Abstract
It is well known that Keller–Segel models serve as a paradigm to describe the self aggregation phenomenon, which exists in a variety of biological processes such as wound healing, tumor growth, etc. In this paper, we study the existence of monotone decreasing spiky steady state and its linear stability property in the Keller–Segel model with logistic growth over one-dimensional bounded domain subject to homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. Under the assumption that chemo-attractive coefficient is asymptotically large, we construct the single boundary spike and next show this non-constant steady state is locally linear stable via Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction method. As a consequence, the multi-symmetric spikes are obtained by reflection and periodic extension. In particular, we present the formal analysis to illustrate our rigorous theoretical results.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00285-022-01840-1/MediaObjects/285_2022_1840_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00285-022-01840-1/MediaObjects/285_2022_1840_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carrillo J, Li J, Wang Z-A (2021) Boundary spike-layer solutions of the singular Keller–Segel system: existence and stability. Proc Lond Math Soc 122(1):42–68
Chen L, Kong F, Wang Q (2020) Stationary ring and concentric-ring solutions of the Keller–Segel model with quadratic diffusion. SIAM J Math Anal 52(5):4565–4615
Chen L, Kong F, Wang Q (2021) Global and exponential attractor of the repulsive Keller–Segel model with logarithmic sensitivity. Eur J Appl Math 32(4):599–617
Chen X, Hao J, Wang X, Wu Y, Zhang Y (2014) Stability of spiky solution of Keller–Segel’s minimal chemotaxis model. J Differ Equ 257(9):3102–3134
Childress S, Percus K (1981) Nonlinear aspects of chemotaxis. Math Biosci 56(3–4):217–237
del Pino M, Wei J (2006) Collapsing steady states of the Keller–Segel system. Nonlinearity 19(3):661
del Pino M, Wei J (2016) An introduction to the finite and infinite dimensional reduction method. Geom Anal Around Scalar Curvatures 31:35–118
FlexPDE. PDE solutions inc. https://www.pdesolutions.com, (2021)
Gui C (1996) Multipeak solutions for a semilinear Neumann problem. Duke Math J 84(3):739–769
Gui C, Wei J (1999) Multiple interior peak solutions for some singularly perturbed Neumann problems. J Differ Equ 158(1):1–27
Gui C, Wei J, Winter M (2000) Multiple boundary peak solutions for some singularly perturbed Neumann problems. Ann Henri Poincaré 17:47–82
Herrero M, Velázquez J (1996) Chemotactic collapse for the Keller–Segel model. J Math Biol 35(2):177–194
Hillen T, Painter K (2009) A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis. J Math Biol 58(1):183–217
Hillen T, Potapov A (2004) The one-dimensional chemotaxis model: global existence and asymptotic profile. Math Methods Appl Sci 27(15):1783–1801
Hillen T, Zielinski J, Painter K (2013) Merging-emerging systems can describe spatio-temporal patterning in a chemotaxis model. Discret Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 18(10):2513
Horstmann D (2001) The nonsymmetric case of the Keller–Segel model in chemotaxis: some recent results. Nonlinear Differ Equ Appl 8(4):399–423
Horstmann D (2003) From 1970 until present: the Keller–Segel model in chemotaxis and its consequences i. Jahresber Deutsch Math-Verein 105:103–165
Horstmann D (2004) From 1970 until present: the Keller–Segel model in chemotaxis and its consequences ii. Jahresber Deutsch Math-Verein 106:51–69
Horstmann D, Winkler M (2005) Boundedness versus blow-up in a chemotaxis system. J Differ Equ 215(1):52–107
** L, Wang Q, Zhang Z (2016) Pattern formation in Keller–Segel chemotaxis models with logistic growth. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 26(02):1650033
Kang K, Kolokolnikov T, Ward M (2007) The stability and dynamics of a spike in the 1D Keller–Segel model. IMA J Appl Math 72(2):140–162
Keller E, Segel L (1970) Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J Theor Biol 26(3):399–415
Keller E, Segel L (1971) Model for chemotaxis. J Theoret Biol 30(2):225–234
Kolokolnikov T, Wei J, Alcolado A (2014) Basic mechanisms driving complex spike dynamics in a chemotaxis model with logistic growth. SIAM J Appl Math 74(5):1375–1396
