Log in

Application of health risk assessment method for geological environment at national and regional scales

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health risk, defined as possibility or probability of health damage, illness or death of humans due to exposure to risk factors in the environment, was derived for geological environment (soils) and estimated at national scale for the whole Europe and at more detailed regional scale for Slovak Republic. The assessment was based on data obtained from international geochemical map** of Europe (Geochemical Atlas of the Europe—827 soil samples) and national geochemical map** programme of the Slovak Republic (9,860 soil samples). The following chemical elements were evaluated: As, B, Ba, Be, Cd, Cu, F, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se and Zn. The health risk assessment method was based on calculations of average daily doses of individual elements analysed in every collected soil sample. Exposure levels were set by using exposure parameters and reference doses from integrated databases of US EPA. The results of calculations were transformed into various sorts of maps (dot, pixel) to delineate areas where increased contents of risk elements can pose risk to human health. The average levels of chronic and carcinogenic risk are presented in the form of tables for single European countries and administrative units of Slovak republic. The results of European map** (Geochemical Atlas of Europe) indicate that increased levels of potentially toxic elements in soil (mainly As, Pb and Ni) occur primarily in the countries of southern and western Europe. Such elements are associated with increased health risk for resident population. For the countries of northern Europe health risk was estimated at significantly lower level. Relatively high sampling density in Slovak Republic made it possible to calculate health risk at more detailed scale for individual administrative units (municipalities, provinces). The increased health risk level was found in areas well known for high soil contamination (e.g. mining areas).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANON (1993) Commission directive 93/67/EEC lying down the principles for assessment of risks to man and the environment of substances notified in accordance with Council Directive 67/548/EEC. Official Journal L 227, 0009–0018

  • ANON (1994) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 of 28 June 1994 laying down the principles for the assessment of risk to man and the environment of existing substances in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 (text with EEA relevance). Official journal No L 161, 29/06/1994:0003–0011

  • ANON (1998) METODICKÝ POKYN MŽP SR č. 623/98-2 na postup hodnotenia a riadenia rizík

  • ANON (2003) Bioavailability of contaminants in soils and sediments: processes, tools, and applications. Committee on bioavailability of contaminants in soils and sediments, National Research Council, 432

  • Čurlík J, Šefčík P (1999) Geochemical Atlas of Slovakia-part V. - Soils. Monograph, Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic, Geological Survey of Slovak Republic, Bratislava, 98

  • De Vos W, Tarvainen T (Chief-editors), Salminen R, Reeder S, De Vivo B, Demetriades A, Pirc S, Batista MJ, Marsina K, Ottesen R-T, O’connor PJ, Bidovec M, Lima A, Siewers U, Smith B, Taylor H, Shaw R, Salpeteur I, Gregorauskiene V, Halamic J, Slaninka I, Lax K, Gravesen P, Birke M, Breward N, Ander EL, Jordan G, Duris M, Klein P, Locutura J, Bel-lan A, Pasieczna A, Lis J, Mazreku A, Gilucis A, Heitzmann P, Klaver G, Petersell V (2006) Geochemical Atlas of Europe. Part 2. Interpretation of geochemical maps, additional tables, figures, maps, and related publications. Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, 692 p

  • IRIS (2009) Integrated risk information system. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/iris/

  • Lee H, Cho Y, Parka S (2006) Dietary exposure of the Korean population to arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury. J Food Compost Anal 19:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAIS (2009) Risk Assessment Information System http://rais.ornl.gov/

  • Rapant S, Kordík J (2003) An environmental risk assessment map of the Slovak Republic: application of data from Geochemical Atlases. Environ Geol 44(4):400–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapant S, Rapošová M, Bodiš D, Marsina K, Slaninka I (1999) Environmental-geochemical map** program in the Slovak Republic. J Geochem Explor 66:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapant S, Salminen R, Tarvainen T, Krčmová K, Cvečková V (2008) Application of a risk assessment method on European wide geochemical baseline data. Geochemistry: exploration, environment, analysis, 8, 3/4, 291–299

  • Rapant S, Letkovičová M, Cvečková V, Fajčíková K, Galbavý J, Letkovič M (2010) Environmentálne a zdravotné indikátory Slovenskej republiky. Final report. Štátny geologický ústav D. Štúra, Bratislava, p 279

  • Salminen R, Tarvainen T, Demetriades A, Duris M, Fordyce FM, Gregorauskiene V, Kahelin H, Kivisilla J, Klaver G, Klein H, Larson JO, Lis J, Locutura J, Marsina K, Mjartanova H, Mouvet C, O'connor P, Odor L, Ottonello G, Paukola T, Plant JA, Reimann C, Schermann O, Siewers U, Steenfelt A, Van Der Sluys J, Vivo B. De, Williams L (1998) FOREGS Geochemical Map** Field Manual. Geologian tutkimuskeskus. Opas 47, 36 p

  • Salminen R (Chief-editor), Batista MJ, Bidovec M, Demetriades A, De Vivo B, De Vos W, Duris M, Gilucis A, Gregorauskiene V, Halamic J, Heitzmann P, Lima A, Jordan G, Klaver G, Klein P, Lis J, Locutura J, Marsina K, Mazreku A, O'Connor PJ, Olsson SÅ, Ottesen R-T, Petersell V, Plant JA, Reeder S, Salpeteur I, Sandström H, Siewers U, Steenfelt A, Tarvainen T (2005) Geochemical Atlas of Europe. Part 1. Background information, methodology and maps. Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, 526 p

  • Selinus O, Alloway BJ, Centeno JA, Finkelman RB, Fuge R, Lindh U, Smedley P (2005) Essentials of medical geology, impacts of the natural environment on public health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 793 pp

  • Spence LR, Walden T (2001) Risk-integrated software for clean-ups—Version RISC4. User‘s manual, spence engineering, Pleasanton, California/BP Oil International, Sunbury

  • US EPA (1989) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (HHEM). Part A. Baseline risk assessment. Interim Final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, (EPA/540/1-89/002)

  • US EPA (1991) Risk assessment guidance for superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (HHEM)—Supplemental guidance, interim final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC (OSWER 9285.6-03)

  • US EPA (1997) Exposure factors handbook I, II, III. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of research and development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC (EPA/600/P-95/002Fa)

  • US EPA (1998) Arsenic, inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0278.htmsubst/0278.htm

  • US EPA (1999) A risk assessment–multiway exposure spreadsheet calculation tool. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2004) Risk assessment guidance for superfund (RAGS). Volume I. Human health evaluation manual (HHEM). Part E. Supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment, final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2005) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC (EPA/630/P-03/001F)

  • US EPA (2008) Child-specific exposure factors handbook. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC (EPA/600/R-06/096F)

  • US EPA (2009) Risk assessment guidance for superfund (RAGS). Volume I. Human health evaluation manual (HHEM). Part F. Supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC EPA-540-R-070-002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen CJ, Vermeire TG (eds) (2007) Risk assessment of chemicals: an introduction. 2nd edn. XXXII. Hardcover, Springer, Berlin, 688 p

  • Vrana K, Rapant S, Bodiš D, Marsina K, Lexa J, Pramuka S, Maňkovská B, Čurlík J, Šefčík P, Vojtaš J, Daniel J, Lučivianský L (1997) Geochemical Atlas of the Slovak Republic at a scale 1:1,000,000. J Geochem Explor 60(1):7–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Sato T, **ng B, Tao S (2005) Health risk of heavy metals to the general public in Tian**, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci Total Environ 350:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Rapant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapant, S., Fajčíková, K., Khun, M. et al. Application of health risk assessment method for geological environment at national and regional scales. Environ Earth Sci 64, 513–521 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0875-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0875-x

Keywords

Navigation