Background

Diabetes is a rapidly growing global health issue, partly because of improved living conditions and rising rates of obesity [1]. The incidence of hypertension in the diabetic population is 1.5 to 3 times higher than in the non-diabetic age group [2]. The management and prevention of chronic disease require particular attention to self-management, including the use of a number of medications prescribed for comorbidity [3]. Former surveys have reported that it is related to poor results, including mortality, hospitalization, and health maintenance costs in chronically ill patients [4, 5]. Thus, simultaneous research aims to solve these problems by develo** new combinations of fixed doses in two different categories and by applying new routes of administration.

Transdermal administration provides benefits such as avoidance of first-pass effect, control of drug release rate, improved patient compliance, alternative to the immediate end of therapy, etc. [6]. This is most suitable for combination/concomitant diseases that are administered at different timings (before and after food) via the oral route. In recent years, different types of nanocarriers have been designed to improve transdermal drug administration [7].

Among various nanocarriers, nano invasomes (NI) are efficient carriers for lipophilic and hydrophilic agents [8]. They are mainly composed of Phosphatidyl choline, i.e., soy-phosphatidylcholine, which forms invasomal bilayer and lysophosphatidyl choline acts as edge activator giving flexibility to the bilayer, ethanol and a mixture of terpenes for boosting drug penetration and to give fluidity or flexibility to phospholipids [9].

Gliblenclamide (GLB) is an inexpensive anti-hyperglycemic drug. GLB is a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II drug, with low oral bioavailability of ~ 45% and having a high permeability and low aqueous solubility [10]. GLB has a high dose frequency due to short elimination half-life of 4 h [11]. Atenolol (ATN) is a beta-adrenergic receptor blocker with no membrane stabilization or intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, which has been used to treat hypertension. It has an oral bio-availability of only 50% and is partially absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, while the rest is excreted unchanged in the feces [12, 13].

The present research has investigated the possibility of NI as a new carrier system for combination transdermal administration of GLB and ATN. The preparations were optimized by utilizing a three-factor three-level Box–Behnken design and further evaluated for particle size, shape, ex vivo skin permeation, in vivo drug absorption studies, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic study.

Methods

ATN and GLB are gift samples from Sun Pharma Limited in Mumbai, India. Phospholipon® 90 G was received as a gift sample from Phospholipid GmbH Nattermannallee, Germany. d-limonene was received from the Arora Aromatics Private Limited, Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh. Ethanol was procured from E Merck, Mumbai, India. All the reagents used are of analytical grade.

FTIR spectroscopy

GLB and ATN have been compressed into pellet with KBr using a hydraulic press. The IR spectra of drugs, ethanol, terpenes, and optimized combinational nano invasomal gel (OCNIG) were recorded in the wave number region of 400–4000 cm−1 in Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) [14].

Preparation of nano-invasomes

NI was prepared by dissolving Phospholipon ® 90 G and drugs in 10 ml chloroform:methanol mixture (2:1, v/v) in a round bottom flask of the rotary evaporator (Medica instrument Mfg., Co. Mumbai) [15]. At a temperature above the lipid transition temperature, thin lipid film was produced by evaporation of organic solvents. After the formation of thin films, terpene and ethanol were added, followed by addition of filtered phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS). The formed vesicles were sonicated for 15 min in 3 rounds (5 min for each cycle with 5 min pause among these cycles) with a probe ultrasonicator (Model No. PS500, Ultra autosonic India, Pune) to obtain nano invasomes [16].

Optimization of nano-invasomes by box–Behnken design

Optimization of NI gel by Box–Behnken design was done using Design Expert 11 software. The selected independent variables were phospholipid (mg) (X1), ethanol (%) (X2), and terpene (%) (X3) while % entrapment efficiency (EE) of GLB and ATN (Y1 and Y2), flux of GLB, and ATN (Y3 and Y4) were the dependent variables. All variables were investigated at three different levels (Table 1). The design includes sets of points in the middle of each side and three replicated center points of the multidimensional cube. This experimental design provides fewer numbers (15 runs) of experiments than that provided by a full factorial design (27 runs). Various formulations were formulated based on the selected independent variables, as indicated in Table 2.

Table 1 Independent and dependent variables used in Box–Behnken design for the development and optimization of NI
Table 2 Observed responses in Box–Behnken design for development and optimization of NI formulations

NI characterization

% entrapment efficiency

The percentage EE was determined by ultracentrifugation method. Samples were centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 3 h at 4 °C in a centrifuge machine (REMI, Mumbai). The collected supernatant was diluted with phosphate buffer saline and quantified by UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) [17]. The % EE was determined by the following equation [18].

$$ {C}_{\mathrm{a}}-{C}_{\mathrm{b}}/{C}_{\mathrm{a}}\times 100 $$

where Ca = concentration of total drug and Cb = concentration of free drug.

Particle size, PDI, and surface charge

The particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of the NI formulations were determined by Zetasizer 1000HS (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) with photon correlation spectroscopy. Before analyzing, samples were diluted with PBS and filtered through 0.45 mm membrane filter [19]. The surface charge of drug-entrapped vesicles was estimated with the Zetasizer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The average zeta potential of the vesicles was determined [20]. The values presented herein were acquired from three separate experiments, each of which included three replicates; N = 3.

pH evaluation

The pH of OCNIG was determined by means of a pH meter (Elico) that is diluted in double distilled water by placing it in contact with the gel [20].

Spreadability, homogeneity, and extrudability

Spreadability was assessed on the basis of slide and swipe character of the gel. Modified method of 0.5 g gel was placed on a glass plate over which a second glass plate was placed within a premarked circle of 2 cm diameter. A weight of 500 g was allowed to rest on the upper glass plate for 5 min. The increase in the diameter due to spreading of the gel was noted [16, 21]. The diameter of gel spreading is increased and the % spread by area was determined by (A2/A1) × 100, where A1 is 2 cm and A2 is a final area after spreading.

By simple visual inspection, the homogeneity of the gels was observed. Extrudability of gels from a collapsible tube was determined by considering the weight in grams required to squeeze 0.5 cm ribbon of gel in 10 s [22].

Rheological measurements

Viscosity of gel was determined by using a Brookfield Viscometer with spindle C50–1, (Model No. LVDVE, Brookfield Engineering Laboratories Inc., Middleboro, MA, USA), at 50 rpm for 50 s in triplicate [23].

TEM

The surface structure of diluted OCNIG with distilled water was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Jeol electron microscope, Japan). Before the examination, add one drop of the NI suspension (1 mg/ml) to one drop of potassium phosphotungstate (2%) on copper grids, and then air-dried at room temperature [24].

Evaluation of stability of OCNIG

Stability studies were carried out as per the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Q1A (R2) guidelines (ICH topic Q1 (R2), 2009). To carry out a stability study, the OCNIG was placed in closed glass vials at 25 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5%, 40 ± 2 °C/75 ± 5% RH and refrigerated condition (4 ± 2 °C) for 3 months. Samples were analyzed for parameters like clarity, pH, drug content, %EE, and vesicle size [25].

HPLC determination of GLB and ATN

The concentration of the combination of GLB and ATN in the samples was analyzed by using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (Water 2690 composed of PDA-2996 detector) with BDS C18 250 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 μ columns. Data acquisition, recording, and chromatographic integration were performed by Empower 2 software. Mobile phase consisting of 0.01 N potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (pH 4.8) and acetonitrile (ACN) taken at ratio 55:45 with 1.0 ml injection volume in gradient mode with the temperature of the column oven held at 30 °C and the elution monitored by a detector at a wavelength of 235.0 nm [26].

In-vitro drug release and release kinetics

In-vitro drug permeation studies of the optimized formulation were performed by Franz diffusion cells with a diffusional area of 3.14 cm2. An egg layer was set among donor and receptor compartments. The OCNIG was spreaded on egg film. The receptor compartment contained phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and was constantly mixed by remotely determined Teflon-coated magnetic bead. The temperature of the cell was kept up at 37 ± 1 °C, to mimic the physiological conditions. Aliquots (1 ml each) were gathered at regular time interval for 24 h and measured for the two drugs concentration utilizing HPLC technique as depicted previously. Each release study was performed in triplicate [27]. The release kinetics was evaluated to ensure the integrity of fit of different kinetic models [28,29,30].

Ex-vivo skin permeation study

Ex vivo skin permeation studies were carried out with the approval from Animal Ethics Committee IAEC (1220/PO/Re/S/08/CPCSEA) by using a Franz diffusion cell with an efficacious permeation area and receptor volume of 3.14 cm2 and 15 ml, respectively [31]. The hair on the rabbit skin was removed using hair removal cream, and was wiped with isopropyl alcohol. The receptor compartment (PBS, pH 7.4) was constantly stirred by a magnetic stirrer at 100 rpm, which is maintained at 37 ± 1 °C. Regular samples were withdrawn at different time intervals up to 24 h and these were analyzed by HPLC. From the obtained data, flux is calculated by using the below formula [32, 33]. The slope of the linear portion of the curve is calculated for a graph taken cumulative amount permeated per cm2 on Y-axis and time on X-axis

$$ \mathrm{Steady}\ \mathrm{state}\ \mathrm{flux}\ \left({J}_{\mathrm{ss}}\right)=\mathrm{Slope}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{linear}\ \mathrm{portion}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{curve}/\mathrm{Surface}\ \mathrm{area}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{diffusion}\ \mathrm{cell} $$
$$ \mathrm{Permeability}\ \mathrm{coefficient}\ \left({K}_{\mathrm{p}}\right)=\mathrm{flux}/\mathrm{initial}\ \mathrm{concentration}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{drug}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{donor}\ \mathrm{chamber}={J}_{\mathrm{ss}}/{D}_0 $$

