Interim Housing Provision Following Earthquake Disaster

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering
  • 125 Accesses

Synonyms

Core housing; Housing; Recovery phase; Shelter; Transitional housing

Introduction

The provision of interim housing following an earthquake disaster is important because it is the first substantial community step away from the effects of a sudden and unexpected seismic event and back towards some “normality.”

It is defined as housing that is “short term that can be in place for 1 month to 2 years – preferably on sites close to the damaged housing. (To the extent that displaced residents can remain near their previous homes means that economic impacts are reduced.) Interim housing will be needed because those organizations “donating” temporary shelter space need to reclaim that space for its original uses as schools – community centers – churches – that serve the community.” (ABAG 2008).

The idea of “shelter in place” is important not only from a psychosocial perspective of those affected but moreover as part of the subsequent recovery and reconstruction. Shelter in place will...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABAG (2008) Long term housing recovery Pub. by Earthquake and hazards program local and regional disaster recovery planning issues Association of Bay Area Governments Issues paper, 8 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • ARC (2012) Preferred sheltering practices for emergency sheltering in Australia. The application of international humanitarian best practice. Pub. by Australian Red Cross, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan H, Coşgun N (2007) The evaluation of temporary earthquake houses dismantling process in the context of building waste management. In: International earthquake symposium Koceau, Turkey 22–26 Oct 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancern (2014) Newsletter # 113, 31 January 2014. http://www.rebuildchristchurch.co.n2/blog/2014/1/cancern-newsletter-113-31-January-2014. Accessed Feb 2015

  • Chang Y, Wilkinson S, Potangaroa R, Seville E (2011) Identifying factors affecting resource availability for post-disaster reconstruction: a case study in China. Construct Manage Econ 29(1):37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva J (2010) Lessons from Aceh Key considerations in post-disaster reconstruction. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby/Warwickshire, p 63. ISBN 978 1 85339 700 4. www.practicalactionpublishing.org

  • Davidson C, Johnson C, Lizarralde G, Sliwinski A, Dikmen N (2007) Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat Int 31:100–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis I (2007) Learning from disaster recovery guidance for decision makers. International Recovery Platform (IRP), Geneva and Koba, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis I (2010) What is the vision for sheltering and housing in Haiti? Summary observations of reconstruction progress following the Haiti earthquake of January 12th 2010 online at www.onuhabitat.org/haiti, accessed Feb 2015

  • DHS (2013) Unless modified, FEMA’s temporary housing plans will increase costs by an estimated $76 million annually. Department of Homeland Security, Washinton, DC, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • EERI (2004) Learning from earthquakes. Social and public policy issues following the Bam, Iran, Earthquake. EERI special earthquake report, California, Aug 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • EERI (2008) Reconnaissance report on the China Wenchuan Earthquake May 12, 2008. Chu-Chieh J. Lin, Associate Research Fellow of NCREE Juin-Fu Chai, Research Fellow of NCREE, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • EPYPSA (2011) Estudios Proyectos y Planificación S.A. An evaluation of the Haiti earthquake 2010 meeting shelter needs: issues, achievements and constraints. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), Geneva, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris E (2010) Earthquakes and floods: comparing Haiti and Pakistan. The Brookings Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovinazzi S, Stevenson J (2012) Temporary housing issues following the 22nd Christchurch earthquake, NZ. In: 2012 NZSEE conference University of Canterbury, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas J, Kates R, Bowden M (1977) Reconstruction following disaster. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt J (2013). Errors of commission. In: AUBEA 2013 conference, Auckland, 20–22 Nov 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • IASC (2010) Shelter Cluster Haiti transitional shelter technical guidance 19/02/10. Shelter Cluster technical working group, Port au Princes

    Google Scholar 

  • IASC (2011) United Nations Inter Agency Standing Committee operational guidelines on the protection of persons in situations of natural disasters. The Brookings – Bern Project on Internal Displacement, IASC, Geneva, Jan 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM (2012) Haiti: from emergency to sustainable recovery IOM Haiti two year report (2010–2011), pp 9–11, 37-3B. http://www.com.int/Jah 19/webdav/shared/main site/activities/countries/docs/haiti/10M-Haiti-Two-year-Report-2010-2011-From-Emergency-to-sustainable-Recovery.pdf. Accessed Feb 2015

  • IRP (2009) International Recovery Platform, recovery status report. The Yogyakarta and Central Java Earthquake 2006 with Gadjah mada uni. pub. IRP Kobe Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha A, Barenstein J, Phelps P, Pittet D, Sena S (2010) The social dimension of housing reconstruction. In: Safer homes, stronger communities: a handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters. World Bank, Washinton, DC, pp 59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C (2002) What’s the big deal about temporary housing? Planning considerations for temporary accommodation after disasters: example of the 1999 Turkish earthquakes. In: TIEMS disaster management conference 2002, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C (2007) Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat 31(1):36–52

    Google Scholar 

  • JRF (2008) Two years after the Java earthquake and tsunami: implementing community based reconstruction, increasing transparency. Java Reconstruction Fund progress report 2008, World bank, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/wrote/en/2008/01/97921 accessed Feb 2015

