBS_ENSO rainfall simulations. At the beginning of the EASM season, GOML3-GC3_ENSO presents dry conditions in southeast China, the Bay of Bengal, and the Indochinese Peninsula, during both develo** El Niño and La Niña (not shown). Additionally, GOML3-GC3_ENSO presents wet conditions in the Maritime continent. The aforementioned anomalous conditions resemble the ones present in the GOML3-GC3gbl experiment in June (Fig. 3a), implying that these ENSO-teleconnection biases between GOML3-GC3_ENSO simulation are predominately related to GC3 SST biases. In July, GOML3-GC3_ENSO simulations are drier for a large area of southeast China (between \(\approx {30}^\circ -40^\circ\) N) during develo** El Niño events (not shown). However, during develo** La Niña, GC3 presents more rainfall in most of southeast China. At this point of the simulations, the EASM rainfall does not penetrate northwards enough, implying that GOML3-GC3_ENSO exacerbates the dry conditions during the EASM in northern southeast China during both ENSO phases.
In August, GOML3-GC3_ENSO enhances the Indian Monsoon circulation in both develo** ENSO phases, leading to more rainfall in continental India and the Bay of Bengal and less rainfall over the equatorial Indian Ocean (not shown), similar to the ones in the GOML3-GC3gbl experiment in August (Fig. 3c).
Most of the differences in JJAS precipitation between ERA5 and both GOML3 simulations are seen over southernmost South East Asia (\(\approx {20}^\circ -30^\circ\) N): while ERA5 rainfall is positively correlated with Niño 3.4 SSTs in southernmost East China and the Indochinese Peninsula (Fig. 9a), GOML3-OBS_ENSO and GOML3-GC3_ENSO are significantly anticorrelated over the region mentioned above (Fig. 9b, c, respectively). These analyses suggest that GOML3 presents a systematic bias of underestimated rainfall in South East China during El Niño years. The GC3 ocean mean state bias exacerbates this error, which affects the ENSO teleconnection to the EASM by simulating drier (wetter) conditions over South East China during El Niño (La Niña) events.
ERA5 and both GOML3 experiments differ in the location of anomalous rainfall along the central Pacific Ocean. While both GOML3 experiments show a significant positive correlation of rainfall with ENSO, ERA5 shows a negative correlation that extends \(\approx {7-10}^\circ\) N latitude. This particular feature in ERA5-regressed JJAS rainfall is related to the anomalous equatorward (poleward) shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) during El Niño (La Niña) events (e.g., Berry and Reeder 2014), which is not properly captured in either GOML3 experiment.
We investigate the errors in ENSO teleconnection pathways to the EASM and compute the moisture sources for JJAS rainfall in the south China box (defined previously in Sect. 2.2). Figure 10 shows the regressions of moisture sources and moisture transport onto Niño 3.4 SSTs. These regression analyses suggest that ERA5 rainfall in the south China box is positively correlated with moisture sources from continental India, the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, the south Maritime Continent, and the region of Guizhou and Guangxi in South East China during El Niño. Simultaneously, anomalous northeastwards moisture transport from the Tibetan Plateau and continental India is positively correlated with anomalies of rainfall in the South China box.
GOML3 errors in simulating the moisture sources of rainfall in the south China box are found mainly in the Indian Ocean (Fig. 10), having the opposite sign to the ERA5 regressions. The GOML3 simulations also present a northward bias in the location of moisture transport vectors over the Pacific Ocean. As discussed, the precipitation in the south China box during JJAS is weakened (enhanced) by MetUM GOML3 experiments during El Niño (La Niña). The regression analysis for GOML3 experiments suggests that, during El Niño events, the reduced rainfall in the south China box simulated with GOML3-OBS_ENSO and GOML3-GC3_ENSO is associated with reduced moisture from a large area of the equatorial Indian Ocean, the Bay of Bengal, the Arabian Sea and the Maritime Continent. These regressions also suggest that during El Niño, the reduced rainfall simulated with both GOML3 experiments in the south China box is associated with a weaker moisture transport from the Indian monsoon circulation. In all cases, both GOML3 simulations show opposite conditions during La Niña. The biases with GOML3 precipitation in the south China box come from errors capturing important sources of moisture and moisture transport from the Indian Ocean and the Maritime Continent.
