Log in

Fitness Philanthropy and Social Capital: an Emerging Research Agenda for Sport and Community Well-Being

  • Perspective Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Community Well-Being Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing recognition of the ways in which sport and leisure can contribute to well-being. This paper offers a socio-cultural account of the sport-charity nexus as a site and source of community well-being. The paper conceives sports charity as broader than a fundraising imperative or a motivation for physical health outcomes and benefits and argues instead that “fitness philanthropy” is an important socio-sporting movement that mobilises well-being in increasingly neo-liberal times. Drawing on the literature on sport and social capital, and leisure and well-being, the paper argues that fitness philanthropy provides an important social barometer for broader cultural and ideological imperatives that contribute in novel ways to understanding health and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an extensive comparison of the numerous approaches taken, see Adler and Kwon (2002).

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualisation: Institutionalized individualism and its social political consequences. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2012). Young people and sexual agency in rural Uganda. Culture, Health & Sexuality. An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 14(3), 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., Mousley, W., Kitchin, P., & Ali-Choudhury, R. (2007). Motivations for participating in charity-affiliated sporting events. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 6(2), 155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton, A., Phillips, G., Daykin, N., Yu, G., Taylor, K., & Petticrew, M. (2012). Think of your arteries: Arts participation, behavioural cardiovascular risk factors and mental well-being in deprived communities in London. Public Health, 126, S57–S64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks A (2005). Does social capital make you generous? Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), p.xx.

  • Bunds, K. (2017). Sport, politics and the charity industry: Running for water. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunds, K., Brandon-Lai, S., & Armstrong, C. (2016). An inductive investigation of participants attachment to charity sport events: The case of team water charity. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16(3), 364–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, C. (2006). Building social capital through an ‘active community club’. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 41(3–4), 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakley, J. (2011). Ideology doesn’t just happen: Sports and neoliberalism. Curitiba, 1(1), 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (2005). The social benefits of sport. Sport England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: Who’s kee** the score? London. UK: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, A. (2014). Cycling charity challenge events: Can they contribute to the lifestyle medicine movement? Tourism Review International, 18, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, A., & Filo, K. (2013). Using constant comparison method and qualitative data to understand participants’ experiences at the nexus of tourism, sport and charity events. Tourism Management, 35, 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, A., & Filo, K. (2016). Bringing personal character strengths into the production of the leisure experience. Leisure Sciences, 38(2), 100–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalisation of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10, 65–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R. (2006). Health as meaningful social practice. Health. An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 10(4), 401–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daykin, N., Mansfield, L., Payne, A., et al. (2017). What works for well-being in culture and sport? Report of a DELPHI process to support coproduction and establish principles and parameters of an evidence review. Perspectives in Public Health, 137, 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H. (2009). Critiquing capabilities: The distractions of a beguiling concept. Critical Social Policy, 29(2), 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Metcalf, R. (2012). Measuring subjective well-being: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 409–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Kavetsos, G., & Vlaev, I. (2014). The happiness workout. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1363–1377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filo, K., Funk, D. C., & O’Brien, D. (2008). It’s really not about the bike: Exploring attraction and attachment to the events of the Lance Armstrong Foundation. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 501–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filo, K., Groza, M., & Fairley, S. (2012). The role of belief in making a difference in enhancing attachment to a charity sport event. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 24(2), 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filo, K., Funk, D. C., & O’Brien, D. (2014). Examining motivation for charity sport event participation: A comparison of recreation-based and charity-based motives. Journal of Leisure Research, 43(4), 491–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H. (2018). Chronicling the use of life satisfaction, quality of life, wellness and well-being in leisure research. Presented at the 20th Leisure, Recreation and Tourism Research Symposium and International Forum, September 29-30th, 2018. Taipei: Taiwan National University.

  • Gregg, E., Pierce, D., Sweeney, K., & Lee, J. (2015). Purposeful pedalling: Analyzing MS 150 participant behavior. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 6(3), 269–281.

  • Inoue, Y., Heffernan, C., Yamaguchi, T., & Filo, K. (2018). Social and charitable impacts of a charity-affiliated sport event: A mixed methods study. Sport Management Review, 21(2), 202–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (2013). Charity running more competitive than ever. Retrieved from runnersworld.com/general-interest/charity-running-more-competive-thanever?Page=single.

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

  • Higgins, V., & Larner, W. (Eds.). (2017). Assembling neoliberalism. Expertise, practices, subjects. Melbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E., & Nielsen, G. (2008). Acts of citizenship. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, A., & McDonald, B. (2019). How elite sport helps to foster and maintain a neoliberal culture: The ‘branding’ of Melbourne, Australia. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019830853.

  • King, S. (2001). All consuming cause: Breast cancer, corporate philanthropy, and the market for generosity. Social Text, 69, 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, S. (2006). Pink ribbons, Inc.: Breast cancer and the politics of philanthropy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, S. (2010). Pink diplomacy: On the uses and abuses of breast cancer awareness. Health Communication, 25, 286–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavrence, C., & Lozanski, K. (2014). This is not your practice life: Lululemon and the neoliberals governance of self. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 51(1), 76–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H., Peck, J., & Sheppard, E. (2007). Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • D Lock, K Filo, T Kunkel and J Skinner. (2013). Thinking about the same things differently: Examining perceptions of a community non-profit sport organization. Sport Management Review, vol. 16, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2013.02.001.

  • Macmillan Cancer Support. (2015). Retrieved from: https://www.macmillan.org.uk/

  • Mansfield, L., Daykin, N., Kay, T., & T. (2020). Leisure and well-being. Leisure Studies, 39(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2020.1713195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor-Lowndes, M., Crittall, M., Conroy, D. & Keast, R. with Baker, C., Barraket, J. & Scaife, W. (2017) Individual giving and volunteering. Giving Australia 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.communitybusinesspartnership.gov.au/about/research-projects/giving-australia-2016.

