SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Tribocorrosion Study of Additive Manufactured and Wrought 316L Stainless Steel in Simulated Body Fluids

  • Published:
Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the corrosion and tribocorrosion behavior of additive manufactured (AM) 316L is investigated and compared to wrought 316L. The experiments were performed in both a 0.9 wt% NaCl solution and a simulated body fluid based on the protein albumin. The results are interpreted based on the analysis of the microstructure, inherent AM porosities and surface roughness. The results confirm that the AM samples present a substandard behavior compared to the wrought materials due to the higher surface area caused by the voids inherent to the AM process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsson COA, Landolt D (2001) Film growth during anodic polarization in the passive region on 304 stainless steel with Cr, Mo and W additions studied with EQCM and XPS. J Electrochem Soc 148:B438–B449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsson COA, Landolt D (2003) Passive films on stainless steels-chemistry, structure and growth. Electrochim Acta 48:1093–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jemmely P, Mischler S, Landolt D (1999) Tribocorrosion behaviour of Fe–17Cr stainless steel in acid and alkaline solutions. Tribol Int 32:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Z et al (2016) Effect of proteins on the surface microstructure evolution of a CoCrMo alloy in bio-tribocorrosion processes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 145:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bidiville A et al (2007) Effect of surface chemistry on the mechanical response of metals in sliding tribocorrosion systems. Wear 263:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Albrektsson T, Johansson C (2001) Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 10:96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sin JR (2015) Investigation of the corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviour of metallic biomaterials. Doctoral Thesis, Luleaa University of Technology

  8. Yan Y (2006) Corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviour of metallic orthopaedic implant materials. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Leeds

  9. Vaithilingam J et al (2016) The effect of laser remelting on the surface chemistry of Ti6al4V components fabricated by selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol 232:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamaguchi H, Fergani O, Pei-Ying W (2017) Modification using magnetic field-assisted finishing of the surface roughness and residual stress of additively manufactured components. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66:305–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Henry P, Takadoum J, Bercot P (2009) Tribocorrosion of 316L stainless steel and TA6V4 alloy in H2SO4 media. Corros Sci 51:1308–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mischler S (2008) Triboelectrochemical techniques and interpretation methods in tribocorrosion: a comparative evaluation. Tribol Int 41:573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mischler S, Debaud S, Landolt D (1998) Wear accelerated corrosion of passive metals in tribocorrosion systems. J Electrochem Soc 145:750–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Munoz AI, Espallargas N (2011) Tribocorrosion mechanisms in sliding contacts. In: Landolt D, Mischler S (eds) Tribocorrosion of passive metals and coatings. Woodhead Publishing, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  15. von der Ohe CB, Johnsen R, Espallargas N (2010) Modeling the multi-degradation mechanisms of combined tribocorrosion interacting with static and cyclic loaded surfaces of passive metals exposed to seawater. Wear 269:607–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papageorgiou N, Mischler S (2012) Electrochemical simulation of the current and potential response in sliding tribocorrosion. Tribol Lett 48:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Espallargas N, Johnsen R, Torres C (2013) A new experimental technique for quantifying the galvanic coupling effects on stainless steel during tribocorrosion under equilibrium conditions. Wear 307:190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vieira AC et al (2012) Mechanical and electrochemical deterioration mechanisms in the tribocorrosion of Al alloys in NaCl and in NaNO\(_3\) solutions. Corros Sci 54:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diomidis N et al (2010) Tribocorrosion of stainless steel in sulfuric acid: Identification of corrosion-wear components and effect of contact area. Wear 269:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Favero M, Stadelmann P, Mischler S (2006) Effect of the applied potential of the near surface microstructure of a 316L steel submitted to tribocorrosion in sulfuric acid. J Phys D Appl Phys 39:3175–3183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Perret J et al (2010) EBSD, SEM and FIB characterisation of subsurface deformation during tribocorrosion of stainless steel in sulphuric acid. Wear 269:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bazzoni A, Mischler S, Espallargas N (2013) Tribocorrosion of pulsed plasma-nitrided CoCrMo implant alloy. Tribol Lett 49:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei R et al (2004) High-intensity plasma ion nitriding of orthopedic materials: part I, tribological study. Surf Coat Technol 186:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lanning BR, Wei R (2004) High intensity plasma ion nitriding of orthopedic materials: part II, microstructural analysis. Surf Coat Technol 186:314–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Elik C et al (2008) Effects of plasma nitriding on mechanical and tribological properties of CoCrMo alloy. Surf Coat Technol 202:2433–2438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pichon L et al (2010) CoCrMo alloy treated by floating potential plasma assisted nitriding and plasma based ion implantation: influence of the hydrogen content and of the ion energy on the nitrogen incorporation. Surf Coat Technol 204:2913–2918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ozturk O, Trkan U, Eroglu A (2006) Metal ion release from nitrogen ion implanted CoCrMo orthopedic implant material. Surf Coat Technol 200:5687–5697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zavieh AH, Espallargas N (2016) Effect of 4-point bending and normal load on the tribocorrosion-fatigue (multi-degradation) of stainless steels. Tribol Int 99:96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zavieh AH, Espallargas N (2016) The role of surface chemistry and fatigue on tribocorrosion of austenitic stainless steel. Tribol Int 103:368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zavieh AH, Espallargas N (2017) The effect of friction modifiers on tribocorrosion and tribocorrosion-fatigue of austenitic stainless steel. Tribol Int 111:368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McCafferty E (2009) Thermodynamics of corrosion: pourbaix diagrams. Introduction to corrosion science. Springer, New York, pp 95–117

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vidal CV, Munoz AI (2011) Electrochemical aspects in biomedical alloy characterization: electrochemical impedance spectrosopy, biomedical engineering, trends in materials science. InTech, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Galant NJ (2012) Disulfidicity: a scale to characterize the disulfide bond strength via the hydrogenation thermodynamics. Chem Phys Lett 539:11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Cristian Torres for his help in conducting the experiments and Vegard Brtan for his help with the SLM process. The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the research center ‘SFI Manufacturing’ and the MKRAM project (Grant No. 248243), which is sponsored by the Research Council of Norway and industrial partners.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, NTNU, Richard Birkelands vei 2B, 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Johan Stendal & Nuria Espallargas

  2. Siemens Software Industry, Leuven, Belgium

    Omar Fergani

  3. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Hitomi Yamaguchi

Authors
  1. Johan Stendal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omar Fergani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hitomi Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nuria Espallargas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar Fergani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stendal, J., Fergani, O., Yamaguchi, H. et al. A Comparative Tribocorrosion Study of Additive Manufactured and Wrought 316L Stainless Steel in Simulated Body Fluids. J Bio Tribo Corros 4, 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-017-0125-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-017-0125-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation