Log in

Novel PEEK/nHA composites fabricated by hot-pressing of 3D braided PEEK matrix

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integration of nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) into polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has been recognized as an effective approach to improve osseointegration of PEEK-based devices. In this work, we report a novel method based on 3D braiding-self retention-hot pressing to yield a bioactive PEEK/nHA composite with superior mechanical properties. The better apatite formation ability and higher MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion and proliferation for the braided PEEK composite reinforced with 6.5 wt% and 14.5 wt% nHA displayed than the unfilled PEEK matrix, mainly ascribed to the incorporation of nHA. Meanwhile, the elastic modulus, hardness, and bending strength of binary composites increased from 4.3 to 8.3 GPa, 0.23 to 0.34 GPa, and 138.86 to 155.32 MPa correspondingly. Compared with the fracture toughness of pure PEEK matrix, that of 6.5 wt% nHA/PEEK composites had a 54.9% increase, whereas that of 14.5 wt% nHA/PEEK composites showed a 23.6% decrease, which was mainly attributed to the interfacial properties between HA and PEEK as well as braid structure of PEEK filaments. These findings exhibited both good mechanical properties and bioactivity of the braided PEEK/nHA composites. Therefore, it is proposed that the 3D braiding-self retention-hot pressing technique is a promising approach for customized PEEK-based implants.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdullah MR, Goharian A, Abdul Kadir MR, Wahit MU (2015) Biomechanical and bioactivity concepts of polyetheretherketone composites for use in orthopedic implants-a review. J Biomed Mater Res A 103(11):3689–3702

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28(32):4845–4869

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanasono MM, Goel N, DeMonte F (2009) Calvarial reconstruction with polyetheretherketone implants. Ann Plast Surg 62(6):653–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sampaio M, Buciumeanu M, Askari E, Flores P, Souza JCM, Gomes JR, Silva FS, Henriques B (2016) Effects of poly-ether-ether ketone (PEEK) veneer thickness on the reciprocating friction and wear behavior of PEEK/Ti6Al4V structures in artificial saliva. Wear 368-369:84–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sampaio M, Buciumeanu M, Henriques B, Silva FS, Souza JCM, Gomes JR (2016) Tribocorrosion behavior of veneering biomedical PEEK to Ti6Al4V structures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 54:123–130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu A, Liu X, Gao X, Deng F, Deng Y, Wei S (2015) Enhancement of osteogenesis on micro/nano-topographical carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite biocomposite. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 48:592–598

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng Y, Sun Y, Chen X, Zhu P, Wei S (2013) Biomimetic synthesis and biocompatibility evaluation of carbonated apatites template-mediated by heparin. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33(5):2905–2913

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Monich PR, Henriques B, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Souza JCM, Fredel MC (2016) Mechanical and biological behavior of biomedical PEEK matrix composites: a focused review. Mater Lett 185:593–597

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang L, Weng L, Song S, Sun Q (2010) Mechanical properties and microstructure of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite nanocomposite materials. Mater Lett 64(20):2201–2204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Weng L, Song S, Zhang Z, Tian S, Ma R (2011) Characterization of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite nanocomposite materials. Mater Sci Eng A 528(10–11):3689–3696

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ma R, Yu Z, Tang S, Pan Y, Wei J, Tang T (2016) Osseointegration of nanohydroxyapatite- or nano-calcium silicate-incorporated polyetheretherketone bioactive composites in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine 11:6023–6033

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang L, Huang FJ, Wu ZZ, Qin J, Wang CB, **e MZ (2016) Cytocompatibility of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite materials with Sprague Dawley rat osteoblasts. Mater Technol 31(sup1):28–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abu Bakar MS, Cheang P, Khor KA (2003) Mechanical properties of injection molded hydroxyapatite-polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:421–425

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abu Bakar MS, Cheng MHW, Tan SM, Yu SC, Liao K, Tan CT, Khor KA, Cheang P (2003) Tensile properties, tension–tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Biomaterials 24(13):2245–2250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Converse GL, Yue W, Roeder RK (2007) Processing and tensile properties of hydroxyapatite-whisker-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials 28(6):927–935

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. ** YS, Bian CC, Zhang ZQ, Zhao Y, Yang L (2017) Preparation and characterization of bio-composite PEEK/nHA. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 167

  17. Bastan FE, Atiq Ur Rehman M, Avcu YY, Avcu E, Ustel F, Boccaccini AR (2018) Electrophoretic co-deposition of PEEK-hydroxyapatite composite coatings for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 169:176–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu GM, Hsiao WD, Kung SF (2009) Investigation of hydroxyapatite coated polyether ether ketone composites by gas plasma sprays. Surf Coat Technol 203(17–18):2755–2758

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira TP, Silva SN, Sousa JA (2018) Flexural fatigue behavior of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite-coated polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) injection moldings derived from dynamic mechanical analysis. Int J Fatigue 108:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma R, Fang LZ, Zheng R, Song S, Weng L, Lei J (2014) Fabrication and characterization of modified-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone coating materials. Appl Surf Sci 314:341–347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JH, Jang HL, Lee KM, Baek HR, ** K, Hong KS, Noh JH, Lee HK (2013) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the bioactivity of hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone biocomposites created by cold spray technology. Acta Biomater 9(4):6177–6187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JH, Jang HL, Lee KM, Baek HR, ** K, Noh JH (2017) Cold-spray coating of hydroxyapatite on a three-dimensional polyetheretherketone implant and its biocompatibility evaluated by in vitro and in vivo minipig model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105(3):647–657

