Abstract
Objective
To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of vacuum versus forceps application in assisted vaginal delivery.
Material and Method
Women in labor with vertex presentation were delivered by vacuum and forceps. A total of 120 cases were included in this prospective study. Maternal and neonatal morbidity were compared in terms of perineal lacerations, episiotomy extension, post-partum hemorrhage, Apgar score, instrumental injuries, NICU admissions PNM etc. χ2 test was used to analyze the data.
Observations
Maternal morbidity viz. episiotomy extension as well as first and second degree perineal tear were significant in the forceps group (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.02, respectively). With regards to neonatal morbidity, no statistically significant difference was noted.
Conclusion
Vacuum and forceps should remain appropriate tools in the armamentarium of the modern obstetrician. However, ventouse may be chosen first (if there is no fetal distress) as it is significantly less likely to injure the mother.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists. Number 17. 2000.
Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, et al. Operative vaginal delivery, neonatal, infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329:24.
Wu Wen S, Shiliang L, Kramer SM, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:103–7.
Archanna S, Monga D. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction—a review of 200 cases. Singapore Med J. 1994;35:605–8.
Okunwobi YS, Cooke I, Mackenzie IZ. Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery. BJOG. 2000;107:467–71.
Miksovsky P, Watson WJ. Obstetric vacuum extraction: state of the art in the new millennium. Obstet Gynaecol Surv. 2001;56:736–51.
Patel BS, Pandya NC, Sahram AS. Maternal and perinatal outcome in forceps and ventouse extraction delivery: a comparative study. Obstet Gynaecol Surv. 2000;5:614–9.
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Instrumental vaginal delivery. Guideline No. 26. London: RCOG; 2005.
Cargill YM, Mackinnon CJ. Guidelines for operative vaginal birth. Society of obstetrician & gynecologists of Canada, SOGC clinical practice guidelines no. 148. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2004;26:747–53.
Johnson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 1999 (issue 2).
Eason E, Labraque M, Marioux S, et al. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ. 2002;166:326–30.
Prapas N, Kalogiannidis I, Masoura S, et al. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: short term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Hippokratia. 2009;13:41–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, A., Rathore, P. A Comparative Study of Feto-Maternal Outcome in Instrumental Vaginal Delivery. J Obstet Gynecol India 61, 663–666 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-011-0119-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-011-0119-3