In vivo pharmacokinetic study

The animals used for the study were obtained from NCLAS, Hyderabad, and whole experiments were performed at the Annamacharya College of pharmacy, Rajampet. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on male New Zealand rabbits (2.5–3.0 kg) and studies were carried out with the approval from Animal Ethics Committee IAEC (1220/PO/Re/S/08/CPCSEA). Rabbits were kept under standard laboratory conditions in 12 h light/dark cycle at 25 ± 2 °C which were fed with food and water. The hair on rabbit skin was shaved before the experiment. The rabbits were divided into three groups; group I was treated as control, group II was given an oral suspension of marketed GLB and ATN, and group III OCNIG was administered. The blood samples were collected at different time intervals (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 h) and analyzed by HPLC method [34]. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by using Thermo Kinetica (ver. 5.0; Thermo Fischer scientific). Various PK parameters such as Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) and Tmax (time to maximum plasma concentration) were directly obtained from the plasma concentration versus time curve. The area under the curve from 0 to t (AUC0–24), 0 to ∞ (AUC0–∞), area under the first moment curve from 0 to 24 (AUMC0–24) 0 to ∞ (AUMC0-∞) were computed by trapezoid rule and elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated by using the formula t1/2 = log 2/Kel. The relative bioavailability (F%), defined as the ratio of AUC0−∞ of each transdermal system to that of the orally administered at the same doses, was also calculated.

Skin irritation study

The study was performed by using healthy Male Newzeland Rabbits (2.5–3.0 kg). For the study, the rabbits were divided into three groups. Group 1 served as a control, group 2 received blank nano invasomal gel, and group 3 received OCNIG on the shaven side of rabbits. The study was carried out as per the Draize scoring system (Table 3) [35, 36]. The responses scored after removing test and the standard at 1, 2, 3, and on the 7th day and they were examined for any signs of erythema and edema. All animals used in the experiment were rehabilitated in animal house. No surgical procedure was performed on rabbits and all animals used were sent for rehabilitation treatment after experimentation to the point of returning to normal existence and the care of such an animal has been taken over its intended statistical life.

Table 3 Draize score evaluation criteria for skin irritation study

Pharmacodynamic study

The animals used for the study were obtained from animal house, and whole experiments were performed at the CAPE biolabs, Marthandam with a written consent. Animal experiments were done as per the standards and guidelines set by the institutional animal ethical committee (IAEC No. CBLRC/IAEC/13/01-2019). All Wistar albino rats (150–180 g) were fed ad libitum and housed in light and dark cycle in an ambient temperature-controlled environment [37]. No surgical procedure was performed on rats and all animals used were sent for rehabilitation treatment after experimentation to the point of returning to a normal existence and the care of such an animal has been taken over its intended statistical life.

Anti-diabetic activity of OCNIG in rats

The rats were rendered diabetic by an intraperitoneal injection of streptozocin (50 mg/kg body weight) in pH 4.5 citrate buffer after fasting for 30 h. The blood glucose > 250 mg/dl were selected after 24 h. The rats were divided into 3 groups (n = 6). Group 1—given oral marketed suspension GLB, group 2—GLB (single drug) NI gel (NIG), and group 3—OCNIG (ATN and GLB combination) was applied on the previously shaven dorsal side of rats. To secure it firmly at the application site, a tape was wrapped on the gel formulation. Blood samples were collected from Retro Orbital-Sinuses of rats after euthanized with ketamine (100 mg/kg, intramuscularly) and the blood glucose level of each rat was measured at the interval of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h using the One Touch glucometer [38].

Antihypertension activity of OCNIG in rats

Hypertension is induced by subcutaneous injection of Methyl Prednisolone acetate (20 mg/kg/week) for 3 weeks in rats, and the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by tail-cuff method (NIBP system IN125/R; AD Instrument Pvt. Ltd., Australia) and rats with the systolic pressure (SBP) > 130 mmHg were then selected for the experiment [39]. The rats were divided into 3 groups as follows: group 1—oral administration of suspension of the marketed ATN, group 2—ATN (single drug) NI gel, and group 3—OCNIG (both drugs—ATN and GLB) was applied on the previously shaven dorsal side of rats. To secure it firmly at the application site, a tape was wrapped on the gel formulation. SBP levels were measured just before and at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h using the tail-cuff system [40, 41].

