Abstract
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process that plays an import role in cellular proteostasis. The continual degradation, and recycling, of portions of the cytoplasm through autophagy eliminates unused and toxic proteins and organelles, promoting a functional proteome and cellular function. Autophagy also serves as an important adaptive mechanism that protects against metabolic perturbation. Loss of autophagy activity has major detrimental effects and has been shown to lead to neuronal proteotoxicity, protein aggregation, and cell death onset associated with neurodegeneration. Studies aimed at modulating autophagy activity have shown promising results in clearing toxic protein cargo and preserving neuronal viability. Neurons are characterized by a particularly efficient autophagy system. However, to finely control autophagy activity requires the precise and accurate measurement of the autophagy flux, i.e., the rate of flow along the entire autophagy pathway. Fluorescence microscopy has substantially contributed to the assessment of autophagy, due to its ability to identify the autophagy pathway intermediates, and to describe them kinetically, in the entire cell volume. However, the quantitative discernment between autophagy pathway intermediates, particularly the autophagosome pool size and the autophagosome flux, has remained challenging. Here, we describe a single-cell analysis approach that allows the characterization of the autophagy system in terms of the pathway intermediate steady-state pool size, the autophagosome flux, and the transition time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loos B, Engelbrecht AM, Lockshin RA, Klionsky DJ, Zakeri Z (2013) The variability of autophagy and cell death susceptibility: unanswered questions. Autophagy 9(9):1270–1285
Jahreiss L, Menzies FM, Rubinsztein DC (2008) The itinerary of from peripheral formation to kiss-and-run fusion with lysosomes. Traffic 9:574–587
Ravikumar B, Vacher C, Berger Z, Davies JE, Luo S, Oroz LG, Scaravilli F, Easton DF, Duden R, O’Kane CJ, Rubinsztein DC (2004) Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy and reduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansions in fly and mouse models of Huntington disease. Nat Genet 36:585–595
Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B (2010) Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140:313–326
Mizushima N, Yoshimori T (2007) How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy 3:542–545
Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T (2007) Dissection of the autophagosome process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent tagged lc3. Autophagy 3:452–460
Kaizuka T, Morishita H, Hama Y, Tsukamoto S, Matsui T, Toyota Y, Kodama A, Ishihara T, Mizushima T, Mizushima N (2016) An autophagic flux probe that releases an internal control. Mol Cell 17:835–849
Yoshimura K, Shibata M, Koike M, Gotoh K, Fukaya M, Watanabe M, Uchiyama Y (2006) Effects of rna interference of atg4b on the limited proteolysis of lc3 in pc12 cells and expression of atg4b in various rat tissues. Autophagy 2:200–208
Scherz-Shouval R, Shvets E, Fass E, Shorer H, Gil L, Elazar Z (2007) Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J 26(7):1749–1760
Loos B, du Toit A, Hofmeyr JHS (2014) Defining and measuring autophagosome flux—concept and reality. Autophagy 10(11):2087–2096
du Toit A, Hofmeyr J-HS, Gniadek TJ, Loos B (2018) Measuring autophagosome flux. Autophagy 14:1060–1071
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682
Katayama H, Kogure T, Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Miyawaki A (2011) A sensitive and quantitative technique for detecting autophagic events based on lysosomal. Chem Biol 18:1042–1052
Hardelauf H, Waide S, Sisnaiske J, Jacob P, Hausherr V, Schöbel N, Janasek D, van Thriel C, West J (2014) Micropatterning neuronal networks. Analyst 139:3256–3264
Carpi N, Piel M, Azioune A, Fink J (2011) Micropatterning on glass with deep UV. Protoc Exch 10
Loos B, Klionsky DJ, du Toit A, Hofmeyr JHS (2020) On the relevance of precision autophagy flux control in vivo—points of departure for clinical translation. Autophagy 16(4):750–762
Van der Walt S, Schönberger J, Nunez-Iglesias J, Boulogne F, Warner J, Yager N, Gouillart E, Yu T (2014) scikit-image: image processing in python. PeerJ 2:e453
Bradski G, Kaehler A (2000) Opencv. Dr Dobb’s J Softw Tools 120:122–125
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), the South African National Research Foundation (NRF), and the Cancer Association South Africa (CANSA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
du Toit, A., Hofmeyr, JH.S., Loos, B. (2022). Measuring Autophagosome Flux. In: Loos, B., Wong, E. (eds) Imaging and Quantifying Neuronal Autophagy. Neuromethods, vol 171. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1589-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1589-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1588-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1589-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols