Abstract
Objective
This study tested the hypothesis that greater mean changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), in either the absence or presence of reduced interindividual variability, explain larger CRF response rates following higher doses of exercise training.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed CRF data from eight randomized controlled trials (RCT; n = 1590 participants) that compared at least two doses of exercise training. CRF response rates were calculated as the proportion of participants with individual confidence intervals (CIs) placed around their observed response that lay above 0.5 metabolic equivalents (MET). CIs were calculated using no-exercise control group-derived typical errors and were placed around each individual’s observed CRF response (post minus pre-training CRF). CRF response rates, mean changes, and interindividual variability were compared across exercise groups within each RCT.
Results
Compared with lower doses, higher doses of exercise training yielded larger CRF response rates in eight comparisons. For most of these comparisons (7/8), the higher dose of exercise training had a larger mean change in CRF but similar interindividual variability. Exercise groups with similar CRF response rates also had similar mean changes.
Conclusion
Our findings demonstrate that larger CRF response rates following higher doses of exercise training are attributable to larger mean changes rather than reduced interindividual variability. Following a given dose of exercise training, the proportion of individuals expected to improve their CRF beyond 0.5 METs is unrelated to the heterogeneity of individual responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després J-P, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2016;134:e653–99. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461.
Ross R, Goodpaster BH, Koch LG, Sarzynski MA, Kohrt WM, Johannsen NM, et al. Precision exercise medicine: understanding exercise response variability. Br J Sports Med [Internet]. 2019;53:1141–53. http://www.bjsm.bmj.com/.
Sisson SB, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Bouchard C, Blair SN, Church TS. Volume of exercise and fitness nonresponse in sedentary, postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:539–45.
Ross R, de Lannoy L, Stotz PJ. Separate effects of intensity and amount of exercise on interindividual cardiorespiratory fitness response. Mayo Clin Proc [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2015;90:1506–14. http://www.linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0025619615006400.
Montero D, Lundby C. Refuting the myth of non-response to exercise training: ‘non-responders’ do respond to higher dose of training. J Physiol. 2017;595:3377–87.
Gurd BJ, Giles MD, Bonafiglia JT, Raleigh JP, Boyd JC, Ma JK, et al. Incidence of nonresponse and individual patterns of response following sprint interval training. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab [Internet]. 2016;41:229–34. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0449.
Raleigh JP, Giles MD, Scribbans TD, Edgett BA, Sawula LJ, Bonafiglia JT, et al. The impact of work-matched interval training on \(\dot{V}\)O2peak and\(\dot{V}\)O2 kinetics: diminishing returns with increasing intensity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab [Internet]. 2016;41:706–13. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0614.
Weatherwax RM, Harris NK, Kilding AE, Dalleck LC. Incidence of \(\dot{V}\)O2max responders to personalized versus standardized exercise prescription. Med Sci Sport Exerc [Internet]. 2019;51:681–91. http://journals.lww.com/00005768-201904000-00010.
Johannsen NM, Swift DL, Lavie CJ, Earnest CP, Blair SN, Church TS. Categorical analysis of the impact of aerobic and resistance exercise training, alone and in combination, on cardiorespiratory fitness levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3305–12.
Ross R, Hudson R, Stotz PJ, Lam M. Effects of exercise amount and intensity on abdominal obesity and glucose tolerance in obese adults. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2015;162:325. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1189.
Church TS, Earnest CP, Skinner JS, Blair SN. Effects of different doses of physical activity on cardiorespiratory fitness among sedentary, overweight or obese postmenopausal. JAMA. 2007;297:2081–91.
Duscha BD, Slentz CA, Johnson JL, Houmard JA, Bensimhon DR, Knetzger KJ, et al. Effects of exercise training amount and intensity on peak oxygen consumption in middle-age men and women at risk for cardiovascular disease. Chest [Internet]. 2005;128:2788–93. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.4.2788.
Martin CK, Johnson WD, Myers CA, Apolzan JW, Earnest CP, Thomas DM, et al. Effect of different doses of supervised exercise on food intake, metabolism, and non-exercise physical activity: the E-MECHANIC randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2019;110:583–92. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/110/3/583/5512180.
Atkinson G, Williamson P, Batterham AM. Issues in the determination of ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’ in physiological research. Exp Physiol [Internet]. 2019;104:1215–25. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP087712.
Mann T, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. Methods of prescribing relative exercise intensity: physiological and practical considerations. Sport Med. 2013;43:613–25.