Statistical analysis

Data from various endpoints were statistically assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey tests, and mean values were considered for the respective endpoints. All the values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6).

Results

FTIR spectroscopy

The IR spectra of pure drugs have shown peaks at 1515.29 cm−1 and 1521.99 cm−1 (N=N stretching), 1242.08 cm−1 and 1246.56 cm−1 (C=C stretching), 2924.46 cm−1 and 2931.19 cm−1 (CH3 stretching), 1415.09 cm−1 and 1455.35 cm−1 (CH3 deformation), and 3356.86 cm−1 and 3367.54 cm−1 (O-H Stretching) for ATN and GLB respectively [42]. The FTIR spectra of GLB, ATN, Phospholipid®90G, d-limonene, and OCNIG are depicted in Fig. 1

Fig. 1
figure 1

FTIR spectroscopy images

Optimization of nano-invasomes by box–Behnken design

A 3-factor, 3-level Box–Behnken design was applied to investigate quadratic response surfaces with Design Expert 11 (Version 11.0, Stat-Ease Inc.). Table 2 provides the results of 17 runs and the responses of the prepared formulations. These 3D-plots are known to study the interaction effects of the factors on the responses as well as are useful in studying the effects of two factors on the response at one time which is shown in Fig. 2. Actual and predicted values as linear correlation plots and the corresponding residual plots for various responses were shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

3D-Response surface plots presenting the effect of three selected factors on a % EE of GLB, b % EE of ATN, and c flux of GLB and d flux of ATN

Fig. 3
figure 3

Actual and predicted values as linear correlation plots (a, c, e, and g) and the corresponding residual plots (b, d, f, h) for various responses

Response 1 (Y1): effect of independent variables on % EE of GLB

A UV spectrophotometric method was applied for the determination of %EE the prepared formulations. The calibration curves of GLB and ATN were prepared in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and found linear over the concentration range of 2–12 μg/ml and 10–50 μg/ml respectively with coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.998 and 0.999 respectively.

The model-F value 23.89 was found to suggest that the model was significant. There is only a 0.01% chance that such a high F value may occur as a result of noise. Values of “Prob> F” less than 0.0500 indicate that model terms were significant. Here X1, X2, X12 are significant model terms. The lack of fit F value 0.23 means it is not significant with respect to the pure error. The p value of the ANOVA model is 0.0002 which indicates the model was significant.

$$ \%\mathrm{EE}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{GLB}=+76.59+11.68\ \mathrm{X}1-3.66\ \mathrm{X}2+0.1700\ \mathrm{X}3-0.025\mathrm{X}1\ \mathrm{X}2-0.8525\ \mathrm{X}1\mathrm{X}3-0.9375\ \mathrm{X}2\ \mathrm{X}3+6.93\ {\mathrm{X}1}^2-1.75\ {\mathrm{X}2}^2+1.07\ {\mathrm{X}3}^2 $$

The ratio is 15.546 indicating the correct signal. The predicted R2 of 0.8847 is in reasonable accord with the adjusted R2 of 0.9279.

Response 2 (Y2): effect of independent variables on % EE of ATN

The model-F value 20.17 suggested that the model was significant. There is only a 0.03% chance that such a high F value may occur as a result of noise. Here X1, X2, X12 are significant model terms. The F value of the lack of fit 0.28 means that the lack of fit is not significant with respect to the pure error. The p value of the ANOVA model is 0.0003 which indicates model is significant.

$$ \%\mathrm{EE}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{ATN}=+74.60+11.53\ \mathrm{X}1-3.94\ \mathrm{X}2-0.0300\ \mathrm{X}3-0.1375\ \mathrm{X}1\ \mathrm{X}2-0.9725\ \mathrm{X}1\mathrm{X}3-1.37\ \mathrm{X}2\ \mathrm{X}3+6.28\ {\mathrm{X}1}^2-1.66\ {\mathrm{X}2}^2+0.6793\ {\mathrm{X}3}^2 $$

The ratio is 14.651 indicating the correct signal. The predicted R2 of 0.8494 is in reasonable accord with the adjusted R2 of 0.9151.

