Abstract
Homegarden, a type of agroforestry system, is one of the earliest thriving traditional food systems reported. Studying the contribution of homegardens in the context of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is crucial when the COVID-19 pandemic has hindered the achievement of many of the crucial SDGs. In this review, we focused on 94 peer-reviewed papers on homegardens from 2010 to 2021 to interrelate them with the corresponding targets and indicators of each SDG. The SDGs were classified into five categories, each focusing on a specific aspect: Category 1 (SDGs 1–5, poverty dimension), Category 2 (SDGs 6–9, development infrastructures), Category 3 (SDGs 10–12, sustainable production and consumption), Category 4 (SDGs 13–15, green infrastructures), and Category 5 (SDGs 16–17, green institutions). The distribution of the 94 papers analyzed was 92%, 23%, 33%, 51%, and 50% in each of the SDG categories, respectively. Category 1 and SDG 2 were found to be most realized in the homegarden literature. Important observations were found that highlight homegardens’ probable use in providing food security, nutritional needs, health and wellness, preservation of agrobiodiversity, and enduring sustainability. Homegardens appear to be an important strategy for attaining the SDGs and can be accomplished with proper planning, in addition to taking into consideration how the traditional societies have sustained it for long.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Contents
-
1. Introduction
-
2. Methodology
-
3. Results
-
3.1 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Multiple Poverty Dimensions (Category 1)
-
3.2 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Development Infrastructure (Category 2)
-
3.3 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Sustainable Production and Consumption (Category 3)
-
3.4 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Ecological Infrastructure (Category 4)
-
3.5 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Institutions (Category 5)
-
-
4. Discussion
-
5. Use of HG in COVID-19 times and future implications on achievement of SDGs
-
7. Conclusion
1 Introduction
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a set of 17 actionable areas and 169 targets adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 2015, aspiring to be fulfilled by the year 2030. It complements the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to achieve sustainability in social, environmental, and economic growth (Sachs 2015; Salvia et al. 2019). Land-use, particularly food systems, has been mentioned as a single point of convergence for these goals (Agroforestry Network 2018; van Noordwijk et al. 2018). All the participating nations have reported annual progress on these goals (Allen et al. 2020). However, the COVID-19 pandemic has hampered progress on several fronts to achieve some of these goals (in particular, SDGs 2 and 3) (Shupler et al. 2021), which is evident from the rising levels of malnourishment and hunger around the world. As per the latest UN report on food security and nutrition (FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, 2020), 720 to 811 million people are undernourished globally. Both developed and develo** countries are being affected, although South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and the Pacific area will be the hotspots of food insecurity (Lal 2020). COVID-19 has exacerbated the already chronic problems of hunger and hidden hunger in Asia and Africa, the two continents with the highest rates of under-nourishment and malnutrition. Therefore, strengthening local food production at the family and community levels is critical. Clearly, more robust food production techniques must be adopted to reduce food waste along the supply chain. There is also a need to strengthen local agricultural capacities (Lal 2020; Mina and Kumar 2021). Modern agricultural systems focusing on monoculture have consequences such as erosion of farmland biodiversity (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005; IPBES 2019) and an increase in the incidence of many zoonotic diseases (IPBES 2019). Given the global realization of the unsustainability of modern agricultural practices and the threat of climate change, there is a need to explore sustainable agricultural practices to ensure food security. The recent Global Food Policy Report has highlighted the overriding need for food system transition to regain the lost ground for achieving the SDGs by 2030 (IFPRI 2021).
Agroforestry, an integrated land management system of growing food crops, trees, and/or animals together for multiple benefits from the same land parcel, is a diversified land-use system reported to be practiced by farmers throughout the world for a long time (Nair et al. 2021b). Agroforestry systems can be classified into agrisilviculture (crops including shrubs/vines and trees), silvopastoral (pasture/animals and trees), and agrosilvopastoral (crops, pasture/animals, and trees) systems (FAO 2015). Homegardens (HG) represent a type of agroforestry (agrosilvopastoral) involving “multispecies combinations of a variety of economically useful plants including trees, shrubs, vines, and herbaceous species, often in association with livestock, in small landholdings around or adjacent to the home” (Figs. 1 and 2) (Nair et al. 2021a). It is regarded as a “time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry” (Kumar and Nair 2006). It is practiced extensively in tropical and temperate regions (Nair et al. 2021b). The homegardens, thus, represent a farming system, which blends diverse production functions, enhances food supply, and increases food diversity. Homegardens provide easy access to fresh vegetables and fruits daily, leading to enriched and balanced diets with protein, vitamin, and mineral supplements (Galhena et al. 2013).
A few examples of homegardens in India: a Crops like cassava (Manihot esculenta), and several tree species including jackfruit tree (Artocarpus heterophyllus) and kumkum tree (Mallotus philippensis) from Idukki district, Kerala (Photo: BM Kumar). b A multi-species homegarden in Thrissur, Kerala: coconut palm (Cocos nucifera), areca palm (Areca catechu), and other miscellaneous species (Photo: BM Kumar). c A women-owned homegarden in Sonitpur district, Assam: areca palm (Areca catechu), black pepper (Piper nigrum), and other miscellaneous species (Photo: R Sharma). d Animals as important component of HG in Sonitpur district, Assam (Photo: R Sharma).
An attempt to link the agroforestry systems to the potential achievement of global goals is not new. Previously, agroforestry systems’ contributions to achieving the MDGs, namely eradicating hunger, uplifting the rural poor from poverty, conserving biodiversity, protecting watershed, and building human and institutional capacity to adapt to climate change, have been reported (Garrity 2004; Mbow et al. 2014). Table 1 shows the historical distribution of publications in this respect.
Homegardens, especially their tropical form, are second only to shifting cultivation among the earliest food production methods (Kumar and Nair 2004). Fernandes et al. (1984) described homegardens as a land-use system that involves a range of practices from vegetable planting to complex multi-storeyed systems around the house. FAO defined HG as a “small-scale, supplementary food production system by and for household members that mimic the natural, multi-layered ecosystem” (Hoogerbrugge and Fresco 1993). One of the most widely used definitions of HG, however, is as the “intimate, multi-story combinations of various trees and crops, sometimes in association with domestic animals, around homesteads” (Kumar and Nair 2006) (Fig. 3). Table 2 lists the characteristics of HG, and the salient ones include the following: (1) located near the residence of the gardener (Mitchell and Hanstad 2004); (2) accommodate high plant diversity (Galluzzi et al. 2010; Mitchell and Hanstad 2004); (3) the production of complementary food rather than being the main source of income and consumption (Nair 1985); (4) involves a small area (Brownrigg 1985); and (5) being a system that requires minimal financial investment for initiation; HG are the system of production that the poor can easily enter at some level (Marsh 1998).
HG have been documented worldwide, mainly in the tropical regions where profound variability in size, frequency, and function of HG has been noted (Kumar and Nair 2004). According to published data, the Indonesian homegardens, or pekarangan, cover around 5.13 million ha of land, with about 1.74 million ha in Java alone (BPS 2000). In Bangladesh, homegardens occupy around 0.88 million ha, with 0.81 million ha in rural areas (BBS 2020). In Sri Lanka, the extent of homegardening is approximately 1.05 million ha (LUPPD 2020), about 60% of the landholdings of size <8 ha. Similarly, in the Philippines, HG are maintained by nearly 70% of households (Landauer and Brazil, 1990). A rough estimate suggests that HG forms the 15–36% residential area in countries like China, the UK, Africa, and India (Clarke et al. 2014). Differences in soil, topography, and species diversity determine the choice of crops and other species in HG. While HG are sometimes referred to as the epitome of sustainability (Torquebiau 1992), it is sometimes considered an enigma (Kumar and Nair 2004). In any case, they are a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. The HG structure is also reportedly variable among different traditional societies (Altieri et al. 2015).
As per the recent reports by the Agroforestry Network, land management systems such as agroforestry have the potential to achieve nine out of the 17 SDGs. With a relatively higher focus on goals such as 1 (No Poverty), 2 (Zero Hunger), 13 (Climate Action), and 15 (Life on Land) than others (Agroforestry Network 2018). With this background, a review aiming at analyzing the role of HG in the achievement of 17 SDGs was attempted (based on knowledge generated on them in the last 11 years, i.e., 5 years before and 6 years after formulating the SDGs). As proposed by van Noordwijk et al. (2018), the SDGs were organized into five categories—Poverty Dimensions, Development Infrastructure, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Ecological Infrastructure, and Institutions. We provide a descriptive overview of the challenges involved in the particular category of SDGs, and then analyze the literature on HG published over the previous 11 years to explore how HG are linked to these challenges, including food insecurity, malnutrition, agrobiodiversity loss, unsustainable agricultural practices, biodiversity loss, and loss of food sovereignty. This review has three contributions: first, it provides policymakers with a knowledge base for considering HG as a policy option for achieving the SDGs; second, it identifies the gaps in scholarly evidence needed to situate HG in the achievement of SDGs; and third, it attempts to address the synergies between diverse SDGs in the design of sustainable food systems.
2 Methodology
The 17 SDGs are interconnected either in the form of synergy, i.e., achievement of one goal helps in the achievement of another, or in the form of trade-offs, i.e., potential achievement of one may disrupt the achievement of another (Dolley et al. 2020). In the present review, for analyzing the potential of HG for achieving the SDGs,17 SDGs are grouped into five categories following the classification scheme proposed by van Noordwijk et al. (2018) and Cumming et al. (2017) (Fig. 4).
