Search
Search Results
-
Bootstrap** and Persuasive Argumentation
That bootstrap** and Moorean reasoning fail to instantiate persuasive argumentation is an often informally presented but not systematically...
-
Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation: Emotional Appeals and Reactions
In this paper, we present a model of pathos, delineate its operationalisation, and demonstrate its utility through an analysis of natural language...
-
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation
This paper defends negotiation as a way of rationally overcoming disagreements. Negotiation is a type of dialogue where the parties begin with a...
-
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies
Anyone interested in philosophical argumentation should be prepared to study philosophical debates and controversies because it is an intensely...
-
Bridging Informal Reasoning and Formal Proving: The Role of Argumentation in Proof-Events
This paper explores the relationship between informal reasoning, creativity in mathematics, and problem solving. It underscores the importance of...
-
Argumentation-induced rational issue polarisation
Computational models have shown how polarisation can rise among deliberating agents as they approximate epistemic rationality. This paper provides...
-
The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View
In ‘The making of argumentation theory’ van Eemeren and van Haaften describe the contributions made to the five components of a full-fledged research...
-
What is Extremism? Advancing Definition in Political Argumentation
One of the positive ways in which argumentation can improve political thinking is through providing definitions. We can establish definitions through...
-
Formalization of Mathematical Proof Practice Through an Argumentation-Based Model
Proof requires a dialogue between agents to clarify obscure inference steps, fill gaps, or reveal implicit assumptions in a purported proof. Hence,...
-
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
Argumentation as the public exchange of reasons is widely thought to enhance deliberative interactions that generate and justify reasonable public...
-
Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach
This paper examines the conceptual and terminological overlap between theories and models of practical deliberation developed within the fields of...
-
Asking before Arguing? Consent in Argumentation
Arguments involve, at minimum, attempts at presenting something that an audience will take to be a reason. Reasons, once understood, affect an...
-
Argumentation as a Speech Act: Two Levels of Analysis
Following and extending Searle’s speech act theory, both Pragma-Dialectics and the Linguistic Normative Model of Argumentation characterize...
-
It’s not (only) about Getting the Last Word: Rhetorical Norms of Public Argumentation and the Responsibility to Keep the Conversation Going
The core function of argumentation in a democratic setting must be to constitute a modality for citizens to engage differences of opinion...
-
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies
The article focuses on the argumentative character of the eulogy, a speech that is part of a funeral ritual and serves to console the community of...
-
Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach
Argumentation has remained under-researched in studies analyzing academic journal publications despite its importance in academic writing. This paper...
-
Argumentation and the problem of agreement
A broad assumption in argumentation theory is that argumentation primarily regards resolving, confronting, or managing disagreement. This assumption...
-
Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings
When parties attempt to persuade their opponents of the tenability of a certain standpoint using reasons, they will often find that the circumstances...
-
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation
In this paper, I highlight the significance of practices of refutation in philosophical inquiry, that is, practices of showing that a claim, person...
-
Belief Revision and Computational Argumentation: A Critical Comparison
This paper aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model reasoning processes. Referring to some prominent...