3.4.2 IOD
To analyse errors in the IOD teleconnection pathways to the EASM, we linearly regress GOML3-OBS_IOD and GOML3-GC3_IOD simulations of seasonal meteorological variables onto the standardised seasonal IOD index. In this study, the IOD index is calculated as the difference between SST anomalies of two regions of the tropical Indian Ocean, named IOD west (\(50^\circ\) E–\(70^\circ\) E longitude, \(10^\circ\) S–\(10^\circ\) N latitude) and IOD east (\(90^\circ\) E–\(110^\circ\) E longitude, \(10^\circ\) S–\(0^\circ\) S latitude) (Saji et al. 1999). Similarly, we calculate observed linear regressions of seasonal SSTs of ERSSTv5 and ERA5 meteorological variables onto standardised seasonal IOD index calculated with ERSSTv5 data.
JJAS ERSSTv5 SSTs regressed onto the observed IOD index show a typical pattern of the positive IOD (Fig. 11a). In addition, ERA5 anomalous southeasterlies at 850 hPa, which extend from the Tasman Sea to the equatorial Indian Ocean (to \(\approx {60}^\circ\) E), are positively correlated with the IOD index [as in Saji et al. (1999)]. Simultaneously, this regression analysis also shows significant anomalous low-level, westerly winds over continental India and the Bay of Bengal, extending east to reach the equatorial Pacific Ocean.
GOML3-OBS_IOD SSTs and 850 hPa wind regression analysis show southeasterlies over the equatorial Indian Ocean and the Bay of Bengal that are positively correlated with the IOD index (Fig. 11b). This significant circulation continues towards the Bay of Bengal, where anomalous westerlies extend from the Indochinese peninsula to the Pacific Ocean (at \(\approx {15}^\circ\) N latitude).
Differences between ERSSTv5 and GOML3-OBS_IOD-regressed SSTs are found in the Tasman Sea, the east side of the Maritime Continent, and the subtropical North Pacific. GOML3-OBS_IOD circulation biases are found in the Pacific Ocean, where anomalous 850 hPa easterlies in positive IOD years are further north than in ERA5. This change in the circulation influences the southward flank of an anomalous weakened WNPSH centred over the Philippine Sea. The GOML3-GC3_IOD 850 hPa easterlies over the South China Sea and the Indochinese peninsula oppose the direction of ERA5-regressed winds.
JJAS ERA5 rainfall in southeast China is positively correlated with the IOD index with regressions up to 0.5 mm \(\text {day}^{-1}\) and negatively correlated with south Indian and Australian rainfall (Fig. 12a). Regressed ERA5 rainfall presents a dipole of negative anomalies in the IOD east region with up to 1.5 mm \(\text {day}^{-1}\) and positive anomalies in the IOD west part of up to 2 mm \(\text {day}^{-1}\).
GOML3-OBS_IOD underestimates the magnitude of anomalous rainfall in both IOD west and IOD east regions, with about 1 mm \(\text {day}^{-1}\) biases in both cases. For positive IOD, GOML3-OBS_IOD shows less rainfall than ERA5 over most South East China, the East China Sea, and Bangladesh and more precipitation in Australia (Fig. 12b).
On the other hand, GOML3-GC3_IOD shows more rainfall in positive IOD than GOML3-OBS_IOD in southeastern China, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Australia (Fig. 12c). This analysis suggests that GOML3-GC3_IOD presents positive changes in the regression slope against GOML3-OBS_IOD during positive IOD events. As a result, GOML3-GC3_IOD offers a better estimation of the sign of anomalous rainfall over southeastern China. Different from the negative rainfall biases in GOML3-GC3gbl (Fig. 6d) during JJAS, GOML3-GC3_IOD regressed slope shows a positive difference in rainfall over southeastern China. This analysis suggests that during IOD episodes, GOML3_GC3 represents the correct sign of rainfall anomalies over EASM rainfall over most of southeast China.
To investigate the errors in the IOD teleconnection pathways to the EASM, we compute the moisture sources for JJAS rainfall for the South China box. First, we determine the moisture sources for precipitation over this box in ERA5 and GOML3 experiments using the WAM-2layers back trajectory tool (Fig. 13).
ERA5 regressed moisture sources show that in IOD positive years, increased evaporation from the IOD west region, the Bay of Bengal, and the Arabian Sea, precipitates over the south China box (Fig. 13a). Increased moisture transport from these regions is related to increased rainfall over the South China box.
