Abstract
Intratesticular hematoma is one of the most frequent presentations of scrotal trauma. Ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality in the evaluation of scrotal trauma, and its findings are crucial for the choice of treatment. An intratesticular hematoma may represent a diagnostic pitfall for the investigating physician since its appearance may mimic other conditions, such as testicular neoplasms or segmental infarction. Although the gold standard imaging modality for the characterization of a testicular lesion is contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR), MR equipment is not always available in an emergency department. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) may represent a valid and cheaper alternative compared with MR, which may aid the physician in the differential diagnosis. We describe the case of a 19-year-old male with a scrotal trauma following a motorcycle crash. In accordance with the literature, we carried out a contrast-medium whole-body computed tomography for the evaluation of any potential traumatic injury. Because of scrotal swelling and the patient complaining about pain in the right testicle, we performed a scrotal ultrasound, which demonstrated an enlarged right testicle, with an inhomogeneous echostructure due to the presence of a hypoechoic area in the middle and upper portion of the testicle. Color Doppler ultrasound did not show signals of intralesional vascularization. The lesion, although having characteristics compatible with hematoma, must not be diagnosed as testicular neoplasia, segmental infarction, or other mimics. For more information, a CEUS examination was performed. The examination clearly showed the extent of the lesion, the integrity of the testicular capsule, and the absence of internal vascularization; all these findings were regarded as indicators of a testicular hematoma. After the urological examination, the patient was prescribed antibiotic therapy and bed rest. For further confirmation of the CEUS examination, an MR was performed 2 days later, showing a perfect correspondence with the CEUS findings. Our case demonstrates that CEUS is a faster, cheaper, and valid alternative to MR in an emergency setting, as in testicular trauma, in which the hematoma may mimic conditions (neoplasm) that require a different treatment.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40477-019-00389-y/MediaObjects/40477_2019_389_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40477-019-00389-y/MediaObjects/40477_2019_389_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40477-019-00389-y/MediaObjects/40477_2019_389_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40477-019-00389-y/MediaObjects/40477_2019_389_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40477-019-00389-y/MediaObjects/40477_2019_389_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40477-019-00389-y/MediaObjects/40477_2019_389_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Munter DW, Faleski EJ (1989) Blunt scrotal trauma: emergency department evaluation and management. Am J Emerg Med 7:227–234
Mulhall JP, Gabram SG, Jacobs LM (1995) Emergency management of blunt testicular trauma. Acad Emerg Med 2:639–643
Siegel MJ (1997) The acute scrotum. Radiol Clin North 35:959–976
Cass AS, Luxenberg M (1991) Testicular injuries. Urology 37:528–530
Buckley JC, McAninch JW (2006) Use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular injuries in blunt scrotal trauma. J Urol 175:175–178
Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Hricak H, McAninch JW (1983) Sonography of testicular trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141:993–995
Herbener TE (1996) Ultrasound in the assessment of the acute scrotum. J Clin Ultrasound 24:405–421
Deurdulian C, Mittelstaedt CA, Chong WK, Fielding JR (2007) US of acute scrotal trauma: optimal technique, imaging findings, and management. RadioGraphics 27:357–369
Sommers DN, Jensen J (2015) Sonographic findings of typical and atypical scrotal trauma. Ultrasound Q 31:99–108
Marko J, Wolfman DJ, Aubin AL, Sesterhenn IA (2017) Testicular seminoma and its mimics. RadioGraphics 37:1085–1098
Boldt BM, Nguyen D (2010) Post-traumatic intra-testicular haematoma may mimic a neoplasm or abscess on ultrasound. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr.06.2010.3119
Dietrich CF et al (2017) How to perform contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Ultrasound Int Open 3:E2–E15
Miele V, Piccolo CL, Galluzzo M, Ianniello S, Sessa B, Trinci M (2016) Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in blunt abdominal trauma. Br J Radiol 89(1061):20150823. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150823
Piccolo CL, Trinci M, Pinto A, Brunese L, Miele V (2018) Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis and management of traumatic splenic injuries. J Ultrasound 21:315–327
Trinci M, Piccolo CL, Ferrari R, Galluzzo M, Ianniello S, Miele V (2018) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. J Ultrasound 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-0346-x
Moschouris H, Stamatiou K, Lampropoulou E, Kalikis D, Matsaidonis D (2009) Imaging of the acute scrotum: is there a place for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography? Int Braz J Urol 35:692–705
Bertolotto M, Derchi LE, Sidhu PS, Serafini G, Valentino M, Grenier N (2011) Acute segmental testicular infarction at contrast-enhanced ultrasound: early features and changes during follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:834–841
Catalano O, Lobianco R, Sandomenico F, Mattace Raso M, Siani A (2004) Real-time, contrast-enhanced sonographic imaging in emergency radiology. Radiol Med 108:454–469
Valentino M, Bertolotto M, Derchi L, Bertaccini A, Pavlica P, Martorana G, Barozzi L (2011) Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases. Eur Radiol 21:1831–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2039-5
Badea R, Lucan C, Suciu M, Vasile T, Gersak M (2016) Contrast enhanced harmonic ultrasonography for the evaluation of acute scrotal pathology. A pictorial essay. Med Ultrason 18:110–115. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.181.esy
Cantisani V, Bertolotto M, Weskott HP et al (2015) Growing indications for CEUS: the kidney, testis, lymph nodes, thyroid, prostate, and small bowel. Eur J Radiol 84:1675–1684
Cokkinos DD et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound performed under urgent conditions. Indications, review of the technique, clinical examples and limitations. Insights Imaging 4:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0209-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trinci, M., Cirimele, V., Ferrari, R. et al. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and comparison with color Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance in a case of scrotal trauma. J Ultrasound 23, 189–194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00389-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00389-y