Abstract
Molecular dynamics based free energy calculations allow for a robust and accurate evaluation of free energy changes upon amino acid mutation in proteins. In this chapter we cover the basic theoretical concepts important for the use of calculations utilizing the non-equilibrium alchemical switching methodology. We further provide a detailed step-by-step protocol for estimating the effect of a single amino acid mutation on protein thermostability. In addition, the potential caveats and solutions to some frequently encountered issues concerning the non-equilibrium alchemical free energy calculations are discussed. The protocol comprises details for the hybrid structure/topology generation required for alchemical transitions, equilibrium simulation setup, and description of the fast non-equilibrium switching. Subsequently, the analysis of the obtained results is described. The steps in the protocol are complemented with an illustrative practical application: a destabilizing mutation in the Trp cage mini protein. The concepts that are described are generally applicable. The shown example makes use of the pmx software package for the free energy calculations using Gromacs as a molecular dynamics engine. Finally, we discuss how the current protocol can readily be adapted to carry out charge-changing or multiple mutations at once, as well as large-scale mutational scans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gapsys V, Michielssens S, Seeliger D, de Groot BL (2016) Accurate and rigorous prediction of the changes in protein free energies in a large-scale mutation scan. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 55(26):7364–7368
Griss R, Schena A, Reymond L, Patiny L, Werner D, Tinberg CE, Baker D, Johnsson K (2014) Bioluminescent sensor proteins for point-of-care therapeutic drug monitoring. Nat Chem Biol 10(7):598–603
Feng J, Jester BW, Tinberg CE, Mandell DJ, Antunes MS, Chari R, Morey KJ, Rios X, Medford JI, Church GM, Fields S, Baker D (2015) A general strategy to construct small molecule biosensors in eukaryotes. eLife 4:323–329
Zhou L, Bosscher M, Zhang C, Özçubukçu S, Zhang L, Zhang W, Li CJ, Liu J, Jensen MP, Lai L, He C (2014) A protein engineered to bind uranyl selectively and with femtomolar affinity. Nat Chem 6(3):236–241
Correia BE, Bates JT, Loomis RJ, Baneyx G, Carrico C, Jardine JG, Rupert P, Correnti C, Kalyuzhniy O, Vittal V, Connell MJ, Stevens E, Schroeter A, Chen M, MacPherson S, Serra AM, Adachi Y, Holmes MA, Li Y, Klevit RE, Graham BS, Wyatt RT, Baker D, Strong RK, Crowe JE, Johnson PR, Schief WR (2014) Proof of principle for epitope-focused vaccine design. Nature 507(7491):201–206
Koday MT, Nelson J, Chevalier A, Koday M, Kalinoski H, Stewart L, Carter L, Nieusma T, Lee PS, Ward AB, Wilson IA, Dagley A, Smee DF, Baker D, Fuller DH (2016) A computationally designed hemagglutinin stem-binding protein provides in vivo protection from influenza independent of a host immune response. PLoS Pathog 12(2):e1005409
Clark AJ, Gindin T, Zhang B, Wang L, Abel R, Murret CS, Xu F, Bao A, Lu NJ, Zhou T, Kwong PD, Shapiro L, Honig B, Friesner RA (2017) Free energy perturbation calculation of relative binding free energy between broadly neutralizing antibodies and the gp120 glycoprotein of HIV-1. J Mol Biol 429(7):930–947
Fowler PW, Cole K, Gordon NC, Kearns AM, Llewelyn MJ, Peto TEA, Crook DW, Walker AS (2018) Robust prediction of resistance to trimethoprim in Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Chem Biol 25:339–349
Hauser K, Negron C, Albanese SK, Ray S, Steinbrecher T, Abel R, Chodera JD, Wang L (2018) Predicting resistance of clinical Abl mutations to targeted kinase inhibitors using alchemical free-energy calculations. Commun Biol 1:70
Tinberg CE, Khare SD, Dou J, Doyle L, Nelson JW, Schena A, Jankowski W, Kalodimos CG, Johnsson K, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2013) Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity. Nature 501(7466):212
Yang W, Lai L (2017) Computational design of ligand-binding proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 45:67–73
Brender JR, Zhang Y (2015) Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein binding interactions through structure-based interface profiles. PLoS Comput Biol 11(10):e1004494
Pires DEV, Ascher DB, Blundell TL (2014) mCSM: predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures. Bioinformatics 30(3):335–342
Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, Serrano L (2005) The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Suppl 2):W382–W388
Kortemme T, Baker D (2002) A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(22):14116–14121
Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, Jacak R, Kaufman K, Renfrew PD, Smith CA, Sheffler W, Davis IW, Cooper S, Treuille A, Mandell DJ, Richter F, Ban YEA, Fleishman SJ, Corn JE, Kim DE, Lyskov S, Berrondo M, Mentzer S, Popović Z, Havranek JJ, Karanicolas J, Das R, Meiler J, Kortemme T, Gray JJ, Kuhlman B, Baker D, Bradley P (2011) Rosetta3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487(C):545–574
Petukh M, Li M, Alexov E (2015) Predicting binding free energy change caused by point mutations with knowledge-modified MM/PBSA method. PLoS Comput Biol 11(7):e1004276
Beard H, Cholleti A, Pearlman D, Sherman W, Loving KA (2013) Applying physics-based scoring to calculate free energies of binding for single amino acid mutations in protein-protein complexes. PLoS ONE 8(12):e82849
Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ (2007) Computational alanine scanning mutagenesis - An improved methodological approach. J Comput Chem 28(3):644–654
Seeliger D, de Groot BL (2010) Protein thermostability calculations using alchemical free energy simulations. Biophys J 98(10):2309–2316
Chipot C, Pohorille A (eds) (2007) Free energy calculations: theory and applications in chemistry and biology, vol 86. Springer, Berlin
Neidigh JW, Fesinmeyer RM, Andersen NH (2002) Designing a 20-residue protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol 9(6):425–430
Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, Lindahl E (2015) GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 2:1–7
Gapsys V, Michielssens S, Seeliger D, de Groot BL (2015) pmx: automated protein structure and topology generation for alchemical perturbations. J Comput Chem 36(5):348–354
Chipot C (2014) Frontiers in free-energy calculations of biological systems. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 4(1):71–89
Gapsys V, Michielssens S, Peters JH, de Groot BL, Leonov H (2015) Molecular modeling of proteins, vol 1215. Humana Press, New York
Pohorille A, Jarzynski C, Chipot C (2010) Good practices in free-energy calculations. J Phys Chem B 114(32):10235–10253
Hansen N, van Gunsteren WF (2014) Practical aspects of free-energy calculations: a review. J Chem Theory Comput 10(7):2632–2647
Goette M, Grubmüller H (2009) Accuracy and convergence of free energy differences calculated from nonequilibrium switching processes. J Comput Chem 30(3):447–456
Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys Rev Lett 78(14):2690–2693
Jarzynski C (1997) Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach. Phys Rev E 56:5018–5035
Crooks GE (1998) Nonequilibrium measurements of free energy differences for microscopically reversible Markovian systems. J Stat Phys 90(5/6):1481–1487
Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Phys Rev E 60(3):2721–2726
Crooks GE (2000) Path-ensemble averages in systems driven far from equilibrium. Phys Rev E 61(3):2361–2366
Hummer G, Szabo A (2001) Free energy reconstruction from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(7):3658–3661
Hummer G (2001) Fast-growth thermodynamic integration: error and efficiency analysis. J Chem Phys 114(17):7330–7337
Hummer G, Szabo A (2005) Free energy surfaces from single-molecule force spectroscopy. Acc Chem Res 38(7):504–513
Zwanzig RW (1954) High-temperature equation of state by a perturbation method. I. nonpolar gases. J Chem Phys 22(8):1420–1426
Kirkwood JG (1935) Statistical mechanics of fluid mixtures. J Chem Phys 3(5):300–313
Cuendet MA (2006) The Jarzynski identity derived from general Hamiltonian or non-Hamiltonian dynamics reproducing NVT or NPT ensembles. J Chem Phys 125(14):144109
Wood RH, Mühlbauer WCF, Thompson PT (1991) Systematic errors in free energy perturbation calculations due to a finite sample of configuration space: sample-size hysteresis. J Phys Chem 95(17):6670–6675
Gore J, Ritort F, Bustamante C (2003) Bias and error in estimates of equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(22):12564–12569
Nanda H, Lu N, Woolf TB (2005) Using non-Gaussian density functional fits to improve relative free energy calculations. J Chem Phys 122(13):134110
Massey FJ Jr (1951) Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Test 46(253):68– 78
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap, vol 5, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London/West Palm Beach
Bennett CH (1976) Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data. J Comput Phys 22(2):245–268
Shirts MR, Bair E, Hooker G, Pande VS (2003) Equilibrium free energies from nonequilibrium measurements using maximum-likelihood methods. Phys Rev Lett 91(14):140601
Nelder JA, Mead R (1964) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313
Hahn AM, Then H (2010) Measuring the convergence of Monte Carlo free-energy calculations. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 81(4):041117
Lindorff-Larsen K, Trbovic N, Maragakis P, Piana S, Shaw DE (2012) Structure and dynamics of an unfolded protein examined by molecular dynamics simulation. J Am Chem Soc 134(8):3787–3791