Kolokolnikov T, Wei J, Winter M (2009) Existence and stability analysis of spiky solutions for the Gierer–Meinhardt system with large reaction rates. Phys D 238(16):1695–1710
Kong F, Wang Q (2022) Stability, free energy and dynamics of multi-spikes in the minimal Keller–Segel model. Discret Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 42(5):2499
Kong F, Wei J, Xu L (2022) Existence of multi-spikes in the Keller–Segel model with logistic growth. preprint
Lin C-S, Ni W-M, Takagi I (1988) Large amplitude stationary solutions to a chemotaxis system. J Differ Equ 72(1):1–27
Lin F-H, Ni W-M, Wei J (2007) On the number of interior peak solutions for a singularly perturbed Neumann problem. Commun Pure Appl Math 60(2):252–281
Lin K, Mu C (2017) Convergence of global and bounded solutions of a two-species chemotaxis model with a logistic source. Discret Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 22(6):2233
Nagai T (1995) Blow-up of radially symmetric solutions to a chemotaxis system. Adv Math Sci Appl 5:581–601
Nagai T, Senba T, Suzuki T (2000) Chemotactic collapse in a parabolic system of mathematical biology. Hiroshima Math J 30(3):463–497
Nagai T, Senba T, Yoshida K (1997) Application of the Trudinger–Moser inequah. ty to a parabolic system of chemotaxis. Funkc Ekvacioj 40:411–433
Nanjundiah V (1973) Chemotaxis, signal relaying and aggregation morphology. J Theor Biol 42(1):63–105
Ni W-M, Takagi I (1991) On the shape of least-energy solutions to a semilinear Neumann problem. Commun Pure Appl Math 44(7):819–851
Ni W-M, Takagi I (1993) Locating the peaks of least-energy solutions to a semilinear Neumann problem. Duke Math J 70(2):247–281
Novick-Cohen A, Segel L (1984) A gradually slowing travelling band of chemotactic bacteria. J Math Biol 19(1):125–132
Osaki K, Yagi A (2001) Finite dimensional attractor for one-dimensional Keller–Segel equations. Funkc Ekvacioj 44(3):441–470
Painter K, Hillen T (2011) Spatio-temporal chaos in a chemotaxis model. Phys D 240(4–5):363–375
Schaaf R (1985) Stationary solutions of chemotaxis systems. Trans Am Math Soc 292(2):531–556
Senba T, Suzuki T (2000) Some structures of the solution set for a stationary system of chemotaxis. Adv Math Sci Appl 10(1):191–224
Wang G, Wei J (2002) Steady state solutions of a reaction-diffusion system modeling chemotaxis. Math Nachr 233(1):221–236
Wang Q, Yan J, Gai C (2016) Qualitative analysis of stationary Keller–Segel chemotaxis models with logistic growth. Z Angew Math Phys 67(3):1–25
Wang X, Xu Q (2013) Spiky and transition layer steady states of chemotaxis systems via global bifurcation and Helly’s compactness theorem. J Math Biol 66(6):1241–1266
Wei J (1998) On the interior spike solutions for some singular perturbation problems. Proc R Soc Edinb A 128(4):849–874
Wei J, Winter M (1998) Stationary solutions for the Cahn–Hilliard equation. Ann Henri Poincaré. 15:459–492
Wei J, Winter M (2014) Mathematical aspects of pattern formation in biological systems, vol 189. Springer, London
Winkler M (2008) Chemotaxis with logistic source: very weak global solutions and their boundedness properties. J Math Anal Appl 348(2):708–729
Winkler M (2010) Boundedness in the higher-dimensional parabolic–parabolic chemotaxis system with logistic source. Commun Part Differ Equ 35(8):1516–1537
Winkler M (2014) Global asymptotic stability of constant equilibria in a fully parabolic chemotaxis system with strong logistic dampening. J Diff Equ 257(4):1056–1077
** can prevent blow-up for the minimal Keller–Segel chemotaxis system? J Math Anal Appl 459(2):1172–1200
**ang T (2018) Sub-logistic source can prevent blow-up in the 2D minimal Keller–Segel chemotaxis system. J Math Phys 59(8):081502
Zhang Y, Chen X, Hao J, Lai X, Qin C (2014) An eigenvalue problem arising from spiky steady states of a minimal chemotaxis model. J Math Anal Appl 420(1):684–704
Acknowledgements
The research of J. Wei is partially supported by NSERC of Canada. L. Xu would like to express the gratitude for the financial support of China Scholarship Council and Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11931012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Formal expansion of single boundary spikes
In Appendix A, we shall employ the matched asymptotic analysis to reconstruct the non-constant steady state (1.4), which can support our rigorous argument.
