Log in

Volume-based soil particle fractal relation with soil erodibility in a small watershed of purple soil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The particle size distribution in small watershed changes under different land uses and affects soil erodibility. The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the volume fractal dimension of particle size distribution under different land uses in a typical small watershed of purple soil, (2) to estimate soil erodibilities of various land uses utilizing the Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator (EPIC) model and the nomogram (NOMO) model, and (3) to relate volume fractal dimension with the soil erodibility used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) in purple soil areas. Laser diffractions and double-logarithmic model were used to measure and calculate volume fractal dimension values. The results show that soil volume fractal dimensions were well linearly fitted to the double-logarithmic model with high correlation coefficients of 0.902–0.936 under six land uses in the small watershed. The averaged volume fractal dimension values under different land uses, from high to low were in the order of Zea mays L, Ipomoea batatas, Citrus reticulata Blanco, Setaria viridis, Robinia pseudoacacia L, Pinus massoniana Lamb. The volume fractal dimension was positively correlated to clay particle fraction (R = 0.933). The average soil erodibility values under different land uses from high to low were in the order of Setaria viridis, Citrus reticulata Blanco, Pinus massoniana Lamb, Zea mays L, Ipomoea batatas, Robinia pseudoacacia L while average soil erodibilities from high to low values were in the order of Setaria viridis, Citrus reticulata Blanco, Zea mays L, Ipomoea batatas, Pinus massoniana Lamb, Robinia pseudoacacia L. The soil erodibilities calculated by the two models were similar, and positively correlated (R = 0.630–0.877). The volume fractal dimension values of six land uses were negatively correlated to both soil erodibility estimated by EPIC and by NOMO models. Moreover, the correlations of the volume fractal dimension values of Zea mays L, Ipomoea batatas and Citrus reticulata Blanco estimated by EPIC or NOMO were lower than those of Pinus massoniana Lamb, Robinia pseudoacacia L and Setaria viridis. Further research is needed to determine the influence of volume fractal dimension on the soil erodibility under different land use and managements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolfo ND, Daniel G, Marco B, Carlos MP, Markus F (2001) Multifractal characteristics of soil particle size distribution. Soil Sci Am J 65:1361–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adolfo ND, Daniel G, Roberto Q, Richard P (2003) Multifractal characteristics of soil pore system. Soil Sci Am J 67:1361–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya LM, Heiman JL, Thapa BB, Bowman DC (2010) Predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity of golf course sands from particle size distribution. Soil Sci Am J 74:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniego FJ, Espejo R, Martin MA, Jose FS (2005) Multifractal scaling of soil spatial variability. Ecol Model 182:291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LD, Fu BJ, Xu JY, Gong J (2003) Location-weighted landscape contrast index: a scale independent approach for landscape pattern evaluation based on “source-sink” ecological processes. Acta Ecologica Sinica 23:2406–2413

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LD, Fu BJ, Zhao WW (2006) Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significances. Acta Ecologica Sinica 26:1444–1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng XF, Shi XZ, Wang HJ (2003) Fractal characteristics of particle of Arable Layers in Hilly Region of red soil. Scientia Geographica Sinica 23:617–621

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vente J, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, Van Rompaey A, Govers G (2008) Spatially distributed modelling of soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales in Spain. Glob Planet Change 60(3–4):393–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer KJ (1989) Fractal geometry. Wiley, Chichester, pp 89–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu BJ, Xu YD, Lv YH (2008) Scale characteristics and couple research of landscape pattern and soil and water loss. Adv Earth Sci 25:673–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu JZ, Zhang WH, Li WZ (2004) Effect of plant community on anti-erodibility of land under rehabilitation in BeiChuanHe basin. Acta Pedol Sin 41:854–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Zhang WH (2002) Fractal property of soil particle size distribution and its application. Acta Pedol Sin 4:490–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Science (1978) Measurement method of soil physicochemical properties. Science Press, Bei**g

  • Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Science (1980) The analysis of soil physicochemical properties. Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai

  • Liu BY, **e Y, Zhang KL (2001) The soil erosion model. Science Press, Bei**g, pp 65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelort BB (1977) Form chance and dimension. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 1–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelort BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 45–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin MA, Montero E (2002) Laser diffraction and mutifractal analysis for the characterization of dry soil volume-size distribution. Soil Tillage Res 64:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao CY, Ni JR, Borthwick AGL (2010) Recent changes in water discharge and sediment load of the Yellow River basin, China. Prog Phys Geogr 34(4):541–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao CY, Ni JR, Borthwick AGL, Yang L (2011) A preliminary estimate of human and natural contributions to the changes in water discharge and sediment load in the Yellow River. Glob Planet Change 76(3–4):196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao CY, Duan QY, Yang L, Borthwick AGL (2012) On the applicability of temperature and precipitation data from CMIP3 for China. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millan H, Gonzalez P, Aguilar M, Dominguez J, Cespedes L (2003) On the fractal scaling of soil data particle-size distribution. Geoderma 117:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect E, Kay BD, Rasiah V (1993) Multifractal method for soil aggregate fragmentation. Soil Sci Am J 57:896–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosperinin N, Perugini D (2008) Particle size distributions of some soil from the Umbria Region (Italy): fractal analysis and numerical modeling. Geoderma 145:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieu M, Sposito G (1991) Fractal fragmentation soil porosity and soil water properties. Application. Soil Sci Am J 55:1231–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal E, Shouse PJ, Bradford SA, Skaggs TH, Corwin DL (2009) Measuring particle size distribution using laser diffraction: implications for predicting soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci 174:639–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi XZ, Yu DS, Lu XX (1995) Study on soil erodibility by using rainfall simulator in subtropic China. J Soil Eros Soil Water Conserv 9(3):38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Su YZ, Zhao HL (2004) Fractal features of soil particle size distribution in the desertification process of the farmland in Horqin Sandy land. Acta Ecologica Sinica 24:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1989) Application of fractal mathematics to soil water retention estimation. Soil Sci Am J 53:987–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1992) Fractal scaling of soil particle size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Sci Am J 56:362–369

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1951) Soil survey manual. U.S. Dept. Agriculture Handbook No. 18, Washington DC, USA

  • Vanelslande A, Rousseau P, Lal R, Gabriels D, Ghuman BS (1984) Testing the applicability of a soil erodibility nomogram for soil tropical soils. Chall Afr Hydrol Water Resour 144:463–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang GL, Zhou SL, Zhao QG (2005) Volume fractal dimension of soil particles and its application to land use. Acta Pedol Sin 42:546–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Fu BJ, Zhao WW, Hu HF, Wang YF (2008) Multifractal characteristics of soil particle size distribution under different land-use types on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 72:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei CF, **e DT, Chen FC (1989) Study on purple soil particles and chemical component in South Sichuan Basin. J Southwest Agric Univ 11:425–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Sharply AN (1990) EPIC-erosion productivity impact calculator. Model Documentation USDA of Agricultural Technical Bulletin, no. 1768

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. A guide to conservation planning. USDA, ARS, Agricultural Handbook, Washington, DC, no. 53

  • Wischmeier WH, Johnson CB, Cross BV (1971) A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction cites. J Soil Water Conserv 26:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu CZ, Hong W (1999) Study on fractal features of soil aggregate structure under different management patterns. Acta Pedol Sin 36:162–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Borkovec M, Sticher H (1993) On particle-size distribution in soil. Soil Sci Am J 57:883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **a L, Zhang GC, Heathman GC, Wang YQ, Huang CH (2009) Fractal features of soil particle size distribution as affected by plant communities in the forested region of Mountain Yimeng, China. Gederma 154:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang PL, Luo YP, Shi YC (1993) The description of the soil fractal characterization based on weight distribution of the particle size. Chin Sci Bull 38:1896–1899

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JL, Li DC, Zhang GL (2008) Comparison of mass and volume fractal dimensions of soil size distributions. Acta Pedol Sin 45:413–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KL, Peng WY, Yang HG (2007) Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soil in China. Acta Pedol Sin 44:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JC, Li HD, Lin J (2008a) Spatial variability of soil erodibility (K-factor) at a catchment scale in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28:2199–2206

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wei CF, **e DT, Gao M, Zeng XB (2008b) Effect of land use patterns on soil aggregate stability in Sichuan Basin, China. Particuology 6:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao WZ, Liu ZM, Cheng GD (2002) Fractal dimension of soil particle for sand desertification. Acta Pedol Sin 39:877–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XM (1960) The effect of vegetation in Loess areas on the soil erosion. Acta Pedol Sin 8:17–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2011C013), National Technology Support Program (2011BAD31B03); Postdoctoral Science Foundation for Southwest University (SWU110023); Construction Funds for Ecology Key Disciplines for Project 211 Southwest University, National Key Basic Special Foundation Project of China (2010CB95160402).We are also grateful for the comments and criticisms of the journal’s anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **aoyan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zhou, J. Volume-based soil particle fractal relation with soil erodibility in a small watershed of purple soil. Environ Earth Sci 70, 1735–1746 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2261-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2261-y

Keywords

Navigation