Log in

Ultrastructure of the protonephridial system of regenerating Stenostomum sp. (Plathelminthes, Catenulida)

  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ultrastructure of the flame bulbs, protonephridial capillaries and duct of fully developed and regenerating Stenostomum sp. is described. Flame bulbs are formed by a single cell whose nucleus is located basally or laterally to the weir. The weir is formed by a single row of transverse ribs connected by a thin ‘membrane’, apparently of extracellular matrix. Internal leptotriches arise from the proximal cytoplasm and extend in a (usually) single row along the weir and into the lumen of the distal cytoplasmic tube. Many or all leptotriches do not fuse with the distal cytoplasm. Two cilia are each anchored in the proximal cytoplasm by a cross-striated vertical and lateral rootlet, the latter bent forward and extending for some distance into one of the two cytoplasmic cords along the weir. Each cord contains the lateral rootlet in its proximal part, as well as many microtubules. The distal cytoplasmic tube contains two (longitudinal) junctions, i.e. lines of contact between cell processes of the same, terminal cell. Occasionally, more than two junctions were seen, apparently due to branches of the terminal cell in contact with each other. Flame bulbs join capillaries lined by several canal cells type I, containing few or no microvilli but lateral flames. Such capillaries join a duct (or ducts?) lined by canal cells type II with many long microvilli. The large protonephridial duct is lined by numerous cells with lateral flames and many long microvilli. In regenerating tissue (10.5 hours after cutting) some flame bulbs were ‘free’, i.e. not connected to capillaries, and some capillaries openly communicated with the surrounding intercellular space. In the presence of a single row of ribs in the weir, of internal leptotriches, and of vertical and lateral ciliary rootlets, the flame bulb of Stenostomum sp. resembles that of other Plathelminthes much more closely than hitherto thought. The species differs from non-catenulid plathelminths mainly in the large number of glandular cells lining the large protonephridial ducts, in the transverse orientation of the ribs in the weir and in the presence of only two cilia in the flame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borkott H (1970) Geschlechtliche Organisation, Fortpflanzungsverhalten und Ursachen der sexuellen Vermehrung von Stenostomum sthenum nov. spec. (Turbellaria, Catenulida). Z Morphol Tiere 67:183–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg J (1966) Die Reusenformen der Cyrtocyten. Eine Beschreibung von fünf weiteren Reusengeißelzellen und eine vergleichende Betrachtung. Zool Beitr 12:345–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers U (1985) Das phylogenetische System der Plathelminthes. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman LH (1951) The Invertebrates: Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kümmel G (1962) Zwei neue Formen von Cyrtocyten. Vergleich der bisher bekannten Cyrtocyten und Erörterung des Begriffes, “Zelltyp”. Z Zellforsch 57:172–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kümmel G (1965) Druckfiltration als ein Mechanismus der Stoffausscheidung bei Wirbellosen. In: Funktionelle und morphologische Organisation der Zelle. Sekretion und Exkretion. Springer, Berlin, pp 203–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Kümmel G (1977) Der gegenwärtige Stand der Forschung zur Funktionsmorphologie exkretorischer Systeme. Versuch einer vergleichenden Darstellung. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 1977:154–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraczewski J (1981) Fine structure of some Catenulida (Turbellaria, Archoophora). Zool Poloniae 28:367–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott HN (1892) A study of Stenostoma leucops O. Schm. J Morphol 7:263–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger E (1976) Zur Evolution des stomatogastrichen Nervensystems bei den Plathelminthen. Z Zool Syst Evol 14:241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde K (1991) The evolution of protonephridia of the Platyhelminthes. Hydrobiologia 227:315–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde K, Watson N, Cannon LRG (1987) Ultrastructure of the protonephridia of Mesostoma sp. (Rhabdocoela, ‘Typhloplanoida’). J Submicrosc Cytol 19:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterrer W, Rieger R (1974) Retronectidae — new cosmopolitan marine family of Catenulida (Turbellaria) In: Riser NW, Morse MP (ed) Biology of the Turbellaria, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 63–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohde, K., Watson, N.A. Ultrastructure of the protonephridial system of regenerating Stenostomum sp. (Plathelminthes, Catenulida). Zoomorphology 113, 61–67 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430977

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430977

Keywords

Navigation