Abstract
The outperformance of Chinese students in large-scale international assessments has increasingly attracted the attention of researchers. This study explored the relationship between an important student factor, self-regulated learning (SRL), and Hong Kong students’ reading performance on Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA). Using data from PISA 2009, this study found that Hong Kong students obtained an overall strong performance on the PISA 2009 reading assessment. They were relatively good at reflecting and evaluating and reading continuous texts. Compared with the OECD average, Hong Kong students showed better reading engagement and perceived a more positive classroom disciplinary climate in their reading lessons, but they used fewer control strategies, had poorer awareness of effective reading strategies, and perceived a lower degree of teacher stimulation and scaffolding. Reading enjoyment and control strategies were the most important SRL components facilitating Hong Kong students’ reading performance, after controlling for other background variables in multilevel analysis. Possible cultural and contextual factors affecting Hong Kong students’ SRL and reading performance, and their relationship are discussed to shed light for understanding the paradox of Chinese learners and improving the instructional practices in Chinese classes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although Hong Kong is a city of the PRC, it maintains its own education system under ‘one country, two systems’. Hong Kong’s school curriculum and public examinations are separate from mainland China’s.
The first PISA cycle, PISA 2000, only involved OECD countries. Hong Kong joined PISA 2000 + in 2002 with other non-OECD countries and regions. The assessment of PISA 2000 + was the same as PISA 2000.
Electronic reading was added as an optional assessment in PISA 2009, but this paper only focuses on the paper-based assessment of reading.
References
Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing, and Math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 253–257.
Brown, R. (2002). Straddling two worlds: Self-directed comprehension instruction for middle schoolers. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 337–350). New York: Guilford Press.
Butler, D. L. (2002). Qualitative approaches to investigating self-regulated learning: Contributions and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 37, 59–63.
Chan, K. K., & Rao, N. (2009). The paradoxes revisited: The Chinese learner in changing educational contexts. In K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 315–350). Hong Kong: Springer: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Cheng, B. L. (2001). The relations among motivation, goal setting, action control, and learning strategies: The construct and verification of self-regulated learning process model (in Chinese). Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 46, 67–92.
Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 153–167.
Dignath, C., & Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition Learning, 3, 231–264.
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 6–25.
Gow, L., Balla, J., Dember, D., & Hau, K. T. (1996). The learning approaches of Chinese people: A function of socialization processes and the context of learning? In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese Psychology (pp. 109–123). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Guthrie, J. T., & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 95–105.
Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 59–85.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mobenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–420). New York: Longman.
Hilden, K. R., & Pressley, M. (2007). Self-regulated through transactional strategies instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 51–75.
Ho, D. Y. (1994). Cognitive socialization in Confucian heritage cultures. In P. Greenfield & R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 285–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Ho, M. S. (1999). Evaluating the Chinese language curriculum from an ability training perspective (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Culture and Education Publishing Co.
Ho, E. S. C. (2009). Characteristics of East Asian learners: What we learned from PISA. Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 327–348.
Ho, D. Y., Peng, S. Q., & Chan, F. S. (2001). An investigative research in teaching and learning in Chinese society. In C. Y. Chiu, F. Salili, & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), Multiple competencies and self-regulated learning: Implications for multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 215–244). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Hojo, M., & Oshio, T. (2012). What factors determine student performance in East Asia? New evidence from the 2007 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Asian Economic Journal, 26, 333–357.
Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council (HKCDC). (2001a). Learning to learn—The way forward in curriculum. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council (HKCDC). (2001b). Chinese language education curriculum guide (junior and senior secondary grades) (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Horner, S. L., & Shwery, C. S. (2002). Becoming an engaged, self-regulated reader. Theory Into Practice, 41, 102–109.
Housand, A., & Reis, S. M. (2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108–136.
Jeynes, W. (2008). What we should and should not learn from the Japanese and other East Asian education system. Educational Policy, 22, 900–927.
Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1991). A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 117–128.
Lau, K. L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 367–382.
Lau, K. L. (2012). Instructional practices and self-regulated learning in Chinese language classes. Educational Psychology, 32, 427–450.