Response 3 (Y3): effect of independent variables on flux of GLB

The model-F value 138.43 suggested that the model was significant. There is only a 0.01% chance that such a high F value may occur as a result of noise. Here X1, X2, X12, X22 are significant model terms. The F value of the lack of fit 0.38 means that the lack of fit is not significant with respect to the pure error. The p value of the ANOVA model is < 0.0001 which indicates the model is significant. The predicted R2 of 0.9733 is in reasonable accord with the adjusted R2 of 0.9872.

$$ \mathrm{Flux}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{GLB}\ \left(\mathrm{Y}3\right)=+181.36+46.11\ \mathrm{X}1-17.87\ \mathrm{X}2+1.26\ \mathrm{X}3+2.62\ \mathrm{X}1\ \mathrm{X}2-0.6500\ \mathrm{X}1\mathrm{X}3+3.88\ \mathrm{X}2\ \mathrm{X}3+13.67\ {\mathrm{X}1}^2-7.61\ {\mathrm{X}2}^2-1.83\ {\mathrm{X}3}^2 $$

The 3D-response graph (Fig. 2c) showed that flux increased with increase in phospholipid level. The formulations with highest phospholipid levels (14% w/w) F13 and F15 showed the higher transdermal flux than that formulation F1, and F9 with low levels of phospholipid (9% w/w).

Response 4 (Y4): effect of independent variables on flux of ATN

The model-F value 29.75 suggested that the model was significant. There is only a 0.01% chance that such a high F value may occur as a result of noise. Here X1, X2, X3, X2X3, X22 are significant model terms. The F value of the lack of fit 1.92 means that the lack of fit is not significant with respect to the pure error. The p value of the ANOVA model is < 0.0001 which indicates model is significant. The predicted R2 of 0.7433 is in reasonable accord with the adjusted R2 of 0.9418.

$$ \mathrm{Flux}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{ATN}\ \left(\mathrm{Y}4\right)=+439.58+56.09\ \mathrm{X}1-10.89\ \mathrm{X}2+11.80\ \mathrm{X}3+6.37\ \mathrm{X}1\ \mathrm{X}2-9.20\ \mathrm{X}1\mathrm{X}3-23.20\ \mathrm{X}2\ \mathrm{X}3-2.28\ {\mathrm{X}1}^2-28.13\ {\mathrm{X}2}^2-10.55\ {\mathrm{X}3}^2 $$

The 3D-response graph (Fig. 2d) showed that flux increased with increase in phospholipid level. The formulations with highest phospholipid levels (14% w/w) F13 and F15 showed the higher transdermal flux than that formulation F1, and F9 with low levels of phospholipid (9% w/w). Summary of results of regression analysis for responses Y1, Y2, Y3, and Y4 for fitting to quadratic model were given in Table 4.

Table 4 Summary of results of regression analysis for responses Y1, Y2, and Y3 for fitting to quadratic model

The optimization was done based on the principle of achieving the desirable values of % EE, transdermal flux by applying numerical point prediction method. The formulation composition with phospholipid (14 mg), ethanol (5%), and d-limonene (1.78%) has been found to comply with the requirements. The OCNIG presented the practical values of %EE of GLB is 96.67 ± 0.65%, %EE of ATN is 93.76 ± 0.89%, and flux of GLB (240.43 ± 1.76 μg/cm2/h) and flux of ATN (475.2 ± 1.54 μg/cm2/h). These practical values of %EE and transdermal flux yielded by the OCNIG formulation were found in conformity with the predicted value of % EE of GLB is 97.62 ± 0.85%, %EE of ATN is 95.27 ± 0.67%, and transdermal flux of GLB is 246.32 ± 2.56 (μg/cm2/h), flux of ATN is 481.08 ± 2.46 μg/cm2/h respectively.

NI characterization

The particle size of OCNIG formulation was found to be 125.35 ± 3.25 nm with a polydispersity index of 0.223 ± 0.012. The value of pH was found as 6.9 ± 0.1. The viscosity of OCNIG was found to be 39.00 Pa s. The surface charge of OCNIG was − 18. 6 ± 0.3 mV. Smooth and spherical structure conformed by TEM. The images were shown in Figs. 4, 5, and 6.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Zeta Potential Graph of OCNIG

Fig. 5
figure 5

TEM image of OCNIG

Fig. 6
figure 6

Particle size graph of the OCNIG, particle size: 125.3 nm

Evaluation of stability of OCNIG

Stability of OCNIG was studied by evaluating clarity, pH, drug content, EE, and vesicle size after storage. The evaluation of stability of OCNIG was given in Table 5.

