Abstract
Forests play a pivotal role in carbon and water cycles by governing the exchanges of CO2 and H2O between the terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere. The evapotranspiration (ET) is the variable, which links these cycles. The eddy covariance (EC) method provides direct, high-frequency observations of ET of an ecosystem. The present study was carried out in a moist deciduous plant functional type (PFT) of northwest Himalayan foothills of India to estimate ET using the EC flux tower measurements and to study its biophysical controls from 2016 to 2018. The variability of sensible (H) and latent (LE) heat fluxes was also studied. The mean diurnal variation in H was from − 1.31 to 109.35 Wm−2 whereas LE ranged from 4.47 to 186.89 Wm−2. The mean annual ET for 2016–2018 was found to be 693.67 ± 46.70 mm year−1. The highest diurnal variability in ET was witnessed during the post monsoon season followed by the monsoon, winter, and dry summer seasons. A relative weight analysis with multiple regression model was implemented to understand the control of biophysical variables on ET at an 8-day time scale. A combination of incoming solar radiation (Rg), leaf area index (LAI), vapour pressure deficit (VPD), air temperature (Tair), soil water content (SWC), and precipitation was able to explain 73% of the variability of ET at 8-day time scale. The analysis revealed that in the moist deciduous PFT the ET was limited by the availability of energy. The present study is the first-ever attempt to report the direct estimates of ET for an Indian forest.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO Rome 300(9):D05109
Anderson MC, Hain C, Otkin J, Zhan X, Mo K, Svoboda M, Wardlow B, Pimstein A (2013) An intercomparison of drought indicators based on thermal remote sensing and NLDAS-2 simulations with US Drought Monitor classifications. J Hydrometerol 14(4):1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0140.1
Anderson MC, Kustas WP, Norman JM, Hain CR, Mecikalski JR, Schultz L, González-Dugo MP, Cammalleri C, d’Urso G, Pimstein A, Gao F (2011) Map** daily evapotranspiration at field to continental scales using geostationary and polar orbiting satellite imagery. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:223
Aubinet M, Vesala T, Papale D (2012) Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, p 438
Baldocchi DD (2020) How eddy covariance flux measurements have contributed to our understanding of Global Change Biology. Glob Change Biol 26(1):242–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14807
Baldocchi DD, Ryu Y (2011) A synthesis of forest evaporation fluxes–from days to years–as measured with eddy covariance. In: Levia D, Carlyle-Moses D, Tanaka T (eds) Forest hydrology and biogeochemistry ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol 216. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 101–116
Baldocchi DD, Xu L (2007) What limits evaporation from Mediterranean oak woodlands—the supply of moisture in the soil, physiological control by plants or the demand by the atmosphere? Adv Water Res 30(10):2113–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.06.013
Baldocchi DD, Xu L, Kiang N (2004) How plant functional-type, weather, seasonal drought, and soil physical properties alter water and energy fluxes of an oak–grass savanna and an annual grassland. Agric For Meteorol 123(1–2):13–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.11.006
Burba G (2013) Eddy Covariance method for scientific industrial agricultural and regulatory applications: a field book on measuring ecosystem gas exchange and areal emission rates. LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, p 331
Champion SH, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, Delhi
Deb Burman PK, Sarma D, Williams M, Karipot A, Chakraborty S (2017) Estimating gross primary productivity of a tropical forest ecosystem over north-east India using LAI and meteorological variables. J Earth Syst Sci 126(7):99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0874-3
Dunne T, Zhang W, Aubry BF (1991) Effects of rainfall, vegetation, and microtopography on infiltration and runoff. Water Resour Res 27(9):2271–2285. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01585
Foltýnová L, Fischer M, McGloin RP (2020) Recommendations for gap-filling eddy covariance latent heat flux measurements using marginal distribution sampling. Theo Appl Climatol 139(1):677–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02975-w
Ford CR, Hubbard RM, Kloeppel BD, Vose JM (2007) A comparison of sap flux-based evapotranspiration estimates with catchment-scale water balance. Agric For Meteorol 145(3–4):176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.010
Grachev AA, Fairall CW, Blomquist BW, Fernando HJ, Leo LS, Otárola-Bustos SF, Wilczak JM, McCaffrey KL (2020) On the surface energy balance closure at different temporal scales. Agric For Meteorol 281:107823. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111160
