Abstract
Analysis of slope stability is a classic issue with immense consequences in geotechnical engineering. Using a two-dimensional finite element analysis tool, the present study investigates the influence of different distribution patterns in the soil slope reinforced with geogrid on the shear failure plane and stability of the slope under gravity and various earthquake loading conditions. A soil slope of height, H = 10 m, having inclination from the horizontal ground β = 60° is considered in the present study. The pseudo-static approach is applied to simulate the earthquake loading, and the horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient (i.e., kh) is varied from 0.1 to 0.4 to access the behavior of the slope system. The rigorous lower bound and upper bound strength reduction analysis has been performed for all the considered cases to determine the factor of safety (FOS) of the soil slope system. A parametric study is performed, and a secondary reinforcement technique is adopted to enhance and investigate the performance of soil slope. The study reveals that for the considered problem, the primary reinforcing layers alone are not sufficient enough to stabilize the slope, and the inclusion of secondary reinforcement results in additional improvement in the factor of safety in both gravity and seismic loading. Moreover, the various modes of failure of the unreinforced and reinforced slope are discussed exhaustively. This study concluded that after reinforcing the soil slope with primary reinforcement and the secondary layers, the FOS satisfies the design criteria of minimum factor of safety for a stable slope in both static and seismic conditions.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-022-10366-1/MediaObjects/12517_2022_10366_Fig16_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the data and materials associated with this paper are available.
Abbreviations
- FEM :
-
Finite element method
- FOS :
-
Factor of safety
- GRS :
-
Geosynthetic reinforced slope
- H :
-
Height of the soil slope (m)
- LB :
-
Lower bound
- L p :
-
Length of primary reinforcement (m)
- L s :
-
Length of secondary reinforcement (m)
- k h :
-
Horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient
- c :
-
Cohesion of soil (Mohr-Coulomb parameter) (kPa)
- ϕ :
-
Angle of internal friction of soil (Mohr-Coulomb parameter) (°)
- β :
-
Inclination of soil slope with the horizontal ground surface (°)
- EA :
-
Axial elastic stiffness of the geogrid (kN/m)
- UR :
-
Unreinforced condition
- PR :
-
Primary reinforcement
- SSR :
-
Single secondary reinforcement
- DSR :
-
Double secondary reinforcement
- Svp :
-
Vertical spacing between two consecutive primary reinforcement (m)
- S vSS :
-
Vertical spacing between primary and single secondary reinforcement (m)
- S vDS :
-
Vertical spacing between primary and double secondary reinforcement (m)
- UB :
-
Upper bound
- σ1 :
-
Major principal stress (kPa)
- σ3 :
-
Minor principal stress (kPa)
References
Aria S, Shukla SK, Mohyeddin A (2019) Numerical investigation of wraparound geotextile reinforcement technique for strengthening foundation soil. Int J Geomech 19(4):04019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001361
Baziar MH, Ghorbani A (2005) Evaluation of lateral spreading using artificial neural networks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.09.001
Berg RR, Christopher BR, Samtani NC (2009a) Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes. Vol. I. Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-10-024, National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Berg RR, Christopher BR, Samtani NC (2009b) Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes. Vol. II. Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-10-025, National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Chen T-C, Chen R-H, Lin S-S (2000) A nonlinear homogenized model applicable to reinforced soil analysis. Geotext Geomembr 18(6) Elsevier:349–366
Gupta A, Chauhan VB (2021) Assessment of the reinforced slope stability under earthquake loading. J Geotech Eng 8(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.37591/joge.v8i2.5796
Han J (2015) Principles and practice of ground improvement. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Hird CC, Pyrah IC, Russell D (1990) Finite element analysis of the collapse of reinforced embankments on soft ground. Geotechnique 40(4) Thomas Telford Ltd:633–640
Huang C-C, Horng J-C, Chang W-J, Chueh S-Y, Chiou J-S, Chen C-H (2010) Dynamic behavior of reinforced slopes: horizontal acceleration response. Geosynth Int 17(4) Thomas Telford Ltd:207–219