Mann TN, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training. Sport Med. 2014;44:1113–24.
Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Meyer T, Gäßler N, Faude O, Kindermann W. Exercise at given percentages of VO2max: heterogeneous metabolic responses between individuals. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:74–9.
Preobrazenski N, Bonafiglia JT, Nelms MW, Lu S, Robins L, LeBlanc C, et al. Does blood lactate predict the chronic adaptive response to training: a comparison of traditional and talk test prescription methods. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab [Internet]. 2019;44:179–86. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2018-0343.
Bonafiglia JT, Sawula LJ, Gurd BJ. An examination of the Counting Talk Test’s ability to discern individual variability in exercise-induced metabolic stress. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci [Internet]. 2018;22:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2017.1373650.
Woltmann ML, Foster C, Porcari JP, Camic CL, Dodge C, Haible S, et al. Evidence that the talk test can be used to regulate exercise intensity. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:1248–54.
Egan B, Zierath JR. Exercise metabolism and the molecular regulation of skeletal muscle adaptation. Cell Metab [Internet]. 2013;17:162–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.012.
Sigal RJ, Alberga AS, Goldfield GS, Prud’homme D, Hadjiyannakis S, Phillips P, et al. Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on percentage body fat and cardiometabolic risk markers in obese adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:1006.
Bateman LA, Slentz CA, Willis LH, Shields AT, Piner LW, Bales CW, et al. Comparison of aerobic versus resistance exercise training effects on metabolic syndrome (from the studies of a targeted risk reduction intervention through defined exercise—STRRIDE-AT/RT). Am J Cardiol [Internet]. 2011;108:838–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.037.
Slentz CA, Bateman LA, Willis LH, Granville EO, Piner LW, Samsa GP, et al. Effects of exercise training alone vs a combined exercise and nutritional lifestyle intervention on glucose homeostasis in prediabetic individuals: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia [Internet]. 2016;59:2088–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4051-z.
Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, Johannsen N, Johnson W, Kramer K, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A 1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2010;304:2253.
Swinton PA, Hemingway BS, Saunders B, Gualano B, Dolan E. A statistical framework to interpret individual response to intervention: paving the way for personalised nutrition and exercise prescription. Front Nutr [Internet]. 2018;5:41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00041/abstract.
Bonafiglia JT, Nelms MW, Preobrazenski N, LeBlanc C, Robins L, Lu S, et al. Moving beyond threshold-based dichotomous classification to improve the accuracy in classifying non-responders. Physiol Rep [Internet]. 2018;6:e13928. http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/10/9653.
Bonafiglia JTJT, Ross R, Gurd BJBJ. The application of repeated testing and monoexponential regressions to classify individual cardiorespiratory fitness responses to exercise training. Eur J Appl Physiol [Internet]. 2019;119:889–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04078-w.
Booth FW, Laye MJ. The future: genes, physical activity and health. Acta Physiol [Internet]. 2010;199:549–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02117.x.
Pickering C, Kiely J. Do Non-responders to exercise exist—and if so, what should we do about them? Sport Med [Internet]. 2019;49:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-01041-1.
Marascuilo LA, McSweeney M. Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychol Bull [Internet]. 1967;67:401–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020421.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate : a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57:289–300.
Wolpern AE, Burgos DJ, Janot JM, Dalleck LC. Is a threshold-based model a superior method to the relative percent concept for establishing individual exercise intensity? a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil [Internet]. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation; 2015;7:16. http://www.biomedcentral.com/2052-1847/7/16.
Dalleck LC, Haney DE, Buchanan CA, Weatherwax RM. Does a personalised exercise prescription enhance training efficacy and limit training unresponsiveness? A randomised controlled trial. Fit Res. 2016;5:15–27.
Byrd BR, Keith J, Keeling SM, Weatherwax RM, Nolan PB, Ramos JS, et al. Personalized moderate-intensity exercise training combined with high-intensity interval training enhances training responsiveness. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2019;16:2088. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2088.
Islam H, Siemens TL, Matusiak JBL, Sawula L, Bonafiglia JT, Preobrazenski N, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular endurance responses immediately and two-months after a whole-body Tabata or vigorous-intensity continuous training intervention. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;45:1–32.
Walsh JJ, Bonafiglia JT, Goldfield GS, Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Doucette S, et al. Interindividual variability and individual responses to exercise training in adolescents with obesity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab [Internet]. 2020;45:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2019-0088.