Greve P, Orlowsky B, Mueller B, Sheffield J, Reichstein M, Seneviratne SI (2014) Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land. Nat Geosci 7(10):716–721. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2247
Hamon WR (1960) Estimating potential evapotranspiration. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA
Herbst M, Rosier PT, McNeil DD, Harding RJ, Gowing DJ (2008) Seasonal variability of interception evaporation from the canopy of a mixed deciduous forest. Agric For Meteorol 148(11):1655–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.05.011
Humphreys ER, Black TA, Ethier GJ, Drewitt GB, Spittlehouse DL, Jork EM, Nesic Z, Livingston NJ (2003) Annual and seasonal variability of sensible and latent heat fluxes above a coastal Douglas-fir forest, British Columbia, Canada. Agric For Meteorol 115(1–2):109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00171-5
Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 273(927):593–610. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1976.0035
Jarvis PG, McNaughton KG (1986) Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv Ecol Res 15:1–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60119-1
Jha CS, Thumaty KC, Rodda SR, Sonakia A, Dadhwal VK (2013) Analysis of carbon dioxide, water vapour and energy fluxes over an Indian teak mixed deciduous forest for winter and summer months using eddy covariance technique. J Earth Syst Sci 122:1259–1268
** Z, Liang W, Yang Y, Zhang W, Yan J, Chen X, Li S, Mo X (2017) Separating vegetation greening and climate change controls on evapotranspiration trend over the Loess Plateau. Sci Rep 7(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08477-x
Johnson JW (2000) A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivar Behav Res 35(1):1–19
Legesse D, Vallet-Coulomb C, Gasse F (2003) Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: case study South Central Ethiopia. J Hydrol 275(1–2):67–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00019-2
Ma X, Feng Q, Su Y, Yu T, ** H (2017) Forest evapotranspiration and energy flux partitioning based on eddy covariance methods in an arid desert region of northwest China. Adv Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1619047
Mao J, Fu W, Shi X, Ricciuto DM, Fisher JB, Dickinson RE, Wei Y, Shem W, Piao S, Wang K, Schwalm CR (2015) Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends. Environ Res Lett 10(9):094008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094008
Marques TV, Mendes K, Mutti P, Medeiros S, Silva L, Perez-Marin AM, Campos S, Lúcio PS, Lima K, dos Reis J, Bezerra B (2020) Environmental and biophysical controls of evapotranspiration from Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests (Caatinga) in the Brazilian Semiarid. Agric For Meteorol 287:107957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107957
Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, vol 19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 205–234
Nandy S, Saranya M, Srinet R (2021) Spatio-temporal variability of water use efficiency and its drivers in major forest formations in India. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112791
Nandy S, Singh R, Ghosh S, Watham T, Kushwaha SPS, Kumar AS, Dadhwal VK (2017) Neural network-based modelling for forest biomass assessment. Carbon Manag 8(4):305–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1357402
Oke TR (1987) Boundary layer climates. Methuen, London and New York
Otkin JA, Anderson MC, Hain C, Svoboda M, Johnson D, Mueller R, Tadesse T, Wardlow B, Brown J (2016) Assessing the evolution of soil moisture and vegetation conditions during the 2012 United States flash drought. Agric For Meteorol 218:230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.12.065
Reichstein M, Falge E, Baldocchi D, Papale D, Aubinet M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Buchmann N, Gilmanov T, Granier A, Grünwald T (2005) On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Glob Change Biol 11(9):1424–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x
Roberts JM (2009) The role of forests in the hydrological cycle. In: Roberts JM, Lund HG (eds) Forests and forest plants, vol III. Centre for Forest Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, pp 42–76
Rodda SR, Thumaty KC, Jha CS, Dadhwal VK (2016) Seasonal variations of carbon dioxide, water vapor and energy fluxes in tropical Indian mangroves. Forests 7(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7020035
Schwärzel K, Menzer A, Clausnitzer F, Spank U, Häntzschel J, Grünwald T, Köstner B, Bernhofer C, Feger KH (2009) Soil water content measurements deliver reliable estimates of water fluxes: a comparative study in a beech and a spruce stand in the Tharandt forest (Saxony, Germany). Agric For Meteorol 149(11):1994–2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.006
Sheffield J, Wood EF, Munoz-Arriola F (2010) Long-term regional estimates of evapotranspiration for Mexico based on downscaled ISCCP data. J Hydrometeorol 11(2):253–275. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1176.1
