Correction to: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14033-5

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistakes:

  1. 1.

    In Introduction section, paragraph 5, the sentence "...RMS has the advantage of being..." should be "...RSM has the advantage of being..."

  2. 2.

    In section 2.2, Fig. 1 the Legend “…b angle (γ) and kerf (k). Tooth characteristic angles: rank angle (α), sharpness angle (β), and clearance. …” should be “…b Tooth characteristic angles: rank angle (α), sharpness angle (β), and clearance angle (γ) and kerf (k). …”

  3. 3.

    In the 2.4 section, paragraph 2, the sentence “…a feed speed of 13 m/min is imposed than when a cutting velocity of 47.1 m/s is used, which translates the values of fz (0.09 to 0.17…” should be ““…a feed speed of 13 m/min is imposed and when a cutting velocity of 47.1 m/s is used, which translates the values of fz (0.09 to 0.15…”

  4. 4.

    In the subsection 3.2.1, equation 1 “…+ 9.44474e − 05N2” should be “…+ 9.44474e−05N2

  5. 5.

    In the subsection 3.3.3, paragraph 1, the sentence "... (in the range of frequencies studied, in this case, 50 Hz)...” should be “… (in the range of frequencies studied, in this case, 30 Hz)…”

  6. 6.

    Last column of Table 5 was missing. The correct table is shown below:

    Table 5 Model summary statistics for response: fz, Es, and Tw for the different PB types (M60, EU, and FU)
  7. 7.

    Table 3: The last column is also under the main header “Feed per tooth (mm)” and is now correctly shown below:

    Table 3 Expected levels of machining

The original article has been corrected.