  • Miller, T. (2012). A distorted playing field: Neoliberalism and sport through the lens of economic citizenship. In D. L. Andrews & M. L. Silk (Eds.), Sport and neoliberalism: politics, consumption and culture (pp. 23–37). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1997). Mobilizing the consumer: Assembling the subject of consumption. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(February), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S., & Hardey, M. (2006). Running away with health: the urban marathon and the construction of ‘charitable bodies’ health. A Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 10(4), 441–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, M., & Hoye, R. (2008). Sport and social capital: An introduction. In M. Nicholson & R. Hoye (Eds.), Sport and social capital (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, Y., Mirehie, M., & Gibson, H. (2018). Leisure and well-being: Concepts, measurements, and new directions. Workshop and paper presented at the academy of leisure sciences research and teaching symposium, February 20-22nd, 2018. Indianapolis, IN.

  • Numerato, D., & Baglioni, S. (2012). The dark side of social capital: An ethnography of sport governance. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 47(5), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (2006). Citizenship, well-being and sustainability: Epicurus or Aristotle? Analyse & Kritik, 28(2), 158–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyx, J., Kenny, S., & Brown, K. (2012). Active citizenship an empirical investigation. Social Policy and Society, 11(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. (2016). Research on the run: Moving methods and the charity ‘thon’. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 8, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2015.1129641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. (2019). Charity, social justice and sporting celebrity foundations. Celebrity Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2019.1691029.

  • Palmer, C., & Dwyer, Z. (2019). Good running?: The rise of fitness philanthropy and sports-based charity events. Leisure Sciences, 1-15.

  • Palmer, C., & Thompson, K. (2007). The paradoxes of football spectatorship: On field and online expressions of social capital among the ‘grog squad. Sociology of Sport Journal, 24(2), 187–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H. & Thing, L. (2016). Run for your life: A theoretical sociological analysis of race culture, URL (consulted May 2018): https://idrottsforum.org/pedersen-thing160914-in-english/.

  • Peer-to-Peer Thirty. (2016). About the peer-to-peer thirty. Retrieved from: https://www.peertopeerforum.com/resources/research/.

  • Peperkamp, E. (2018). ‘Dutch don’t dance’–leisure experiences and sense of belonging among polish migrants in the Netherlands. Leisure Studies, 37(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2017.1397183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, J. (2018). Practices and rationales of embodied philanthropy. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23(3), e1595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundio, A., Heere, B., & Newland, B. (2014). Cause-related versus non-cause-related sport events: Differentiating endurance events through a comparison of athletes' motives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 23(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruperto, A. R., & Kerr, G. (2009). A study of community events held by not-for-profit organizations in Australia. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 21, 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G., & Benson, M. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the non-profit sector. Social Sciences Quarterly, 86(1), 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, M. L., & Andrews, D. L. (2012). The governance of the neoliberal sporting city. In D. L. Andrews & M. L. Silk (Eds.), Sport and neoliberalism: Politics, consumption and culture (pp. 127–142). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, J., Yarnal, C., & Kerstetter, D. (2010). Engendering social capital through a leisure club for middle-aged and older women: Implications for individual and community health and well-being. Leisure Studies, 29(1), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaaij, R. (2011). Beyond the playing field: Experiences of sport, social capital, and integration among Somalis in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(9), 1519–1538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R., & Shanka, T. (2008). Cause for event: Not-for-profit marketing through participant sport events. Journal of Marketing Management, 24, 945–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testoni, S., Mansfield, L. and Dolan, P. (2018). Defining and measuring subjective well-being for sport policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. xx

  • Tonts, M. (2005). Competitive sport and social capital in rural Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (2001). The erosion of citizenship. British Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 189–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting subjects: social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.

  • Vella-Burrows, T., Newbank, N., Mills, S., Shipton, M., Clift, S., Gray F. (2014). Cultural value and social capital: Investigating social capital, health and well-being impacts in three coastal towns undergoing cultureled regeneration (AHrC cultural value project). Kent: Sidney De Haan research Centre for Arts and Health in Association with NeA.

  • Vernon, M. (2014). Well-being. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2010). Crafting the neoliberal state: Workfare, prisonfare, and social insecurity. Sociological Forum, 25(2), 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Webster (2013). Sport aid: The race against time. Retrieved from http://www.brianwebster.com/sportaid.html

  • Widdop, P., King, N., Parnell, D., Cutts, D., et al. (2018). Austerity, policy and sport participation in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltshire, G., Fullagar, S., & Stevinson, C. (2018). Exploring parkrun as a social context for collective health practices: Running with and against the moral imperatives of health responsibilisation. Sociology of Health and Illness, 40(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Won, D., Turner, B., & Park, M. (2010). Motivations for participating in health-related charity sport events. Journal of Venue and Event Management, 1(2), 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Won, D., Park, M., Lee, K. Y., & Chung, J. (2011). Factors affecting participation in charity sport events involving a low intensive physical activity. International Journal of Leisure and Tourism Marketing, 2(3), 248–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, J., Heere, B., & Walker, M. (2013). Do charity sport events function as “Brandfests” in the development of Brand Community? Journal of Sport Management, 27, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Palmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

There are no potential conflicts of interest. This perspectives paper does not contain any empirical data obtained through research with human participants and/or animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmer, C. Fitness Philanthropy and Social Capital: an Emerging Research Agenda for Sport and Community Well-Being. Int. Journal of Com. WB 4, 77–90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00063-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00063-w

Keywords

Navigation