Sheffield J, Wood EF, Roderick ML (2012) Little change in global drought over the past 60 years. Nature 491(7424):435–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11575
Singh N, Patel NR, Bhattacharya BK, Soni P, Parida BR, Parihar JS (2014) Analyzing the dynamics and inter-linkages of carbon and water fluxes in subtropical pine (Pinus roxburghii) ecosystem. Agric For Meteorol 197:206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.07.004
Soubie R, Heinesch B, Granier A, Aubinet M, Vincke C (2016) Evapotranspiration assessment of a mixed temperate forest by four methods: eddy covariance, soil water budget, analytical and model. Agric For Meteorol 228:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.001
Srinet R, Nandy S, Patel NR (2019) Estimating leaf area index and light extinction coefficient using Random Forest regression algorithm in a tropical moist deciduous forest, India. Ecol Inform 52:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.05.008
Srinet R, Nandy S, Padalia H, Ghosh S, Watham T, Patel NR, Chauhan P (2020) Map** plant functional types in northwest Himalayan foothills of India using random forest algorithm in google earth engine. Int J Remote Sens 41(18):7296–7309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1766147
Tong X, Zhang J, Meng P, Li J, Zheng N (2017) Environmental controls of evapotranspiration in a mixed plantation in North China. Int J Biometeorol 61(2):227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-016-1205-0
Vincke C, Breda N, Granier A, Devillez F (2005) Evapotranspiration of a declining Quercus robur (L.) stand from 1999 to 2001 I Trees and forest floor daily transpiration. Ann For Sci 62(6):503–512. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005055
Wang K, Dickinson RE (2012) A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Rev Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000373
Watham T, Kushwaha SPS, Patel NR, Dadhwal VK, Kumar AS (2017a) Ecosystem productivity and its response to environmental variable of moist Indian sal forest. Trop Ecol 58(4):761–768
Watham T, Patel NR, Kushwaha SPS, Dadhwal VK (2017b) A study on sap flow rate of Mallotus philippensis and its relationship with environmental factors. J Agrometeorol 19(2):104–109
Watham T, Srinet R, Nandy S, Padalia H, Sinha SK, Patel NR, Chauhan P (2020) Environmental control on carbon exchange of natural and planted forests in Western Himalayan foothills of India. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00727-x
Wever LA, Flanagan LB, Carlson PJ (2002) Seasonal and interannual variation in evapotranspiration, energy balance and surface conductance in a northern temperate grassland. Agric For Meteorol 112(1):31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00041-2
Wilson KB, Baldocchi DD (2000) Seasonal and interannual variability of energy fluxes over a broadleaved temperate deciduous forest in North America. Agric For Meteorol 100(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00088-X
Wutzler T, Lucas-Moffat A, Migliavacca M, Knauer J, Sickel K, Šigut L, Menzer O, Reichstein M (2018) Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc. Biogeoscience 15(16):5015–5030. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5015-2018
**ao J, Sun G, Chen J, Chen H, Chen S, Dong G, Gao S, Guo H, Guo J, Han S, Kato T (2013) Carbon fluxes, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Agric For Meteorol 182:76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.08.007
Yu D, Li X, Cao Q, Hao R, Qiao J (2020) Impacts of climate variability and landscape pattern change on evapotranspiration in a grassland landscape mosaic. Hydrol Process 34(4):1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13642
Zha T, Li C, Kellomäki S, Peltola H, Wang KY, Zhang Y (2013) Controls of evapotranspiration and CO2 fluxes from scots pine by surface conductance and abiotic factors. PLoS ONE 8(7):e69027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069027
Acknowledgements
The present study was carried out as a part of Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere-Flux (SVAF) of National Carbon Project (NCP) supported by ISRO-Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. The authors wish to acknowledge the Divisional Forest Officer, Dehradun Forest Division and staff of Barkot Forest Range, Dehradun Forest Division, Government of Uttarakhand, India, and field staff of Barkot Flux Site for field support. Thanks are also due to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions, which helped us to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srinet, R., Nandy, S., Watham, T. et al. Measuring evapotranspiration by eddy covariance method and understanding its biophysical controls in moist deciduous forest of northwest Himalayan foothills of India. Trop Ecol 63, 387–397 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-021-00216-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-021-00216-8