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Johansson P, Barkarmo S, Hawthan M, Peruzzi N, Kjellin P, Wennerberg A (2018) Biomechanical,histological, and computed X-ray tomographic analyses of hydroxyapatite coated PEEK implants in an extended healing model in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res A 106(5):1440–1447

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma R, Weng L, Bao X, Song S, Zhang Y (2013) In vivo biocompatibility and bioactivity of in situ synthesized hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite materials. J Appl Polym Sci 127(4):2581–2587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan YS, Shen QQ, Chen Y, Yu K, Pan CL, Zhang L (2014) Mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Mater Technol 30(5):257–263

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ma R, Weng L, Fang L, Luo Z, Song S (2012) Structure and mechanical performance of in situ synthesized hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone nanocomposite materials. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 62(1):52–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Almasi D, Izman S, Assadian M, Ghanbari M, Abdul Kadir MR (2014) Crystalline ha coating on peek via chemical deposition. Appl Surf Sci 314:1034–1040

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marcomini AL, Rego BT, Suman Bretas RES (2016) Improvement of the short- and long-term mechanical properties of injection-molded poly(etheretherketone) and hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 134(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44476

  29. Ma R, Li Q, Wang L, Zhang X, Fang L, Luo Z, Xue B, Ma L (2017) Mechanical properties and in vivo study of modified-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 73:429–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hughes EA, Parkes A, Williams RL, Jenkins MJ, Grover LM (2018) Formulation of a covalently bonded hydroxyapatite and poly(ether ether ketone) composite. J Tissue Eng 9:2041731418815570

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meyers MA, McKittrick J, Chen PY (2013) Structural biological materials: critical mechanics-materials connections. Science 339(6121):773–779

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma J, Xue YZB, Liang XY, Liao CZ, Tan ZJ, Tang B (2019) Bi-directional regulatable mechanical properties of 3D braided polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Mater Sci Eng C 103:109811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109811

  33. Szewczyk D, Bauer A, Holt RM (2016) A new laboratory apparatus for the measurement of seismic dispersion under deviatoric stress conditions. Geophys Prospect 64(4):789–798

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brum RS, Monich PR, Berti F, Fredel MC, Porto LM, Benfatti CAM, Souza JCM (2019) On the sulphonated PEEK for implant dentistry: biological and physicochemical assessment. Mater Chem Phys 223:542–547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. da Cruz M, Marques J, Peñarrieta Juanito GM, Costa MM, Souza J, Magini R, Miranda G, Silva F, Mata A, Caramês J (2019) Hard and soft tissue cell behavior on PEEK, zirconia, and titanium implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6926

  36. Almasi D, Izman S, Sadeghi M, Iqbal N, Roozbahani F, Krishnamurithy G, Kamarul T, AbdulKadir MR (2015) In vitro evaluation of bioactivity of chemically deposited hydroxyapatite on polyether ether ketone. Int J Biomater 2015:475435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Deng Y, Liu X, Xu A, Wang L, Luo Z, Zheng Y, Deng F, Wei J, Tang Z, Wei S (2015) Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite. Int J Nanomedicine 10:1425–1447

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Monich PR, Berti FV, Porto LM, Henriques B, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Fredel MC, Souza JCM (2017) Physicochemical and biological assessment of PEEK composites embedding natural amorphous silica fibers for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 79:354–362

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Deng Y, Zhou P, Liu X, Wang L, **ong X, Tang Z, Wei J, Wei S (2015) Preparation, characterization, cellular response and in vivo osseointegration of polyetheretherketone/nano-hydroxyapatite/carbon fiber ternary biocomposite. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 136:64–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang YH, Tao W, Zhang Y, Tang L, Gu JW, Jiang ZH (2018) Continuous carbon fiber/crosslinkable poly(ether ether ketone) laminated composites with outstanding mechanical properties, robust solvent resistance and excellent thermal stability. Compos Sci Technol 165:148–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bonfield W, Wang M, Tanner KE (1998) Interfaces in analogue biomaterials. Acta Mater 46(7):2509–2518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Carter DR, Spengler DM (1978) Mechanical properties and composition of cortical bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 135(135):192–217

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wong KL, Wong CT, Liu WC, Pan HB, Fong MK, Lam WM, Cheung WL, Tang WM, Chiu KY, Luk KD, Lu WW (2009) Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composites. Biomaterials 30(23–24):3810–3817

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Biswas S, Dasgupta P, Pramanik P, Chanda A (2014) Macro and micro-indentation behavior of the cortical part of human femur. Procedia Mater Sci 5:2320–2329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ma R, Weng L, Bao X, Ni Z, Song S, Cai W (2012) Characterization of in situ synthesized hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite materials. Mater Lett 71:117–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. J Ma would like to thank Dr. JB Zhang for his guidance and assistance in operating the SANS Material Testing Machine.

Funding

This study is financially supported by the National Foundation of Science of China (Project No. 11872200), Guangdong Foundation of Science and Technology (Project No. 2017B030301018), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (Project No. JCYJ20170817111312887, KQJSCX20180319114439683, and ZDSYS20140509142721429). This work was also supported by the Pico Center at SUSTech that receives support from Presidential fund and Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen Municipality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, J., Li, Z., Xue, Y. et al. Novel PEEK/nHA composites fabricated by hot-pressing of 3D braided PEEK matrix. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 3, 156–166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00147-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00147-3

Keywords

Navigation