Log in

Process Derivation Methodology for Reconfigurable Smart Factory

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the development of computing technology, various data are collected and analyzed to extract meaningful information and are utilized in various industries. In particular, in the manufacturing industry, collected data are analyzed and used for process management, monitoring, quality prediction, etc., to establish smart factories and Reconfigurable Smart Factories. To continuously manage the processes of a Reconfigurable Smart Factory, it is necessary to derive a process model that includes factors affecting the process and to compare the actual execution process with the designed process and make improvements. The conventional methods for deriving process model are methods that apply to processes with a fixed start and end and are difficult to apply directly to the processes of a Reconfigurable Smart Factory. Furthermore, the conventional methods are sequential control flow-oriented, and a process derivation method that includes factors affecting the process is required. Therefore, it is necessary to consider various factors (e.g., time attributes, task time) that affect the process, not just the sequence, to solve this. In this study, we propose a novel method to derive a process that includes sequential flow and time conditions. The proposed methodology focuses on the execution time and order of instances to derive the process. Experiments were conducted by changing the conditions of the methodology and measuring the execution time to validate the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun, Y., et al. (2022). UAV and IoT-based systems for the monitoring of industrial facilities using digital twins: Methodology, reliability models, and application. Sensors, 22(17), 6444.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, Z., Fei, F., & Zhang, G. (2022). Edge-to-cloud IIoT for condition monitoring in manufacturing systems with ubiquitous smart sensors. Sensors, 22(15), 5901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dey, B. K., et al. (2021). Autonomation policy to control work-in-process inventory in a smart production system. International Journal of Production Research, 59(4), 1258–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dey, B. K., Sarkar, B., & Seok, H. (2021). Cost-effective smart autonomation policy for a hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 162, 107758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Radziwon, A., Bilberg, A., Bogers, M., & Madsen, E. S. (2014). The smart factory: Exploring adaptive and flexible manufacturing solutions. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1184–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi, S., Youm, S., & Kang, Y.-S. (2019). Development of scalable on-line anomaly detection system for autonomous and adaptive manufacturing processes. Applied Sciences, 9(21), 4502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss, R. Adidas brings the fast shoe revolution one step closer. Bloomberg Businessweek, October 5, 2017, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-05/adidas-brings-the-fast-shoe-revolution-one-step-closer, accessed November 2017.

  8. Fast, flexible, modular production technology provides platform for future European growth. https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/results/228867/final1-f3-factory-keymessages-and-casestudy-summaries.pdf

  9. National Research Council. (1998). Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krygier, R. (2005). The integration of flexible, reconfigurable manufacturing with quality. In 3rd CIRP international conference on reconfigurable manufacturing.

  11. Koren, Y. (2013). The rapid responsiveness of RMS. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23–24), 6817–6827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen, A.-L., et al. (2017). Towards a generic design method for reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Analysis and synthesis of current design methods and evaluation of supportive tools. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 42, 179–195.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koren, Y. (2006). General RMS characteristics. Comparison with dedicated and flexible systems. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and transformable factories 27–45.

  14. Mehrabi, M. G., et al. (2002). Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehrabi, M. G., Galip Ulsoy, A., & Koren, Y. (2000). Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and their enabling technologies. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 1(1), 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dou, J., Dai, X., & Meng, Z. (2009). Graph theory-based approach to optimize single-product flow-line configurations of RMS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41, 916–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang, L. (2005). Design and reconfiguration of RMS for part family. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Youssef, A. M. A., & ElMaraghy, H. A. (2007). Optimal configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 19, 67–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Molina, A., et al. (2005). Next-generation manufacturing systems: key research issues in develo** and integrating reconfigurable and intelligent machines. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18(7), 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burattin, A., Maggi, F. M., & Sperduti, A. (2016). Conformance checking based on multi-perspective declarative process models. Expert Systems with Applications, 65, 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zuhaira, B., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Business process modeling, implementation, analysis, and management: The case of business process management tools. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 145–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Linz, P., & Rodger, S. H. (2022). An introduction to formal languages and automata. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murata, T. (1989). Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(4), 541–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harel, D. (1987). Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming, 8(3), 231–274.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Endsley, E. W., Almeida, E. E., & Tilbury, D. M. (2006). Modular finite state machines: Development and application to reconfigurable manufacturing cell controller generation. Control Engineering Practice, 14(10), 1127–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaid, H., Al-Ahmari, A., & Li, Z. (2020). Colored resource-oriented Petri net based ladder diagrams for PLC implementation in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. IEEE Access, 8, 217573–217591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, J., et al. (2009). Rapid design and reconfiguration of Petri net models for reconfigurable manufacturing cells with improved net rewriting systems and activity diagrams. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 57(4), 1431–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Han, J., et al. (2001). Prefixspan: Mining sequential patterns efficiently by prefix-projected pattern growth. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on data engineering. IEEE Washington, DC, USA.

  29. Chand, C., Thakkar, A., & Ganatra, A. (2012). Sequential pattern mining: Survey and current research challenges. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 2(1), 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Agrawal, R. & Srikant, R. (1995). Mining sequential patterns. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on data engineering, IEEE.

  31. Garofalakis, M.N., Rastogi, R., & Shim, K. (1999). SPIRIT: Sequential pattern mining with regular expression constraints. In International conference on very large data bases (p. 99).

  32. Aseervatham, S., Osmani, A., & Viennet, E. (2006). bitSPADE: A lattice-based sequential pattern mining algorithm using bitmap representation. In Sixth international conference on data mining (ICDM'06), IEEE.

  33. Gouda, K., Hassaan, M., & Zaki, M. J. (2010). Prism: An effective approach for frequent sequence mining via prime-block encoding. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 76(1), 88–102.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Fournier-Viger, P., Nkambou, R., Nguifo, E. M. (2008). A knowledge discovery framework for learning task models from user interactions in intelligent tutoring systems. In Mexican international conference on artificial intelligence. Springer.

  35. Hirate, Y., & Yamana, H. (2006). Generalized sequential pattern mining with item intervals. Journal of Computers, 1(3), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pei, J., et al. (2001). PrefixSpan: Mining sequential patterns efficiently by prefix-projected pattern growth. In Proceedings 17th international conference on data engineering (pp. 215–224). IEEE.

  37. Wright, A. P., et al. (2015). The use of sequential pattern mining to predict next prescribed medications. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 53, 73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Béchet, N., et al. (2012). Sequential pattern mining to discover relations between genes and rare diseases. In 25th IEEE international symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS). IEEE.

  39. Chen, Y.-L., et al. (2009). Discovering recency, frequency, and monetary (RFM) sequential patterns from customers’ purchasing data. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(5), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Homayoun, S., et al. (2020). Know abnormal, find evil: frequent pattern mining for ransomware threat hunting and intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 8(2), 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Venant, R., et al. (2017). Using sequential pattern mining to explore learners’ behaviors and evaluate their correlation with performance in inquiry-based learning. In European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 286–299). Springer.

  42. Lattner, A.D., et al. (2005). Sequential pattern mining for situation and behavior prediction in simulated robotic soccer. In Robot soccer world cup (pp. 118–129). Springer.

  43. Rahman, A., et al. (2016). Finding anomalies in SCADA logs using rare sequential pattern mining. In International conference on network and system security (pp. 499–506).

  44. Ladigeas, J., Fülber, A., Arroyo, E., Fay, A., Haubeck, C., & Lamersdorf, W. (2015). Learning material flow models for manufacturing plants from data traces. In 2015 IEEE 13th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) (pp. 294–301). IEEE.

  45. Reynolds, T.G., & John Hansman, R. (2002). Conformance monitoring approaches in current and future air traffic control environments. In Proceedings of the 21st digital avionics systems conference (Vol. 2). IEEE.

  46. van Zelst, S. J., et al. (2017). Online conformance checking: relating event streams to process models using prefix-alignments. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 25, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Burattin, A., et al. (2018). Online conformance checking using behavioural patterns. In International conference on business process management. Springer.

  48. Zhou, Y., Yan, S., & Huang, T. S. (2007). Detecting anomaly in videos from trajectory similarity analysis. In 2007 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo. IEEE.

  49. Zhang, D., Li, N., Zhou, Z. H., Chen, C., Sun, L., & Li, S. (2011). iBAT: Detecting anomalous taxi trajectories from GPS traces. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 99–108). ACM.

  50. Camossi, E., Dimitrova, T., & Tsois, A. (2012). Detecting anomalous maritime container itineraries for anti-fraud and supply chain security. In 2012 European intelligence and security informatics conference (pp. 76–83). IEEE.

  51. Ouyang, W. & Huang, Q. (2007). Mining direct and indirect fuzzy sequential patterns in large transaction databases. In International conference on intelligent computing. Springer.

  52. Bermingham, L. & Lee, I. (2014). Spatio-temporal sequential pattern mining for tourism sciences, 379–389.

  53. Jou, C., Shyur, H.-J., & Yen, C.-Y. (2014). Timed sequential pattern mining based on confidence in accumulated intervals. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th international conference on information reuse and integration (IEEE IRI 2014). IEEE.

  54. Yue, Y., et al. (2009). Mining time-dependent attractive areas and movement patterns from taxi trajectory data. In 2009 17th international conference on geoinformatics. IEEE.

  55. Jiang, Z., et al. (1999). Object-oriented Petri nets with changeable structure (OPNs-CS) for production system modelling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15(6), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Li, J., Dai, X., & Meng, Z. (2008). Improved net rewriting system-based approach to model reconfiguration of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37(11–12), 1168–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu, J., & Darabi, H. (2004). Control reconfiguration of discrete event systems controllers with partial observation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 34(6), 2262–2272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Chandra, V. & Bhattacharyya, S. (2005). Adaptive supervisory control of hybrid systems having discrete event abstractions. In Proceedings of the ISA EXPO 2005 technical conference.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1F1A104541512) and this work was supported by the AICT (AICT-2022-0013)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Shin Kang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, S., Youm, S. & Kang, YS. Process Derivation Methodology for Reconfigurable Smart Factory. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 25, 497–508 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00820-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00820-9

Keywords

Navigation