Jahanandish M, Keshavarz A (2005) Seismic bearing capacity of foundations on reinforced soil slopes. Geotext Geomembr 23(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.09.001
Jaiswal S, Chauhan VB (2021a) Assessment of seismic bearing capacity of a strip footing resting on reinforced earth bed using pseudo-static analysis. Civ Environ Eng Rep 31(2):117–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/ceer-2021-0023
Jaiswal S, Chauhan VB (2021b) Evaluation of optimal design parameters of the geogrid reinforced foundation with wraparound ends using adaptive FEM. Int J Geosynth Gr Eng 7(4):1–18. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00325-3
Jaiswal S, Chauhan VB (2021c) Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing resting on rock mass using adaptive finite element method. J King Saud Univ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.09.004
Jaiswal S, Chauhan VB (2021d) Response of strip footing resting on earth bed reinforced with geotextile with wraparound ends using finite element analysis. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6(2):1–9. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00486-0
Jaiswal S, Srivastava A, Chauhan VB (2021) Improvement of bearing capacity of shallow foundation resting on wraparound geotextile reinforced soil. In: In International Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo 2021, vol 324. GSP, Dallas, pp 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483411.007
Jones C, Clarke D (2007) The residual strength of geosynthetic reinforcement subjected to accelerated creep testing and simulated seismic events. Geotext Geomembr 25(3) Elsevier:155–169
Juran I, Christopher B (1989) Laboratory model study on geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls. J Geotech Eng 115(7) American Society of Civil Engineers:905–926
Koerner RM (2012) Designing with geosynthetics. Xlibris Corporation, vol 1
Koerner RM, Soong TY (2001) Geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining walls. Geotext Geomembr 19(6):359–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00012-7
Koseki J, Bathurst RJ, Guler E, Kuwano J, Maugeri M (2006) Seismic stability of reinforced soil walls. In 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics 1:51–78
Krabbenhoft K, Lymain AV, Krabbenhoft J (2017) OptumG2: theory. In: Optum Computational Engineering. https://www.optumce.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Theory.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2022
Krabbenhoft K, Lyamin A, Krabbenhoft J (2020) Optum computational engineering. www.optumce.com. Accessed 7 May 2022
Lai F, Chen S, Xue J, Chen F (2020a) New analytical solutions for shallow cohesive soils overlying trench voids under various slip surfaces. Transp Geotech 25. Elsevier:100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100411
Lai F, Liu S, Deng Y, Sun Y, Wu K, Liu H (2020b) Numerical investigations of the installation process of giant deep-buried circular open caissons in undrained clay. Comput Geotech 118. Elsevier:103322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103322
Lai F, Zhang N, Liu S, Sun Y, Li Y (2021) Ground movements induced by installation of twin large diameter deeply-buried caissons: 3D numerical modeling. Acta Geotech 16(9) Springer:2933–2961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01165-1
Lai F, Yang D, Liu S, Zhang H, Cheng Y (2022) Towards an improved analytical framework to estimate active earth pressure in narrow c–ϕ soils behind rotating walls about the base. Comput Geotech 141. Elsevier:104544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104544
Lee KL, Adams BD, Vagneron J-MJ (1973) Reinforced earth retaining walls. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(10) American Society of Civil Engineers:745–764
Leshchinsky D, Boedeker RH (1990) Geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. J Geotech Eng 115(10):1459–1478
Lo SCR, Xu DW (1992) A strain-based design method for the collapse limit state of reinforced soil walls or slopes. Can Geotech J 29(5) NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada:832–842
Michalowski RL (2000) Secondary reinforcement for slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(12):1166–1173
Nouri H, Fakher A, Jones C (2006) Development of horizontal slice method for seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes and walls. Geotext Geomembr 24(3) Elsevier:175–187
Nouri H, Fakher A, Jones CJFP (2008) Evaluating the effects of the magnitude and amplification of pseudo-static acceleration on reinforced soil slopes and walls using the limit equilibrium horizontal slices method. Geotext Geomembr 26(3):263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.09.002
Okabe S (1924) General theory on earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining wall and dam. Proc Civ Engrg Soc, Japan 10(6):1277–1323
Petchkaew P, Keawsawasvong S, Tanapalungkorn W, Likitlersuang S (2021) 3D stability analysis of unsupported rectangular excavation under pseudo-static seismic body force. Geomech Geoengin 2021:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.2019321
Rowe KR, Skinner GD (2001) Numerical analysis of geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall constructed on a layered soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 19(7):387–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00014-0
San K-C, Leshchinsky D, Matsui T (1994) Geosynthetic reinforced slopes: limit equilibrium and finite element analyses. Soils Found 34(2) The Japanese Geotechnical Society:79–85
Sandri D (1997) A performance summary of reinforced soil structures in the Greater Los Angeles area after the Northridge earthquake. Geotext Geomembr 15(4–6):235–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)10006-1
Schaefer VR et al (eds) (1997) Ground improvement ground reinforcement ground treatment. In: Geotechnical Special Publication No. 69. ASCE, New York, pp 151–17
Shahgholi M, Fakher A, Jones C (2001) Horizontal slice method of analysis. Geotechnique 51(10) Thomas Telford Ltd:881–885
Shukla SK, Sivakugan N, Das BM (2011) A state-of-the-art review of geosynthetic-reinforced slopes. Int J Geotech Eng 5(1):17–32. https://doi.org/10.3328/IJGE.2011.05.01.17-32
Srilatha N, Madhavi Latha G, Puttappa CG (2013) Effect of frequency on seismic response of reinforced soil slopes in shaking table tests. Geotext Geomembr 36. Elsevier Ltd:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.10.004
Srivastava A, Chauhan VB (2021) Parametric studies using finite element modeling for the evaluation of the performance of tiered MSE walls under seismic loading. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6(159) Springer International Publishing:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00537-6
Srivastava A, Jaiswal S, Chauhan VB (2021) Numerical study of geosynthetic-reinforced soil wall subjected to static footing loading. Proc Eng Technol Innov 17:13–20. https://doi.org/10.46604/peti.2021.6693
Ukritchon B, Yoang S, Keawsawasvong S (2020) Undrained stability of unsupported rectangular excavations in non-homogeneous clays. Comput Geotech 117:103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103281
Wang L, Zhang G, Zhang JM (2011) Centrifuge model tests of geotextile-reinforced soil embankments during an earthquake. Geotext Geomembr 29(3) Elsevier Ltd:222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.11.002
Yang KH, Thuo JN, Chen JW, Liu CN (2019) Failure investigation of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil slope subjected to rainfall. Geosynth Int 26(1):42–65. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00035
Yodsomjai W, Keawsawasvong S, Likitlersuang S (2021a) Stability of unsupported conical slopes in Hoek-Brown rock masses. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 8:279–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-020-00137-4
Yodsomjai W, Keawsawasvong S, Senjuntichai T (2021b) Undrained stability of unsupported conical slopes in anisotropic clays based on anisotropic undrained shear failure criterion. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 8:557–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-021-00153-y
Yodsomjai W, Keawsawasvong S, Thongchom C, Lawongkerd J (2021c) Undrained stability of unsupported conical slopes in two-layered clays. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00384-x
Yoo C, Jung H-S (2004) Measured behavior of a geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining wall in a tiered configuration. Geotext Geomembr 22(5) Elsevier:359–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(03)00064-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaiswal, S., Chauhan, V.B. Influence of secondary reinforcement layers to enhance the stability of steep soil slope under earthquake loading. Arab J Geosci 15, 1095 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10366-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10366-1