Lau, K. L. (2013). Chinese language teachers’ perception and implementation of self-regulated learning-based instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 56–66.
Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good readers and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 177–190.
Law, Y. K., Chan, C. K., & Sachs, J. (2008). Beliefs about learning, self-regulated strategies and text comprehension among Chinese children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 51–73.
Lee, J. (2014). Universal factors of students achievement in high-performing Eastern and Western countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 364–374.
Leung, F. K. S. (2002). Behind the high achievement of East Asian students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8, 87–108.
Li, H., Lei, P. W., & Pace, C. L. (2013). Reading subskill differences between students in Shanghai-China and the US: Evidence from PISA 2009. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 490–509.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and develo** autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20, 71–94.
Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers‘ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 124–128.
Lombaerts, K., Engels, N., & van Braak, J. (2009). Determinants to teachers’ recognitions of self-regulated learning practices in elementary education. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 163–173.
McGeown, S. P., Norgate, R., & Warhurst, A. (2012). Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation among very good and very poor readers. Educational Research, 54, 309–322.
McInerney, D. M. (2008). The motivational roles of cultural differences and cultural identity in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 369–400). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Morrison, K. (2006). Paradox lost: Toward a robust test of the Chinese learner. Education Journal, 34(1), 1–30.
OECD (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf.
OECD (2010a). PISA 2009 results: Vol. 1. What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852548.pdf.
OECD (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Vol. 3. Learning to learn: Student engagement, strategies and practices. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852630.pdf.
OECD (2011). Shanghai and Hong Kong: Two distinct examples of education reform in China. In OECD (Ed.), Lessons from PISA for the United States (pp. 83–109). Paris: OECD.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.
Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715–729.
Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L., & Thauberger, C. (2007). Mentoring student teachers to design and implement literacy tasks that support self-regulated reading and writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 27–50.
Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., & Dowler, J. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 106, 1854–1878.
Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 237–254.
Perry, N. E., & VandeKamp, K. O. (2000). Creating classroom contexts that support young children’s development of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 821–843.
Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 31, 5–15.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal-orientation in SRL. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeider (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., Conley, A. M., & Kempler, T. M. (2003). Current issues in achievement goal theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 319–337.
Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & DeGroot, E. A. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139–161.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. I. Meece (Eds.), Student perception in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego: Academic Press.
Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Brown, R. (1998). Transactional instruction of comprehension strategies in the elementary grades. In D. M. Schunk & R. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 42–55). New York: The Guilford Press.
Retelsdorf, J., Koller, O., & Moller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21, 550–559.
Rogers, C. (1998). Motivational indicators in the United Kingdom and the People’s Republic of China. Educational Psychology, 18(3), 275–292.
Salili, F. (1996). Achievement motivation: A cross-cultural comparison of British and Chinese students. Educational Psychology, 16(3), 271–280.
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-Regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–650). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Develo** self-efficacious readers and writers: The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34–50). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Stevenson, H. W. (1993). Why Asian students still outdistance Americans. Educational Leadership, 50(5), 63–66.
Tang, M., & Neber, H. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated science learning in high-achieving students: Differences related to nation, gender, and grade-level. High Ability Studies, 19, 103–116.
Tse, S. K., Chan, W. S., Ho, W. K., Law, N., Lee, T., Shek, C., & Yu, F. Y. (1995). Chinese language education for the 21st century: A Hong Kong perspective. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410–441.
Watkins, D., & Biggs, J. B. (2001). The paradox of Chinese learner and beyond. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 3–26). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Watkins, D., Reghi, M., & Astilla, E. (1991). The-Asian-learner-as-a-rote-learner stereotype: Myth or reality? Educational Psychology, 11, 21–34.
Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32, 59–68.
Winnie, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego: Academic Press.
Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27–47.
Zhang, M., & Kong, L. (2012). An exploration of reasons for Shanghai’s success in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009. Frontiers of Education in China, 7, 124–162.
Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and use of reading strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37–59.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinex-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lau, Kl., Ho, E.Sc. Reading Performance and Self-regulated Learning of Hong Kong Students: What We Learnt from PISA 2009. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 159–171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0246-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0246-1