Category 1 focusing on multiple poverty dimensions includes SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 3 (Human Well-being), SDG 4 (Quality Education), and SDG 5 (Gender Equality). We analyzed the challenges of Category 1 and how HG addressed them through the literature on income improvement (1.2), food security (2.1), nutritional security (2.2), farm income (2.3), sustainable agricultural practices (2.4), agrobiodiversity (2.5), preventing non-communicable disease (3.4), contribution to education initiatives (4.7), and women role in HG (5.4). Category 1 involving SDGs 1 to 5 is among the most crucial goals essential for the very sustenance of human life across the globe. At times, when poverty (SDG 1) and food security (SDG 2) are emerging as the major challenge across the globe, concerted global efforts are necessary to achieve these goals (Blesh et al. 2019; World Bank 2020). Previously, eradication of hunger mostly involved counting the intake of calories; however, only calorie intake would not suffice for this purpose. Nutritional needs, if not satisfied, can lead to severe stunting, wasting, and improper brain development, affecting the overall health (SDG 3) of individuals as well as the educational outcomes (SDG 4) of children (Darteh et al. 2014). Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations can drastically reduce the iron, zinc, and protein contents of crops, which in turn can again push 175 million people to the risk of mineral and protein deficiencies, especially in the poorer countries (Smith and Myers 2018). The importance of designing a system that women and marginalized people can easily practice (SDG 5) is also essential since 70% of the world’s poor people are women and are vulnerable to climate change and environmental and economic shocks (IPBES 2020).
Category 2 focusing on development infrastructure includes SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure). We analyzed the challenges of Category 2 and how HG addressed them through the literature on water conservation (6.4), availability of renewable energy (7.4), decent livelihood (8.5), and opportunities of non-farm livelihood (9.1) aspect of HG. In the wake of the reports of dwindling groundwater resources worldwide (Turner et al. 2019), there is a need for farming systems with efficient groundwater use (SDG 6). Similarly, finding more environmentally friendly ways to gather fuelwood (SDG 7) remains a significant challenge, with about 2.4 billion poor people around using this form of energy (Rahman et al. 2021). Also, exploring small-scale systems that can provide better employment opportunities at the local level is essential (SDG 8). The Mitchell and Hanstad (2004) training sheet mentions HG as the systems that can provide the products for the agro-processing industry at the local levels (SDG 8 and SDG 9).
Category 3 focusing on sustainable production and consumption includes SDG 10 (Reduced Inequality), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). We analyzed the challenges of Category 3 and how HG addressed them through HG literature on the improvement of income of marginalized groups (10.1), the contribution of HG in urban green space and agriculture (11.7), and productivity aspects of HG (12.3). To improve the income opportunities of the bottom 40% of people, target 10.1 of SDG 10 seems relevant for HG. It is a system that the poor and marginalized can easily practice (Mitchell and Hanstad 2004). Also, with the poor concentrating in the cities, designing production systems in which the poor can easily participate is urgently needed (World Bank 2020). In develo** countries, urban agriculture is associated with better income and nutritional needs. In contrast, in the developed countries, they are more of the symbolism of ecotechnological approaches and getting reconnected to nature (Amos et al. 2018). Generally, food comes from long distances in the cities, often covering 800 to 1500 km, substantially increasing the carbon and water footprints. However, the current thrust is on food production systems that are more sustainable, emphasizing local production (Lal 2020; Nicholls et al. 2020).
Category 4 focusing on ecological infrastructure includes SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 14 (Life Below Water), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). We analyzed the challenges of Category 4 and how HG could be beneficial through the literature published on carbon sequestration potential (13.2), nutrient flow to water bodies (14.7), and biodiversity conservation (15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5). The modern agricultural sector is the emitter of three major greenhouse gases, i.e., carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, contributing to a total of one-third of the greenhouse gas emissions (Vermeulen et al. 2012; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity 2020). Therefore, farming practices need to be reoriented, as we desperately need to move to a low emission world. Water bodies worldwide suffer from nitrogen- and phosphorus-based eutrophication, and acidification of soils, worsening water quality with nitrates and nitrites entering the water supply caused due to excessive agricultural wastes (Kanter et al. 2020). Biodiversity loss is another major factor affecting the agroecosystems worldwide, threatening primary ecosystem functions and services (Skogen et al. 2018). In particular, pollinator populations of honey bees and others vital for sustaining productivity of fruits and other types of flowering plants are declining in many parts of the world (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity 2020; IPBES 2016).
Category 5 (Institutions) comprises SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). We analyzed the challenges of Category 5 and how HG addresses them through the literature published on the role of community in the maintenance of HG and the concepts of food sovereignty (16.7), and the probable value addition of HG products for export (17.1). The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) conceptual framework suggests that institutions and governance systems significantly affect the ability of nature’s contribution to people to provide good quality of life and human well-being (Díaz et al. 2015). Out of the many benefits that nature can produce, humans have extensively used the provisioning benefits, grievously neglecting the regulating ones (IPBES 2020). A focus on this, although required for finding the systems which balance human interactions, is lacking.
We then systematically searched the Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for articles on HG using the keywords “homegardens,” “home gardens,” and “homegarden agroforestry” for the 2010–2021 (February) period. We searched these keywords in the title of the articles and obtained a total of 732 articles. For reviewing, we considered original and peer-reviewed research articles only. After these filtrations and duplicate removal, 224 articles were then studied by abstract to judge the relevance to targets of SDGs by whether they mention any of the keywords as mentioned in Table 3. From it, we found 117 articles to be relevant to the study. We then studied the full text of these articles for the empirical data, and 90 peer-reviewed publications were shortlisted. We also checked the literature citation sections of the selected papers for any additional references. At last, a total of 94 articles were found suitable for this review. The articles were further sorted into five categories as per their relevant keywords of SDGs, as mentioned in Table 3. The relative distribution of the publications obtained from different countries and the frequency of publications in each category is as shown in Fig. 5. Most studies were reported from India (14%), followed by Mexico (12%). The papers often reflected more than one category of SDGs, especially for Categories 2, 4, and 5.
a Countrywise distribution of homegardens publications (2010–2021). b HG studies addressing Category 1 (Multiple Poverty Dimensions); Category 2 (Development of Infrastructure); Category 3 (Sustainable Production and Consumption); Category 4 (Ecological Infrastructure); and Category 5 (Institutions). c HG studies addressing different SDGs.
3 Results
3.1 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Multiple Poverty Dimensions (Category 1)
We found 86 (92%) papers referring to Category 1 of SDGs. Most of the publications (89%) referred to one or the other aspects of SDG 2 (Zero Hunger). Regarding SDG 1, 20% of the total publications referred to considered indicator 1.2 of improvement of income (Whitney et al. 2017; Abdoellah et al. 2020; Whitney et al. 2018b; Wiehle et al. 2014; da Cunha Salim et al. 2018). The publications interrelated with targets 2.1 (food security) and 2.2 (nutritional security) of Goal 2 were 38% and 15%, respectively. The production of food rich in vitamins and micronutrients, especially vitamin A, was reported to be substantially high in the HG compared to other agriculture systems (Whitney et al. 2017; Castañeda-Navarrete 2021; Pinela et al. 2012). The importance of HG in providing food and nutritional security has already been reported from Thailand, Uganda, Mexico, Ethiopia, India, and Bangladesh (Cruz-Garcia and Struik 2015; Whitney et al. 2018a; Wolka et al. 2021; George and Christopher 2020; Panyadee et al. 2018; Schreinemachers et al. 2015; Ferdous et al. 2016). Also, there were papers relating that agrobiodiversity in HG positively affects dietary diversity. Such studies relating agrobiodiversity in HG have used indicators of household dietary diversity score, child dietary diversity score, toddler dietary diversity score, and the minimum dietary diversity for women (Whitney et al. 2018b). The 24-h recall method used in the study highlighted that the majority of the food recalled was harvested and ingested the same day, highlighting a steady supply from HG (Whitney et al. 2018b). Ethiopian HG contributes 25–85% food demand of the house, more than that of croplands (Wolka et al. 2021). Also, in India, edible plants form 39% of the total plant species in HG (George and Christopher 2020). Complementing a similar study in the Yucatán region of Mexico highlighted a positive relationship between plant diversity and animal diversity in HG to better dietary intake (Castañeda-Navarrete 2021).
Domestication of the diverse landraces and species which are not otherwise easily cultivated is the feature of homegardeners (Wiehle et al., 2014). Corresponding to this, target 2.5 (Agrobiodiversity Conservation) was the next frequently mentioned criteria in HG, with 48% of studies referring to it. One of the reasons for getting more diverse landraces in HG is the cross-breeding between wild and domesticated varieties. Many relic crops that are not common in the commercial farms prosper in HG, making them important in situ conservation sites for landraces. As many as 39 landraces of 31 species are reported from the HG of the Iberian Peninsula and 269 species in 70 HG of Central Amazon (Calvet-Mir et al. 2011; Junqueira et al. 2016). In Hungary, the HG of Csinod contained most planted species grown from their seeds and those available from the adjacent mountains (Papp et al. 2013). Fennoscandian HG had the indigenous variety of shallot, also called potato onion (Allium cepa ) (Leino et al. 2018). In Sweden, the HG have local cultivars of Pisum sativum (Solberg et al. 2015). HG of Mesoamerica conserved the germplasms of wild species of Brosimum alicastrum (Breadnut), Cordia dodecandra (Ziricote), and Spondias purpurea (Jocote) (Ferrer et al., 2020). However, almost 70% of the plant varieties in HG were of the multi-use category (Vlkova et al. 2011), making them an important example of conservation models by use.
Target 3.4 (Better Health) under Goal 3 has been mentioned in 31 (33%) publications, with the publications related to prevention of non-communicable disease (indicator 3.4.1) and improvement of mental health (indicator 3.4.2). In Ecuadorian HG, the medicinal plants are used for primary healthcare by 91% of gardeners (Caballero-Serrano et al. 2016). Infections, infestations, nutritional diseases, and digestive disorders were the most reported ailments for which the medicinal plants in the HG of four ethnic tribes in Thailand were used (Panyadee et al. 2019). The Naxi healers from the Sino-Himalayan region cultivate key medicinal plants, which play a crucial role in community well-being (Yang et al. 2014). HG formed an essential part of the folk therapeutic system of Transylvania, a fast depleting bio-resource that needs to be conserved (Papp et al. 2013). Paraguayan migrants living in Argentina conserve medicinal plants (Kujawska et al. 2018).
Regarding indicator 3.4.2, which relates to improving mental health, there are 4 (4%) publications. A study from Scotland mentions that HG are the great contributor to managing older adults’ physical, mental, and emotional health at COVID-19 times (Corley et al. 2021). Another study from Spain mentions the crucial role of HG in suicidal tendency prevention (Calvet-Mir et al. 2012). Also, immigrant HG are the vital component of better mental health in Southern California (Mazumdar and Mazumdar 2012).
Regarding Goal 5, the gendered effect of the HG corresponding to target 5.4 was reported from many traditional societies around the world. Ten (11%) publications have mentioned this target of Goal 5. In rural Bangladesh and the Yucatan region of Mexico, HG are generating employment for rural women (Kabir et al. 2016; Castañeda-Navarrete 2021). Studies from the Iberian Peninsula and Mexico reported that HG managed by women was more species-rich on a unit area basis than gardens managed by men. Moreover, women favored household consumption compared to sale or gifting (Reyes-García et al. 2010; Buechler 2016). However, women often do not have land ownership, which affects the women-managed HG structure, composition, and functions. For example, in rural Ethiopian HG, women had a significant role in the overall production and processing of HG. However, with the advent of more commercialized HG involving monoculture khat (Catha edulis) production, the women’s role was substantially diminished (Gebrehiwot et al. 2018).
3.2 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Development Infrastructure (Category 2)
We found 21 (23%) publications related to this category of goals. Though intuitively, HG are the systems that require less water due to lower evapotranspiration and lower soil moisture losses (Kumar and Nair 2004; Fernandes and Nair 1986). Studies directly linking HG to water conservation corresponding to target 6.4 of Goal 6 are scanty. Only three studies, one from Oman, another from the Kerala state of India, and a third from northeastern Thailand, have reported the role of HG in sustainable water management. In the study from Oman, the designing of better irrigation techniques uses the capillary barrier wick irrigation system in the HG (Al-Mayahi et al. 2020). The second study from Kerala reported that diverse cultivated plant species in the HG support the quick recovery of crucial soil microarthropods, making HG a resilient agroecosystem in extreme meteorological events of drought and flood (Lakshmi et al. 2021). In northeastern Thailand, the rain-fed HG systems required very little groundwater for irrigation (Cruz-Garcia and Struik 2015; Goenster et al. 2014).
HG are often an important source of fuelwood corresponding to target 7.2 of SDG 7 (Agroforestry Network 2018). This target is critical when approximately 2.4 billion poor people worldwide use fuelwood as the main form of energy (Rahman et al. 2021). There were 7 (8%) publications focusing on this target. Fuelwood harvested from the HG of Bangladesh provides USD 71.9 per homegarden per year, and fuelwood was the only commodity gathered around the year (Alam 2012). In rural Vietnam, the fuelwood collected from HG constituted 32% of the total material collected (Vlkova et al. 2011). Also, HG in Thailand and India provides primary fuelwood sources (Panyadee et al. 2018; Das and Das 2015).
Nineteen (20%) publications mentioned HG as the source of livelihood corresponding to target 8.5 of SDG 8. Worldwide, the HG can improve the farm incomes of marginalized groups and women (Kabir et al. 2016). In rural Uganda, the high crop diversity positively impacted rural livelihoods (Whitney et al. 2018b). Commercialization (i.e., the introduction of high fetching cash crops) may further increase the cash income of the gardeners (Mellisse et al. 2018; Wiehle et al. 2014). Also, HG can improve the income by being the sites of eco- and ethnotourism where the traditional lifestyles, local customs, and biocultural heritage of the homegardeners would be presented (Vlkova et al. 2011).
3.3 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Sustainable Production and Consumption (Category 3)
We found a total of 31 (33%) publications relating to this category of goals. Nineteen (20%) examples mention target 10.1 (improvement of income of marginalized groups) of SDG 10 (Reduced Inequality). For instance, the marginalized people of Barak Valley in the Indian state of Assam use HG products as an instant source of cash during emergencies (Das and Das 2015). In Java, Indonesia, the marginalized groups are commercializing the HG for better income opportunities (Abdoellah et al. 2020). In HG of Ethiopia, commercialization positively affected income (Mellisse et al. 2018). Also, the HG are known to preserve high levels of agrobiodiversity. A future research initiative on payments for agrobiodiversity conservation and conducting fairs for highlighting traditional food items to improve the income of the marginalized can be thought of (Vlkova et al. 2011).
Eleven (12%) of the publications mention target 11.7 (urban green space and agriculture) of SDG 11(Sustainable Cities and Communities). In the urban areas, HG are the dominant land-use type, hel** preserve the native biodiversity and providing opportunities for the people to connect with nature (Freeman et al. 2012; Jaganmohan et al. 2012). HG in Spain and China provide cultural ecosystem services (Clarke et al. 2014; Calvet-Mir et al. 2012). The themes related to HG role in urban green infrastructure focusing on biodiversity and human well-being are already well studied in Thailand (Panyadee et al. 2016). However, Balooni et al. (2014) reported that the homegardens are losing most of their species diversity due to rapid urbanization. Also, urban homegardens are at the risk of extinction from rising real estate dealings as observed in the urban HG of Costa Rica (González-Ball et al. 2017).
There is a potential for urban HG to satisfy indicators 11.6.1 (reduced municipal waste) and 11.6.2 (reducing particulate matter concentration) under target 11.6 (reduce environmental impacts in cities) of SDG 11. However, studies in these dimensions are scarce. As regards waste management, the use of livestock sludge and other domestic wastes as manure in the HG has been mentioned (Ichinose et al. 2020). However, only one paper used the word “waste” in the context of HG. Wolka et al. (2021), in a study on the rural HG of southwest Ethiopia, mentioned that enset (Ensete ventricosum)–based HG received most of the household wastes and manure.
Target 12.3 (productivity) of SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) accounted for 15 (16%) publications. The wholesomeness of the HG system involving less intensively tilled soil and non-complete harvest balances the evapotranspiration rates and soil moisture availability (Nair 1985). The croplands are plowed thrice annually; however, HG are never plowed in Uganda (Ichinose et al. 2020). The HG in the Indian state of Assam produced an annual litterfall of 6.27 Mg ha−1, and the nitrogen input to the soil through litterfall accounted for 48.17 kg ha−1 year−1, implying sustainability of the system (Das and Das 2010). Also, as reported from Central Amazonia, Brazil, the aluminum, organic carbon, calcium, magnesium, and potassium levels in soils reported from the HG were not significantly different from those of a primary or secondary forest (da Cunha Salim et al. 2018).
3.4 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Ecological Infrastructure (Category 4)
We found 48 (52%) publications in this category. Out of these, the carbon sequestration potential of HG related to target 13.2 of goal 13 (Climate Action) is highlighted by 15 (16%) publications. Due to the high diversity of the perennial trees and shrubs, which do not get harvested entirely, the HG have enhanced soil carbon storage (Islam et al. 2015; Barbhuiya et al. 2016). The tree component of the traditional HG is an important avenue for carbon sequestration both within the soil and vegetation. In Ethiopian HG, the soil carbon stocks were as high as 156.17 Mg ha−1 (Birhane et al. 2020). Due to increased carbon sequestration potential, HG can contribute to the REDD+ initiatives and clean development mechanisms (Kumar 2011). Furthermore, a study on tree diversity in the HG of Mizoram state of India showed that the carbon sequestering potential of older HG systems was comparatively very high compared to the new HG (Singh and Sahoo 2021), implying the need for conserving the species-diverse older HG.
Targets 15.2 (sustainable management forests), 15.3 (restore degraded lands), 15.4 (conservation of mountain biodiversity), and 15.5 (halt loss of biodiversity) of SDG 15 (Life on Land), referring to the conservation of biodiversity on land, are reported by 43 (46%) publications in this analysis. HG composes an essential locus for trees outside the forest (Cruz-Garcia and Struik 2015) and could help achieve target 15.2 under SDG 15 of sustainable forest management. Regarding target 15.3, the HG are the crucial component for eco-restoration of degraded lands as reported from Spain, Sri Lanka, and Mexico, respectively (Calvet-Mir et al. 2012; Mattsson et al. 2013; Rooduijn et al. 2018). HG are also forming critical green areas in the mountains (Wiehle et al. 2014; Calvet-Mir et al. 2012; Barbhuiya et al. 2016), corresponding to target 15.4.
Aquilaria malaccensis, a critically endangered tree species, is widely cultivated in the HG of Assam, India (Das and Das 2015; Barbhuiya et al. 2016). Furthermore, Calaverita, an endangered orchid of Mexico, was cultivated in the Mexican HG (Salazar-Rojas et al. 2010). Plant varieties and the HG in the Philippines have more bees than the nearby rice fields (Schrader et al. 2018). Also, high pollinators’ diversity was observed in the HG near the forests in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia (Motzke et al. 2016). HG were also found to contain diverse arthropod communities in Indonesia, India, and Mexico (Toledo-Hernández et al. 2016; Lakshmi and Joseph 2017; Huerta and van der Wal 2012). Besides these services, HG provides a habitat for wild animals and birds. For example, in the Eastern Himalayan regions of India, HG were found to act as refuges for great hornbill (Buceros bicornis), red-breasted parakeet (Psittacula alexandri), capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus), and lesser adjutant (Leptoptilos javanicus), and to contain as many as 140 species of butterflies (Singh et al. 2021). Also, in Brazil, the HG are the dominant habitat for five species of large frugivorous birds (Goulart et al. 2011). All these correspond to target 15.5 of protection of endangered plants and animals in HG (Gbedomon et al. 2016).
3.5 How HG literature has addressed challenges in Institutions (Category 5)
We found 47 (51%) publications in this category. Target 16.7 (food sovereignty) related to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) is in 47 publications. The agrobiodiversity distribution in the HG varies with the cultural practices of the region, as reported from Mexico and Uganda (Alcudia-Aguilar et al. 2018; Whitney et al. 2018b). In the Amazonian HG of Bolivia, the Tsimane social organization influenced the patterns of exchange of medicinal plants in the HG. People at the center of the community chain maintained a greater richness of medicinal plants in their HG than informants in the more isolated villages (Díaz-Reviriego et al. 2016). In rural Indonesia, the commercialization of the HG indeed improved the farmers’ livelihood; however, it negatively influenced food security and food sovereignty and weakened the traditional institutional setup of Gapoktan (a form of traditional farmer cooperative) in the area (Abdoellah et al. 2020). In the Iberian Peninsula, HG systems incorporate both traditional and modern agriculture knowledge, showing that they are resilient systems that can adapt even if knowledge systems and management practices change (Reyes-García et al. 2014). In the Mizoram state of India, the ownership of HG is passed from one generation to another as permanent family gardens, without significant changes in the composition of plant varieties (Barbhuiya et al. 2016). Also, the non-market food provisioning services by HG and the Satoyama systems of Japan revealed that productions from the HG are shared within the community rather than being sold in the market, and human nutritional well-being and social relations were positively correlated in these systems (Kamiyama et al. 2016). Specific local knowledge about the cultivated plants in the HG varies in different regions; for example, the seeds of Phaseolus lunatus were used differently even in adjacent Indonesian villages (Sujarwo and Caneva 2015). HG are critical components for food sovereignty as reported from studies on the Paraguayan migrant rural HG in Argentina, the high mountain HG of Spain, Orang Asli HG of Malaysia, Segovias HG of Nicaragua, and the rural HG of Cyprus, Indonesia, and Mexico (Kujawska et al. 2018; Boone and Taylor 2016; Calvet-Mir et al. 2012; Milow et al. 2013; Ciftcioglu 2017; Abdoellah et al. 2020; Avilez-López et al. 2020)
4 Discussion
The highest number of research papers found in category 1 (91%), specifically SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) (88%), provides scope for the inclusion of HG in the holistic development of sustainable food systems. The finding that HG plays a crucial role in food and nutritional security aligns with the conclusions made in the review of Sri Lankan HG (Mattsson et al. 2018) that argues that HG are crucial for food security especially for the poor and vulnerable groups. Even though HG are an age-old practice in many regions of the tropics and the rest of the world (Kumar and Nair 2006), there is little or no information available on the quantity of food produced worldwide by HG, and how many families depend on it, and the actual extent of HG. Therefore, more focus should be on compiling the HG systems’ vital statistics at local, regional, national, and global levels (Nair 2001; Kumar and Nair 2004). Previously Torquebiau (1992) reported that homegarden dietary supplies contribute 3 to 44% of total calories and 4 to 32% of protein intake. Furthermore, homegardens are rarely known to be a system supplying the entire household’s basic staple-food requirements. Indeed, they are part of the overall farming system and coexist with other production methods involving staple food crops like rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), and cassava (Manihot esculenta). However, recently, Wolka et al. (2021) have mentioned that HG consists of 25–85% household food requirements in Ethiopia. The improved HG supplies annual vegetable requirements to households between 55 and 79 kg/head/year in Bangladesh (Ferdous et al. 2016). This is an important area of research that would be crucial for the future role of HG in the achievement of food and nutritional security corresponding to SDG 2.
Also, the high diversity of landraces of crop plants in the HG is consistent with the reviews on HG that describe them as loci for conserving the indigenous and rare germplasm (Galluzzi et al. 2010; Kumar and Nair 2004). Figure 6 shows how HG can be connected to SDG 2: the inner pentagon refers to the targets that HG can help achieve. The outer pentagon focuses on the tools and methodologies used for this purpose. Goal 4 is not directly addressed in HG literature; however, HG nutritional outcomes seem to significantly improve children’s educational outcomes (FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, 2020). Also, HG can be crucial in imparting knowledge related to sustainable living to children (target 4.7 of goal 4). HG are reported to be the storehouses of traditional knowledge in communities worldwide (Reyes-García et al. 2014; Calvet-Mir et al. 2012), and this knowledge is often embedded within sustainability principles. When looking at HG as loci for knowledge sharing, the most important feature would be HG as a site for agronomic and traditional innovations (Avilez-López et al. 2020; Panyadee et al. 2019).
The high proportion of publications in category 4 that detailed studies on the carbon sequestration potential of HG is consistent with the results from other agroforestry systems. In the Indian context, a 30% increase in the land area under agroforestry, as per the provisions of the National Agroforestry Policy of 2014, will have the potential to completely fulfill the target of Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) of the country for sequestering atmospheric CO2 (Nath et al. 2021). Similar conclusions were made for the Sri Lankan HG earlier (Mattsson et al. 2018). However, the age of the HG is a cardinal determinant of the carbon sequestration potential. Older HG have more significant carbon sequestration potential than younger gardens (Singh et al. 2021), implying the need to preserve the older HG with a diverse range of mature woody perennial species from annihilation (Kumar et al. 1994). Target 14.1 (reduce marine pollution due to nutrient flow) of SDG 14 (Life Below Water) is also interrelated with HG. The HG produce is never entirely harvested and produces minimum soil runoff. The HG generally employs few fertilizers (Islam et al. 2015), so nutrient loading of water bodies causing eutrophication due to agricultural non-point source pollution could be less than that of intensive agricultural production systems. However, there have been no studies on this dimension in the last decade.
Many publications on urban HG and productivity are available, signifying Category 3 goals. However, the prevailing dogma is that HG are the systems suitable for rural settings; but based on the results from this analysis, this vision will change drastically. Indeed, there are a large number of publications focusing on urban HG. This is perhaps consistent with the studies linking small-scale production systems in urban areas to SDG achievement (Nicholls et al. 2020; Lal 2020). Some papers also connect the urban HG to ecosystem services (Calvet-Mir et al. 2012; Caballero-Serrano et al. 2016; Clarke et al. 2014). Reports on the productivity of HG also abound and indicate that HG are the low input system, which favors nutrient sharing (among the components of the system) and nutrient conservation (Das and Das 2010).
Category 2 had fewer publications (22%), signifying those studies relating to HG and water conservation are scarce. This is, however, in contrast to the findings of a recent global review, which highlighted the role of small domestic gardens in rainwater harvesting and groundwater recharge (Amos et al. 2018). Fuelwood supply from the agroforestry systems is one of the major thematic areas in the report by the agroforestry network (Agroforestry Network 2018). Many previous authors too reported on the contribution of HG as a source of fuelwood supply (Das and Das 2005; Shanavas and Kumar 2003); yet, such studies are somewhat waning in recent times. Although HG are providing livelihood opportunities, aspect relating to target 9.3 (small scale factory) of Goal 9 is missing. However, there is a possibility of providing local livelihood by setting up small factories that can use HG products and convert them into more valuable ones (value addition through post-harvest processing). Homegardeners were reported to favor handicrafts such as basketry, which can be useful in setting up small industries (Vlkova et al. 2011; Avilez-López et al. 2020). An example of this is the cooperative societies (Ma and Abdulai 2017) which can be set up locally for value addition of HG produce hel** the homegardeners to increase their income.
Many publications on Category 5 are consistent with HG being personalized by individuals, traditional communities, and local institutions (Kumar and Nair 2004). In traditional societies, informal knowledge sharing in HG has been prominent (Kujawska et al. 2018). However, in modern times, many NGOs and government organizations promote and maintain HG (Ferdous et al. 2016; Schreinemachers et al. 2015). Although organizations at any level can play a role in the maintenance of the system, local communities are often the best managers of traditional systems (Ostrom et al. 1999). Similar conclusions were reported from the HG literature of this decade also (Barbhuiya et al. 2016). The bottom line is that such interventions should improve nutritional and livelihood outcomes (Ferdous et al. 2016; Schreinemachers et al. 2015). Farmers seek institutional support for procuring quality planting materials, credit, and other knowledge systems (Alam et al. 2010). Therefore, although HG are the private green space, they require unique policy instruments for governance; ideally, such policy interventions should aim to preserve these traditional systems (Balooni et al. 2014). Figure 4 shows how HG can potentially contribute to each of the SDG. Also, homegardens are an essential component in the Osusowake tradition of food sharing in Japan. On the island of Hachijo, the food sharing network of HG provides more than 20% of the consumption of daily fruits and vegetable (Tatebayashi et al. 2019). Target 17.1 (product for export) of SDG 17 (Partnership for Goals) is also interrelated with HG. The products obtained from HG can be marked with sustainability labels and exported outside.
An initiative for providing labels for sustainable production can probably enhance the marketability of the HG produce, thereby augmenting income generation for homegardeners (Flinzberger et al. 2020). However, at present, no such studies have been mentioned. HG could play a crucial role in a global attempt to design systems that enhance the potential synergistic pathways between different SDGs (Lima et al. 2017). The review of HG literature in this study shows many synergistic pathways for linking up SDGs. For example, SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 15 (Life on Land) are crucially interrelated, with 39% of publications covering both thematic areas. Furthermore, both are highly achievable by HG, as shown in Table 4. This is important when the search for food systems with a minimum negative impact on the environment is being promoted (IFPRI 2021). The HG could be one of the ideal systems in this context. Apart from analyzing the potential contribution of HG to SDGs, this study also underscores that they are flexible systems with the potential to incorporate both modern and traditional methods of cultivation (Reyes-García et al. 2014). Although traditional communities have been using these systems for a long time, there is a newfound acceptance in urban areas. As a result, HG are being promoted extensively in urban areas. This corroborates the point that HG are the time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry that is spatially replicable (Kumar and Nair 2004).
5 Use of HG in COVID-19 times and future implications on achievement of SDGs
Literature on calamities has shown that agroecosystems with high diversity are highly resilient to external shocks (Cabell and Oelofse 2012). This aspect is probably reiterated in a recent study from Nepal, which highlighted that traditional diversified farming systems such as HG became more important and significant during the COVID-19 pandemic and were able to absorb about a half-million youth who returned from cities owing to the “reverse trans-migration” after lockdown (Adhikari et al. 2021), corresponding to probable attainment of SDG 1, SDG 2, and SDG 8. Even in India, the local community–based food systems like HG were quite resilient at COVID-19 times (Mina and Kumar 2021). The importance of HG in providing urban food security in COVID-19 times is also well summarized in the review by Lal (2020), also providing a technical term, HGUA (homegardening and urban agriculture), for highlighting the high importance of HG in urban areas in pandemic times. Apart from providing alternate livelihood opportunities and improving food security, recent studies have indicated the role of HG in improving mental health in the COVID-19 times, corresponding to SDG 3 (Marques et al. 2021; Corley et al. 2021). New emerging trends of homegardening in COVID-19 times from the USA, Canada, and Russia indicate large number of people signing up for online courses on gardening, and almost a four times rise in demand for seeds of vegetables and fruits for homegardening purposes (Walljasper and Polansek 2020), implying a growing interest in homegardening during COVID-19 times.
In Sri Lanka, HG prominently features the government agenda of meeting REDD + targets (SDG 13 and SDG 15). In 2018, HG represented 15% of the land area and a recent report suggests they increased to 18% (Mattsson et al. 2018; LUPPD 2020). However, as the HG are booming worldwide, their structure, composition, and types are changing. For example, the structure and functioning of the Indonesian pekarangan HG have changed considerably due to commercialization (Abdoellah et al. 2006). Though commercialization has increased the farmers’ income, it has led to a decline in the aspects of food accessibility considerably (Abdoellah et al. 2020). Historically, Agelet et al. (2000) had mentioned that in Catalonia (Spain), migration of the labor force to urban areas, mechanization of agriculture, and the accompanying specialization of agricultural duties have resulted in the degradation of the traditional family garden system. However, a more recent study (Reyes-García et al. 2014) mentions that HG systems are still thriving in Spain through the amalgamation of traditional and modern knowledge. A substantial number of Kerala homegardens have also been transformed into small-scale coconut and rubber plantations (Hevea brasiliensis) or crop** systems with a limited range of crops (Kumar and Nair 2004; Balooni et al. 2014). These and several findings suggest that we need studies to understand the changes in traditional HG systems. One of the threats to the traditional homegarden is the large-scale influx (both intentional and unintentional) of invasive alien species (e.g., Australian and meso-American species such as Acacia spp., Eucalyptus spp., Mimosa invisa, and Mikania micrantha, especially into South Asia) that can potentially out-compete the native flora. It is in the interest of all to save traditional HG as they are harbingers of biodiversity (Table 4). Indeed, they represent the circa situm pathway for biodiversity conservation (Barbhuiya et al. 2016). These land-use regimes also serve as wildlife refuges (Ulman et al. 2021). As a result, homegardens may act as crucial linkages to other agricultural and natural landscapes, resulting in a variegated landscape mosaic.
Looking into the benefits of HG, it represents a “win-win” strategy, considering the overall ecological benefits of mixed-species communities and, above all, their possible economic gains and the possibility of achieving many crucial targets of SDGs. Future efforts should save traditional HG and design HG that mimics the traditional ones with opportunities to incorporate modern technologies. Land fragmentation is a significant issue concerning the HG; the schemes like payment of ecosystem services for people protecting traditional HG could be crucial in the achievement of many SDGs. Furthermore, intervention in the areas where people already have some land but do not have homegarderning expertise could also help. Similarly, HG role as sites harboring crucial medicinal plants and better mental health corresponds to a new dimension for HG research. Also, the species richness of HG has implications for resilience to climate disturbance (Lakshmi et al. 2021). HG being the breeding ground for many of the experiments on plant variety selection and propagation (Kumar and Nair 2004) could help solve many of the pressing environmental and developmental paradigms issues. The complex interactions between the various components of the HG (crops, trees, livestock, and farm household) require a systems approach to understand their full functional dynamics
6 Limitations of the study
As this study focuses on all SDGs, the detailed analysis for each of the targets and indicators of individual SDGs is beyond the scope of this study. Also, the study takes a more qualitative approach using the corresponding keywords of SDG indicators and connecting them with HG, and it suffers from the limitation of any qualitative analysis (Schanes et al. 2018). Also, this study intends to be a guide to highlight trends, rather than a universalized truth which can vary in detailed studies on each target of the individual SDGs.
7 Conclusion
The results of this study highlight that HG can potentially contribute to the achievement of SDGs. Specifically, the synergistic prospects concern food security, agrobiodiversity conservation, and designing sustainable food systems (SDG 2). However, improving the metrics of HG productivity such as nutrition per hectare and yield per hectare to evaluate aspects such as how much nourishment is, and or could be, provided by HG can contribute more in analyzing the role of this system in the realization of SDG 2 (Cassidy et al. 2013). Being a small-scale system, HG can also facilitate the participation of women (SDG 5) and other marginalized groups (SDG 1, SDG 8) in the production process. The potential of HG for improving livelihood security (SDG 2, SDG 8) constitutes another important aspect that needs urgent research attention. Yet, another theme that requires attention is the development of appropriate public policies (SDG 16) for conserving the traditional HG systems. Previously, although various ecosystem services flowing from the HG are already well studied, policy frameworks on the full-time integration of these smallholder production systems have been rare. The full-scale analysis of the economic, social, and ecological implications of the integration of HG in food systems is also important for proper appreciation of the merits of this time-tested traditional farming system. Consistent with the previous reviews, this review also found that HG are mainly distributed in tropical countries. However, it is gradually becoming popular in the temperate countries in North America and Europe. For example, the European Agroforestry Federation (EURAF 2021) has recognized HG as one of the five agroforestry practices (silvoarable or alley crop**, silvopasture, riparian buffer, and forest farming are the four other systems) that are somewhat similar to the North American practices.
Data availability
All data is made available in this article.
References
Abdoellah OS, Hadikusumah HY, Takeuchi K, Okubo S (2006) Commercialization of homegardens in an Indonesian village: vegetation composition and functional changes. In: Tropical homegardens. Springer, pp 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4948-4
Abdoellah OS, Schneider M, Nugraha LM, Suparman Y, Voletta CT, Withaningsih S, Heptiyanggit A, Hakim L (2020) Homegarden commercialization: extent, household characteristics, and effect on food security and food sovereignty in Rural Indonesia. Sustain Sci 15(3):797–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00788-9
Adhikari J, Timsina J, Khadka SR, Ghale Y, Ojha H (2021) COVID-19 impacts on agriculture and food systems in Nepal: implications for SDGs. Agric Syst 186:102990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102990
Agelet A, Bonet MÀ, Vallés J (2000) Homegardens and their role as a main source of medicinal plants in mountain regions of Catalonia (Iberian Peninsula). Econ Bot 54(3):295–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02864783
Agroforestry Network (2018) Achieving the global goals through agroforestry. Agroforestry Network and Vi-Skogen, Stockholm
Alam M (2012) Valuation of tangible benefits of a homestead agoforestry system: a case study from Bangladesh. Hum Ecol 40(4):639–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9512-5
Alam M, Furukawa Y, Mika M (2010) Perceptions, preferences, and attitude of Bangladesh farmers towards homegarden farming systems. Small-scale For 9(2):213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-010-9111-5
Alcudia-Aguilar A, van der Wal H, Suárez-Sánchez J, Martínez-Zurimendi P, Castillo-Uzcanga MM (2018) Home garden agrobiodiversity in cultural landscapes in the tropical lowlands of Tabasco, México. Agrofor Syst 92(5):1329–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0078-5
Allen C, Reid M, Thwaites J, Glover R, Kestin T (2020) Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): experience from Australia. Sustain Sci 15(2):521–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00711-x
Al-Mayahi A, Al-Ismaily S, Al-Maktoumi A, Al-Busaidi H, Kacimov A, Janke R, Bouma J, Šimůnek J (2020) A smart capillary barrier-wick irrigation system for home gardens in arid zones. Irrig Sci 38:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-020-00666-3
Altieri MA, Nicholls CI, Henao A, Lana MA (2015) Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agron Sustain Dev 35(3):869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2
Amos CC, Rahman A, Karim F, Gathenya JM (2018) A sco** review of roof harvested rainwater usage in urban agriculture: Australia and Kenya in focus. J Clean Prod 202:174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.108
Avilez-López T, van der Wal H, Aldasoro-Maya EM, Rodríguez-Robles U (2020) Home gardens’ agrobiodiversity and owners’ knowledge of their ecological, economic and socio-cultural multifunctionality: a case study in the lowlands of Tabasco, México. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 16(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00392-2
Balooni K, Gangopadhyay K, Kumar BM (2014) Governance for private green spaces in a growing Indian city. Landscape Urban Plann 123:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.004
Barbhuiya AR, Sahoo UK, Upadhyaya K (2016) Plant diversity in the indigenous home gardens in the Eastern Himalayan Region of Mizoram, Northeast India. Econ Bot 70(2):115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-016-9349-8
BBS (2020) Statistical Yearbooks of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Dhaka
Birhane E, Ahmed S, Hailemariam M, Negash M, Rannestad MM, Norgrove L (2020) Carbon stock and woody species diversity in homegarden agroforestry along an elevation gradient in southern Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst 94(3):1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00475-4
Blesh J, Hoey L, Jones AD, Friedmann H, Perfecto I (2019) Development pathways toward “zero hunger”. World Devel 118:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.004
Boone K, Taylor PL (2016) Deconstructing homegardens: food security and sovereignty in northern Nicaragua. Agr Human Values 33(2):239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9604-0
BPS (2000) Badan pusat statistik. BPS-Statistics Indonesia
Brownrigg L (1985) Home gardening in international development: what the literature shows. The League for International Food Education, Washington, DC
Buechler S (2016) Gendered vulnerabilities and grassroots adaptation initiatives in home gardens and small orchards in Northwest Mexico. Ambio 45(3):322–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0832-3
Caballero-Serrano V, Onaindia M, Alday JG, Caballero D, Carrasco JC, McLaren B, Amigo J (2016) Plant diversity and ecosystem services in Amazonian homegardens of Ecuador. Agric Ecosyst Environ 225:116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.04.005
Cabell JF, Oelofse M (2012) An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecol Soc 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118
Calvet-Mir L, Calvet-Mir M, Vaqué-Nuñez L, Reyes-García V (2011) Landraces in situ conservation: a case study in high-mountain home gardens in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Iberian Peninsula 1. Econ Bot 65(2):146–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-011-9156-1
Calvet-Mir L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V (2012) Beyond food production: ecosystem services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecol Econ 74:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.011
Cassidy ES, West PC, Gerber JS, Foley JA (2013) Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare. Environ Res Lett 8(3):034015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034015
Castañeda-Navarrete J (2021) Homegarden diversity and food security in southern Mexico. Food Secur 13:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01148-w
Ciftcioglu GC (2017) Social preference-based valuation of the links between home gardens, ecosystem services, and human well-being in Lefke Region of North Cyprus. Ecosyst Serv 25:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.002
Clarke LW, Li L, Jenerette GD, Yu Z (2014) Drivers of plant biodiversity and ecosystem service production in home gardens across the Bei**g Municipality of China. Urban Ecosyst 17(3):741–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0351-6
Corley J, Okely JA, Taylor AM, Page D, Welstead M, Skarabela B, Redmond P, Cox SR, Russ TC (2021) Home garden use during COVID-19: associations with physical and mental wellbeing in older adults. J Environ Psychol 73:101545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101545
Cruz-Garcia GS, Struik PC (2015) Spatial and seasonal diversity of wild food plants in home gardens of northeast Thailand 1. Econ Bot 69(2):99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9309-8
Cumming TL, Shackleton RT, Förster J, Dini J, Khan A, Gumula M, Kubiszewski I (2017) Achieving the national development agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through investment in ecological infrastructure: a case study of South Africa. Ecosyst Serv 27:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.005
da Cunha Salim MV, Miller RP, Ticona-Benavente CA, van Leeuwen J, Alfaia SS (2018) Soil fertility management in indigenous homegardens of Central Amazonia, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 92(2):463–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0105-6
Darteh EKM, Acquah E, Kumi-Kyereme A (2014) Correlates of stunting among children in Ghana. BMC Public Health 14(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-504
Das T, Das AK (2005) Inventorying plant biodiversity in homegardens: a case study in Barak Valley, Assam, North East India. Curr Sci:155–163 http://www.jstor.org/stable/24110441
Das T, Das AK (2010) Litter production and decomposition in the forested areas of traditional homegardens: a case study from Barak Valley, Assam, northeast India. Agrofor Syst 79(2):157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9284-0
Das T, Das AK (2015) Conservation of plant diversity in rural homegardens with cultural and geographical variation in three districts of Barak Valley, Northeast India 1. Econ Bot 69(1):57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9299-6
Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A (2015) The IPBES Conceptual Framework—connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
Díaz-Reviriego I, González-Segura L, Fernández-Llamazares Á, Howard PL, Molina JL, Reyes-García V (2016) Social organization influences the exchange and species richness of medicinal plants in Amazonian homegardens. Ecol Soc 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07944-210101
Dolley J, Marshall F, Butcher B, Reffin J, Robinson JA, Eray B, Quadrianto N (2020) Analysing trade-offs and synergies between SDGs for urban development, food security and poverty alleviation in rapidly changing peri-urban areas: a tool to support inclusive urban planning. Sustain Sci 15(6):1601–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00802-0
EURAF (2021) European Agroforestry Federation. https://euraf.isa.utl.pt/news/policybriefing2. Accessed 10 July 2021
FAO (2015) Agroforestry https://www.fao.org/forestry/agroforestry/80338/en/. Accessed 21 June 2021
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (2020) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9692en
Ferdous Z, Datta A, Anal AK, Anwar M, Khan AMR (2016) Development of home garden model for year round production and consumption for improving resource-poor household food security in Bangladesh. NJAS -Wagening J Life Sci 78:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.05.006
Fernandes EC, Nair PR (1986) An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agric Syst 21(4):279–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(86)90104-6
Fernandes EC, Oktingati A, Maghembe J (1984) The Chagga homegardens: a multistoried agroforestry crop** system on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Northern Tanzania). Agrofor Syst 2(2):73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131267
Ferrer MM, Montañez-Escalante PI, del Rocio Ruenes-Morales M, Estrada-Medina H, Jimenez-Osornio J (2020) Growing out of the tropical forests: domestication syndrome of native Mesoamerican trees in Mayan homegardens. Genet Resour Crop Evol 67(3):587–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00833-2
Flinzberger L, Zinngrebe Y, Plieninger T (2020) Labelling in Mediterranean agroforestry landscapes: a Delphi study on relevant sustainability indicators. Sustain Sci 15(5):1369–1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00800-2
Freeman C, Dickinson KJ, Porter S, van Heezik Y (2012) “My garden is an expression of me”: exploring householders’ relationships with their gardens. J Environ Psychol 32(2):135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.005
Galhena DH, Freed R, Maredia KM (2013) Home gardens: a promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agric Food Secur 2(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-2-8
Galluzzi G, Eyzaguirre P, Negri V (2010) Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodivers Conserv 19(13):3635–3654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9919-5
Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. Agrofor Syst 61(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_1
Gbedomon RC, Assogbadjo AE, Salako VK, Fandohan AB, Kakaï RG (2016) Exploring the spatial configurations of home gardens in Benin. Sci Hortic 213:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.10.020