  • Kipa M, Potangaroa R, Wilkinson S (2013) Iwi resilience? The Maori response following the February 22, 2011 Christchurch earthquake. In: AUBEA 2013 conference, Auckland, 20–22 Nov 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristin D, Hedda F, Liu J, Zhang H (2012) Recovering from the Wenchuan earthquake. FAFO-Report 2012:39, Oslo. ISBN 978-82-7422-917-4, ISSN 0801-6143. www.fafo.no/english

  • Lloyd-Jones T (2006) Mind the gap! Post-disaster reconstruction and the transition from humanitarian relief. RICS, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons M, Schilderman T, Boano C (2010) Building back better: delivering people-centred housing reconstruction at scale. Practical Action, Rugby; South Bank University/IFRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MBIE (2012) Guidance to assist the development of temporary accommodation to house workers in greater Christchurch. NZ Government; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Wellington, Sept 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • MCDEM (2004) National civil defence and emergency management CDEM strategy 2003–2006. Ministry of Civil Defence Emergency Management, NZ Govt, Wellington, pp 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh J (2013) Chapter10: The implications of post disaster recovery for affordable housing. In: Approaches to disaster management – examining the implications of hazards, emergencies and disasters. Intech, Rijeka

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Hazards Center (2001) Holistic disaster recovery ideas for building local sustainability after a natural disaster. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado 482 UCB, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • OCHA (2012) What is the cluster approach? OCHA on message: the cluster approach. UN office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs. https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/120320_OOM-ClusterApproach_eng.pdf

  • Potangaroa R (2005) The strategy for a shelter program. Report for UNHCR Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Technical Coordinator UNHCR Bandar Aceh, 24 Jan 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Potangaroa R (2006) The development of a permanent shelter program for Aceh, North Sumatra. In: Proceedings of the scientific forum on the tsunami, its impact and recovery regional symposium, AIT, Thailand, 6–7th June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Potangaroa R (2010a) The seismic gap: issues of seismic design in post disaster reconstruction. i-Rec2010 participatory design and appropriate technology for post-disaster reconstruction, Ahmadabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Potangaroa R (2010b) Lessons learnt as part of the terms of reference deliverables. Shelter cluster technical coordinator available via the Shelter Cluster Web site. Haiti, Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Potangaroa R, Wang M, Chang Y (2009) Identifying resilience in those affected by the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. J Eng Sci (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Potangaroa R, Wilkinson S, Zare M, Steinfort P (2011a) The management of portable toilets in the eastern suburbs of Christchurch after the february 22, 2011 earthquake. Australas J Disaster Trauma Stud 2011(2):35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Potangaroa R, Mattar Neri R, Brown D (2011b)The design development and costs of several key housing issues for Delmas 19, Port Au Prince. Report for the British Red Cross Haiti, Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • QG (2010) Form23 temporary accommodation buildings checklist.(version 1) The State of Queensland (Department of Infrastructure and Planning). Queensland Government, Brisbane, May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli EL (1995) Patterns of shelter and housing in US disasters. Disaster Prev Manage 4(3):43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees-Gildea P, Moles O (2012) Lessons learned & best practices. In: The international federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Shelter Programme in Haiti 2010–2012, IFRC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychansyah M (2009) Chapter 3: sector-specific recovery and Case Studies: 3.1 Shelter international Recovery Platform recovery status report. The Yogyakarta and Central Java Earthquake 2006, IRP Washington, DC, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMB (2009) Regulating temporary farm worker housing in the ALR. Discussion paper and standards. The Sustainable Agriculture Management Branch Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiawan B (2007) Lessons from Aceh and Jogya. Towards better disaster management. Partnership for Governance Reform, Yogyakarta, Dec 2007. ISBN 978-979-26-9629-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelter Cluster Philippines (2014) Shelter and environment – an overview Typhoon Yolanda response. Philippines, Haiyan Shelter Cluster, 12 Jan 2014 download from https://www.sheltercluster.org/

  • SPHERE (2011) The Sphere project, the humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby. ISBN 978-1-908176-00-4

    Google Scholar 

  • TIME (2005) After the tsunami: a time to build. Special issue, 4 Apr 2005, 165(14)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRD (2008) The disaster management planning Hyogo Office of the United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD). Report on the 2008 Great Sichuan earthquake, Mar 2009. Available at http://www.preventionweb.net/files/13114_UNCRDSichuanReport200903EN.pdf

  • UNHCR (2007) Handbook for emergencies, 3rd edn. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHIC (2005) Guidelines on housing repair and construction. United Nations Humanitarian Information Centre for Sumatra, Book 3 SWG, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • USAF (2001) Temporary lodging design guide. United States Air Force, Brooks AFD, Texas, Rec 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2008) 2008 Sichuan earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Sichuan_earthquake

  • Wikipedia (2010) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Haiti_earthquake. Accessed Feb 2014

  • Wilson W (2013) Homelessness in England – commons library standard note. Published 12 Dec 2013, Standard notes SN01164

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo K (2010) Procurement and contractual arrangements for post-disaster reconstruction. PhD thesis, Auckland University School of Engineering, p 60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regan Potangaroa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Potangaroa, R. (2015). Interim Housing Provision Following Earthquake Disaster. In: Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I.A., Patelli, E., Au, SK. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_350

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation