Abstract
Interactions of stem cells with biophysics of extracellular matrix (ECM) have shown a significant influence in control of the stem cell behavior. To mimic nanometer and micrometer scale of ECM structures, biomaterials such as nanotopographical substrates, nanofibers, conductive gold nanoparticles, carbon nanomaterials, hydrogels, and micropatterned surface are used to culture stem cells. In this review, we focused on easily attainable and clinically applied adult stem cells rather than embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells that are still in infantile stage of research. We present the effects of the biomaterials on adult stem cell behavior, especially on stem cell differentiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BKK Teo, ST Wong, cK Lim, et al., Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase, ACS Nano, 7, 4785 (2013).
S Khetan, M Guvendiren, WR Legant, et al., Degradationmediated cellular traction directis stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels, Nat Materials, 12, 458 (2013).
HN Kim, A Jiao, NS Hwang, et al., Nanotopography-guided tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 65, 536 (2013).
CJ Bettinger, R Langer, JT Borenstein, Engineering substrate micro- and nanotopography to control cell function, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 48, 5406 (2009)
SL Goodman, PA Sims, RM Albrecht, Three-dimensional extracellular matrix textured biomaterials, Biomaterials, 17, 2087 (1996).
GA Abrams, SL Goodman, PF Nealey, et al., Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque, Cell Tissue Res, 299, 39 (2000).
E Pamula, V De Cupere, YF Dufrene, et al., Nanoscale organization of adsorbed collagen: influence of substrate hydrophobicity and adsorption time, J Colloid Interf Sci, 271, 80 (2004).
EKF Yim, SW Pang, KW Leong, Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage, Exp Cell Res, 313, 1820 (2007).
VF Segers, RT Lee, Stem-cell therapy for cardiac disease, Nature, 451, 937 (2008).
KR Chien, IJ Domian, KK Parker, Cardiogenesis and the complex biology of regenerative cardiovascular medicine, Science, 322, 1494 (2008).
DH Kim, Kshitiz, RR Smith, et al., A Levchenko, Nanopatterned cardiac cell patches promote stem cell niche formation and myocardial regeneration, Integr Biol, 4, 1019 (2012).
RR Smith, L Barile, HC Cho, et al., Regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells expanded from percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy specimens, Circulation, 115, 896 (2007).
E Messina, L De Angelis, G Frati, et al., Isolation and expansion of adult cardiac stem cells from human and murine heart, Cir Res, 95, 911 (2004).
YN Wu, JB Law, AY He, et al., Substrate topography determines the fate of chondrogenesis from human mesenchymal stem cells resulting in specific cartilage phenotype formation, Nanomedicine, DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.04.002 (2014).
BM Baker, AS Nathan, AO Gee, et al., The influence of an aligned nanofibrous topography on human mesenchymal stem cell fibrochondrogenesis, Biomaterials, 31, 6190 (2010).
YN Wu, Z Yang, JHP Hui, et al., Cartilaginous ECM component-modification of the micro-bead culture system for chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, Biomaterials, 28, 4056 (2007).
S Watari, K Hayashi, JA Wood, et al., Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographicallypattered ridges and grooves, Biomaterials, 33, 128 (2012).
S Mwenifumbo, MM Stevens, ECM interactions with cells from the macro to nanoscale. In: K Gonsalves, C Halberstadt, CT Laurencin, L Nair, eds. Biomedical Nanostructures, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 223 (2008).
SJ Liliensiek, JA Wood, J Yong, et al., Modulation of human vascular endothelial cell behaviors by nanotopographic cues, Biomaterials, 31, 5418 (2010).
R Vasita, DS Katti, Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering, Int J Nanomedicine, 1, 15 (2006).
JM Anderson, JL Patterson, JB Vines, A Javed, SR Gilbert, HW Jun, Biphasic peptide amphiphile nanomatrix embedded with hydroxyapaptite nanoparticles for stimulated osteoinductive response, ACS Nano, 5, 9463 (2011).
JM Anderson, A Andukuri, DJ Lim, et al., Modulating the gelatin properties of self-assembling peptide amphiphiles, ACS NANO, 3, 3447 (2009).
M Supova, Problem of hydroxyapatite dispersion in polymer matrices: a review, J. Mater Sci: Mater Med, 20, 1201 (2009).
M Vallet-Regí, JM González, Calcium phosphates as substitution of bone tissues, Prog Solid State Chem, 32, 1 (2004).
T Mygind, M Stiehler, A Baatrip, et al., Mesenchymal stem cell in growth and differentiation on coralline hydroxyapatite scaffolds, Biomaterials, 28, 1036 (2007).
H Hosseinkhani, M Hosseinkhani, F Tian, et al., Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in self-assembled peptide-amphiphile nano-fibers, Biomaterials, 27, 4079 (2006).
H Shin, JS Temenoff, GC Bowden, et al., Osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells cultured on arggly- asp modified hydrogels without dexamethasone and betaglycerol phosphate, Biomaterials, 26, 3645 (2005).
SH Lim, XY Liu, H Song, et al., The effect of nanofiber-guided cell alignment on the preferential differentiation of neural stem cells, Biomaterials, 31, 9031 (2010).
GT Christopherson, H Song, HQ Mao, The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation, Biomaterials, 30, 556 (2009).
MG Chang, L Tung, RB Sekar, et al., Proarrhythmic potential of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation revealed in an in vitro coculture model, Circulation, 113, 1832 (2006).
S Fernandes, HW Van Rijen, V Forest, et al., Cardiac cell therapy: overexpression of connexin 43 in skeletal myoblasts and prevention of ventricular arrhythmias, J Cell Mol Med, 12, 3703 (2009).
M Radisic, H Park, H Shing, et al., Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 18129 (2004).
JO You, M Rafat, GJ Ye, et al., Nanoengineering the heart: conductive scaffolds enhance connexin 43 expression, Nano Lett, 11, 3643 (2011).
M Shevach, BM Maoz, R Feiner, et al., gold particle composite fibers for cardiac tissue engineering, J Materials Chemistry B, 1, 5210 (2013).
S Bae, H Kim, Y Lee, et al., Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes, Nat Nanotechnol, 5, 574 (2010).
M Kalbacova, A Broz, J Kong, et al., Graphene substrates promote adherence of human osteoblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells, Carbon, 48, 4232 (2010).
WC Lee, CH Lim, H Shi, et al., Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide, ACS Nano, 5, 7334 (2011).
N Jaiswal, SE Haynesworth, AI Caplan, et al., Osteogenic differentiation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro, J Cell Biochem, 64, 295 (1997).
H Hauner, P Schimid, EF Pfeiffer, Glucocorticoids and insulin promotes the differentiation of human adipocyte precursor cells into fat cells, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 64, 832 (1987).
R Baktur, SH Yoon, S Kwon, Effects of multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced collagen scaffold on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, J Nano Mat, DOI: 10.1155/2013/904083 (2014).
JL Allen, EC Margaret, T Alliston, ECM stiffness primes the TGFâ pathway to prmote chondrocyte differentiation, Mol Biol Cell, 23, 3731 (2012).
AJ Engler, S Sen, HL Sweeney, et al., Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification, Cell, 126, 677 (2006).
LA Flanagan, YE Ju, B Marg, et al., Neurite branching on deformable substrates, Neuroreport, 12, 2411 (2002).
AJ Engler, MA Griffin, S Sen, et al., Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments, J Cell Biol, 166, 877 (2004).
AJ Garcia, CD Reyes, Bio-adhesive surfaces to promote osteoblast differentiation and bone formation, J Dent Res, 84, 407 (2005).
HJ King, TR Polte, E Alsberg, et al., FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102, 4300 (2005).
JS Park, JS Chu, AD Tsou, et al., The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-β, Biomaterials, 32, 3921 (2011).
K Kurpinski, H Lam, J Chu, et al., Transforming growth factor- β and notch signaling mediate stem cell differentiation into smooth muscle cells, Stem Cells, 28, 734 (2010).
CG William, TK Kim, A Taboas, et al., In vitro condrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a phtopolymerizing hydrogel, Tissue Eng, 9, 679 (2003).
AM Kloxin, AM Kasko, CN Salinas, et al., Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties, Science, 324, 59 (2009).
R McBeath, DM Pirone, CM Nelson, et al., Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment, Developmental Cell, 6, 483 (2004).
R Peng, X Yao, B Cao, et al., The effect of culture conditions on the adipogenic and osteogenic inductions of mesenchymal stem cells on micropatterned surfaces, Biomaterials, 33, 6008 (2012).
R Peng, X Yao, J Ding, Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion, Biomaterials, 32, 8048 (2011).
MF Pittenger, AM Mackay, SC Beck, et al., Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells, Science, 284, 143 (1999).
AM Parfitt, Age-related structural change sin trabecular and cortical bone: cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences, Calcif Tissue Int, 36 (Suppl 1), S123 (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S., Kim, BS. Control of adult stem cell behavior with biomaterials. Tissue Eng Regen Med 11, 423–430 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-014-0068-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-014-0068-x