Gebrehiwot M, Elbakidze M, Lidestav G (2018) Gender relations in changing agroforestry homegardens in rural Ethiopia. J Rural Stud 61:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.05.009
George MV, Christopher G (2020) Structure, diversity and utilization of plant species in tribal homegardens of Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 94(1):297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00393-5
Goenster S, Wiehle M, Gebauer J, Ali AM, Buerkert A (2014) Carbon and nutrient fluxes and balances in Nuba Mountains homegardens, Sudan. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 100(1):35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9624-y
González-Ball R, Bermúdez-Rojas T, Romero-Vargas M (2017) Floristic composition and richness of urban domestic gardens in three urban socioeconomic stratifications in the city Heredia, Costa Rica. Urban Ecosyst 20(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0587-4
Goulart FF, Vandermeer J, Perfecto I, da Matta-Machado RP (2011) Frugivory by five bird species in agroforest home gardens of Pontal do Paranapanema, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 82(3):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9398-z
Hoogerbrugge I, Fresco LO (1993) Homegarden systems: agricultural characteristics and challenges, vol 39. IIED https://edepot.wur.nl/73745
Huerta E, van der Wal H (2012) Soil macroinvertebrates’ abundance and diversity in home gardens in Tabasco, Mexico, vary with soil texture, organic matter and vegetation cover. Eur J Soil Biol 50:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.12.007
Ichinose Y, Nishigaki T, Funakawa S (2020) Central roles of livestock and land-use in soil fertility of traditional homegardens on Mount Kilimanjaro. Agrofor Syst 94(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00357-9
IFPRI (2021) Global food policy report: transforming food systems after COVID-19. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293991
IPBES (2016) The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3402856
IPBES (2019) Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579
IPBES (2020) Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4147317
Islam M, Dey A, Rahman M (2015) Effect of tree diversity on soil organic carbon content in the homegarden agroforestry system of North-Eastern Bangladesh. Small-scale For 14(1):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9275-5
Jaganmohan M, Vailshery LS, Gopal D, Nagendra H (2012) Plant diversity and distribution in urban domestic gardens and apartments in Bangalore, India. Urban Ecosyst 15(4):911–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0244-5
Junqueira AB, Souza NB, Stomph TJ, Almekinders CJ, Clement CR, Struik PC (2016) Soil fertility gradients shape the agrobiodiversity of Amazonian homegardens. Agric Ecosyst Environ 221:270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.002
Kabir ME, Rahman MM, Rahman MAU, Ando K (2016) Effects of household characteristics on homegarden characteristics in Kalaroa Upazila, Satkhira District, Bangladesh. Small-scale For 15(4):443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9332-3
Kamiyama C, Hashimoto S, Kohsaka R, Saito O (2016) Non-market food provisioning services via homegardens and communal sharing in satoyama socio-ecological production landscapes on Japan’s Noto peninsula. Ecosyst Serv 17:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.002
Kanter DR, Bartolini F, Kugelberg S, Leip A, Oenema O, Uwizeye A (2020) Nitrogen pollution policy beyond the farm. Nat Food 1(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0001-5
Kujawska M, Zamudio F, Montti L, Carrillo VP (2018) Effects of landscape structure on medicinal plant richness in home gardens: evidence for the environmental scarcity compensation hypothesis. Econ Bot 72(2):150–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-018-9417-3
Kumar BM (2011) Species richness and aboveground carbon stocks in the homegardens of central Kerala, India. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140(3-4):430–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.006
Kumar BM, George SJ, Chinnamani S (1994) Diversity, structure and standing stock of wood in the homegardens of Kerala in peninsular India. Agrofor Syst 25(3):243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00707463
Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2006) Introduction. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4948-4_1
Kumar BM, Nair PR (2004) The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst 61(1):135–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028995.13227.ca
Lakshmi G, Beggi F, Menta C, Kumar NK, Jayesh P (2021) Dynamics of soil microarthropod populations affected by a combination of extreme climatic events in tropical home gardens of Kerala, India. Pedobiologia (Jena) 85:150719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2021.150719
Lakshmi G, Joseph A (2017) Soil microarthropods as indicators of soil quality of tropical home gardens in a village in Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 91(3):439–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9941-z
Lal R (2020) Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Secur 12:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01058-3
Landauer CK, Brazil M (1990) Tropical home gardens. Selected papers from an International Workshop held at the Institute of Ecology, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia, 2-9 December 1985
Leino MW, Solberg SØ, Tunset HM, Fogelholm J, Strese E-MK, Hagenblad J (2018) Patterns of exchange of multiplying onion (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum-Group) in Fennoscandian home gardens. Econ Bot 72(3):346–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-018-9426-2
Lima MGB, Kissinger G, Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Brana-Varela J, Gupta A (2017) The Sustainable Development Goals and REDD+: assessing institutional interactions and the pursuit of synergies. Int Environ Agreem: Politics Law Econ 17 (4):589–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9366-9
LUPPD (2020) Data and information of home gardens in Sri Lanka. Land Use Policy Planning Department, Ministry of Lands and Land Development, Sri Lanka Colombo
Ma W, Abdulai A (2017) The economic impacts of agricultural cooperatives on smallholder farmers in rural China. Agribusiness (N Y N Y) 33(4):537–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21522
Marques P, Silva AS, Quaresma Y, Manna LR, de Magalhães NN, Mazzoni R (2021) Home gardens can be more important than other urban green infrastructure for mental well-being during COVID-19 pandemics. Urban For Urban Green 64:127268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127268
Marsh R (1998) Building on traditional gardening to improve household food security. Food Nutr Agric:4–14
Mattsson E, Ostwald M, Nissanka S (2018) What is good about Sri Lankan homegardens with regards to food security? A synthesis of the current scientific knowledge of a multifunctional land-use system. Agrofor Syst 92(6):1469–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0093-6
Mattsson E, Ostwald M, Nissanka S, Marambe B (2013) Homegardens as a multi-functional land-use strategy in Sri Lanka with focus on carbon sequestration. Ambio 42(7):892–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0390-x
Mattsson E, Ostwald M, Nissanka S, Pushpakumara D (2015) Quantification of carbon stock and tree diversity of homegardens in a dry zone area of Moneragala district, Sri Lanka. Agrofor Syst 89 (3):435–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9780-8
Mazumdar S, Mazumdar S (2012) Immigrant home gardens: places of religion, culture, ecology, and family. Landscape Urban Plann 105(3):258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.020
Mbow C, Smith P, Skole D, Duguma L, Bustamante M (2014) Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.002
Mellisse BT, Descheemaeker K, Giller KE, Abebe T, van de Ven GW (2018) Are traditional home gardens in southern Ethiopia heading for extinction? Implications for productivity, plant species richness and food security. Agric Ecosyst Environ 252:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.026
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
Milow P, Malek S, Mohammad NS, Ong HC (2013) Diversity of plants tended or cultivated in Orang Asli homegardens in Negeri Sembilan, Peninsular Malaysia. Hum Ecol 41(2):325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9555-7
Mina U, Kumar R (2021) COVID-19 pandemic impact on food security and food system of India: lessons for future. In: Environmental resilience and transformation in times of COVID-19. Elsevier, pp 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85512-9.00022-X
Mitchell R, Hanstad T (2004) Small homegarden plots and sustainable livelihoods for the poor. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Montagnini F, Metzel R (2017) The contribution of agroforestry to sustainable development goal 2: end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture. In: Integrating landscapes: Agroforestry for biodiversity conservation and food sovereignty. Springer, pp 11–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69371-2_2
Motzke I, Klein A-M, Saleh S, Wanger TC, Tscharntke T (2016) Habitat management on multiple spatial scales can enhance bee pollination and crop yield in tropical homegardens. Agric Ecosyst Environ 223:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.001
Nair P (2001) Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agrofor Syst 53(2):239–245. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013388806993
Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2021a) Definition and concepts of agroforestry. In: An introduction to agroforestry: four decades of scientific developments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_2
Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2021b) Global distribution of agroforestry systems. In: An introduction to agroforestry: four decades of scientific developments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_4
Nair PR (1985) Classification of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 3(2):97–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122638
Nath AJ, Das AK (2011) Carbon storage and sequestration in bamboo-based smallholder homegardens of Barak Valley, Assam. Curr Sci:229–233
Nath AJ, Sileshi GW, Laskar SY, Pathak K, Reang D, Nath A, Das AK (2021) Quantifying carbon stocks and sequestration potential in agroforestry systems under divergent management scenarios relevant to India’s Nationally Determined Contribution. J Clean Prod 281:124831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124831
Nicholls E, Ely A, Birkin L, Basu P, Goulson D (2020) The contribution of small-scale food production in urban areas to the sustainable development goals: a review and case study. Sustain Sci 15:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00792-z
Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284(5412):278–282. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5412.278
Panyadee P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Inta A (2016) Woody plant diversity in urban homegardens in northern Thailand. Econ Bot 70(3):285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-016-9348-9
Panyadee P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Inta A (2018) Karen homegardens: characteristics, functions, and species diversity. Econ Bot 72(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-018-9404-8
Panyadee P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Inta A (2019) Medicinal plants in homegardens of four ethnic groups in Thailand. J Ethnopharmacol 239:111927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.111927
