Abstract
In this study, we reconstruct the \(\gamma\)-photon energy spectrum, which is in good agreement with the experimental data of \(^{86}\)Kr + \(^{12}\)C at E/A = 44 MeV within the framework of the modified EQMD model. The directed and elliptic flows of free protons and direct photons were investigated by considering the \(\alpha\)-clustering structure of \(^{12}\)C. Compared with free protons, direct photon flows provide clearer information about the early stage of a nuclear reaction. The difference in the collective flows between different configurations of \(^{12}\)C is observed in this study. This indicates that the collective flows of direct photons are sensitive to the initial configuration. Therefore, the \(\gamma\) bremsstrahlung process might be taken as an alternative probe to investigate the \(\alpha\)-clustering structure in a light nucleus from heavy-ion collisions within the Fermi-energy region.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-021-00897-9/MediaObjects/41365_2021_897_Fig9_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Gamow, Mass defect curve and nuclear constitution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 126, 632–644 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1930.0032
H.A. Bethe, R.F. Bacher, Nuclear physics a. stationary states of nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys. 8, 82–229 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.8.82
H.A. Bethe, Nuclear physics b. nuclear dynamics, theoretical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 69–244 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.9.69
L.R. Hafstad, E. Teller, The alpha-particle model of the nucleus. Phys. Rev. 54, 681–692 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.54.681
F. Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars. I. The synthesis of elements from carbon to nickel. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 1, 121 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1086/190005
S. **, L.F. Roberts, S.M. Austin et al., Enhanced triple-\(\alpha\) reaction reduces proton-rich nucleosynthesis in supernovae. Nature 588, 57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2948-7
H.L. Liu, D.D. Han, P. Ji et al., Reaction rate weighted multilayer nuclear reaction network. Chin. Phys. Lett. 37, 112601 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/37/11/112601
H.L. Liu, D.D. Han, Y.G. Ma, et al., Network structure of thermonuclear reactions in nuclear landscape. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 112062 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-020-1552-2
A. Ono, Antisymmetrized molecular dynamics for heavy ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 53, 501–581 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.05.002
H. Feldmeier, J. Schnack, Molecular dynamics for fermions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 655–688 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.655
T. Maruyama, K. Niita, A. Iwamoto, Extension of quantum molecular dynamics and its application to heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 53, 297–304 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.297
W.B. He, Y.G. Ma, X.G. Cao et al., Giant dipole resonance as a fingerprint of \(\alpha\) clustering configurations in \(^{12}{\rm C}\) and \(^{16}{\rm O}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.032506
W.B. He, Y.G. Ma, X.G. Cao et al., Dipole oscillation modes in light alpha-clustering nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 94, 014301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014301
B.S. Huang, Y.G. Ma, W.B. He, Photonuclear reaction as a probe for \(\alpha\)-clustering nuclei in the quasi-deuteron region. Phys. Rev. C 95, 034606 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034606
J. He, S. Zhang, Y.G. Ma et al., Clustering structure effect on Hanbury-BrowncTwiss correlation in \(^{12}\text{C} +^{197}\text{ Au }\)12C+197Au collisions at 200 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00002-0
B.S. Huang, Y.G. Ma, Two-proton momentum correlation from photodisintegration of \(\alpha\)-clustering light nuclei in the quasideuteron region. Phys. Rev. C 101, 034615 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034615
B.S. Huang, Y.G. Ma, Emission time sequence of neutrons and protons as probes of \(\alpha\)-clustering structure. Chin. Phys. C 44, 094105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/44/9/094105
W. Broniowski, E.R. Arriola, Signatures of alpha clustering in light nuclei from relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 112–501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.112501
S. Zhang, Y.G. Ma, J.H. Chen et al., Nuclear cluster structure effect on elliptic and triangular flows in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 95, 064904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064904
S. Zhang, Y.G. Ma, J.H. Chen et al., Collective flows of \(\alpha\)-clustering 12c + 197au by using different flow analysis methods. Eur. Phy. J. A 54, 161 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2018-12597-y
S.H. Lim, J. Carlson, C. Loizides et al., Exploring new small system geometries in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 99, 04490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044904
C.C. Guo, Y.G. Ma, Z.D. An et al., Influence of \(\alpha\)-clustering configurations in \(^{16}{\rm O}+{}^{197}{\rm Au}\) collisions at fermi energy. Phys. Rev. C 99, 044607 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044607
C.C. Guo, W.B. He, Y.G. Ma, Collective flows of \(^{16}o+\)\(^{16}o\) collisions with \(\alpha\)-clustering configurations. Chin. Phys. Lett. 34, 092101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307x/34/9/092101
Y.A. Li, S. Zhang, Y.G. Ma, Signatures of \(\alpha\)-clustering in \(^{16}\rm O\) by using a multiphase transport model. Phys. Rev. C 102, 054907 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054907
W. Reisdorf, H.G. Ritter, Collective flow in heavy-ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nuclear Particle Sci. 47, 663–709 (1997). ar**v:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.47.1.663, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.47.1.663
N. Herrmann, J.P. Wessels, T. Wienold, Collective flow in heavy-ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nuclear Particle Sci. 49, 581–632 (1999). ar**v:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.581, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.581
A.E. Glassgold, W. Heckrotte, K.M. Watson, Collective excitations of nuclear matter. Ann. Phys. 6, 1–36 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(59)90037-5
W. Scheid, H. Müller, W. Greiner, Nuclear shock waves in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 741–745 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.741
H.A. Gustafsson, H.H. Gutbrod, B. Kolb et al., Collective flow observed in relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1590–1593 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1590
R.E. Renfordt, D. Schall, R. Bock, et al., Stop** power and collective flow of nuclear matter in the reaction ar+pb at 0.8 gev/u. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 763–766 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.763
C.A. Ogilvie, W. Bauer, D.A. Cebra et al., Disappearance of flow and its relevance to nuclear matter physics. Phys. Rev. C 42, R10–R14 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.42.R10
C.L. Zhou, Y.G. Ma, D.Q. Fang et al., Correlation between elliptic flow and shear viscosity in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 90, 057601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.057601
G.D. Westfall, W. Bauer, D. Craig et al., Mass dependence of the disappearance of flow in nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1986–1989 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1986
B.A. Li, A.T. Sustich, Differential flow in heavy-ion collisions at balance energies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5004–5007 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.5004
U. Heinz, R. Snellings, Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102212-170540
C. Shen, L. Yan, Recent development of hydrodynamic modeling in heavy-ion collisions. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00829-z
M. Waqas, F.H. Liu, L.L. Li et al., Effective (kinetic freeze-out) temperature, transverse flow velocity, and kinetic freeze-out volume in high energy collisions. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00821-7
G.H. Liu, T.Z. Yan, Y.G. Ma et al., Anisotropic flows of nuclear clusters and hard photons in intermediate energy heavy ion collisions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 17, 1850–1864 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301308010830
G. Liu, Y.G. Ma, X. Cai et al., Azimuthal asymmetry of direct photons in intermediate energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B 663, 312–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.04.037
Y.G. Ma, G.H. Liu, X.Z. Cai et al., Hard-photon flow and photon-photon correlation in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 85, 024618 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024618
S.S. Wang, Y.G. Ma, X.G. Cao et al., Hard-photon production and its correlation with intermediate-mass fragments in a framework of a quantum molecular dynamics model. Phys. Rev. C 102, 024620 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024620
R. Bertholet, M.K. Njock, M. Maurel et al., High energy gamma-ray production from 44 mev/a 86kr bombardment on nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 474, 541–556 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(87)90630-0
C.Z. Shi, Y.G. Ma, X.G. Cao et al., Direct photon emission and influence of dynamical wave packets in an extended quantum molecular dynamics model. Phys. Rev. C 102, 014601 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014601
A. Ono, H. Horiuchi, T. Maruyama et al., Antisymmetrized version of molecular dynamics with two nucleon collisions and its application to heavy ion reactions. Prog. Theor. Phys. 87, 1185–1206 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.87.1185
W. Bauer, G.F. Bertsch, W. Cassing et al., Energetic photons from intermediate energy proton- and heavy-ion-induced reactions. Phys. Rev. C 34, 2127–2133 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.34.2127
A.M. Poskanzer, S.A. Voloshin, Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C 58, 1671–1678 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671
Y.G. Ma, W.Q. Shen, J. Feng et al., Rotational behavior in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 48, R1492–R1496 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.48.R1492
Y.G. Ma, W.Q. Shen, Correlation-functions and the disappearance of rotational collective motion in nucleus-nucleus collisions below 100 mev/nucleon. Phys. Rev. C 51, 3256–3263 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.48.R1492
T. Furuta, K.H.O. Hasnaoui, F. Gulminelli, et al., Monopole oscillations in light nuclei with a molecular dynamics approach. Phys. Rev. C 82. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.034307
G.Q. Zhang, Y.G. Ma, X.G. Cao, et al., Unified description of nuclear stop** in central heavy-ion collisions from 10 A MeV to 1.2 A GeV. Phys. Rev. C 84, 034612 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034612
H. Nifenecker, J. Bondorf, Nuclear electromagnetic bremsstrahlung: a new tool for studying heavy-ion reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 442, 478–508 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(85)80028-2
N. Gan, K.T. Brinkmann, A.L. Caraley et al., Neutron-proton bremsstrahlung from low-energy heavy-ion reactions. Phys. Rev. C 49, 298–303 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.49.298
S.S. Wang, Y.G. Ma, X.G. Cao et al., Azimuthal anisotropy and multiplicities of hard photons and free nucleons in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 254 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00264-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (No. 2020B0301030008), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11890710, 11890714, and 11961141003), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS (No. XDB34000000).
Appendix
Appendix
Strictly speaking, one should sample adequate times according to the Wigner function of a nucleon as follows:
Herein, \(w_i({\mathbf {r}})\) is the probability that the ith nucleon is at point \({\mathbf {r}}\), and \(w_i({\mathbf {p}})\) represents the probability of this nucleon with momentum \({\mathbf {p}}\) when its position is known at \({\mathbf {r}}\). It is easy to obtain certain quantities from Eq.17 as follows:
We also consider the zero-pointer kinetic energy into momentum sampling, our formulation is as follows:
Here, \({\mathbf {p}}_i\) is the momentum of the nucleon after its zero-point kinetic energy is considered.
If one samples the coordinate and momentum adequately, the following can be easily proven:
Thus far, this proves that the kinetic energy obtained by this sampling method is consistent with the expected kinetic energy described by the Hamilton of the EQMD model. This part of the kinetic energy is dominant, namely in the “Fermi-motion” question in the study by Maruyama et al. [11]. In the actual calculation, it should be noted that there is an appropriate simplification for simulation purposes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, CZ., Ma, YG. \(\alpha\)-clustering effect on flows of direct photons in heavy-ion collisions. NUCL SCI TECH 32, 66 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00897-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00897-9