We firstly multiply the both hand side of the u-equation by \(\frac{1}{\chi }\) in (1.3) to obtain
Our aim is to look for a localized pattern with the centre being 0. Recall \(\epsilon :=\sqrt{1/\chi }\), then in the inner region, we introduce
Upon substituting (1.2) into (1.1), one has
We expand
and substitute it into (1.3). To the leading order, we see that \( V_{0yy}=0\). Since we would like to find the uniformly bounded solution in \((0,\infty )\), one takes \(V_0=V_{00}\), where \(V_{00}\) is an undetermined constant. Moreover, we collect the following hierarchy from (1.3) and (1.4):
and
Noting \(U\ll 1\) in the outer region, one has \(U_0\rightarrow 0\) as \(\vert y\vert \rightarrow 0\). Thus, we infer from the first equation of (1.5) that \(U_0(y)=U_{00} e^{ V_1(y)}\), where \(U_{00}\) is an unknown constant. Now in the outer region, we can replace U in sense of distribution by
As such we find the outer problem for v is
where \(C:=\int _0^\infty e^{V_1}d\rho \) and we impose that C is a finite integral. To express v in the outer region, we introduce the following one-dimensional Neumann Green’s function \(G(x;\xi )\):
where G has the following explicit form:
Hence, we find v satisfies \(v\sim \epsilon U_{00}CG(x;0)\). It follows that as \(x\rightarrow 0\) and \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0^+\), \(v\rightarrow 0\). Recall in the inner expansion, \(V=V_{00}+\epsilon ^2 V_1+\cdots ,\) then we conclude from the matching that \(V_{00}=0.\)
We next solve (1.5) to find the inner solution. Upon substituting \(U_0=U_{00}e^{V_1}\) and \(V_{00}=0\) into the second equation, we establish the following core problem:
Solving equation (1.6) gives rise to
where a is a free parameter. Since \( V_{1y}=-\sqrt{a}\tanh \big (\frac{\sqrt{a}}{2} y\big )\), one has from the relationship between \(V_{1}\) and \(U_{0}\) that
To determine the constants, we next apply the integral constraint \(\int _{0}^L u({{\bar{u}}}-u)dx=0\) thanks to the Neumann boundary condition. Noting \(U\sim U_0\), we can arrive at
By using \(U_0(y)=U_{00} e^{V_1}\), one has \(\int _{0}^{\infty }(e^{V_1}-U_{00} e^{2 V_1})dy=0\), which then yields that
Let \(z=\frac{\sqrt{a}}{2} y\), then we solve (1.8) to get \(a\sim 3{{\bar{u}}}.\) Therefore, we have from (1.7) that for \(y\in (0,\infty ),\)
with \(a\sim 3{{\bar{u}}}.\) Now, we have obtained the inner solution.
Focusing on the outer region, one has \(u\sim 0\) and \(v_{xx}-v\sim 0\) with \(v_{0y}(L)=0\). By solving it, we get
where \(C_v\) is an unknown constant to be determined. We next use the matching condition to determine constant \(C_v\). From the inner solution, one finds
which yields
On the other hand, from the outer solution, we conclude for \(0<x<L,\)
It follows that
After matching (1.9) and (1.10), one can get \(C_{\nu }=\epsilon \sqrt{a}/\sinh L. \)
In summary, the single boundary spike \((u^-,v^-)\) can be asymptotically written as
and
where \(a\sim 3{{\bar{u}}}\). Next, we use the Van Dyke’s matching principle \(v_\text {unif}=v_\text {inner}+v_\text {outer}-v_\text {overlap}\) to find the composite expansion of v, which is
These results agree with those stated in Theorem 1.1.
Appendix B: Formal analysis of the eigenvalue problem
This section is devoted to the study of linearized eigenvalue problem (4.1) via the matched asymptotic analysis. Similarly, in the inner region, we introduce the following rescaled functions:
By using it together with (1.2), one can rewrite (4.1) as
Similarly as above, we expand
and substitute them together with (1.4) into (2.1). Then one can find \(\Psi _{0y}=0\), and thereby \(\Psi _0(y):=\Psi _{00}\) with \(\Psi _{00}\) being a constant. Moreover, with the help of matching condition between the inner and the outer solution, we obtain \(\Psi _{00}=0.\)
We further collect the following leading order system:
The first equation in (2.2) implies that \(\Big (\frac{\Phi _0}{U_0}\Big )_y=\Psi _{1y}\), hence \(\Phi _0=U_0\Psi _1+CU_0\) thanks to the boundary conditions, where C is some constant to be determined later on. Therefore, (2.2) yields that
Since \(U_0= \frac{a}{2}\textrm{sech}^{2}\Big (\frac{\sqrt{a}}{2}y\Big )\) and \(a\sim 3{{\bar{u}}}\), we further solve (2.3) to get the eigenfunctions are unique up to a constant multiplier of the following
Next, we proceed to show the corresponding leading eigenvalue \(\lambda _0<0\), which tells us that steady state (1.4) is linearly stable.
Proof
We integrate the \(\phi \)-equation in (4.1) over (0, L) to get
Upon substituting (2.4) into (2.5), one has the left hand side and right hand side satisfy
and
respectively. By straightforward calculation, we obtain
and
Combining (2.8) and (2.9), we have from (2.5), (2.6) and (2.1) that \(\lambda _0\sim -2\mu {{\bar{u}}}.\) This gives us (1.4) is linearly stable with respect to the even eigenfunction (2.4), then formally verifies Theorem 1.2. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kong, F., Wei, J. & Xu, L. The existence and stability of spikes in the one-dimensional Keller–Segel model with logistic growth. J. Math. Biol. 86, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-022-01840-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-022-01840-1