Papp N, Birkás-Frendl K, Farkas Á, Pieroni A (2013) An ethnobotanical study on home gardens in a Transylvanian Hungarian Csángó village (Romania). Genet Resour Crop Evol 60(4):1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9930-7
Pinela J, Barros L, Carvalho AM, Ferreira IC (2012) Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of four tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) farmer’ varieties in Northeastern Portugal homegardens. Food Chem Toxicol 50(3-4):829–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.045
Poot-Pool WS, Van Der Wal H, Flores-Guido S, Pat-Fernández JM, Esparza-Olguín L (2012) Economic stratification differentiates home gardens in the Maya village of Pomuch, México. Econ Bot 66 (3):264–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-012-9206-3
Rahman MH, Kitajima K, Rahman MF (2021) Spatial patterns of woodfuel consumption by commercial cooking sectors within 30 km of Lawachara National Park in northeastern Bangladesh. Energy Sustain Dev 61:118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.01.008
Rayol BP, Do Vale I, Miranda IS (2019) Tree and palm diversity in homegardens in the Central Amazon. Agrofor Syst 93 (2):515–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0144-z
Reyes-García V, Aceituno-Mata L, Calvet-Mir L, Garnatje T, Gómez-Baggethun E, Lastra JJ, Ontillera R, Parada M, Rigat M, Vallès J (2014) Resilience of traditional knowledge systems: the case of agricultural knowledge in home gardens of the Iberian Peninsula. Global Environ Change 24:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.022
Reyes-García V, Vila S, Aceituno-Mata L, Calvet-Mir L, Garnatje T, Jesch A, Lastra JJ, Parada M, Rigat M, Vallès J (2010) Gendered homegardens: a study in three mountain areas of the Iberian Peninsula. Econ Bot 64(3):235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-010-9124-1
Rooduijn B, Bongers F, van der Wal H (2018) Wild native trees in tropical homegardens of Southeast Mexico: fostered by fragmentation, mediated by management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 254:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.015
Sachs JD (2015) The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press
Salako VK, Fandohan B, Kassa B, Assogbadjo AE, Idohou AFR, Gbedomon RC, Chakeredza S, Dulloo ME, Kakaï RG (2014) Home gardens: an assessment of their biodiversity and potential contribution to conservation of threatened species and crop wild relatives in Benin. Genet Resour Crop Evol 61(2):313–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0035-8
Salazar-Rojas VM, Herrera-Cabrera BE, Soto-Arenas MÁ, Castillo-González F (2010) Morphological variation in Laelia anceps subsp. dawsonii f. chilapensis Soto-Arenas Orchidaceae in traditional home gardens of Chilapa, Guerrero, Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57(4):543–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-009-9492-5
Salvia AL, Leal Filho W, Brandli LL, Griebeler JS (2019) Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: Local and global issues. J Clean Prod 208:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242
Schanes K, Dobernig K, Gözet B (2018) Food waste matters-a systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. J Clean Prod 182:978–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030
Schrader J, Franzén M, Sattler C, Ferderer P, Westphal C (2018) Woody habitats promote pollinators and complexity of plant–pollinator interactions in homegardens located in rice terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras. Paddy Water Environ 16(2):253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-017-0612-0
Schreinemachers P, Patalagsa MA, Islam MR, Uddin MN, Ahmad S, Biswas SC, Ahmed MT, Yang R-Y, Hanson P, Begum S (2015) The effect of women’s home gardens on vegetable production and consumption in Bangladesh. Food Secur 7(1):97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0408-7
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2020) Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal
Serrano-Ysunza A, van der Wal H, Gallardo-Cruz J, Ramos-Muñoz D, Vaca R (2018) A 6-year longitudinal study on agrobiodiversity change in homegardens in Tabasco, México.Agrofor Syst 92(6):1485–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0094-5
Shanavas A, Kumar BM (2003) Fuelwood characteristics of tree species in homegardens of Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 58(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025450407545
Shupler M, Mwitari J, Gohole A, de Cuevas RA, Puzzolo E, Čukić I, Nix E, Pope D (2021) COVID-19 impacts on household energy & food security in a Kenyan informal settlement: the need for integrated approaches to the SDGs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 144:111018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111018
Singh M, Kumar A, Sharma M (2021) Conservation of wildlife diversity in agroforestry systems in Eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot. In: Proc Zool Soc. Springer, pp 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-021-00361-x
Singh SL, Sahoo UK (2021) Tree species composition, diversity and soil organic carbon stock in homegardens and shifting cultivation fallows of Mizoram, Northeast India. Vegetos 34(1):220–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-021-00194-1
Skogen K, Helland H, Kaltenborn B (2018) Concern about climate change, biodiversity loss, habitat degradation and landscape change: embedded in different packages of environmental concern? J Nat Conserv 44:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2018.06.001
Smith MR, Myers SS (2018) Impact of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions on global human nutrition. Nat Clim Change 8(9):834–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0253-3
Solberg SØ, Brantestam AK, Olsson K, Leino MW, Weibull J, Yndgaard F (2015) Diversity in local cultivars of Pisum sativum collected from home gardens in Sweden. Biochem Syst Ecol 62:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.09.004
Sujarwo W, Caneva G (2015) Ethnobotanical study of cultivated plants in home gardens of traditional villages in Bali (Indonesia). Hum Ecol 43(5):769–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9775-8
Tatebayashi K, Kamiyama C, Matsui T, Saito O, Machimura T (2019) Accounting shadow benefits of non-market food through food-sharing networks on Hachijo Island, Japan. Sustain Sci 14(2):469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0580-3
Toledo-Hernández M, Denmead LH, Clough Y, Raffiudin R, Tscharntke T (2016) Cultural homegarden management practices mediate arthropod communities in Indonesia. J Insect Conserv 20(3):373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9871-0
Torquebiau E (1992) Are tropical agroforestry home gardens sustainable? Agric Ecosyst Environ 41(2):189–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(92)90109-O
Turner SW, Hejazi M, Calvin K, Kyle P, Kim S (2019) A pathway of global food supply adaptation in a world with increasingly constrained groundwater. Sci Total Environ 673:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.070
Ulman Y, Singh M, Kumar A, Sharma M (2021) Conservation of wildlife diversity in agroforestry systems in Eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot. In: Proceedings of the zoological society. vol 2. Springer, pp 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-021-00361-x
van Noordwijk M, Duguma LA, Dewi S, Leimona B, Catacutan DC, Lusiana B, Öborn I, Hairiah K, Minang PA (2018) SDG synergy between agriculture and forestry in the food, energy, water and income nexus: reinventing agroforestry? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 34:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.003
Vermeulen SJ, Aggarwal PK, Ainslie A, Angelone C, Campbell BM, Challinor AJ, Hansen JW, Ingram J, Jarvis A, Kristjanson P (2012) Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change. Environ Sci Policy 15(1):136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.003
Vlkova M, Polesny Z, Verner V, Banout J, Dvorak M, Havlik J, Lojka B, Ehl P, Krausova J (2011) Ethnobotanical knowledge and agrobiodiversity in subsistence farming: case study of home gardens in Phong My commune, central Vietnam. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58(5):629–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9603-3
Walljasper C, Polansek T (2020) Home gardening blooms around the world during coronavirus lockdowns. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-gardens-idUSKBN2220D3. Accessed 29 January 2022
Whitney CW, Luedeling E, Hensel O, Tabuti JR, Krawinkel M, Gebauer J, Kehlenbeck K (2018a) The role of homegardens for food and nutrition security in Uganda. Hum Ecol 46(4):497–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-018-0008-9
Whitney CW, Luedeling E, Tabuti JR, Nyamukuru A, Hensel O, Gebauer J, Kehlenbeck K (2018b) Crop diversity in homegardens of southwest Uganda and its importance for rural livelihoods. Agr Human Values 35(2):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-018-0008-9
Whitney CW, Tabuti JR, Hensel O, Yeh C-H, Gebauer J, Luedeling E (2017) Homegardens and the future of food and nutrition security in southwest Uganda. Agric Syst 154:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.009
Wiehle M, Goenster S, Gebauer J, Mohamed SA, Buerkert A, Kehlenbeck K (2014) Effects of transformation processes on plant species richness and diversity in homegardens of the Nuba Mountains, Sudan. Agrofor Syst 88(3):539–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9717-2
Wolka K, Biazin B, Martinsen V, Mulder J (2021) Soil organic carbon and associated soil properties in Enset (Ensete ventricosum Welw. Cheesman)-based homegardens in Ethiopia. Soil Tillage Res 205:104791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104791
World Bank (2020) Understanding Poverty https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview. Accessed 07 May 2021
Yang L, Ahmed S, Stepp JR, Mi K, Zhao Y, Ma J, Liang C, Pei S, Huai H, Xu G (2014) Comparative homegarden medical ethnobotany of Naxi healers and farmers in Northwestern Yunnan, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 10(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-6
Acknowledgements
Author Rashmita Sharma is thankful to the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, for providing the Prime Minister’s Research Fellowship. We like to thank all reviewers and editors for their valuable comments, which have helped improve the manuscript. We also want to thank Anurag Verma, Ph.D. Scholar, School Ecology and Environment Studies, Nalanda University, for providing his valuable feedback on the design of this work.
Code availability
Not applicable
Funding
The research of Rashmita Sharma was supported by the Prime Ministers Research Fellowship (PMRF), May 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Rashmita Sharma: literature review, conceptual outline, analyzing, discussion, writing, and preparation of original draft
Usha Mina: conceptual outline, discussion, writing – review, and editing
B Mohan Kumar: discussion, writing—review, and editing
All authors have contributed and approved the review in its present form.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 373 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, R., Mina, U. & Kumar, B.M. Homegarden agroforestry systems in achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42, 44 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00781-9
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00781-9