Evolution of Floral Organ Identity

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Developmental Biology

Abstract

Understanding the origin and rapid diversification of the angiosperm flower is a long-standing problem of evolutionary biology. A poor fossil record and a large morphological gap between extant angiosperms and their closest living relatives, extant gymnosperms, are major reasons that make reconstruction of flower origin such a hard problem. In recent years, however, significant progress has been made, especially in our understanding of the evolution of floral organ identity, by the application of the evo-devo rationale. Quite useful as guiding concepts for understanding floral organ identity development and evolution proved genetic and molecular models, such as diverse ABC models and the floral quartet model. These models highlight the importance of organ identity genes and the interaction of the transcription factors they encode for a better understanding of evolutionary novelties such as flowers. Comparative studies on the MIKC-type genes and proteins underlying the ABC and floral quartet models throughout the seed plants suggest that gene regulatory networks controlling reproductive organ identity quite similar to those of angiosperms existed already in the most recent common ancestor of extant seed plants about 300 million years ago. These networks were probably just recruited and slightly modified to control diverse floral organ identities. Among the major floral organs the carpel, a key character of angiosperms, is arguably least well understood in terms of its origin. This applies even more so to the ovule, which is an important component of the carpel, but has much deeper evolutionary roots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateman RM, Hilton J, Rudall PJ (2006) Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers. J Exp Bot 57:3471–3503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baum DA, Hileman LC (2006) A developmental genetic model for the origin of the flower. In: Ainsworth C (ed) Flowering and its manipulation. Blackwell Publishing, Sheffield, pp 3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanderbali AS, Berger BA, Howarth DG, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2016) Evolving ideas on the origin and evolution of flowers: new perspectives in the genomic era. Genetics 202:1255–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodsworth S (2017) Petal, sepal, or tepal? B-genes and monocot flowers. Trends Plant Sci. 22:8–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endress PK (2001) Origins of flower morphology. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 291:105–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MW, Chase MW (2007) After a dozen years of progress the origin of angiosperms is still a great mystery. Nat Rev Genet 450:1184–1189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gramzow L, Weilandt L, Theißen G (2014) MADS goes genomic in conifers: towards determining the ancestral set of MADS-box genes in seed plants. Ann Bot 114:1407–1429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu HF, Hsu WH, Lee YI, Mao WT, Yang JY, Li YY, Yang CH (2015) Model for perianth formation in orchids. Nat Plants 1:15046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irish VF (2009) Evolution of petal identity. J Exp Bot 60:2517–2517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer EM, Jamarillo MA (2005) Genetic basis for innovations in floral organ identity. J Exp Zool 304B:526–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondragón-Palomino M, Theißen G (2009) Why are orchid flowers so diverse? Reduction of evolutionary constraints by paralogues of class B floral homeotic genes. Ann Bot 104:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauquet H, von Balthazar M, Magallón S, Doyle JA et al (2017) The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification. Nat Commun 8:16047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scutt CP, Vinauger-Douard M, Fourquin C, Cedric Finet C, Dumas C (2006) An evolutionary perspective on the regulation of carpel development. J Exp Bot 57:2143–2152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B, Yant L, Hodges SA, Kramer EM (2014) Understanding the development and evolution of novel floral form in Aquilegia. Curr Opin Plant Biol 17:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Chanderbali AS, Kim S, Buzgo M, Soltis PS (2007) The ABC model and its application to basal angiosperms. Ann Bot 100:155–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Specht CD, Bartlett ME (2009) Flower evolution: the origin and subsequent diversification of the angiosperm flower. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:217–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuessy TF (2004) A transitional-combinational theory for the origin of angiosperms. Taxon 53:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares R, Cagnon M, Negrutiu I, Mouchiroud D (2010) Testing the recent theories for the origin of the hermaphrodite flower by comparison of the transcriptomes of gymnosperms and angiosperms. BMC Evol Biol 10:240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theißen G (2005) Birth, life and death of developmental control genes: new challenges for the homology concept. Theory Biosci 124:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theißen G, Becker A (2004) Gymnosperm orthologues of class B floral homeotic genes and their impact on understanding flower origin. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theißen G, Melzer R (2007) Molecular mechanisms underlying origin and diversification of the angiosperm flower. Ann Bot 100:603–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theißen G, Becker A, Winter KU, Muenster T, Kirchner C, Saedler H (2002) How the land plants learned their floral ABCs: the role of MADS box genes in the evolutionary origin of flowers. In: Cronk QC, Bateman RM, Hawkins JM (eds) Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 173–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Theißen G, Melzer R, Rümpler F (2016) MADS-domain transcription factors and the floral quartet model of flower development: linking plant development and evolution. Development 143:3259–3271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vialette-Guiraud ACM, Andres-Robin A, Chambrier P, Tavares R, Scutt CP (2016) The analysis of Gene Regulatory Networks in plant evo-devo. J Exp Bot 67:2549–2563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

GT thanks Charlie P. Scutt for his kind invitation to write this chapter and for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Günter Theißen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Theißen, G., Rümpler, F. (2021). Evolution of Floral Organ Identity. In: Nuño de la Rosa, L., Müller, G.B. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32979-6_163

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation