SpringerLink
Log in

The integration of frailty into clinical practice: Preliminary results from the Gérontopôle

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Background

Disability is commonly considered as an irreversible condition of advanced age. Therefore, preventive actions need to be taken before the disabling cascade is fully established, that is in the pre-disability phase defined “frailty syndrome”. The complexity and heterogeneity of frailty requires a clinical approach based on multidimensionality and multidisciplinary. In this paper, we present the main characteristics of the newborn Platform for Evaluation of Frailty and Prevention of Disability (Toulouse, France).

Intervention

Persons aged 65 years and older screened for frailty by general practitioners in the Toulouse area are invited to undergo a multidisciplinary evaluation at the Platform. Here, the individual is multidimensionality assessed in order to preventively detect potential risk factors for disability. At the end of the comprehensive evaluation, the team members propose the patient (in agreement with the general practitioner) a preventive intervention program specifically tailored to the his/her needs and resources.

Results

Mean age of our population is 82.7 years, with a large majority aged 75 years and older. Most patients are women (61.9%) Approximately two thirds of patients received any kind of regular help. Regarding level of frailty, 65 patients (41.4%) were pre-frail, and 83 (52.9%) frail. For what concerns the functional status, 83.9% of patients presented slow gait speed, 53.8% were sedentary, and 57.7% had poor muscle strength. Only 27.2% of patients had a SPPB score equal to or higher than 10. Autonomy in ADL was quite well preserved (mean ADL score 5.6 ± 0.8) as expected, suggesting that the patients of the platform have not yet developed disability. Consistently, I ADL showed a marginal loss of autonomy reporting a mean score of 6.0 ± 2.3. About one third of patients (33.1%) presented a MMSE score lower than 25. Dementia (measured by the CDR scale) was observed in 11.6% of the platform population, whereas subjects with mild cognitive impairment (that is CDR equal to 0.5) were 65.8%. New diagnosed depressive disorders were relatively rare with only 3.2% of patients showing signs of depression but some people were already treated. Numerous patients presented vision problems with 10.4% having abnormal findings at the Amsler grid. Finally, it is noteworthy that 9% of the platform population presented an objective state of protein-energy malnutrition, 34% an early alteration of nutritional status, while almost everyone (94.9%) had a vitamin D deficiency (partially explained by the period of the year, that is winter-spring, of most of the measurements).

Conclusion

The Platform clinically evaluates and intervenes on frailty for the first time at the general population-level. This model may serve as preliminary step towards a wider identification of early signs of the disabling cascade in order to develop more effective preventive interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarfield AM (1990) Dr. Ignatz Nascher and the birth of geriatrics. CMAJ 143(9):944–948.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fried TR, Bradley EH, WiLiams CS, Tinetti ME (2001) Functional disability and health care expenditures for older persons. Arch Intern Med 161(21):2602–2607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al (2011) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD, English PA, Sayre JA, Kane RL (1984) Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 311(26):1664–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342(8878):1032–1036.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Monteserin R, Brotons C, Moral I, Altimir S, San José A, Santaeugenia S, et al (2010) Effectiveness of a geriatric intervention in primary care: a randomized clinical trial. Fam Pract 27(3):239–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vellas B, Cestac P, Moley JE (2012) Editorial: implementing frailty into clinical practice: we cannot wait. J Nutr Health Aging 16(7):599–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodríguez-Mañas L, Féait C, Mann G, Viña J, Chatterji S, Chodzko-Zajko W, et al. (2012) Searching for an Operational Definition of Frailty: A Delphi Method Based Consensus Statement. The Frailty Operative Definition-Consensus Conference Project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.

  9. Cesari M (2012) Frailty and Aging. J Frailty Aging. 3–6.

  10. De Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JSM, Olde Rikkert MGM, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG (2011) Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 10(1): 104–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pel-Littel RE, Schuurmans MJ, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Verhaar HJJ (2009) Frailty: defining and measuring of a concept. J Nutr Health Aging 13(4):390–394.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cesari M (2011) The multidimentionality of frailty: many faces of one single dice. J Nutr Health Aging 15(8):663–664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abelian van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, Bonnefoy M, et al (2009) Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 13(10):881–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al (2011) Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 305(l):50–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lafont C, Gerard S, Voisin T, Pahor M, Vellas B (2011) Reducing « iatrogenic disability » in the hospitalized frail elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 15(8):645–660.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Subra J, Rougé-Bugat M-E (2012) Gait speed: a new « vital sign » for older persons in primary care. J Frailty Aging l(2):50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patel KV, Coppin AK, Manini TM, Lauretani F, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L, et al (2006) Midlife physical activity and mobility in older age: The InCHIANTI study. Am J Prev Med 31(3):217–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cesari M, Leeuwenburgh C, Lauretani F, Onder G, Bandinelli S, Maraldi C, et al (2006) Frailty syndrome and skeletal muscle: results from the Invecchiare in Chianti study. Am J Clin Nutr 83(5):1142–1148.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Galvin JE, Roe CM, Powlishta KK, Coats MA, Muich SJ, Grant E, et al (2005) The ADS: a brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology 65(4):559–564.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) « Mini-mental state ». A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3): 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Morris JC (1997) Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr Suppl 1:173–176; discussion 177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskovitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW (1963) Studies of Illness in the Aged, the Index of Adi: A Standardized Measure of Biological and Psychosocial Function. JAMA 185:914–919.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9(3):179–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49(2):M85–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rejeski WJ, Ip EH, Marsh AP, Miller ME, Farmer DF (2008) Measuring disability in older adults: the International Classification System of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Geriatr Gerontol Int 8(l):48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guigoz Y, Vellas B (1999) The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients: presentation of the MNA, history and validation. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Clin Perform Programme 1:3–11; discussion 11–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lipman RS, Covi L (1976) Outpatient treatment of neurotic depression: medication and group psychotherapy. Proc Annu Meet Am Psychopathol Assoc (64): 178–218.

  28. Raskin A, Schulterbrandt J, Reatig N, McKeon JJ (1969) Replication of factors of psychopathology in interview, ward behavior and self-report ratings of hospitalized depressives. J Nerv MentDis 148(l):87–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sindhusake D, Mitchell P, Smith W, Golding M, Newall P, Hartley D, et al (2001) Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Int J Epidemiol 30(6): 1371–1378.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stuck AE, Aronow HU, Steiner A, Alessi CA, Büla CJ, Gold MN, et al (1995) A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 333(18): 1184–1189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stuck AE, Minder CE, Peter-Wüest I, Gillmann G, Egli C, Kesselring A, et al (2000) A randomized trial of in-home visits for disability prevention in community-dwelling older people at low and high risk for nursing home admission. Arch Intern Med 160(7): 977–986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Department of General Medicine, 133 route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse Cedex, France

    J. Subra & S. Oustric

  2. Gérantopôle, Service de médecine interne gériatrique, CHU Toulouse Hôpital Casselardit, 170 avenue de Casselardit, 31300, Toulouse, France

    J. Subra, S. Gillette-Guyonnet, Matteo Cesari & B. Vellas

  3. Inserm 1027, F-31073, Toulouse, France

    S. Gillette-Guyonnet, Matteo Cesari, S. Oustric & B. Vellas

  4. Institut du vieillissement, Université de Toulouse, 37 allées Jules Guesdes, 31000, Toulouse, France

    Matteo Cesari

Authors
  1. J. Subra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Gillette-Guyonnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matteo Cesari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Oustric
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Vellas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

The Platform Team

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Cesari.

Additional information

Balardy L, Ghisolfi A, Bismuth S, Houles M, Hermabessière S, Cavaillon C, Jezequel F, Pedra M, Soto ME, Rolland Y Nourhashemi F.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Subra, J., Gillette-Guyonnet, S., Cesari, M. et al. The integration of frailty into clinical practice: Preliminary results from the Gérontopôle. J Nutr Health Aging 16, 714–720 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0391-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0391-7

Key words

Search

Navigation