Log in

An Extended TOPSIS Method Based on Gaussian Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compared with trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy set (IT2 FS), Gaussian IT2 FS is more concise in representation and can meanwhile capture sufficient uncertainties. Therefore, in this paper the Gaussian IT2 FS is used to model words in multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) process and a comprehensive method is developed under the Gaussian IT2 FS environment. Firstly, a new type of Gaussian IT2 FS is proposed and the ranking rule is constructed to determine the ideal solutions. Secondly, the Euclidean distance is extended to Gaussian IT2 FS to measure the difference between alternatives and ideal solutions. Further, a complete MADM method is established under the framework of TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution). In the end, the effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated by an investment decision-making example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ying, C., Li, Y., Chin, K., Yang, H., Xu, J.: A new product development concept selection approach based on cumulative prospect theory and hybrid-information MADM. Comput. Ind. Eng. 122, 251–261 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Almeida Filho, A.T., Clemente, T.R.N., Morais, D.C., de Almeida, A.T.: Preference modeling experiments with surrogate weighting procedures for the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(2), 453–461 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dong, J., Chen, Y., Wan, S.: A cosine similarity based QUALIFLEX approach with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for financial performance evaluation. Appl. Soft Comput. 69, 316–329 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Grover, N., Pedrycz, W.: Multi-attribute group decision making based on extended TOPSIS method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl. Soft Comput. 69, 554–567 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deveci, M., Canıtez, F., Gökaşar, I.: WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station. Sustain. Cities Soc. 41, 777–791 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meng, D., Shao, C., Zhu, L.: Ethylene cracking furnace TOPSIS energy efficiency evaluation method based on dynamic energy efficiency baselines. Energy 156, 620–634 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, D.R., Mendel, J.M.: Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(6), 1145–1161 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahraman, C., Onar, S.Ç., Öztayşi, B.: B2C marketplace prioritization using hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(7), 2202–2215 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, T., Liu, X., Qin, J.D.: A linguistic solution for double large-scale group decision-making in E-commerce. Comput. Ind. Eng. 116, 97–112 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, D.R., Mendel, J.M.: Computing With words for hierarchical decision making applied to evaluating a weapon system. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 18(3), 441–460 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doctor, F., Hagras, H., Roberts, D., Callaghan, V.: A type-2 fuzzy based system for handling the uncertainties in group decisions for ranking job applicants within human resources systems. FUZZ-IEEE, pp. 481–488 (2008)

  13. Mendel, J. M.: Computing with words, when words can mean different things to different people. In: Proceedings of Third International ICSC Symposium on Fuzzy Logic and Applications, pp. 158–164 (1999)

  14. Mendel, J.M., John, R.I., Liu, F.: Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(6), 808–821 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, M., Ko, C.: On a class of fuzzy c-numbers clustering procedures for fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 84(1), 49–60 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, R., Li, C.: Regression prediction for fuzzy time series. Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. Ser. A. 16, 455–461 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, J., Li, K.: Multi-criteria decision-making method based on intuitionistic normal fuzzy aggregation operators. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 33, 1501–1508 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, D.R.: Twelve considerations in choosing between Gaussian and trapezoidal membership functions in interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–8 (2012)

  19. Qin, J.: Interval type-2 fuzzy Hamy mean operators and their application in multiple criteria decision making. Granul. Comput. 2(4), 249–269 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Atanassov, K., Gargov, G.: Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31(3), 343–349 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, D.R., Mendel, J.M.: A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 179(8), 1169–1192 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendel, J.M.: On a 50% savings in the computation of the centroid of a symmetrical interval type-2 fuzzy set. Inf. Sci. 172(3), 417–430 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, H.D., Pan, X.H., He, S.F.: A new interval type-2 fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21(1), 145–156 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Celik, E., Akyuz, E.: An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: the case of ship loader. Ocean Eng. 155, 371–381 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, X., Yan, L., Peng, H., Gao, X.: Encoding words into Cloud models from interval-valued data via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting. Knowl. Based Syst. 55, 114–124 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mendel, J.M., Wu, D.R.: Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments. Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions that helped to improve the quality of this paper. This work was supported by NSFC Foundation under Grant No. 61402260 and partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through Grant RGPIN-2018-06724.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huidong Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Yao, J., Yan, J. et al. An Extended TOPSIS Method Based on Gaussian Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 1831–1843 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00670-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00670-6

Keywords

Navigation