Regression analysis shows that GOML3-OBS_IOD underestimates moisture sources over continental China and the east IOD region, which contributes to less rainfall in the south China box with GOML3-OBS_IOD (Fig. 13b). GOML3-OBS_IOD experiments also have a strong positive moisture bias that extends from Laos to the Philippines, larger than 1 mm \(\text {month}^{-1}\). Regressed moisture transports from the Philippine Sea are weaker than that in ERA5.
GOML3-OBS_IOD underestimate moisture sources from the South China Sea, IOD east, the Bay of Bengal, the Arabic Sea, and India (Fig. 13c). However, GC3 SST biases enhance the EASM flow. Therefore, GC3 corrects the underestimation of moisture sources in east IOD and southeast China from GOML3-OBS_IOD, and the moisture transport in the Indian Ocean is better represented with GC3.
4 Discussion and summary
In this study, we analyse simulations from the MetUM-GOML3, coupled model of the MetUM GA7 atmosphere to a mixed-layer ocean, which constrains the SSTs to observations (GOML3-OBS) or GC3 SSTs. Furthermore, the GOML3-OBS experiment is used as a reference to analyse different coupled climate-length MetUM-GC3 runs.
GOML experiments with global GC3 SST biases allow us to establish the effects of regional SST errors on the EASM, in which GC3 global SST biases cause a substantial shift in the seasonal cycle of the EASM: a late northward progression of the monsoon in June, and an early retreat of the EASM (early August) reduces rainfall over most of northern China.
Another set of GOML experiments with individual regional SST biases in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans allow us to establish the effects of basin-scale SST errors on the EASM. This approach helps test the remote influence of the three different ocean basins on the EASM.
It is found that the simulated rainfall over East Asia is more sensitive to SST errors in the Indian and Pacific oceans than those in the Atlantic Ocean. However, these analyses show the cancellation of effects between Pacific Ocean biases and Atlantic and Indian Ocean biases. GC3 SST biases in the Indian and Atlantic Oceans reduce JJAS rainfall over most southeastern China. In both cases, these conditions are related to a later northward EASM progression and an earlier monsoon retreat during September. Conversely, GC3 Pacific SST biases increase rainfall over southeastern China, associated with a systematic increase of moisture convergence in the equatorial West Pacific and southeast China and moisture divergence in the Philippine and South China Sea.
An essential finding of the GOML experiments is the opposite effect of the Pacific and the Atlantic Ocean SST biases on the North Pacific circulation. An increase (decrease) in EASM rainfall is linked to an enhanced (weakened) North Pacific subtropical high circulation. In both cases, changes in the circulation in the West Pacific, near the Philippines, play a key role in the biases of local evaporation and moisture transport towards South China.
Our study shows that MetUM-GOML3 presents similar cold SST biases in the Indian Ocean as its predecessors (Levine and Turner 2012; Levine et al. 2021). The low-level winds and rainfall associated with these SST biases characterise an enhanced Indian summer Monsoon. Additionally, our WAM-2layers analysis shows that evaporation and moisture transport biases in the Indian Ocean result in more extensive EASM changes in rainfall. This coincides with multiple studies that found that the Indian Ocean provides the largest amount of moisture during boreal summer for rainfall in southeastern EA (Guo et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2015; Baker et al. 2015).
This study also determined how GC3 SST biases affect the ENSO and the IOD teleconnection to the EASM. The results indicate that ENSO-associated rainfall anomalies over South China are not correctly simulated with the GOML model, even with observed climatological SSTs (Fig. 9).
GOML3 experiments do not accurately represent the equatorward anomalous rainfall migration during the warm episodes of ENSO, which is associated with an anomalous equatorward migration of the ITCZ. In addition, among the GOML3 biases during ENSO, we found anomalous lower troposphere westerly winds located further northwards along the tropical Pacific. Therefore, MetUM-GOML3 experiments have an incorrect sign of the anomalous moisture sources related to the anomalous seasonal rainfall over South China, simulating reduced moisture sources of rainfall in the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea. GC3 SSTs biases worsen the bias of ENSO-associated precipitation over South China, being related to amplified biases of an anomalous moisture source, mainly in the Philippine Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the Tibetan Plateau.
Finally, the effect of GC3 SST biases on the simulated IOD teleconnection to the EASM is studied. The circulation biases are widely found in the tropical Pacific Ocean, where anomalous low-level winds are located further north. This is associated with biases in the intensity and location of the WNPSH and its variability, which strongly influences the location and strength of the GOML3 representation of the EASM rainfall.