Table 5 Evaluation of stability of OCNIG

HPLC determination of GLB and ATN

An isocratic LC method, coupled with PDA detection, was developed for the simultaneous determination of ATN and GLB. Chromatogram A and chromatogram B represents the blank mobile phase and an average retention time of 2.322 min for GLB and 3.260 min for ATN, with no interfering peaks respectively in Fig. 7. According to ICH guidelines (International Council for Harmonization), this method was validated. The validation characteristics were addressed in our earlier work [26].

Fig. 7
figure 7

HPLC chromatograms of mobile phase containing GLB and ATN

In vitro drug release and release kinetics

The highest value of the coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.986 for GLB and R2 = 0.996 for ATN) was observed in the Higuchi matrix model [28], Korsmeyer–Peppas [29] (R2 = 0.976 for GLB and R2 = 0.984 for ATN), and zero order (R2 = 0.857 for GLB and R2 = 0.868 for ATN).

Ex vivo skin permeation study

The release profile of the drugs loaded OCNIG was superior to that of control patches which is given in our earlier work [30]. These were confirmed by the flux values (Jss) which were given in Table 6. The ex-vivo permeation profile of OCNIG yielded higher flux value, i.e., 240.43 ± 1.76 μg/cm2/h for GLB and 475.2 ± 1.54 μg/cm2/h. Ex vivo skin permeation profile of OCNIG was shown in Fig. 8.

Table 6 Ex vivo permeation data of OCNIG
Fig. 8
figure 8

Ex vivo skin permeation profile of OCNIG

In vivo pharmacokinetic study

The plasma concentration-time profiles of GLB and ATN of marketed suspension and OCNIG are shown in Fig. 9. The pharmacokinetic parameters were given in Table 7. The OCNIG exhibited the Cmax of 151.76 ± 12.15 ng/ml for GLB and 127.64 ± 10.06 ng/ml for ATN (p < 0.0001), whereas marketed oral solution of GLB and ATN have Cmax of 251.58 ± 10.5 ng/ml and 177.62 ± 10.14 ng/ml, respectively. The AUC represents the bioavailability from its dosage form. It was observed that significantly high (p < 0.002) AUC(0–24) and AUC(0–∞) for OCNIG GLB and ATN was 2930.21 ± 3.15 ng h/ml; 3362.37 ± 2.22 ng h/ml and 2838.94 ± 1.91 ng h/ml; 3122.55 ± 1.35 ng h/ml, whereas for market preparation is 2226.88 ± 2.31 ng h/ml; 2357.93 ± 1.24 ng h/ml and 1422.6 ± 2.58 ng h/ml; 1576.48 ± 4.24 respectively. The relative bioavailability of NI of GLB and ATN was found to be 134.30% and 180.32% compared to marketed oral preparation.

Fig. 9
figure 9

In vivo drug absorption data

Table 7 Pharmacokinetic parameters of ATN and GLB in rabbits

Time taken to achieve the Tmax was fundamentally delayed in OCNIG. These values were significantly higher as compared to marketed oral suspension (p < 0.002). The t1/2 of 17.087 ± 1.24 h for GLB and 14.786 ± 1.23 h for ATN in plasma was noticed after the application of OCNIG.

Skin irritation studies

No observable erythema and edema was observed on the Male Newzeland Rabbit skin after one week of application. Table 8 shows Draize score for all groups of rabbits.

Table 8 Draize score for all groups of rabbits

Pharmacodynamic study

Anti-diabetic activity of OCNIG in rats

The results indicated a reduction in plasma glucose levels in a transdermal gel containing OCNIG compared to the oral administration of GLB and ATN in diabetic rats. ONIG-treated rats showed statistically significant decrease in blood glucose levels when compared with marketed PIO-treated rats up to 24 h (p < 0.002). The marketed formulation showed blood glucose level of 90.12 ± 5.26 mg/dl (p < 0.005) at the 4th h. As for the ONIG, the reduction of blood glucose level was steady and stable. The maximum response was observed after the 6th h and remained constant up to 24 h (Fig. 7). In the initial 4 h, the hypoglycemic effect produced by TDDS in the animals is significantly less when compared to oral administration. The plasma insulin level was elevated to the maximum in oral, transdermal system treated groups at 4 h and 6 h respectively (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Showing changes in blood glucose levels after oral administration of GLB suspension, GLB NIG, and OCNIG in streptozocin-induced diabetic Wistar albino rats. *p < 0.002, significant difference in blood glucose levels with respect to oral treated group (n = 6, Mean ± SD)

Antihypertension activity of OCNIG in rats

There was a significant difference in SBP values before and after treatment with methyl Prednisolone acetate in Wistar albino rats. The changes in SBP (mmHg) after administration of marketed ATN, ATN NIG, and OCNIG are presented in Fig. 11. Systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced to normal value at 2 h with the highest reduction in SBP (120.67 ± 3.32 mmHg). SBP progressively started to rise after 6 h and reached up to 125.0 ± 3.66 mmHg at 12 h and 130.83 ± 4.75 mmHg at 24 h. When compared with oral, the observed effect was found to be significant (p < 0.002) in case of OCNIG-treated rats. However, ATN-loaded NIG formulation progressively decreased the SBP, and maximum action of the drug was observed at 4 h following transdermal application of ONIG (SPB of 102.50 ± 4.68 mmHg) in hypertensive rats, similar to the effect to group 2, which is similar to findings of previous work [35]. The reduction in blood pressure of OCNIG was sustained and maintained till 24 h.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Showing changes in systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) after oral administration of ATN suspension, ATN NIG, and OCNIG in methyl prednisolone acetate-induced hypertensive Wistar albino rats. *P < 0.002, significant difference in blood pressure with respect to oral treated group (n = 6, Mean ± SD)

Discussion

FTIR spectroscopy

From the spectra of individual drugs and excipients, we can conclude that desired functional group frequencies are replicable in OCNIG. However, there were other peaks in the physical mixture that could be due to the presence of additives as seen in the previous work [43].

Optimization of nano-invasomes by Box–Behnken design

Response 1 (Y1): effect of independent variables on % EE of GLB

In view of all 17 formulations, the average GLB %EE was found to be 79.52%, with least and highest value of 65.95% and 97.62%, respectively. Phospholipid levels had a considerable effect on %EE. The 3D-Response graph (Fig. 2a) showed greater %EE of GLB with increased phospholipid content. Furthermore, ethanol, d-limonene, and the nature of the drug also play an important role in the %EE, as the drug is trapped in the lipid phase. GLB is a lipophilic drug, hence that the entrapment efficiency noticeably was found to be more eminent. It was noted that the formulations with highest phospholipid level (14% w/w) showed higher %EE compared to lowest phospholipid level (9% w/w). The 3D graph showed that the Y1 (%EE) response has an opposite effect with ethanol, which is similar to the earlier work [16, 44]. In addition, terpene (d-limonene) showed positive effects with %EE.

Response 2 (Y2): effect of independent variables on % EE of ATN

In view of all 17 formulations, the average ATN %EE was found to be 77.90%, with least and highest value of 62.98% and 95.76%, respectively. Phospholipid levels had a significant effect on %EE. The 3D-response graph (Fig. 2b) demonstrated that a similar effect is found in % EE of ATN as that of GLB. %EE of ATN was found less when compared with GLB as it is a hydrophilic drug which is similar to findings of Badran et al. [45].

Response 3 (Y3): effect of independent variables on flux of GLB

Transdermal flux increases with ethanol and terpene combination which is in agreement with Hofland et al. [46] (Fig. 2c). Penetration studies exposed noteworthy penetration of the drug through the skin via invasome. Moreover, invasomes having limonene showed additional penetration because of its higher lipophilicity and low boiling point. The higher enhancement of limonene may also be attributed to its low boiling point. The low boiling points of terpenes indicate the weak cohesiveness or self-association of the molecules and therefore they may more easily associate or interact with lipid components of stratum corneum and alter the barrier property. Furthermore, invasomes with d-limonene showed further penetration due to their higher lipophilic and lower boiling point, which is also reported in earlier work [47]. The permeation into the skin is increased to 3.87-fold when it contains 1% terpenes which are reported in previous work [48, 49].

Response 4 (Y4): effect of independent variables on flux of ATN

Transdermal flux of ATN increased on increasing the phospholipid content in the formulation. The 3D-response graph (Fig. 2d) showed that on increasing the phospholipid content in formulations, higher transdermal flux of ATN was observed [50]. Moreover, the transdermal flux is also increased on increasing ethanol content. Terpene also plays a substantial role in the permeation enhancement of hydrophilic as well as lipophilic drug. In our study, terpene such as d-limonene showed a positive relationship with ATN and GLB flux. The most optimum concentration of the selected variables was determined using the “point optimization” feature. Experimental values of these independent variables yielded by the ONIG were found to be in agreement with the predicted values, which imply that the optimized formulation was rational and reliable.