Hecksteden A, Kraushaar J, Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Theisen D, Senn S, Meyer T. Individual response to exercise training—a statistical perspective. J Appl Physiol [Internet]. 2015;118:1450–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00714.2014.
Snapinn SM, Jiang Q. Responder analyses and the assessment of a clinically relevant treatment effect. Trials [Internet]. 2007;8:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-31.
Koch LG, Pollott GE, Britton SL. Selectively bred rat model system for low and high response to exercise training. Physiol Genom. 2013;45:606–14.
Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Leblanc C, Landry F, Fontaine E. Sensitivity of maximal aerobic power to training is genotype-dependent [Internet]. Med Sci Sport. Exerc. 1984. p. 489–93. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=6542620.
Bouchard C, An P, Rice T, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Gagnon J, et al. Familial aggregation of \(\dot{V}\)O(2max) response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE family study. J Appl Physiol [Internet]. 1999;87:1003–8. http://jap.physiology.org/content/87/3/1003.abstract.
Bouchard C, Sarzynski MA, Rice TK, Kraus WE, Church TS, Sung YJ, et al. Genomic predictors of the maximal O2 uptake response to standardized exercise training programs. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110:1160–70.
Williams CJ, Williams MG, Eynon N, Ashton KJ, Little JP, Wisloff U, et al. Genes to predict VO2max trainability: a systematic review. BMC Genom. 2017;18:81–110.
Tesch PA, Daniels WL, Sharp DS. Lactate accumulation in muscle and blood during submaximal exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. 1982;114:441–6.
Hammond BP, Stotz PJ, Brennan AM, Lamarche B, Day AG, Ross R. Individual variability in waist circumference and body weight in response to exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:315–22.
Atkinson G, Batterham AM. True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol [Internet]. 2015;100:577–88. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25823596.
Williamson PJ, Atkinson G, Batterham AM. Inter-individual responses of maximal oxygen uptake to exercise training: a critical review. Sport Med [Internet]. 2017;47:1501–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0680-8.
Deyi BA, Kosinski AS, Snapinn SM. Power considerations when a continuous outcome variable is dichotomized. J Biopharm Stat [Internet]. 1998;8:337–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543409808835243.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G * Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.
Buford TW, Roberts MD, Church TS. Toward exercise as personalized medicine. Sport Med. 2013;43:157–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
J. T. B., N. P., H. I., and B. J. G. were supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada: Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship, Canada Graduate Scholarship (Master’s), Post-graduate scholarship (Doctoral), and Discovery Grant (#402635), respectively. L.M.R. was supported by a NHLBI fellowship (T32-FL-007101). The DREW, E-MECHANIC, and HART-D trials were supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with Grant numbers: HL66262; R01: HL102166, P30: DK072476, and U54: GM104940; and DK068928, respectively. The HEARTY and Queen’s trials were supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) with Grant numbers MCT-71979 and OHN-63277, respectively. STRRIDE I (NCT00200993) and STRRUDE AT/RT (NCT00275145) were funded by a NHLBI Grant (HL-057354). STRRIDE-PD (NCT00962962) was funded by a NIDDK Grant (DK081559).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval
Each trial was granted ethics approval at their respective institutions.
Consent to participate
All participants from each trial provided written informed consent to participate prior to data collection.
Consent to publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Author contributions
All authors, unless otherwise noted (see note regarding Dr. CPE): (1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; (2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; (3) approved the version to be published; and (4) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Dr. CPE made substantial contributions to the conception, design, and data collection of the trials conducted at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Dr. CPE was unable to edit or approve the final version of the manuscript.
Additional information
Conrad P. Earnest: Deceased.
Dr. Earnest made substantial contributions to the conception, design, and data collection of the trials conducted at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Dr. Earnest was unable to edit or approve the final version of the manuscript.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
40279_2021_1442_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Supplemental Figure 1. Flow chart for secondary analysis. * As determined in steps in 1A or 1B of primary analysis. † Unpaired t-tests were only performed if ANOVAs with three groups (e.g. ANOVAs for DREW, HART-D, and HEARTY) revealed significant group × time interaction effects. These unpaired t-tests were used as post-hoc tests to determine which groups had significantly different mean changes in CRF (TIF 566 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonafiglia, J.T., Preobrazenski, N., Islam, H. et al. Exploring Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Response Rates Across Varying Doses of Exercise Training: A Retrospective Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials. Sports Med 51, 1785–1797 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01442-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01442-9