Data availability
The MetUM was used under licence from the UK Met Office; for details, see https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/modelling-systems/unified-model. Data and code will be available upon request through JASMIN (http://www.jasmin.ac.uk/). MetUM simulation data are available via the National Centre for Atmospheric Science and the UK Met Office; access is restricted.
References
Adler RF, Sapiano MRP, Huffman GJ, Wang J-J, Gu G, Bolvin D, Chiu L, Schneider U, Becker A, Nelkin E, **e P, Ferraro R, Shin D-B (2018) The global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly analysis (new version 2.3) and a review of 2017 global precipitation. Atmosphere 9(4):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138
Alexander M, Scott J (2002) The influence of ENSO on air–sea interaction in the Atlantic. Geophys Res Lett 29(14):46–1464. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014347
Baker AJ, Sodemann H, Baldini JUL, Breitenbach SFM, Johnson KR, van Hunen J, Zhang P (2015) Seasonality of westerly moisture transport in the East Asian summer monsoon and its implications for interpreting precipitation. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(12):5850–5862. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022919
Berry G, Reeder MJ (2014) Objective identification of the intertropical convergence zone: climatology and trends from the ERA-interim. J Clim 27(5):1894–1909. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00339.1
Cai W, Cowan T (2013) Why is the amplitude of the Indian Ocean dipole overly large in CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate models? Geophys Res Lett 40(6):1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50208
Dai A, Li H, Sun Y, Hong L-C, LinHo, Chou C, Zhou T (2013) The relative roles of upper and lower tropospheric thermal contrasts and tropical influences in driving Asian summer monsoons. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(13):7024–7045. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50565
Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hólm EV, Isaksen L, Kållberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette J-J, Park B-K, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut J-N, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
Ding H, Greatbatch RJ, Park W, Latif M, Semenov VA, Sun X (2014) The variability of the East Asian summer monsoon and its relationship to ENSO in a partially coupled climate model. Clim Dyn 42(1):367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1642-3
Fu Y, Lu R (2017) Improvements in simulating the relationship between ENSO and East Asian summer rainfall in the CMIP5 models. J Clim 30(12):4513–4525. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0606.1
Fu Y, Lu R, Wang H, Yang X (2013) Impact of overestimated ENSO variability in the relationship between ENSO and East Asian summer rainfall. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:6200–6211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50482
Gill AE (1980) Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Quar J R Meteorol Soc 106:447–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644905
Guo L, van der Ent RJ, Klingaman NP, Demory M-E, Vidale PL, Turner AG, Stephan CC, Chevuturi A (2019) Moisture sources for east asian precipitation: mean seasonal cycle and interannual variability. J Hydrometeorol 20(4):657–672. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0188.1
Guo L, van der Ent RJ, Klingaman NP, Demory M-E, Vidale PL, Turner AG, Stephan CC, Chevuturi A (2020) Effects of horizontal resolution and air-sea coupling on simulated moisture source for East Asian precipitation in MetUM GA6/GC2. Geosci Model Dev 13(12):6011–6028. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6011-2020
Ha K-J, Chu J-E, Lee J-Y, Yun K-S (2017) Interbasin coupling between the tropical Indian and Pacific Ocean on interannual timescale: observation and CMIP5 reproduction. Clim Dyn 48(1):459–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3087-6
He C, Zhou T (2014) The two interannual variability modes of the Western North Pacific Subtropical High simulated by 28 CMIP5-AMIP models. Clim Dyn 43:2455–2469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2068-x
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Schepers D et al (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 146(730):1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
Hirons LC, Klingaman NP, Woolnough SJ (2015) MetUM-GOML: a near-globally coupled atmosphere-ocean-mixed-layer model. Geosci Model Dev 8:363–379. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-363-2015
Huang B, Thorne PW, Banzon VF, Boyer T, Chepurin G, Lawrimore JH, Menne MJ, Smith TM, Vose RS, Zhang H-M (2017) Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5): upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J Clim 30(20):8179–8205. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1
Jiang D, Tian Z, Lang X (2016) Reliability of climate models for China through the IPCC Third to Fifth Assessment Reports. Int J Climatol 36(3):1114–1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4406