NI characterization

The prepared NI gel was considered acceptable with no skin irritation and having a less vesicle size which facilitates their permeation. The NI gels which are formulated were light in color with uniform appearance and texture with absence of lumps. A gel with good spreadability takes less time to spread [21]. The developed gel of OCNIG presented 90% spreadability with excellent extrudability. Viscosity is a significant factor for describing the gels as it affects the extrudability and release of drugs. Ethanol interpenetrates into the hydrocarbon chains and alters the net charge of the vesicles and decreases its mean vesicle size. Furthermore, ethanol-based nanovesicles have been reported more stable under storage condition possibly due to generation of negative surface charge and electrostatic repulsion which restrict vesicle aggregation. The image of TEM showed well-identified spherical nano vesicular and homogenous with sharp boundaries.

Evaluation of stability of OCNIG

The results revealed a no considerable change between the newly prepared and the stored formulation. It was concluded that the prepared OCNIG has good stability under storage conditions [51,52,53].

HPLC determination of GLB and ATN

The analytical method for simultaneous estimation of GLB and ATN was validated. Validated analytical method was found acceptable and proved to be adequate for the determination of GLB and ATN in plasma [26].

In vitro drug release and release kinetics

The coefficient of determination obtained after fitting the in vitro permeation data to the respective model equation indicate that the best fit model was the Higuchi’s model for nano-invasomes gel. Higuchi describes drug release as a diffusion process based on the Fick’s law, square root time dependent. This relation can be used to describe the drug dissolution from several types of modified release pharmaceutical dosage forms, as in the case of some transdermal systems which was reported by previous researchers [54].

Ex vivo skin permeation study

The percentage of drug diffused through the rabbit skin was assessed. The Box–Behnken design relationship has been established between independent and dependent variables. This helped to understand the exact factors affecting the response of the prepared NI. More drug permeation was observed from the OCNIG when compared to transdermal patches [55].

In vivo pharmacokinetic study

The plasma concentration-time profiles of GLB and ATN of marketed suspension and OCNIG are shown in Fig. 9. The pharmacokinetic parameters were given in Table 6. The values showed that Cmax of the OCNIG was significantly (p < 0.001) lower than the oral marketed suspension. Higher AUC values which are preferable to the upkeep of the concentration of the drug within the pharmacological effective range for a longer period of time, which is similar to findings of previous researchers [56, 57]. Increased bioavailability of the drugs can be identified due to significant (p < 0.002) high AUC0–24 values. The increased t1/2 GLB and ATN in plasma was noticed after the application of OCNIG which is confirmed by previous findings [16, 58]. The %F was found to be 135% for GLB and 180% for ATN [59] when compared with oral preparations.

Skin irritation studies

Based on the findings, the skin irritation study showed that the developed OCNIG applied was not irritable. It was considered safe for transdermal operation [60].

Pharmacodynamic study

In the present study, GLB NI gel and OCNIG produced significant hypoglycemic effects in STZ-induced diabetic rats. Due to the induction of diabetes by STZ, there is a significant increase in fasting blood glucose levels in diabetic rats [61]. Formulation OCNIG was successful in reducing the blood glucose levels to normal values, whereas the oral marketed GLB unsuccessful in blood glucose level reduction [62, 63]. Results of in vivo antihypertensive activity clearly indicate that the OCNIG released the drug gradually over a period of time, which resulted in prolonged control of hypertension up to 24 h. Formulation OCNIG was successful in reverting the rat BP to normal values, whereas orally failed to reduce the BP maximum period [64]. The result indicated that the transdermal administration of ONIG was capable of producing prolonged release of ATN, similar to the effect of ATN-loaded NIG formulation. The above results suggest that the developed OCNIG holds promise for the management of diabetes and hypertension that must be validated by clinical trials.

Conclusion

The administration of therapeutants via the skin has many advantages over other methods of administration. Within this framework, we optimized and evaluated the transdermal administration of a combined nano-invasomal gel that contains active molecules to treat concurrent diseases, including diabetes with hypertension. It plays an important role in the administration of medications with increased skin penetration and drug absorption. Here, widely used antidiabetic and antihypertensive since adherence with these medicines is quite short, and the use of this combination is to manage long-acting medication, which releases drugs at the same time, simplifies complex therapeutic regimen, and to better acceptability and adherence. In pharmacodynamic and in vivo assays, therapeutic doses of drugs were given to rats in a sustained manner, which demonstrated the potential of this combined route of administration. Perhaps the increased use of fixed-dose combination therapy may make it easier for our patients to remember to take their medications especially in comorbid conditions and get them to goal quicker and with less trouble. This should improve the rates of blood pressure control and ultimately accelerate the reduction in cardiovascular disease events attributable to hypertension in diabetic patient. Hence, they can open up new challenges and opportunities for the development of novel improved therapies. Combinational nano invasomal gel represents a promising technology that could be used for transdermal delivery of many other established drugs which are used for treating these types of concurrent diseases.