Log in

The Impact of a Firm’s Financial Flexibility on its Strategic Renewal: Key Concepts with Evidential Support from Businesses Across Industries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To propose a research agenda towards making an assessment of a firm’s practices of financial flexibility and their impact on its strategic renewal. The paper takes the form of a theoretical discussion on few major practices of financial flexibility that a firm can choose to exercise in its attempts to bring about strategic self-renewal on a sustained basis. The paper triggers a discussion on few possible takeaways for organizations in their attempts to integrate existing financial practices, generate new practices of financial flexibility and successfully exploit this new knowledge towards strategic renewal initiatives of the organizations. This is a developmental paper and many of its suggestions require rigorous testing through studies in a wider array of settings. Firms can inculcate the spirit of financial flexibility judiciously towards enhancing their strategic flexibility in their attempts to augment their prospects of strategic renewal. Finance being the most fungible resource that a firm possesses, every attempt should be made to leverage such a resource towards optimally managing the diverse portfolio of projects that a firm undertakes in its endeavor to fructify its strategic renewal goal, on an ongoing basis, while generating additional wealth for its shareholders. The paper provides a snapshot of various corporate practices of financial flexibility adopted by firms across industries and the respective success/failure stories the lessons of which when learnt properly can go a long way in the strategic self-renewal of many an organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Mascarenhas, B. (1984). The need for strategic flexibility. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(Fall), 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2000). Intrapreneurship modeling in transition economies: a comparison of Slovenia and the United States. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, A., & Gregory, J. (2003). Credit—the complete guide to pricing, hedging, and risk management. London: Risk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awerbuch, S. (2000). Investing in photovoltaics: risk, accounting and the value of new technology. Energy Policy, 28, 1023–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. The Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H., & Hurry, D. (1993). Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental choice process. Academy of Management Review, 18(October), 760–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R., & Myers, S. (1996). Principles of corporate finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, P. C., Garrison, R. H., & Noreen, E. W. (2009). Introduction to managerial accounting. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caouette, J. B., Altman, E. I., Narayanan, P., & Nimmo, R. (2008). Managing credit risk—the great challenge for the global financial markets. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, P. (2003). Finance Sense. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Slagmulder, R. (1997). Target costing and value engineering. Mont Vale: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(January), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 16(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2007). The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., Zahra, S. A., Floyd, S. W., & Janney, J. J. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 351–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., & Pindyck, R. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen, G. (2009). Decision options—the art and science of making decisions. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall, CRC, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. (1991). Strategic flexibility for high technology maneuvers: a conceptual framework. Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., & Christensen, J. F. (2001). A market-process approach to corporate coherence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 22, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W. D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(summer), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H., & Pisano, G. P. (1994). Beyond world class: The new manufacturing strategy. Harvard Business Review, 72(January / February), 77–86.

  • Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? ERIM Report Series Research in Management, ERS-2005-025-STR.

  • Jorion, P. (2003). Financial risk manager handbook. Inc. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Kickert, W. J. M. (1985). The magic word flexibility. International Studies of Management & Organization, 14(4), 11–25.

  • Lehn, K., & Makhija, A. K. (1996). EVA & MVA as performance measures & signals for strategic change. Strategy & Leadership, 24(3), 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malagoli, S., & Magni, C. A. (2007). The use of fuzzy logic and expert systems for rating and pricing firms. Managerial Finance, 33(11), 836–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C. (1995). ‘Discovery driven planning’ Harvard Business Review. July–August, 1995.

  • Miniter, R. (2002). The myth of market share. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische, M. A. (2000). Strategic renewal—becoming a high-performance organization. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Momaya, K. (2002). Strategic flexibility for competitiveness. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 3(1), iii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., & Sexton, D. L. (1996). The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: implications for company performance. Journal of Business Research, 36, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, J., & Komisar, R. (2009). Getting to plan B—break through to a better business model. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.

  • Ramaswamy, V. S., & Namakumari, S. (1999). Strategic planning—formulation of corporate strategy. New Delhi: Macmillan India Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. (1992). Financial management: Concepts and applications. Macmillan.

  • Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16(special issue), 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. (2004). Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence. Journal of Business Research, 57, 518–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, R. (1997). People value added—the new performance measure. Strategy & Leadership, 25(2), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz E. S., & Trigeorgis L. (2001). Real option and investment under uncertainty. MIT Press.

  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice (Spring), 11–27.

  • Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 562–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, H. T. J., & Trigeorgis, L. (2004). Strategic investment—real options and games. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetz, P. E., Stewart, A., Howell, R., Blair, J. D., Fottler MD. (1998). Dimensionality of the entrepreneurial posture/orientation construct: A structural equation study. Paper presented at the 1998 Academy of Management Meeting, San Diego.

  • Stopford, J. (2001). Should strategy makers become dream weavers? Harvard Business Review, (January), 165–169.

  • Talluri, K. T., & Van Ryzin, G. J. (2004). The theory and practice of revenue management. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1), 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. M. (1994). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review (Winter), 72–89.

  • Vedpuriswar, A. V. (2002). Strategic financial management—achieving sustainable competitive advantage. New Delhi: Vision Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedpuriswar, A. V. (2010). Enterprise risk management—industry experiences. Hyderbad: ICFAI University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdú-Jover, A. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & García-Morales, V. J. (2006). Environment-flexibility coalignment and performance: An analysis in large versus small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 334–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vithessonthi, Chaiporn, Financial Flexibility, Financial System, and Organizational Change (2010). The Business Review, 15(1), 72–82. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1548227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W. (1998). Building the flexible firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W., & Elfring, T. (2001). Rethinking strategy. California: SAGE Publications Inc.

  • Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: from evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2111–2136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation—performance relationship. Paper presented at the 1999 Babson College-Kauffman Foundation Research Conference, Columbia.

  • Young, D. W. (2003). A manager’s guide to creative cost cutting. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance—a taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship—performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Balasubrahmanyam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balasubrahmanyam, S., Kaipa, P. & Akhilesh, K.B. The Impact of a Firm’s Financial Flexibility on its Strategic Renewal: Key Concepts with Evidential Support from Businesses Across Industries. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 13, 165–175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0015-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0015-4

Keywords

Navigation