Jiang W, Li G, Wang G (2021) Effect of the El Niño decaying pace on the East Asian summer monsoon circulation pattern during post-El Niño summers. Atmosphere 12(2):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020140
Jiao D, Xu N, Yang F, Xu K (2021) Evaluation of spatial-temporal variation performance of ERA5 precipitation data in China. Sci Rep 11(1):17956. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97432-y
Klingaman NP, Demott CA (2020) Mean state biases and interannual variability affect perceived sensitivities of the Madden–. J Adv Model Earth Syst 12(2):e2019MS001799. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001799
Kusonoki S, Yoshimura J, Yoshimura H, Noda A, Oouchi K, Mizuta R (2006) Change of Baiu Rain Band in global warming projection by an atmospheric general circulation model with a 20-km grid size. J Meteorol Soc Jpn Ser II 84(4):581–611. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.84.581
Lau N-C, Ploshay JJ (2009) Simulation of synoptic- and subsynoptic-scale phenomena associated with the East Asian summer monsoon using a high-resolution GCM. Mon Weather Rev 137(1):137–160. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2511.1
Lee S-S, Seo Y-W, Ha K-J, Jhun J-G (2013) Impact of the western North Pacific subtropical high on the East Asian monsoon precipitation and the Indian Ocean precipitation in the boreal summertime. Asia-Pac J Atmos Sci 49(2):171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0018-x
Levine RC, Turner AG (2012) Dependence of indian monsoon rainfall on moisture fluxes across the Arabian Sea and the impact of coupled model sea surface temperature biases. Clim Dyn 38(11):2167–2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1096-z
Levine RC, Klingaman NP, Peatman SC, Martin GM (2021) Roles of air-sea coupling and horizontal resolution in the climate model simulation of Indian monsoon low pressure systems. Clim Dyn 56:1203–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05526-6
Li X, Zhou W (2012) Quasi-4-yr coupling between El Niño-Southern Oscillation and water vapor transport over East Asia-WNP. J Clim 25:5879–5891. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00433.1
Li S, Lu J, Huang G, Hu K (2008) Tropical Indian Ocean basin warming and East Asian summer monsoon: a multiple AGCM study. J Clim 21:6080–6088. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2433.1
Li C, Scaife AA, Lu R, Arribas A, Brookshaw A, Comer RE, Li J, MacLachlan C, Wu P (2016) Skillful seasonal prediction of Yangtze river valley summer rainfall. Environ Res Lett 11:094002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094002
Li Y, Deng Y, Yang S, Zhang H, Ming Y, Shen Z (2019) Multi-scale temporal-spatial variability of the East Asian summer monsoon frontal system: observation versus its representation in the GFDL HiRAM. Clim Dyn 52(11):6787–6798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4546-z
Liu J, Wang B, Yang J (2008) Forced and internal modes of variability of the East Asian summer monsoon. Clim Past 4(4):225–233. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-4-225-2008
Matsuno T (1966) Quasi-geostrophic motions in the equatorial area. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 44:25–43. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25
Nogueira M (2020) Inter-comparison of ERA-5, ERA-interim and GPCP rainfall over the last 40 years: process-based analysis of systematic and random differences. J Hydrol 583:124632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124632
Peatman SC, Klingaman NP (2018) The Indian summer monsoon in MetUM-GOML2.0: effects of air–sea coupling and resolution. Geosci Model Dev 11(11):4693–4709. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4693-2018
Rodríguez JM, Milton SF (2019) East Asian summer atmospheric moisture transport and its response to interannual variability of the west Pacific subtropical high: an evaluation of the met office unified model. Atmosphere 10(8):457. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10080457
Saji NH, Goswami BN, Vinayachandran PN, Yamagata T (1999) A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature 401:360–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/43854
Smith DM, Murphy JM (2007) An objective ocean temperature and salinity analysis using covariances from a global climate model. J Geophys Res Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003172
Song F, Zhou T (2014) Interannual variability of East Asian summer monsoon simulated by CMIP3 and CMIP5 AGCMs: skill dependence on Indian ocean-western pacific anticyclone teleconnection. J Clim 27(4):1679–1697. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00248.1
Sperber KR, Annamalai H, Kang I-S, Kitoh A, Moise A, Turner A, Wang B, Zhou T (2013) The Asian summer monsoon: an intercomparison of CMIP5 vs. CMIP3 simulations of the late 20th century. Clim Dyn 42(9):2711–2744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1607-6
Stephan CC, Klingaman NP, Vidale PL, Turner AG, Demory M-E, Guo L (2018) Interannual rainfall variability over China in the MetUM GA6 and GC2 configurations. Geosci Model Dev 11(5):1823–1847. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1823-2018
Stephan CC, Klingaman NP, Turner AG (2019) A mechanism for the recently increased interdecadal variability of the Silk Road pattern. J Clim 32(3):717–736. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0405.1
Sun B, Wang H (2015) Analysis of the major atmospheric moisture sources affecting three sub-regions of East China. Int J Climatol 35(9):2243–2257. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4145
van der Ent RJ, Tuinenburg OA, Knoche H-R, Kunstmann H, Savenije HHG (2013) Should we use a simple or complex model for moisture recycling and atmospheric moisture tracking? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 01(17):4869–4884. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4869-2013
van der Ent RJ, Wang-Erlandsson L, Keys PW, Savenije HHG (2014) Contrasting roles of interception and transpiration in the hydrological cycle—Part 2: moisture recycling. Earth Syst Dyn 5(2):471–489. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-471-2014
Walters D, Baran AJ, Boutle I, Brooks M, Earnshaw P, Edwards J, Furtado K, Hill P, Lock A, Manners J et al (2019) The Met Office Unified Model global atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES global land 7.0 configurations. Geosci Model Dev 12(5):1909–1963. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019
Wang B, Wu R, Fu X (2000) Pacific-East Asian teleconnection: how does ENSO affect East Asian climate? J Clim 13(9):1517–1536. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1517:PEATHD>2.0.CO;2
Wang B, Wu Z, Li J, Liu J, Chang C-P, Ding Y, Wu G (2008) How to measure the strength of the East Asian summer monsoon. J Clim 21(17):4449–4463. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2183.1
Wang B, **ang B, Lee J-Y (2013) Subtropical High predictability establishes a promising way for monsoon and tropical storm predictions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(8):2718–2722. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214626110
Wang G, Cai W, Santoso A (2017) Assessing the impact of model biases on the projected increase in frequency of extreme positive Indian Ocean dipole events. J Clim 30(8):2757–2767. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0509.1
Weller E, Cai W (2013) Realism of the Indian Ocean dipole in CMIP5 models: the implications for climate projections. J Clim 26(17):6649–6659. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00807.1
Williams KD, Copsey D, Blockley EW, Bodas-Salcedo A, Calvert D, Comer R, Davis P, Graham T, Hewitt HT, Hill R, Hyder P, Ineson S, Johns TC, Keen AB, Lee RW, Megann A, Milton SF, Rae JGL, Roberts MJ, Scaife AA, Schiemann R, Storkey D, Thorpe L, Watterson IG, Walters DN, West A, Wood RA, Woolings T, Xavier PK (2017) The met office global coupled model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3.0 and GC3.1) configurations. J Adv Model Earth Syst 10:357–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001115
Wu R, Kirtman BP, Pegion K (2006) Local air-sea relationship in observations and model simulations. J Clim 19(19):4914–4932. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3904.1
Wu C-H, Freychet N, Chen C-A, Hsu H-H (2017) East Asian presummer precipitation in the CMIP5 at high versus low horizontal resolution. Int J Climatol 37(11):4158–4170. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5055
**e S-P, Hu KM, Hafner J, Tokinaga H, Du Y, Huang G, Sampe T (2009) Indian Ocean capacitor effect on Indo-western Pacific climate during the summer following El Niño. J Clim 22:730–747. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2544.1
**e S-P, Kosaka Y, Du Y, Hu KM, Chowdary JS, Huang G (2016) Indo-western Pacific Ocean capacitor and coherent climate anomalies in post-ENSO summer: a review. Adv Atmos Sci 33:411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-5192-6
Yuan Y, Yang H, Zhou W, Li C (2008) Influences of the Indian Ocean dipole on the Asian summer monsoon in the following year. Int J Climatol 28(14):1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1678
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments to improve the manuscript. This work and its contributors (Armenia Franco-Díaz, Nicholas P. Klingaman, Andrew G. Turner, Liang Guo, and Buwen Dong) were supported by the UK-China Research & Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund. The MetUM-GOML simulations were supported by the UK National Supercomputing Service ARCHER.
Funding
This research has been supported by the Newton Fund (CSSP China).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NPK performed the model integrations. AFD performed the analysis in consultation with AGT, NPK, LG, and BD. AFD prepared the paper with contributions from NPK, AGT, and BD.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Franco-Díaz, A., Klingaman, N.P., Turner, A.G. et al. Effect of global and regional SST biases on the East Asian Summer Monsoon in the MetUM GA7 and GC3 configurations. Clim Dyn 62, 1535–1553 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06954-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06954-w