Rauscher S, Gapsys V, Gajda MJ, Zweckstetter M, de Groot BL, Grubmüller H (2015) Structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins depend strongly on force field: a comparison to experiment. J Chem Theory Comput 11(11):5513–5524
Prevost M, Wodak SJ, Tidor B, Karplus M (1991) Contribution of the hydrophobic effect to protein stability: analysis based on simulations of the Ile-96 → Ala mutation in barnase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88(23):10880–10884
Sneddon SF, Tobias DJ (1992) The role of packing interactions in stabilizing folded proteins. Biochemistry 31(10):2842–2846
Pitera JW, Kollman PA (2000) Exhaustive mutagenesis in silico: multicoordinate free energy calculations on proteins and peptides. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 41(3):385–397
Pearlman DA, Kollman PA (1991) The overlooked bond-stretching contribution in free energy perturbation calculations. J Chem Phys 94(6):4532
Pearlman DA (1994) A comparison of alternative approaches to free energy calculations. J Phys Chem 98(5):1487–1493
Boresch S, Karplus M (1999) The role of bonded terms in free energy simulations: 1. Theoretical analysis. J Phys Chem A 103(1):103–118
Boresch S, Karplus M (1996) The Jacobian factor in free energy simulations. J Chem Phys 105(12):5145–5154
Boresch S, Karplus M (1999) The role of bonded terms in free energy simulations. 2. Calculation of their influence on free energy differences of solvation. J Phys Chem A 103(1):119–136
Beutler TC, Mark AE, van Schaik RC, Gerber PR, van Gunsteren WF (1994) Avoiding singularities and numerical instabilities in free energy calculations based on molecular simulations. Chem Phys Lett 222(6):529–539
Zacharias M, Straatsma TP, McCammon JA (1994) Separation-shifted scaling, a new scaling method for Lennard-Jones interactions in thermodynamic integration. J Chem Phys 100:9025–9031
Pham TT, Shirts MR (2011) Identifying low variance pathways for free energy calculations of molecular transformations in solution phase. J Chem Phys 135(3):034114
Gapsys V, Seeliger D, de Groot BL (2012) New soft-core potential function for molecular dynamics based alchemical free energy calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 8(7):2373–2382
Buelens FP, Grubmüller H (2012) Linear-scaling soft-core scheme for alchemical free energy calculations. J Comput Chem 33(1):25–33
Gapsys V, de Groot BL (2017) pmx Webserver: a user friendly interface for alchemistry. J Chem Inf Model 57(2):109–114
Šali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234(3):779–815
Schrödinger, LLC (2015) The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.8, November 2015
Vriend G (1990) WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graph 8(1):52–56
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C (2006) Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 65(3):712–725
Best RB, Hummer G (2009) Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. J Phys Chem B 113(26):9004–9015
Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2010) Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 78(8):1950–1958
Lindahl E (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations. In: Molecular modeling of proteins. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–26
Barua B, Andersen NH (2001) Determinants of miniprotein stability: can anything replace a buried H-bonded Trp sidechain? Lett Pept Sci 8(3–5):221–226
Barua B, Lin JC, Williams VD, Kummler P, Neidigh JW, Andersen NH (2008) The Trp-cage: optimizing the stability of a globular miniprotein. Protein Eng Des Sel 21(3):171–185
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: an Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98(12):10089–10092
Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 103(19):8577–8593
Rocklin GJ, Mobley DL, Dill KA, Hünenberger PH (2013) Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects. J Chem Phys 139(18):184103
Lin Y-L, Aleksandrov A, Simonson T, Roux B (2014) An overview of electrostatic free energy computations for solutions and proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 10(7):2690–2709
Hub JS, de Groot BL, Grubmüller H, Groenhof G (2014) Quantifying artifacts in Ewald simulations of inhomogeneous systems with a net charge. J Chem Theory Comput 10(1):381–390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
1
work_distributions-checkpoint.ipynb (ZIP 57 KB)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Aldeghi, M., de Groot, B.L., Gapsys, V. (2019). Accurate Calculation of Free Energy Changes upon Amino Acid Mutation. In: Sikosek, T. (eds) Computational Methods in Protein Evolution. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1851. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8736-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8736-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8735-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8736-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols