Log in

Development of a topology optimization program considering density and homogeni-zation methods

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most previous studies of topology optimization, commercial programs, such as Optistruct, ANSYS, and MSC Patran, usually were used during implementation. Such commercial programs are not easy to use and entail time and cost. In addition, it is difficult to confirm results with reference to individual stages of optimization. For addressing this disadvantage, a topology optimization program, which is based on the C language, is developed in this study. This is a very convenient and powerful program for users to conduct topology optimization by using all density methods and homogenization methods in compliance with the methodology. For verifying the developed program, first of all, topology optimization was implemented by using density methods to evaluate the strain energy density of a cantilever plate and a simply supported plate, which are simple models. The feasibility of the program was verified through a comparison of the results with those from Optistruct, which is a commercial program. Finally, topology optimization was implemented with regard to the rolling-stock leading-cab, which is an application model. Through the Ls-Dyna program, the collision characteristic was also confirmed. Next, through homogenization methods, crash analysis was implemented in the rollingstock leading-cab. By the use of the internal energy density as deduced from the collision interpretation, topology optimization was implemented. The optimal values, by which the internal energy was maximized per unit weight, of the parameters of homogenization methods were deduced. By the use of Ls-Dyna program for the optimum model, where internal energy is maximized per unit weight, the crash characteristic was confirmed on the basis of the optimization result and the feasibility of the result was verified. This methodology deduces the axis compression deformation by implementing the role of a crash initiator during collision. In addition, the economic advantage of light-weight cars also can be deduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b:

body-force intensity

C:

compliance

e:

element index

E:

Young’s modulus

E0 :

original Young’s modulus

Eijkl :

elastic module

EH ijkl :

homogenized elastic module

tf :

final time-step

T:

boundary traction

Th:

threshold value for eliminate low-density element for threshold algorithm

U:

internal energy

UH(μ):

homogenized internal energy at in-plane stress density μ

VF:

volume fraction that is specified as a percentage of the original volume for resizing algorithm

V:

allowable volume

V(μ):

volume at in-plane stress density μ

z:

displacement field

β1 :

parameter having effect of limiting the changes in the density for resizing algorithm

β2 :

parameter requiring the change in the density for resizing algorithm

Λ:

optimality criterion that is calculated by sum of product of internal energy at each time step and weighting factor

Λave :

average optimality criterion

μ:

in-plane stress density

μ(e):

in-plane stress density of element e

ρ:

bulk material density

Ω:

structural domain

References

  1. Kim, H. J., Kim, S. H., Jung, H. S., Kwon, T. S. and Suh, M. W., “The study on Conceptual Structure Design in Protective shell frame of Rolling Stock leading-cab using Topology Optimization,” Proc. of KSAE Spring Conference, pp. 2025–2030, 2007.

  2. Kim, S. R., Park, J. Y., Lee, W. G., Yu, J. S. and Han, S. Y., “Reliability-Based Topology Optimization Based on Evolutionary Structural Optimization,” International Journal of Mechanical Systems Science and Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 135–139, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suzuki, K. and Kikuchi, N., “A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 291–318, 1991.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Min, S. and Kikuchi, N., “Optimal reinforcement design of structures under the buckling load using the homogenization design method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 565–576, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer, R. R. and Kikuchi, N., “Application of topological optimization techniques to structural crashworthiness,” International Journal for Numerical Method in Engineering, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 1383–1403, 1996.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Wierzbicki, T. and Abramowicz, W., “On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 727–734, 1983.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Abramowicz, W. and Jones, N., “Dynamic axial crushing of square tubes,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 179–208, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H. S. and Wierzbicki, T., “Effect of the cross-sectional shape of hat-type cross-sections on crash resistance of an “S”-frame,” Thin-walled Structures, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 535–554, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho, Y. B., “Crashworthiness optimization of a closed-hat section member using homogenization method and design of experiments,” Ph.D. Thesis, Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, 2002.

  10. Ryu, J. C. and Kim, Y. Y., “Density-Dependent Shape Function Approach for Topology Optimization: Focused on Heat-Dissipating Structure Design,” Proc. of KSME Fall Conference, pp. 12–16, 2006.

  11. Kim, H. J., Cho, H., Jung, H. S., Kwon, T. S. and Suh, M. W., “Crashworthiness Design and Evaluation on the Leading-cab Structure of Rolling Stock Using Topology Optimization,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 79–85. 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jang, I. G., Yu, Y. G. and Kwak, B. Y., “Topology Optimization for a Knuckle Using Design Space Adjustment and Refinement,” Transactions of KSME, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 595–601, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Song, C. O. and Yoo, J. H., “Sequential DOE Based Topology Optimization,” Proc. of KSME Fall Conference, pp. 1–5, 2006.

  14. Rozvany, G. I. N., Zhou, M., Rotthaus, M., Gollub, W. and Spengenmann, F., “Continuum-type optimality criteria methods for large finite element system with a displacement constraint, Part I,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 47–72, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen, P., “On optimal orientation of orthotropic materials,” Structural Optimization, Vol. 1, pp. 101–106, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spath, D., Neithardt, W. and Bangert, C., “Integration of Topology and Shape Optimization in the Design Process,” International CIRP Design Seminar, 2001.

  17. Koo, J. S. and Youn, Y. H., “Crashworthy Design And Evaluation On The Front-End Structure Of Korean High Speed Train,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 173–180, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., “ABAQUS Manual Version 6.5,” 2005.

  19. Ministry of Construction & Transportation(MOCT), “Transit Safety Act, Standard Accident Scenario, 16 Articles,” 2007.

  20. Altair, “Hypermesh User’s manual,” 2006.

  21. Livermore Software Technology Corp., “LS-DYNA Ver. 960,” 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myung-Won Suh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, HJ., Kim, BY. & Suh, MW. Development of a topology optimization program considering density and homogeni-zation methods. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12, 303–312 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0040-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0040-9

Keywords

Navigation